Case Name: United States of America v. Search of U.S. Postal Servic Priority Mail Package tracking number EE369345684US with return address of Statsuki Glover 1700 Carson St. Long Beach CA 90807 and a delivery address of Javon Lane 2808
TUCSON, Arizona – The last of twenty-eight defendants charged in two sweeping investigations into the manufacture and distribution of the controlled substance commonly referred to as “spice,” a synthetic cannabinoid made with chemicals, was federally sentenced on December 10 in United States District Court.
The twenty-eight defendants were charged and convicted of a variety of crimes including conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance, conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance analogue, conspiracy to engage in interstate travel in aid of racketeering, conspiracy to commit mail fraud, introduction of misbranded drugs into interstate commerce, and money laundering.
As part of their sentences, the twenty-eight individuals forfeited, among other things, six residences, one business, twelve vehicles, $532,158 in U.S. currency, and obtained money judgments in the amount of $1,335,402.
The National Institute of Health describes synthetic cannabinoids as human-made, mind-altering chemicals that are either sprayed or dried, shredded plant material that can be smoked, or sold as liquid to be vaporized and inhaled in e-cigarettes and other devices. Synthetic cannabinoids are often labeled as “not for human consumption,” and may claim they contain natural materials, however they are dangerous chemicals that bind to the same receptors in the brain as THC and may have unpredictable effects.
Two separate multi-year investigations conducted by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), U.S. Border Patrol (CBP), U.S. Marshal Service (USMS), Tucson Police Department, South Tucson Police Department, Casa Grande Police Department and the Sahuarita Police Department, discovered that “spice” suppliers in Colorado and Arizona imported the precursor chemicals from China, and manufactured the controlled substances in LongBeach, California and Tucson and Phoenix, Arizona. The suppliers then distributed the controlled substances primarily to local smoke shops in Tucson, South Tucson, Dallas/Fort Worth, and other cities, where they were ultimately sold to drug users. The twenty-eight defendants each pleaded guilty and were convicted and sentenced as follows:
On December 10, 2020, Madji Khaleq, of Denver, Colorado, was sentenced to four years of probation for conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and controlled substance analogues. $164,944 in United States currency and $25,320 in money orders were forfeited. Khaleq is also required to pay a personal money judgment in the amount of $75,837 to the United States.
On November 8, 2018, Ana Patricia Hidalgo-Hernandez, of LongBeach, California, was sentenced to time served in prison, followed by three years of supervised release for Conspiracy to Introduce Misbranded Drugs into Interstate Commerce.
On November 30, 2017, Najib Alghaithi, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to twenty-four months in prison followed by three years of supervised release for Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substance Analogues. $66,299 in United States currency was forfeited.
On October 20, 2020, Abdulkader Alghaithi, of Tucson, Arizona was sentenced to thirty-six months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release for Conspiracy Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances, Possession with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances, and Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substance Analogues. The government forfeited Alghaithi’s vehicle and residence.
On July 12, 2018, Jamil Qasem, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to forty-two months in prison followed by three years of supervised release for Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances and Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substance Analogues. Qasem is also required to pay $40,000 to the United States.
On January 18, 2018, Mazin Saleh, 36, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to four years of probation for Conspiracy to Commit Mail Fraud. The government seized $5,000 in lieu of Saleh’s vehicle.
On January 23, 2018, Muhieldin Muhieldin, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to three years of probation for Receiving Misbranded Drugs in Interstate Commerce.
On January 4, 2018, Nasser Farah, of Chicago, Illinois, was sentenced to three years of probation for Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances.
On June 29, 2017, Davoud Shayan, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to time served followed by one year of supervised release for Introduction of Misbranded Drugs in Interstate Commerce.
On August 15, 2017, Denice Michael, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to two years of probation for Receipt of Misbranded Drugs in Interstate Commerce.
On January 23, 2018, Kholoud Hamdi, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to three years of probation for Introduction of Misbranded Drugs in Interstate Commerce.
On January 5, 2018, Sharif Hamdi, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to fourteen months in prison followed by one year of supervised release for Introduction of Misbranded Drugs in Interstate Commerce.
On June 21, 2017, Junior Jacklick, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to time served, for the Introduction of Misbranded Drugs in Interstate Commerce.
On June 6, 2017, Qasem Mahmoud Shahin, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to two years of probation for Receipt of Misbranded Drugs in Interstate Commerce.
On June 22, 2017, Adam Hassan, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to two years of probation for Receipt of Misbranded Drugs in Interstate Commerce.
On February 21, 2018, Abdulaziz Shahin, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to twenty-seven months in prison followed by three years of supervised release for Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance and Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substance Analogues. Shahin is also required to pay $14,565 to the United States.
On November 8, 2017, Nasir Ibrahim, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to thirteen months and one day in prison followed by one year of supervised release for Receiving Misbranded Drugs in Interstate Commerce.
On August 9, 2019, Samuel Salomon of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to thirty-six month in prison followed by three years of supervised release for Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances and Conspiracy to Launder Monetary Instruments. The government forfeited Salomon’s residence, two other parcels of land, his smoke shops, two vehicles, and $15,801 for the sale of a third vehicle. Samuel Salomon is also required to pay $1,200,000 to the United States.
On September 4, 2019, Daniel Salomon, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to six months in prison followed by three years of supervised release for Conspiracy to Launder Monetary Instruments.
On November 13, 2019, Ardell Addington, of Evansville, Wyoming, was sentenced to time served followed by three years of supervised release for Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances and Controlled Substances Analogues.
On June 18, 2019, Renee Salomon, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to four years of probation for Conspiracy to Launder Monetary Instruments. Renee Salomon is also required to pay $50,000 to the United States.
On August 9, 2019, Rodolfo Alvarez Samaniego, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to two years of probation for Causing the Introduction of Misbranded Drugs in Interstate Commerce.
On June 7, 2019, Mauro Acuna, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to three years of probation for Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances and Controlled Substance Analogues.
On January 22, 2020, Anabel Valdez, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to two years of probation for Receipt of Misbranded Drugs in Interstate Commerce.
On March 19, 2018, Jose Edmundo Gradillas, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to two years of probation for Receipt of Misbranded Drugs in Interstate Commerce.
On June 11, 2019, Alfred Manuel Gamez, Jr., of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to three years of probation Receipt of Misbranded Drugs in Interstate Commerce.
On March 16, 2018, Daniel James Garcia, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to four years of probation for Conspiracy to Import Controlled Substances and/or Analogues and Conspiracy to Laundering of Monetary Instruments.
On July 3, 2018, Damien Ismail Sanchez, of Tucson, Arizona, was sentenced to two years of probation for Receipt of Misbranded Drugs in Interstate Commerce.
The investigations were conducted by agencies participating in the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force. The partner agencies include the DEA, IRS-CI, FBI, HSI, CBP, USMS, Tucson Police Department, South Tucson Police Department, Casa Grande Police Department and the Sahuarita Police Department. Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew G. Eltringham, District of Arizona, Tucson, handled the prosecutions.
For more information on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/az/ Follow the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, on Twitter @USAO_AZ for the latest news.
PHOENIX, Ariz. – Timothy Courchaine was sworn in today as the Interim United States Attorney for the District of Arizona. United States Attorney Timothy Courchaine was appointed to the position by Attorney General Pam Bondi on February 28, 2025.As Interim United States Attorney, Mr. Courchaine supervises the prosecution of all federal crimes and the litigation of all civil matters in the District of Arizona in which the United States has an interest. He leads a staff of approximately 350 prosecutors, civil litigators, and support personnel across Arizona. The District of Arizona serves over seven million residents.Mr. Courchaine began his service to the District of Arizona in 2020 as an Assistant U.S. Attorney. During his time with the office, Mr. Courchaine has handled numerous criminal cases related to border crimes and the predatory actions of Mexican-based cartels in the Southwest Border and OCDETF sections. Prior to joining the Department of Justice, Mr. Courchaine served in the United States Marine Corps as a Judge Advocate and left the service as a Captain. He then served as a law clerk to the Honorable William G. Montgomery on the Arizona Supreme Court from 2019 to 2020.Mr. Courchaine received his J.D., from the University of Alabama in 2014 and his B.A. from California State University, LongBeach, in 2011. RELEASE NUMBER: 2025-028_Timothy Courchaine# # #For more information on the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/az/ Follow the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, on X @USAO_AZ for the latest news.
