Score:   1
Docket Number:   WD-VA  1:18-cr-00025
Case Name:   USA v. Farris et al
  Press Releases:
Abingdon, VIRGINIA – A pair of defendants charged as part of Operation California Dreamin’, a large-scale investigation that charged 28 individuals with trafficking methamphetamine from California into Southwest Virginia, Northeast Tennessee, and Georgia, were sentenced this week in U.S. District Court in Abingdon, United States Attorney Thomas T. Cullen announced today.

“The scourge of methamphetamine trafficking and addiction remains the most serious public-safety issue facing far Southwest Virginia,” U.S. Attorney Cullen stated today.  “We will continue to work closely with our federal, state, and local law partners to target and dismantle the drug-trafficking organizations responsible for importing this deadly substance from Mexico and selling it in our communities.” 

Today in District Court, Melissa Barrett, 46, of Meadowview, Va., was sentenced to 168 months’ incarceration. Barrett previously pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and one count of distribution of methamphetamine.

Matthew Todd Mullins, 45, of Bristol, Va., was sentenced Monday, June 10, 2019 to 188 months’ incarceration. Mullins previously pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, one count of distribution of methamphetamine, and one count of manufacture counterfeit obligations.

According to previously submitted court documents, in early 2017, an investigation was opened to examine the trafficking of methamphetamine between California and Southwest Virginia and Northeast Tennessee. Law enforcement identified 28 individuals, located in California, Georgia, Virginia and Tennessee as being involved in the trafficking and distribution of methamphetamine.

In addition, the investigation further revealed that some alleged sources of supply from California temporarily relocated to the Bristol, Virginia and Tennessee region in order to better facilitate their drug distribution operations.

The investigation of the case is being conducted by the Abingdon Police Department, Virginia State Police, Washington County Sheriff’s Office, Bristol, Tennessee Police Department, Bristol, Virginia Police Department, the Sullivan County, Tennessee Second Judicial Drug Task Force, Sullivan County Sheriff’s Department, Commerce, Georgia Police Department, New Jersey State Police, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, and the United States Postal Inspection Service.  The Washington County Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office, Bristol, Virginia Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office, and the Sullivan County, District Attorney’s Office have assisted in the investigation.  Western District of Virginia Criminal Chief Zachary T. Lee and Assistant United States Attorney Cagle Juhan are prosecuting the case for the United States.

CourtListener:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084463/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084467/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084471/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084464/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084455/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8086125/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084452/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084445/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084448/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084450/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084454/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084458/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084456/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084465/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084468/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084469/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084470/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084462/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084472/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084446/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084460/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084461/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084449/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084453/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084444/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084457/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084447/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084451/united-states-v-farris/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8084440/united-states-v-farris/
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fRxz8Lb7G5mirUUa9XcmDzGjGR7XzxdgSzIzfKnuboc
  Last Updated: 2024-05-01 10:27:00 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   WD-VA  1:18-mj-00136
Case Name:   USA v Roberson
  Press Releases:
Abingdon, VIRGINIA – Twenty-eight individuals suspected of trafficking methamphetamine from Southern California into Southwest Virginia, Northeast Tennessee, and Georgia have been charged via a federal criminal complaint with conspiring to possess with the intent to distribute methamphetamine. United States Attorney Thomas T. Cullen was joined in announcing the arrests by officials from the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Washington County Sheriff’s Office, and the Sullivan County, Tennessee Second Judicial Drug Task Force.

“Although the opioid epidemic has gripped many communities in our district, methamphetamine is still the drug of choice in Southwest Virginia,” U.S. Attorney Cullen stated.  “We are committed to working with the DEA, the ATF, the Virginia State Police, and our local partners to target the organizations and individuals responsible for trafficking this deadly drug and send them to federal prison.”

“ATF is committed to dismantling criminal organizations like this one and protecting the communities where they operate,” said Special Agent in Charge Thomas L. Chittum, Washington Field Division. “We are proud to work alongside our local, state and federal partners on operations like this, and will continue to do everything we can to take armed criminals off our streets and put them behind bars where they belong.”

In early 2017, an investigation was opened to examine the trafficking of methamphetamine between California and Southwest Virginia and Northeast Tennessee. According to the criminal complaint and supporting affidavit filed in court following today’s arrests, 28 individuals, located in California, Georgia, Virginia and Tennessee were identified as allegedly being involved in the trafficking and distribution of methamphetamine.

In addition, the investigation further revealed that some alleged sources of supply from California temporarily relocated to the Bristol, Virginia and Tennessee region in order to better facilitate their drug distribution operations.

Those charged today included:

Shawn Wayne Farris

Sean Phillip Maidlow

Jair Medina Gutierrez

Lacey Cheri Weir

Andrea Nichole Stickel

James Nicholas Howington

James Robert Johnson

Stephen A. Graham

Christopher Lee Smiley

Joshua Todd Chapman

Saleemah Lashawn Roberson

Donald Zachary Snyder

James Skyler Sebastian

Larry Levi Bennett

Terry Melvin Dalton

Heather Ashley Davis

Brianna Nicole Woodby

Donald Shane Hawthorne

Gary Lee McFarlane

Elizabeth Pauline Eaton

Matthew Todd Mullins

Anthony Chadwick Harless

Kimberly Ann Drake

Brandon Heath Whitt

Melissa Darlene Barrett

Susan Nicole Payne

Bradley Scott Williams

Devon Scott Coleman

 

The investigation of the case is being conducted by the Abingdon Police Department, Virginia State Police, Washington County Sheriff’s Office, Bristol, Tennessee Police Department, Bristol, Virginia Police Department, the Sullivan County, Tennessee Second Judicial Drug Task Force, Sullivan County Sheriff’s Department, Commerce, Georgia Police Department, New Jersey State Police, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, and the United States Postal Inspection Service.  The Washington County Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office, Bristol, Virginia Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office, and the Sullivan County, District Attorney’s Office have assisted in the investigation.  Western District of Virginia Criminal Chief Zachary T. Lee will prosecute the case for the United States.

A criminal complaint is only a charge and not evidence of guilt.  The defendants are entitled to a fair trial with the burden on the government to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nnlcRK2rCArBK71NkWU70Wq4vyMKMCLbzdB9jj483Qw
  Last Updated: 2024-04-10 20:47:10 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E