SAN DIEGO – Felipe de Jesus Rosales-Herrera of Riverside was sentenced in federal court today to 120 months in prison for leading an extensive migrant smuggling ring responsible for illegally transporting more than 100 migrants and causing one death.According to his plea agreement, Rosales-Herrera employed foot guides to lead migrants over the border and drivers to pick them up on the U.S. side and deliver them to a stash house to meet a sponsor. Rosales-Herrera admitted that he charged approximately $10,000 per migrant. According to court documents, some of the smuggling events in the conspiracy resulted in high-speed chases and crashes, which placed the migrants, drivers, law enforcement and members of the public at risk. This culminated in a tragic collision on December 25, 2021.Rosales admitted in his plea agreement that, even after learning his driver killed someone, he and his co-conspirators continued the conspiracy. As co-defendant John Douglas Oglesby III admitted in his plea agreement, drivers were told to flee if Border Patrol attempted to pull them over. Unfortunately, many drivers did just that, resulting in numerous high-speed chases and several crashes.During the Christmas Day event in 2021, Kevin Antonio Quevedo-Moncada, acting under the supervision of co-defendant (and Rosales’ subordinate in the smuggling ring) Jose Luis Alejo-Cruz, picked up three undocumented migrants in a remote area. When Border Patrol attempted to pull him over, Quevedo-Moncada fled into a nearby campground, swerving wildly and careening around a field at high speed before ramming a Border Patrol vehicle to escape. As agents pursued him, he sped away on wet, winding roads, reaching speeds of close to 100 mph. Quevedo-Moncada lost control of his car and struck a tree, killing one of the migrants and leaving the other two in critical condition. Quevedo-Moncada pleaded guilty to charges related to this incident. Alejo-Cruz discussed the smuggling event with Rosales before the crash. Shortly after the crash, Rosales sent Alejo-Cruz a news article about the accident and confirmed that it was their driver.Alejo-Cruz also relied on intimidation to preserve his position, tracking down and robbing two of his former drivers at gunpoint when he felt they had wronged him and plotting to kidnap a rival migrant smuggler.“You traded in human life, trafficked in people… to line your own pockets” U.S. District Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo told the defendant at todays hearing. “The worst-case scenario in alien smuggling, where someone died, did not deter you.” Judge Bencivengo ultimately ruled that the appropriate sentence was “fully and fairly the statutory maximum.”“These smugglers viewed migrants as dollar signs, not people,” said U.S. Attorney Tara McGrath. “This significant sentence demonstrates the importance of protecting the public from the reckless tactics of criminal networks.”“This event highlights the danger that these criminal organizations pose to the migrants they are transporting as well as the general public.” said U.S. Border Patrol, San Diego Sector Chief Patrol Agent Patrica McGurk-Daniel. “This outcome is the result of a concerted effort by Border Patrol agents and the U.S. Attorney’s Office to dismantle human smuggling networks and bring those responsible to justice. The sentencing today sends a clear message; if you smuggle people across our borders, you will face serious consequences.”Co-defendants Alejo-Cruz and Oglesby were previously sentenced to 120 months and 70 months in federal prison, respectively. The final defendant, Miguel Isaac Villa-Gomez, is scheduled to be sentenced on December 6, 2024.This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Benjamin.DEFENDANTS Case Number 23-CR-871-CABFelipe de Jesus Rosales-Herrera Age: 38 Riverside County, CAJose Luis Alejo-Cruz Age: 23 LongBeach, CAJohn Douglas Oglesby III Age: 20 Chesapeake, VAMiguel Isaac Villa-Gomez Age: 27 Downey, CACase Number 22-CR-1995-B__John Douglas Oglesby III Age: 20 Chesapeake, VASUMMARY OF CHARGESConspiracy to Transport Aliens – Title 8, U.S.C., Section 1324Maximum penalty: Ten years in prison and $250,000 fineINVESTIGATING AGENCYUnited States Border Patrol
SAN DIEGO – Felipe de Jesus Rosales-Herrera of Riverside pleaded guilty in federal court today to human smuggling charges, admitting he was a leader of an organization that smuggled more than 100 unauthorized migrants into the United States, in some instances imperiling public safety by leading authorities on high-speed chases.
According to his plea agreement, Rosales-Herrera employed foot guides to lead migrants over the border and drivers to pick them up on the U.S. side and deliver them to a stash house to meet a sponsor. Rosales-Herrera admitted that he charged approximately $10,000 per migrant.
According to court documents, some of the smuggling events in the conspiracy resulted in high-speed chases and crashes, which placed the migrants, drivers, law enforcement, and members of the public at risk. This culminated in a tragic collision on December 25, 2021. Kevin Antonio Quevedo-Moncada, acting under co-defendant Jose Luis Alejo-Cruz’s supervision, picked up three undocumented migrants in a remote area. When Border Patrol attempted to pull him over, Quevedo-Moncada fled into a nearby campground, swerving wildly and careening around a field at high speed before ramming a Border Patrol vehicle to escape. As agents pursued him, he sped away on wet, winding roads, reaching speeds of close to 100 mph. Quevedo-Moncada lost control of his car and struck a tree, killing one of the migrants and leaving the other two in critical condition. Quevedo-Moncada pleaded guilty to charges related to this incident.
Even after learning that his driver had killed someone, Rosales admitted in his plea agreement that he and his co-conspirators continued the conspiracy. As co-defendant John Douglas Oglesby III admitted in his plea agreement, drivers were told to flee if Border Patrol attempted to pull them over. Unfortunately, many drivers did just that, resulting in numerous high-speed chases and several crashes. Alejo-Cruz also relied on intimidation to preserve his position, tracking down and robbing two of his former drivers at gunpoint when he felt they had wronged him and plotting to kidnap a rival migrant smuggler.
“These smugglers treated humans as a commodity, endangering not only the migrants’ lives, but the safety of every driver on the road,” said U.S. Attorney Tara McGrath. “This office is focused on dismantling smuggling organizations and holding their leaders accountable.”
“We will never stop targeting these criminal organizations who prioritize profit over lives,” said U.S. Border Patrol, San Diego Sector Chief Patrol Agent Patrica McGurk-Daniel. “Our agents are committed to the safety and security of migrants, the public, and our nation. It is only through strong partnerships with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and all our law enforcement partners, that we ensure justice is served and consequences are delivered to these criminals.”
Co-defendants Alejo-Cruz and Oglesby were previously sentenced to 120 months and 70 months in federal prison, respectively. Sentencing for Rosales-Herrera is scheduled to take place on October 11, 2024. A motion hearing and trial setting for the final defendant, Miguel Isaac Villa-Gomez, is scheduled for July 12, 2024.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Benjamin.
DEFENDANTS
Case Number 23-CR-871-CAB
Felipe de Jesus Rosales-Herrera Age: 38 Riverside County, CA
Jose Luis Alejo-Cruz Age: 23 LongBeach, CA
John Douglas Oglesby III Age: 20 Chesapeake, VA
Miguel Isaac Villa-Gomez Age: 27 Downey, CA
Case Number 22-CR-1995-CAB
John Douglas Oglesby III Age: 20 Chesapeake, VA
SUMMARY OF CHARGES
Conspiracy to Transport Aliens – Title 8, U.S.C., Section 1324
Maximum penalty: Ten years in prison and $250,000 fine
SAN DIEGO – Deonathan Abdul Gaston of LongBeach, California, was sentenced in federal court Monday to nine years in prison for transporting two girls, ages 15 and 16, to San Diego in August 2023 to engage in prostitution.
One of the victims had been reported missing from Arizona prior to being transported by Gaston from Arizona to Los Angeles and then to San Diego to engage in prostitution. Gaston had known one of the victims since she was 14.
The victims were rescued by the National City Police Department on August 13, 2023, when officers conducted a traffic stop on the defendant in a high-crime area known for prostitution. He had no driver’s license on him and was not going to be allowed to drive the car. He called his “girlfriend” to come pick up the car from the traffic stop; the girl turned out to be the missing Arizona teen. Officers then responded to the hotel where the girl said they were staying and found the other victim. The case was turned over to the San Diego Human Trafficking Task Force.
“Selling children for sex is a reprehensible crime that impacts victims for a lifetime,” said U.S. Attorney Tara McGrath. “We can all play a part in protecting the vulnerable by paying close attention to warning signs and reporting concerns. Our children are not necessarily being grabbed from the street. They are being groomed and recruited online.” Please see https://humantraffickinghotline.org/en/human-trafficking/recognizing-signs
If you are living or working under threat of violence or extortion, or you suspect someone else may be, call the National Human Trafficking Resource Center toll free, 24/7 Hotline: CALL: (888) 373-7888 or TEXT BeFree or 233733.
This case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Lyndzie M. Carter and Derek Ko.
DEFENDANTS Case Number 23-cr-1944-AGS
Deonathan Abdul Gaston Age: 26 LongBeach, CA
SUMMARY OF CHARGES
Transportation for Purpose of Prostitution – Title 18, U.S.C., Section 2421(a)
Maximum penalty: Ten years in prison and $250,000 fine
SAN DIEGO – An indictment was unsealed today alleging that five individuals participated in a massive, complex fraud and money laundering scheme that resulted in losses of more than $27 million to over 2,000 seniors.
During a coordinated law enforcement operation this morning in Los Angeles, California and Las Vegas, Nevada, about 60 federal, state and local law enforcement officials arrested four of the defendants—Zhao Wang of Henderson, Nevada; Jiandong Chen of Pomona, California; Jun Li of West Covina, California; and Xin Wang of San Gabriel, California—and searched their homes. The fifth defendant, Youfei Gong, was arrested on April 9, 2024, at his home in San Gabriel, California and was in custody on state charges.
According to the indictment and publicly filed documents, the five defendants and their co-conspirators operated a multinational organized fraud ring targeting elderly victims throughout the United States.
The indictment said conspirators contacted victims through unsolicited pop-up ads, emails and phone calls designed to get victims to contact scam call centers in India. The conspirators used social engineering techniques to build trust with victims. In many cases, the conspirators had victims install remote desktop software that the conspirators used to gain remote access to victims’ computers. After building trust with a victim based on fraudulent pretenses, the conspirators used technical support, government impersonation, bank impersonation and/or refund scams to induce victims to send money to other members of the conspiracy, including the five defendants charged in the indictment.
At the direction of conspirators, victims sent wire transfers or cash in express mail packages to locations throughout Southern California, Nevada and elsewhere. The defendants provided fake names and addresses corresponding with retail locations, including CVS Pharmacy locations, where packages were picked up. The defendants and co-conspirators picked up money-laden packages using fake IDs.
According to the indictment, the defendants specifically targeted elderly Americans. After receiving the victims’ money, the defendants laundered it through cryptocurrency transactions to their India-based co-conspirators. As defendant Xin Wang stated in a text message:
The FBI uncovered the multinational conspiracy showing the coordination between the defendants in the United States and their India-based co-conspirators who were in direct contact with victims. Between just 2021 to 2023, agents identified approximately 2,000 victims who lost more than $27 million to the conspirators. The indictment said the conspiracy continued through June 2024.
“Every day swindlers entangle unsuspecting seniors into scams to steal their hard-earned savings,” said U.S. Attorney Tara McGrath. “We urge everyone to use caution and consult with others before sending money to strangers they know only through phone calls, texts, or a computer.”
“Southern California is sadly a target rich environment for foreign and domestic scam artists who relentlessly prey on vulnerable Americans and their bank accounts,” said Akil Davis, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office. “Today's arrests follow hard work by many dedicated law enforcement agencies and will aid our continuing efforts to educate potential victims to avoid responding to strangers who claim to care about them, and never give or send hard-earned money in response to a solicitation.”
“FBI San Diego Elder Justice Task Force, along with FBI LA, has worked tirelessly to bring justice to individuals who target, exploit, and victimize our most vulnerable citizens,” said Stacey Moy Special Agent in Charge for the Federal Bureau of Investigation San Diego Field Office. “The FBI remains resolute in our commitment to disrupt and dismantle foreign-based fraud schemes that prey on our older Americans. We will continue to work side by side with our law enforcement partners to deter and defeat organized fraud rings, no matter where they are located.”
This case was investigated by the San Diego Elder Justice Task Force and its member agencies, including the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Federal Bureau of Investigation, San Diego County District Attorney’s Office, Carlsbad Police Department, San Diego Police Department, and the California Highway Patrol.
If you or someone you know is age 60 or older and has been a victim of financial fraud, help is available through the National Elder Fraud Hotline: 1-833 FRAUD-11 (1-833-372-8311). You can also report fraud to any local law enforcement agency or on the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center at www.ic3.gov.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Kevin Mokhtari.
DEFENDANTS Case Number 24CR1317-RSH
Zhao Wang, aka “Oscar” Age: 40 Henderson, NV
Jiandong Chen, aka “Little Tiger” Age: 40 Pomona, CA
Jun Li Age: 40 West Covina, CA
Xin Wang Age: 36 San Gabriel, CA
Youfei Gong Age: 29 San Gabriel, CA
SUMMARY OF CHARGES
Conspiracy to Commit Mail and Wire Fraud – Title 18, U.S.C., Sections 1349, 2326
Maximum Penalties: Forty years in prison; $1 million fine
Conspiracy to Launder Monetary Instruments – Title 18, U.S.C., Sections 1956(a)(1)(A)(i), 1956(a)(1)(B)(i) and 1956(h)
Maximum Penalties: Twenty years in prison; maximum fine of $500,000 or twice the amount laundered
Criminal Forfeiture – Title 18, U.S.C., Sections 981(a)(1)(C), 982(a)(1), 982(a)(2)(a), 2328 and Title 28, U.S.C., Section 2461(c)
INVESTIGATING AGENCIES
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation – Office of Inspector General
Homeland Security Investigations
San Diego County District Attorney’s Office
San Diego County Sheriff’s Department
San Diego Police Department
San Diego Elder Justice Task Force
Chino Police Department
Coronado Police Department
Escondido Police Department
Glendora Police Department
LongBeach Police Department
Orange County Sheriff’s Department
*The charges and allegations contained in an indictment or complaint are merely accusations, and the defendants are considered innocent unless and until proven guilty.
EL CENTRO – Five indictments were unsealed in federal court today charging 48 alleged members of an Imperial Valley-based, Sinaloa Cartel-linked drug trafficking organization accused of distributing methamphetamine, fentanyl, cocaine, and heroin and bulk cash smuggling.In a coordinated takedown this morning, more than 140 federal, state, and local law enforcement officials arrested 25 defendants and executed 15 search warrants in Imperial County, San Diego, Los Angeles, and Stockton, as well as in Yuma, Arizona and Las Vegas, Nevada. As of this afternoon, the search continues for 23 fugitives.Including seizures today and throughout this long-term investigation, authorities have seized more than 3,600 kg (about 8,000 pounds) of methamphetamine; substantial quantities of fentanyl, cocaine, and heroin; and one firearm.Crimes charged in the indictments include drug trafficking, conspiracy, and bulk cash smuggling.According to court records, the defendants belonged to a drug trafficking organization based in the Imperial Valley and Mexicali, Mexico with ties to Los Rusos, one of the most violent and significant factions of the Sinaloa Cartel.“This investigation represents another blow to traffickers of deadly drugs like fentanyl and methamphetamine,” said U.S. Attorney Tara McGrath. “With the indictment of four dozen individuals, we are not only disrupting a major drug trafficking network but also taking significant steps to protect our community from the devastation these drugs cause. We are committed to dismantling these dangerous operations and ensuring that those who fuel the crisis are held accountable.”“HSI’s challenge with investigating cases tied to the Sinaloa Cartel is to not just chase those who profit from addiction, but to dismantle the transnational network responsible for plaguing our communities and tearing families apart,” said Shawn Gibson, special agent in charge for HSI San Diego. “The success of today’s takedown would not have been possible without the unwavering support and assistance from our law enforcement partners. By working together, we each bring a unique skillset to the fight against these trafficking organizations and can disrupt and dismantle cells like these.”“This successful operation underscores the pivotal role that collaboration among federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies plays in safeguarding our communities,” stated Roque Caza, Area Port Director for the Calexico Port of Entry. “At U.S. Customs and Border Protection, our mission is to protect the nation’s public by preventing dangerous substances from entering the United States. This joint effort highlights our commitment to disrupting the flow of methamphetamine, fentanyl, cocaine, and heroin, addressing the dangerous impacts on public health and safety. Together, we stand strong in our fight against these illicit activities and remain steadfast in protecting our borders and communities.”“The Sinaloa Cartel and any other criminal organization will fare poorly here in the Imperial Valley as we have just seen,” said El Centro Sector Border Patrol Chief Gregory Bovino. “With seamless coordination between HSI, the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and a multitude of state and local agencies, yet another set of alleged traffickers and criminals were prevented from harming the community.”According to court records, employing undercover operations and four rounds of wiretaps, agents conducted numerous controlled purchases, traffic stops of personal vehicles and several tractor trailers, and searches of houses and stash locations leading to large seizures of narcotics. In one instance on April 27, 2022, authorities seized 256 pounds of methamphetamine after intercepting phone conversations between several defendants about a big sale. Federal agents watched the transaction from afar, then conducted a traffic stop on the drug-laden tractor-trailer. Law enforcement officials located four duffel bags containing 256 pounds of methamphetamine in the cab of the truck.This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sean Van Demark and Owen Roth.DEFENDANT Case Number 24cr2316-WQH Adrian Garcia Age: 28 El Centro, CASUMMARY OF CHARGESDistribution of Controlled Substances – Title 21, U.S.C., Sections 841(a) and (b)(1)Maximum penalty: Life in prison with a mandatory minimum of 10 years and a $10 million fine.DEFENDANTS Case Number 24cr2320-WQHFausto Herrera-Lopez, AKA “Vecino”* 50 Mexicali, MXRodolfo Ramirez-Palacios, AKA “Rudy”* 34 Mexicali, MXTereso Ramirez-Velasquez 54 San Bernadino, CAJuan Carlos Ojeda-Saldana 35 Brawley, CAJose David Morales-Rodriguez* 46 Brawley, CAErnesto Morales-Rodriguez* 41 Mexicali, MXVicente Barrera-Robles* 32 Mexicali, MXRicardo Ruben Pinzon 24 El Centro, CAJose Ramon Ochoa-Monteverde 31 El Centro, CASalvador Martinez 54 Los Angeles, CAJuan Carlos Martinez* 52 Los Angeles, CARogelio Robledo-Valdez* 26 Mexicali, MXMaria Elena Reyes 50 Wichita, KSGabriela Estrada* 46 Mexicali, MXJaime Mayoral 40 El Centro, CAMarcos Arturo Barrera 28 Brawley, CAOscar Silvas-Gamez 32 Fresno, CAJuan Ernesto Salas Villela* 37 Fontana, CAYeiming Hernandez 34 Calexico, CAFrank Gustavo Zendejas 56 Calipatria, CAGerardo Medina Plancencia 45 Calexico, CAJose Andres Leyva 55 El Centro, CAStephanie Melgoza* 21 Salinas, CAVictor Rene Herrera* 24 Los Angeles, CAArnulfo Morfin-Moreno* 52 Pasco, WAEdgar Garcia* 24 Las Vegas, NVRoberto Valenzuela De La Torre* 27 Sonora, MXLeonardo Saldivar* 38 San Bernardino, CAFrancisco Ramirez* 52 Tolleson, ArizonaLuis Fernando Simental Palacios* 34 Mexicali, MXAbraham Noe Esparza-Garcia* 36 Mexicali, MXAngelica Guerrero 29 Calexico, CASergio Sanchez 46 LongBeach, CANicholas Adam Fortier 41 Portland, ORLuis Alberto Felix* 38 Pacoima, CAElizabeth Echeverria 43 Las Vega, NVPedro Estrada* 50 San Diego, CABernadette Lucero Vallejos* 33 Goodyear, AZMaribel Garcia Barajas 56 El Centro, CAJose Arturo Mendiola Porras* 57 Mexicali, MXEnrique Villalobos 43 Stockton, CAIsrael Alejandro Ramirez-Velasquez 60 Perris, CA SUMMARY OF CHARGESConspiracy to Distribute Controlled Substances - Title 21, U.S.C., Sections 841(a)(1), (b)(1), and 846Maximum penalty: Life in prison with a mandatory minimum of 10 years and a $10 million fineDistribution of Controlled Substances – Title 21, U.S.C., Sections 841(a) and (b)(1)Maximum penalty: Life in prison with a mandatory minimum of 10 years and a $10 million finePossession of Controlled Substances with Intent to Distribute – Title 21, U.S.C., Sections 841(a) and (b)(1)Maximum penalty: Life in prison with a mandatory minimum of 10 years and a $10 million fineBulk Cash Smuggling – Title 31, U.S.C., Section 5332(a) and (b)Maximum penalty: Five years in prison and a $250,000 fineConspiracy to Commit Bulk Cash Smuggling – Title 18, U.S.C., Section 371Maximum penalty: Five years in prison and a $250,000 fineDEFENDANT Case Number 24cr2318-WQH Nilda Charlenne Ledon Age: 34 El Centro, CASUMMARY OF CHARGESBulk Cash Smuggling – Title 31, U.S.C., Section 5332(a) and (b)Maximum penalty: Five years in prison and a $250,000 fineDEFENDANT Case Number 24cr2319-WQH Jasmine Santos Age: 34 Los Angeles, CASUMMARY OF CHARGESBulk Cash Smuggling – Title 31, U.S.C., Section 5332(a) and (b)Maximum penalty: Five years in prison and a $250,000 fineDEFENDANT Case Number 24cr217-WQH Brenda Lara* Age: 32 Los Angeles, CARomulada Contreras* Age: 75 Mexicali, MXSUMMARY OF CHARGESConspiracy to Commit Bulk Cash Smuggling – Title 18, U.S.C., Section 371Maximum penalty: Five years in prison and a $250,000 fineBulk Cash Smuggling – Title 31, U.S.C., Section 5332(a) and (b)Maximum penalty: Five years in prison and a $250,000 fine*FugitivesINVESTIGATING AGENCIESHomeland Security Investigations, Calexico OfficeUnited States Border Patrol, El Centro Sector Intelligence UnitCustoms and Border Protection, Calexico Intelligence DivisionImperial County Narcotics Task ForceDrug Enforcement Administration, Imperial County OfficeUnited States Postal InspectorsFederal Bureau of Investigations, Imperial County OfficeUnited States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal OperationsUnited States Marshals ServiceCalexico Police DepartmentImperial County Sheriff’s OfficeBrawley Police DepartmentSan Bernardino Police Department Narcotics UnitCalifornia Highway PatrolEl Centro Police DepartmentThe charges and allegations contained in an indictment or complaint are merely accusations, and the defendants are considered innocent unless and until proven guilty.This case is the result of ongoing efforts by the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF), a partnership that brings together the combined expertise and unique abilities of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies. The principal mission of the OCDETF program is to identify, disrupt, dismantle and prosecute high-level members of drug trafficking, weapons trafficking and money laundering organizations and enterprises.This operation is part of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) investigation. OCDETF identifies, disrupts, and dismantles the highest-level drug traffickers, money launderers, gangs, and transnational criminal organizations that threaten the United States by using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach that leverages the strengths of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies against criminal networks.
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Ari D. Fitzwater (619) 546-8756 and Assistant U. S. Attorney Patrick J. Bumatay (619) 546-8450
NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY – February 1, 2017
SAN DIEGO – Christopher Switzer and Mark Gillette pleaded guilty in federal court today to conspiring to destroy their own vessel, the “Commander,” a 57-ft boat used for charter sport-fishing trips, in order to fraudulently collect an insurance payout.
According to their plea agreement, on October 11, 2016, Switzer and Gillette headed out to sea on the Commander from its homeport in Mission Bay and headed toward LongBeach. The two had planned to intentionally sink the Commander and submit a claim to their insurance company.
Switzer and Gillette admitted how they attempted to sink the Commander while off the coast of California by destroying plastic PVC piping in the ship’s engine room, which caused sea water to flood into the vessel. They also pumped sea water onto the vessel and punctured its bulkhead to let sea water spread faster throughout the boat.
After sea water had flooded the Commander and as it was starting to go under, Switzer and Gillette called the United States Coast Guard for help which promptly launched a helicopter to find the two. A Dana Point Harbor Patrol rescue fireboat later found the two boatmen atop the partially submerged ship. As part of their plea agreement, Switzer and Gillette acknowledged that their actions subjected themselves and the emergency responders to the risk of death or serious injury.
Upon their rescue, Switzer and Gillette gave a series of false statements to officials to cover their plot to sink the Commander for insurance money. They indicated the first sign of a problem on the Commander was a power failure and they could not figure out why the vessel was flooding.
Switzer and Gillette’s actions failed to completely sink the Commander and it was found adrift near Dana Point, California the next day. A commercial salvage company was able to successfully tow the Commander back to San Diego Bay, California, where investigators uncovered the scheme to intentionally sink the ship.
Switzer and Gillette pleaded guilty before U.S. Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt. They face a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a maximum $250,000 fine. As part of their plea, they are required to reimburse the U.S. Coast Guard over $15,000 for the price of launching the rescue helicopter and other costs.
Sentencing is scheduled for March 6, 2017 at 9 a.m. before U.S. District Judge Michael M. Anello.
DEFENDANTS Case Number 17cr0251-MMA
Christopher Switzer Age: 39
Mark Gillette Age: 37
SUMMARY OF CHARGES
Conspiracy to Destroy Vessels – Title 18, U.S.C., Section 2271
ALBUQUERQUE – Today, U.S. Attorney Alexander M.M. Uballez for the District of New Mexico, Acting Special Agent in Charge Jason T. Stevens of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) El Paso, and Chief Patrol Agent Anthony Scott Good of the U.S. Border Patrol El Paso Sector, announced the unsealing of an indictment returned by a federal grand jury on July 17, 2024, charging eight members of the leadership and middle management of the Lopez Human Smuggling Organization, a transnational criminal organization operating in Guatemala, Mexico, and the United States. Law enforcement officials effected the arrest of two alleged members of the Lopez Human Smuggling Organization in California and Florida in a coordinated, multistate enforcement operation.
In addition, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions against the Lopez Human Smuggling Organization today as part of its ongoing efforts to address the national security threat posed by human smuggling. Pursuant to Executive Order 13581, as amended, OFAC has taken action to freeze assets and limit financial transactions of the Lopez Human Smuggling Organization.
According to the indictment, Ronaldo Galindo Lopez-Escobar, aka “Tio Roni,” 46, of Malacatan, Guatemala, leads and oversees the Lopez Human Smuggling Organization from Guatemala.
Elvis Bersai Lopez-Ambrosio, aka “Pepe,” and Whiskey Hans Lopez-Ambrosio, aka “Hands,” coordinated with Mexican human smugglers, including Jumilca Sandivel Hernandez-Perez and a La Linea Cartel member known as “Chikis,” “Chiquis,” “Enano,” and “Chicken” to cross undocumented aliens from Guatemala through Mexico, and into the United States through Southern New Mexico.
Upon smuggling undocumented aliens into the United States through Southern New Mexico, Elvis and Whiskey would oversee and direct a network of mid-level smugglers including Eli Adonis Esteban-Lopez and Wenry Gabriel Gomez-Lopez, who assisted in carrying out the day-to-day operations of the Lopez Human Smuggling Organization, and Karen Stefany Hernandez-Vanegas, who received deposits and made payments to co-conspirators through the United States banking system, peer-to-peer money transfer applications, and bulk cash that were derived from the Lopez Human Smuggling Organization.
Furthermore, Elvis would instruct co-conspirators to open U.S. bank accounts in order to receive smuggling fees from smuggled aliens on Elvis’s behalf and in a manner that would be untraceable to Elvis. Elvis would then instruct co-conspirators to withdraw the funds and either: give the funds to Elvis, convert the funds into assets including real estate, or send funds to Lopez-Escobar or his nominees in Guatemala, utilizing money service business money wires, to minimize the trackability of the funds to Lopez-Escobar.
Federal investigators have uncovered evidence suggesting that the Lopez Human Smuggling Organization generated between $104 million and $416 million in illicit proceeds from their human smuggling activities between September 2020 and April 2023.
“Border security is about neighbors taking care of neighbors, reaching across jurisdictional and agency boundaries to protect our community,” said U.S. Attorney Uballez. “With this indictment, we bring the fight across borders to the transnational criminal organizations and their leadership. No long will you profit in safety while migrants suffer and load-drivers take the risks, and the fall, for your greed. We are coming for you and your bank accounts.”
“HSI remains steadfast in vigorously using our broad investigative authority and international footprint to pursue transnational criminal organizations that not only put the lives of migrants at peril, but pose a threat to our national security,” said Jason T. Stevens, Acting Special Agent in Charge of HSI El Paso. “This case exemplifies a coalesced commitment among our federal law enforcement partners to ensure public safety by locking up violent criminal elements associated with these networks. Our message is clear: Human smugglers will not operate with impunity in our communities.”
“On behalf of the U.S. Border Patrol El Paso Sector, I would like to extend my deepest gratitude to the U.S. Attorney’s Office and our local law enforcement partners for their role in this significant criminal apprehension,” said Anthony Scott Good, Chief Patrol Agent of the U.S. Border Patrol El Paso Sector. “The successes in the investigation of the Lopez Human Smuggling Organization represents our unified goal as law enforcement partners: protecting the very communities we live in. Border Patrol's mission extends beyond immigration; we strategically collaborate with local law enforcement to deter and address criminal threats.”
If convicted of the current charges, Lopez-Escobar faces up to 20 years in prison. Lopez-Escobar and nine co-defendants were charged with conspiracy to bring in, transport and harbor illegal aliens on May 24, 2023. Lopez-Escobar remains a fugitive.
If convicted of the current charges, Elvis Bersai Lopez-Ambrosio faces up to 20 years in prison.
If convicted of the current charges, Whiskey Hans Lopez-Ambrosio faces up to 10 years in prison.
If convicted of the current charges, Hernandez-Perez faces up to 10 years in prison.
If convicted of the current charges, Chikis faces up to 10 years in prison.
If convicted of the current charges, Esteban-Lopez faces up to 10 years in prison.
If convicted of the current charges, Gomez-Lopez faces up to 10 years in prison.
If convicted of the current charges, Hernandez-Vanegas faces up to 10 years in prison.
HSI El Paso led U.S. investigative efforts, with enforcement assistance from HSI in the Middle District of Florida and the Central District of California. HSI received investigative assistance from HSI LongBeach and San Jose, U.S. Border Patrol Deming, Lordsburg, Blythe, El Centro, Yuma, and Tucson, the U.S. Marshal Service’s Organized Crime and Gangs Branch, as well as U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s National Targeting Center/Operation Sentinel, and the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Department. The Justice Department’s Human Rights and Special Prosecutions Section (HRSP) and the Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section (MLARS) of the Department’s Criminal Division also provided support in this matter.
The case is being handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Ramirez for the District of New Mexico.
The indictment of these defendants is the result of the coordinated efforts of Joint Task Force Alpha (JTFA). The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Mexico is part of JTFA, which was established by Attorney General Merrick B. Garland in June 2021 to marshal the investigative and prosecutorial resources of the Justice Department, in partnership with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), to enhance U.S. enforcement efforts against the most prolific and dangerous human smuggling and trafficking groups operating in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, and most recently in the Darién to include Colombia and Panama. The task force focuses on disrupting and dismantling smuggling and trafficking networks that abuse, exploit, or endanger migrants, pose national security threats, and are involved in organized crime. JTFA is comprised of detailees from U.S. Attorneys’ Offices along the southwest border, including the Southern District of Texas, the Western District of Texas, the District of New Mexico, the District of Arizona, and the Southern District of California. Dedicated support is also provided by numerous components of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division that are part of JTFA, led by HRSP, and supported by the Office of Prosecutorial Development, Assistance, and Training (OPDAT), the Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section (NDDS), MLARS, the Office of Enforcement Operations (OEO), the Office of International Affairs (OIA), and the Violent Crime and Racketeering Section. JTFA also relies on substantial law enforcement investment from DHS, FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and other partners. To date, JTFA’s work has resulted in over 310 domestic and international arrests of leaders, organizers, and significant facilitators of human smuggling; over 250 U.S. convictions; over 185 significant sentences of 30 years or more in prison imposed; and substantial seizures and forfeiture of substantial assets and contraband, including hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash, real property, vehicles, firearms and ammunition, and drugs; multiple indictments and successful extradition requests against foreign leadership targets.
View the Indictment
Treasury Press Release
An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
Gulfport, Miss. – A California man was sentenced to 237 months in prison for Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine, announced U.S. Attorney Darren J. LaMarca and Special Agent in Charge Brad L. Byerley of the Drug Enforcement Administration.
Brent Alan Wright, age 50, of Yorba Linda, California, was sentenced on August 3, 2023 in U.S. District Court in Gulfport.
According to court records, on December 29, 2021, DEA agents received information regarding a drug trafficking organization in LongBeach, MS. The investigation revealed that the leader of this drug trafficking organization (DTO), Antonina Troyer, was receiving multi-pound packages of methamphetamine from Brent Alan Wright in California. Wright used the United States Postal Service to ship methamphetamine to Troyer on several occasions. During the course of the conspiracy, Wright shipped approximately 2.9 kilograms of methamphetamine to South Mississippi.
The case was investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration and Hancock County Sheriff’s Office.
The case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Erica Rose.
CHARLESTON, S.C. — Jerome S. Goldstein, 78, of LongBeach, New York, was sentenced to nearly four years in federal prison after pleading guilty to traveling with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct.Evidence presented to the court showed that in late 2022, members of the South Carolina Attorney General’s Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force (ICAC), conducted an undercover investigation targeting online sexual offenders. As part of this investigation, an officer created an undercover online persona of a 13-year-old girl on a social messaging app.Between Nov. 28, 2022, and Feb. 15, 2023, Goldstein communicated online with the undercover officer. In their conversations, Goldstein requested that the purported 13-year-old child engage in sexual acts and send him child sexual abuse material. He also informed her that he planned to travel from New York to South Carolina to have sex with her.On Feb. 15, 2023, Goldstein drove from LongBeach, New York to Goose Creek, South Carolina to meet the purported 13-year-old, and to engage in illicit sexual conduct with her. When Goldstein arrived, he encountered law enforcement officers instead and was placed under arrest. Goldstein admitted that he traveled from New York to South Carolina to engage in illicit sexual conduct with the girl. Goldstein had planned to take to a hotel room he had reserved.United States District Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks sentenced Goldstein to 46 months imprisonment, to be followed by a lifetime term of court-ordered supervision. There is no parole in the federal system.This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the U.S. Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse. Led by the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals, who sexually exploit children, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit http://www.justice.gov/psc.This case was investigated by the South Carolina Attorney General’s Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force (ICAC), including the FBI Columbia field office, Homeland Security Investigations, Goose Creek Police Department, Mount Pleasant Police Department, and other law enforcement agencies. Assistant U.S. Attorney Dean H. Secor is prosecuting the case.###
The long-time manager of a Hoquiam wood shavings business was sentenced today in U.S. District Court in Tacoma to three years in prison and three years of supervised release for thirteen federal felonies related to his theft of $1.3 million from a family business, announced U.S. Attorney Annette L. Hayes. WILLIS D. “BILL” LONN, JR., 68, of Aberdeen was convicted in October 2016 of nine counts of mail fraud, two counts of income tax evasion, one count of money laundering conspiracy and one count of interstate transportation of stolen property following a six-day trial. At the sentencing hearing U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle said LONN “profoundly abused the trust of his employer [and] callously betrayed family members and took what belonged to the company.”
“This defendant did not commit just a single act of embezzlement, rather, over the course of years, he stole from the company almost every day,” said U.S. Attorney Annette L. Hayes. “He betrayed the trust of his family members to satisfy his greed and then used the stolen money to start his competing business harming his victims even further.”
According to records filed in the case and testimony at trial, LONN was a long time manager for LongBeach Shavings Company (LBS). The company was owned by LONN’s uncle and cousins and was based in California. The company had one plant in Hoquiam, Washington where it processed wood shavings for use on farms, at horse shows or in pet stores. LONN had worked at the Hoquiam plant for about a decade when he launched a scheme in the 2000s to steal and sell the wood shavings products for his own enrichment. LONN did this by selling the shavings directly to customers in Washington and Oregon without turning the proceeds over to the company. Later in the scheme, LONN arranged to get wood chips for free from a Montesano lumber mill, but he informed the parent company that an entity named M & R Lumber needed to be paid for the wood shavings. LONN posed as M & R Lumber and created phony invoices that he mailed to LBS to bill them for the shavings. LONN then kept the money. Between the two schemes LONN obtained more than $1.3 million from LBS. He was terminated by the company in 2011 when the full scope of the scheme came to light.
Testimony at trial revealed that LONN never paid income taxes on the ill-gotten gain in tax years 2009 and 2010. Had LONN reported the income his tax bill for those years would have increased by more than $80,000.
“At this time of year most Americans are busy fulfilling their obligations as citizens of our country by preparing and filing honest and accurate tax returns. However, a small percentage of the population selfishly shuns their civic duty by dodging the tax laws that the majority of us observe,” stated Special Agent in Charge Darrell Waldon of IRS Criminal Investigation. “When this happens, IRS Special Agents stand ready to defend our nation’s tax system by bringing scofflaws to justice and ensuring a level playing field for all of us.”
Anthony Galetti, Inspector in Charge of Seattle Division of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, stated, “Today’s sentencing confirms that anyone who uses the U.S. Mail to operate a fraud scheme will be held accountable. I’m pleased to see justice in a case which had such an impact on the community of Hoquiam.”
The case was investigated by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) and the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI).
The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Brian D. Werner and Nicholas Manheim.
LOS ANGELES – In another massive law enforcement action targeting health care fraud, federal authorities here announced today criminal cases naming a total of 33 defendants – including doctors, pharmacists and an attorney – who have been charged in a wide-range of schemes that collectively attempted to bilk public and private insurance programs out of more than $660 million.
The defendants charged locally are among hundreds of people charged across the United States in cases that cumulatively allege approximately $2 billion in false billings. The nationwide sweep includes charges against 165 doctors, nurses and other licensed medical professionals who allegedly participated in health care fraud schemes
In the Central District of California, most of the defendants were charged for their roles in schemes to defraud health insurance programs such as Medicare. The cases allege health care fraud and kickback schemes involving surgeries, compounded drugs, home health services, Medicare Part D prescription drugs and hospice care.
“Health care fraud schemes cost Americans billions of dollars every year through higher premiums and tax money stolen from public programs, such as Medicare,” said First Assistant United States Attorney Tracy L. Wilkison. “There is an incredible array of scams, some of which involve services that are simply never provided, and some of which use complicated and sophisticated ruses to conceal illegal acts, such as bribes. Today’s announcement of the far-reaching law enforcement actions targeting a wide range of schemes and a large number of defendants demonstrates the excellent work by our law enforcement partners. Together, we will continue the hard work necessary to identify and hold accountable corrupt health care professionals and fraudsters seeking to line their pockets with your hard-earned money.”
"Health care fraud occurs quietly and behind the scenes on a regular basis in Southern California, which makes detecting it very challenging," said Paul Delacourt, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI's Los Angeles Field Office. "The charges we've brought in Los Angeles against physicians and pharmacists are particularly disturbing since these individuals are placed in a position of trust by victims simply trying to navigate a complicated insurance system. A great deal of investigative ability went into each one of these cases, and I'm proud that the work of our agents and law enforcement partners will ebb the flow of the destructive fraud that plagues Southern California.”
9 new defendants charged in Operation “Spinal Cap”
This week, prosecutors unsealed charges against nine new defendants being charged as part of Operation “Spinal Cap,” which targets a long-running health care fraud scheme that generated nearly $1 billion in fraudulent claims to federal government, California state, and private insurers. The scheme – which was spearheaded by Michael Drobot, the former owner of Pacific Hospital in LongBeach – involved more than $40 million in illegal kickbacks paid to doctors and other medical professionals in exchange for referring thousands of patients who received surgeries and other services at Pacific Hospital.
In the cases announced today in Operation Spinal Cap:
Daniel Capen, 68, of Manhattan Beach, an orthopedic surgeon, has agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy and illegal kickback charges. Capen accounted for approximately $142 million of Pacific Hospital’s claims to insurers, on which the hospital was paid approximately $56 million.
Timothy Hunt, 53, of Palos Verdes Estates, another orthopedic surgeon who referred spinal surgery patients to Capen and other doctors, has agreed to plead guilty to a conspiracy charge involving his receipt of illegal kickbacks stemming from various financial relationships with Pacific Hospital and related entities.
George William Hammer, 65, of Palm Desert, the former chief financial officer of the physician management arm of Pacific Hospital, has agreed to plead guilty to tax charges based on the fraudulent classification of illegal kickbacks in hospital-related corporate tax filings.
Lauren Papa, 52, of Tarzana, a chiropractor, has agreed to plead guilty to a conspiracy charge involving her receipt of illegal kickbacks to refer patients to a neurosurgeon with the understanding that the neurosurgeon would perform the surgeries at Pacific Hospital.
Tiffany Rogers, 53, of Palos Verdes Estates, an orthopedic surgeon, was named in an indictment unsealed Wednesday in connection with receiving illegal kickbacks to refer patients for spinal surgeries at Pacific Hospital.
Brian Carrico, 64, of Redondo Beach, a chiropractor – along with Performance Medical & Rehab Center, Inc., which was partially owned by Carrico; and One Accord Management, Inc., which Carrico wholly owned – were charged in connection with the receipt of illegal kickbacks to influence the referral of patients to Pacific Hospital. An indictment unsealed Wednesday alleges that these defendants and other co-conspirators were responsible for approximately $80 million in claims submitted to the federal workers’ compensation program and were paid approximately $56 million in connection with patients that Performance Medical referred to Pacific Hospital.
William Parker, 64, of Redondo Beach, was charged in a separate indictment unsealed on Wednesday in connection with the same kickback scheme involving Carrico and his companies.
With the new cases being filed in Operation Spinal Cap, the fraudulent claims related to this scheme now span a 15-year period and cumulatively total more than $950 million.
The investigation into the spinal surgery kickback scheme is being conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; IRS Criminal Investigation; the California Department of Insurance; and the United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General.
“Public health insurance programs – whether a workers’ compensation program or Medicare – are not a personal pocketbook for criminals seeking to exploit government programs designed to help those who need these plans the most,” stated R. Damon Rowe, Special Agent in Charge of IRS Criminal Investigation’s Los Angeles Field Office. “Taxpayers rightly expect individuals working in the healthcare industry that receive payments from taxpayer-funded programs to scrupulously follow the rules. IRS Criminal Investigation will continue to protect the integrity of public health insurance programs and ensure that doctors, pharmacists and medical service providers who profit from these illicit schemes are held accountable.”
The new cases were filed by Assistant United States Attorney Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section, and will be prosecuted by AUSA Janakiram and Assistant United States Attorneys Joseph T. McNally and Scott D. Tenley of the Santa Ana Branch Office.
The nine new defendants charged in this investigation will be summoned to appear for arraignments in United States District Court in Santa Ana next month.
Investigation into compound prescription kickback scheme at TYY Consulting
An indictment unsealed on Wednesday outlines a wide-ranging conspiracy that was responsible for more than $250 million in fraudulent claims for prescriptions that were filled by compounding pharmacies in Nevada and Southern California. The indictment charges Irena Shut, 41, an attorney who resides in Hidden Hills, with paying kickbacks to two podiatrists to authorize prescriptions written on pre-printed prescription pads designed to maximize insurance payments, regardless of the medical need for an expensive compounded formulary for each “patient.”
The scheme was operated through TYY Consulting, a Las Vegas, Nevada-based outfit that used a nationwide network of marketers to refer prescriptions to TYY-affiliated pharmacies in exchange for kickbacks. As a result of the fraudulent claims, the victim health care plans paid out nearly $175 million. Shut, who worked as a marketer for TYY, received approximately $6.8 million in kickbacks, some of which was, in turn, given to the charged podiatrists.
The charged podiatrists, Domenic Signorelli, 51, of Irvine, and Robert Joseph, 51, of Huntington Beach, along with several other unnamed co-conspirator doctors, allegedly received kickbacks for “writing” the prescriptions. Once the prescriptions were filled, members of the conspiracy submitted fraudulent claims to federal, state and private insurers for the compounded drugs.
The victims of the scheme include the Department of Defense’s TRICARE program – which provides civilian health benefits for U.S Armed Forces military personnel, military retirees, and their dependents – as well as federal and state workers’ compensation programs.
In addition to paying kickbacks to the charged podiatrists and other medical professionals, TYY induced other doctors to participate in the scheme by offering prostitutes, fancy meals, and expensive event tickets, according to the indictment.
This case is being investigated by the FBI and the United State Postal Service, Office of Inspector General (USPS-OIG).
USPS-OIG Special Agent in Charge Brian Washington stated, “Today’s indictments should send a clear message to all health care providers that health care fraud is a federal crime that carries serious consequences and will not be tolerated. The USPS-OIG, along with our law enforcement partners, will continue to aggressively investigate those who engage in fraudulent activities intended to defraud federal benefit programs and the Postal Service.”
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section.
Shut, Signorelli and Joseph will be directed to appear for arraignments next month in federal court in Los Angeles.
Distribution of prescription opioids
Angela Gillespie-Shelton, 48, of Houston, was arrested Wednesday in her hometown after being indicted last week in Los Angeles on federal drug trafficking and money laundering charges. The six-count indictment alleges that Gillespie-Shelton was one of the leaders of a narcotics trafficking ring based in Los Angeles that sold illegal prescriptions for cash and obtained opioids and other drugs that were shipped from Los Angeles to Texas for sale on the black market.
Gillespie-Shelton allegedly laundered over $1 million of the black market cash proceeds through numerous accounts both to conceal the proceeds and to further the narcotics trafficking conspiracy, including by paying rent for the clinic where the illegal prescriptions were written. The indictment further alleges that Gillespie-Shelton paid more than $200,000 to one of the doctors who wrote the illegal prescriptions.
The doctor, Madhu Garg and numerous other co-conspirators have already been convicted in this matter.
The case against Gillespie-Shelton is being investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration, IRS Criminal Investigation, the Los Angeles Police Department, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, the California Department of Justice, and the Texas Department of Public Safety.
The prosecution of Gillespie-Shelton is being handled by Assistant United States Attorney Michael G. Freedman of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force.
SoCal residents charged in compound drug scheme
A group of pharmacists, doctors and marketers worked together to defraud the TRICARE program by submitting more than $40 million in claims for medically unnecessary compounded medications prescriptions, according to an indictment unsealed Wednesday that also alleges AMPLAN, the Amtrak employee health benefit plan, was victimized.
Marketers that participated in the scheme solicited beneficiaries of the health plans through misleading cold calls that promised free compounded medications, as well as through “wellness” programs that included gym memberships, fitness tracking devices and supplements. The marketers used sensitive personal and insurance information gathered from the beneficiaries to generate fraudulent prescriptions for compounded medications.
The marketers paid doctors to authorize prescriptions by misleading the doctors into believing that the marketers operated legitimate telemedicine businesses or by paying the doctors to write the prescriptions.
The six defendants charged in this case are:
Thu Van Le, aka Tony Le, 40, of Yorba Linda, a licensed pharmacist and owner of TC Medical Pharmacy (TCMP) in Pomona and a silent owner of Mars Hill Pharmacy (MHP) in North Carolina;
Chau Nguyen, aka Cindy Le, 36, of Yorba Linda, a licensed pharmacist and co-operator of TCMP;
Truong Giang Le, 31, of Pomona, a co-operator of MHP;
Chan Van Le, aka Kevin Le, 39, of Chino, the manager of MHP;
Nha Le Tuan Truong, 36, of Fountain Valley, a pharmacist who laundered fraudulently obtained proceeds through a charity; and
Jeffery Lawrence, 55, of Los Angeles, the owner of Wellytics Inc., an entity through which he fraudulently solicited insurance information from beneficiaries of AMPLAN.
Through TCMP, the defendants submitted approximately $13 million in claims, and TRICARE paid reimbursements of more than $10 million, according to the indictment. Through MHP, the defendants submitted approximately $28 million in claims, and TRICARE paid more than $21 million. Nha Le Tuan Truong allegedly laundered more than $1 million in Tricare reimbursements through a charitable foundation.
Lawrence allegedly solicited Amtrak employees to participate in a wellness program that Lawrence claimed would be reimbursement by AMPLAN. Several employees gave Lawrence their AMPLAN beneficiary information, which he then used to procure compounded medications prescriptions submitted to TCMP in exchange for more than $600,000 in kickbacks.
“These cases reinforce our commitment and determination to pursue those who would defraud Amtrak’s health care programs and target such vulnerable populations,” said Amtrak Inspector General Tom Howard. “Our agents will continue to hold perpetrators accountable and to protect Amtrak, its employees and their dependents.”
This case is being investigated by the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the FBI, IRS Criminal Investigation, Amtrak’s Office of Inspector General, the Office of Personnel Management’s Office of Inspector General, the Department of Labor’s Office of Inspector General, and the California Department of Insurance.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Mark Aveis, Paul G. Stern and Cassie Palmer of the Major Frauds Section.
The six defendants charged in this case were arrested on Tuesday and each pleaded not guilty at their arraignments in United States District Court. A trial in this case was scheduled for August 21 in Santa Ana.
Medicare Fraud Strike Force Cases
Seven of the cases announced this week were filed by DOJ trial attorneys working in Los Angeles under the aegis of the Medicare Fraud Strike Force in conjunction with the United States Attorney’s Office. Strike Force operations are part of a joint initiative between the Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services to prevent and deter fraud and enforce current anti-fraud laws around the country.
“We will not tolerate criminals stealing precious dollars from our federal health care programs,” said Christian J. Schrank, Special Agent in Charge for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG). “Today’s announcement shows our commitment to working with our state and federal law enforcement partners to swiftly investigate these fraud schemes and bring criminals to justice.”
Strike Force prosecutors unsealed seven criminal cases this week.
Seven people were named in an indictment that alleges multiple health care fraud conspiracies in which the owner of two pharmacies submitted claims to Medicare and Medi-Cal for expensive, brand-name prescription drugs that were never dispensed to patients. Rather, the drugs were provided to co-conspirators to sell to third parties, thereby generating a profit from each prescription drug twice – first from the reimbursement from Medicare or Medi-Cal, and second from the sale of the prescription drugs diverted to the black market.
The defendants named in the indictment are:
Irina Sadovsky, 48, of Woodland Hills, the owner and pharmacist-in-charge of Five Star and Ultimate pharmacies;
Yigal Keren, 36, of Los Angeles, who owns and operates transitional housing centers;
Mikhail Khanukhov, 38, of Sherman Oaks, the manager at Five Star and Ultimate pharmacies;
Shahriar “Michael” Kalantari, 51, of Los Angeles, who was a marketer;
Andrei Sotnikov, 47, of Northridge, a marketer;
Nida Rosales, 62, of Bellflower, a marketer; and
Juan Carlos Enriquez, 31, of Van Nuys, a pharmacy technician and marketer
The indictment alleges that Sadovsky paid kickbacks to marketers in exchange for patient referrals from facilities that treated Medicare and/or Medi-Cal patients. Sadovsky also paid kickbacks directly to Medicare beneficiaries in exchange for filling their prescriptions at Five Star Pharmacy.
Five Star and Ultimate Pharmacies were collectively paid more than $54 million by Medicare and Medi-Cal between January 2014 and September 2017.
This matter is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG, and the case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Armen Pogossian, 69, of Pasadena, the owner of L.A. Nova Pharmacy, was indicted for his role in the submission of $2.9 million in claims to Medicare Part D sponsors for prescription drugs that were never dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries; indeed, they were never even ordered from a wholesaler. The five-count indictment alleges that Pogossian attempted to conceal the fraudulent claims from auditors through the use of fake invoices that purported to show the drugs had been obtained from wholesalers and thus were in the pharmacy’s inventory. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Tamar Tatarian, 37, of Pasadena, the owner of Akhtamar Pharmacy, was named in a three-count indictment that alleges she participated in a scheme that submitted $1.3 million in claims to Medicare Part D sponsors for prescription drugs that were never ordered from wholesalers, and thus never dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries, which Tatarian attempted to conceal from auditors through the use of fake invoices. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Ruben Filian, 33, of Glendale, a physician’s assistant, was indicted for allegedly participating in a $58 million scheme to certify patients to home health care in exchange for illegal kickbacks. Filian is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, four counts of health care fraud, one count of conspiracy to pay and receive kickbacks, five counts of paying and receiving kickbacks, and three counts of money laundering. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Emily Culbertson.
Dr. Stephen Levine, 74, of North Hollywood, a referring physician to home health agencies, was named in a criminal information for his role in the $58 million fraud scheme that also involved Filian. Levine allegedly certified numerous beneficiaries for home health services, without regard to whether the beneficiaries were homebound or whether the services were medically necessary. Levine was paid cash kickbacks for his referrals. Using Levine’s referrals as support, owners and operators at multiple home health agencies billed Medicare for home health services, and Medicare suffered losses of at least $6.5 million. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Emily Culbertson.
Sarkis Manukyan, 76, of Panorama City, and Eduard Terosipyan, 67, of Montebello, both of whom are managers of medical clinics in Los Angeles and Burbank, were indicted in a $1.9 million Medicare fraud involving kickbacks and outpatient physician services not rendered or not medically necessary. This matter is being investigated by the FBI, the California Department of Justice and the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department. This case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Niall O’Donnell.
Lucille Lam, 54, of Burbank, co-owner and managing employee of Bliss Hospice, was charged in a criminal information for allegedly participating in a scheme to pay kickbacks in exchange for Medicare beneficiaries referred to Bliss for hospice services. As part of the scheme, Lam and the co-owners of the hospice falsely categorized the illegal kickbacks as payroll expenses. Based on the referrals that Lam and her co-conspirators obtained through illegal kickbacks, Bliss submitted claims to Medicare and was paid approximately $2.4 million. This matter is being investigated by the FBI, HHS-OIG, and the California Department of Justice. This case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Claire Yan.
Indictments and criminal informations contain allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed to be innocent until and unless proven guilty in court.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
LOS ANGELES – In another massive law enforcement action targeting health care fraud, federal authorities here announced today criminal cases naming a total of 33 defendants – including doctors, pharmacists and an attorney – who have been charged in a wide-range of schemes that collectively attempted to bilk public and private insurance programs out of more than $660 million.
The defendants charged locally are among hundreds of people charged across the United States in cases that cumulatively allege approximately $2 billion in false billings. The nationwide sweep includes charges against 165 doctors, nurses and other licensed medical professionals who allegedly participated in health care fraud schemes
In the Central District of California, most of the defendants were charged for their roles in schemes to defraud health insurance programs such as Medicare. The cases allege health care fraud and kickback schemes involving surgeries, compounded drugs, home health services, Medicare Part D prescription drugs and hospice care.
“Health care fraud schemes cost Americans billions of dollars every year through higher premiums and tax money stolen from public programs, such as Medicare,” said First Assistant United States Attorney Tracy L. Wilkison. “There is an incredible array of scams, some of which involve services that are simply never provided, and some of which use complicated and sophisticated ruses to conceal illegal acts, such as bribes. Today’s announcement of the far-reaching law enforcement actions targeting a wide range of schemes and a large number of defendants demonstrates the excellent work by our law enforcement partners. Together, we will continue the hard work necessary to identify and hold accountable corrupt health care professionals and fraudsters seeking to line their pockets with your hard-earned money.”
"Health care fraud occurs quietly and behind the scenes on a regular basis in Southern California, which makes detecting it very challenging," said Paul Delacourt, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI's Los Angeles Field Office. "The charges we've brought in Los Angeles against physicians and pharmacists are particularly disturbing since these individuals are placed in a position of trust by victims simply trying to navigate a complicated insurance system. A great deal of investigative ability went into each one of these cases, and I'm proud that the work of our agents and law enforcement partners will ebb the flow of the destructive fraud that plagues Southern California.”
9 new defendants charged in Operation “Spinal Cap”
This week, prosecutors unsealed charges against nine new defendants being charged as part of Operation “Spinal Cap,” which targets a long-running health care fraud scheme that generated nearly $1 billion in fraudulent claims to federal government, California state, and private insurers. The scheme – which was spearheaded by Michael Drobot, the former owner of Pacific Hospital in LongBeach – involved more than $40 million in illegal kickbacks paid to doctors and other medical professionals in exchange for referring thousands of patients who received surgeries and other services at Pacific Hospital.
In the cases announced today in Operation Spinal Cap:
Daniel Capen, 68, of Manhattan Beach, an orthopedic surgeon, has agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy and illegal kickback charges. Capen accounted for approximately $142 million of Pacific Hospital’s claims to insurers, on which the hospital was paid approximately $56 million.
Timothy Hunt, 53, of Palos Verdes Estates, another orthopedic surgeon who referred spinal surgery patients to Capen and other doctors, has agreed to plead guilty to a conspiracy charge involving his receipt of illegal kickbacks stemming from various financial relationships with Pacific Hospital and related entities.
George William Hammer, 65, of Palm Desert, the former chief financial officer of the physician management arm of Pacific Hospital, has agreed to plead guilty to tax charges based on the fraudulent classification of illegal kickbacks in hospital-related corporate tax filings.
Lauren Papa, 52, of Tarzana, a chiropractor, has agreed to plead guilty to a conspiracy charge involving her receipt of illegal kickbacks to refer patients to a neurosurgeon with the understanding that the neurosurgeon would perform the surgeries at Pacific Hospital.
Tiffany Rogers, 53, of Palos Verdes Estates, an orthopedic surgeon, was named in an indictment unsealed Wednesday in connection with receiving illegal kickbacks to refer patients for spinal surgeries at Pacific Hospital.
Brian Carrico, 64, of Redondo Beach, a chiropractor – along with Performance Medical & Rehab Center, Inc., which was partially owned by Carrico; and One Accord Management, Inc., which Carrico wholly owned – were charged in connection with the receipt of illegal kickbacks to influence the referral of patients to Pacific Hospital. An indictment unsealed Wednesday alleges that these defendants and other co-conspirators were responsible for approximately $80 million in claims submitted to the federal workers’ compensation program and were paid approximately $56 million in connection with patients that Performance Medical referred to Pacific Hospital.
William Parker, 64, of Redondo Beach, was charged in a separate indictment unsealed on Wednesday in connection with the same kickback scheme involving Carrico and his companies.
With the new cases being filed in Operation Spinal Cap, the fraudulent claims related to this scheme now span a 15-year period and cumulatively total more than $950 million.
The investigation into the spinal surgery kickback scheme is being conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; IRS Criminal Investigation; the California Department of Insurance; and the United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General.
“Public health insurance programs – whether a workers’ compensation program or Medicare – are not a personal pocketbook for criminals seeking to exploit government programs designed to help those who need these plans the most,” stated R. Damon Rowe, Special Agent in Charge of IRS Criminal Investigation’s Los Angeles Field Office. “Taxpayers rightly expect individuals working in the healthcare industry that receive payments from taxpayer-funded programs to scrupulously follow the rules. IRS Criminal Investigation will continue to protect the integrity of public health insurance programs and ensure that doctors, pharmacists and medical service providers who profit from these illicit schemes are held accountable.”
The new cases were filed by Assistant United States Attorney Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section, and will be prosecuted by AUSA Janakiram and Assistant United States Attorneys Joseph T. McNally and Scott D. Tenley of the Santa Ana Branch Office.
The nine new defendants charged in this investigation will be summoned to appear for arraignments in United States District Court in Santa Ana next month.
Investigation into compound prescription kickback scheme at TYY Consulting
An indictment unsealed on Wednesday outlines a wide-ranging conspiracy that was responsible for more than $250 million in fraudulent claims for prescriptions that were filled by compounding pharmacies in Nevada and Southern California. The indictment charges Irena Shut, 41, an attorney who resides in Hidden Hills, with paying kickbacks to two podiatrists to authorize prescriptions written on pre-printed prescription pads designed to maximize insurance payments, regardless of the medical need for an expensive compounded formulary for each “patient.”
The scheme was operated through TYY Consulting, a Las Vegas, Nevada-based outfit that used a nationwide network of marketers to refer prescriptions to TYY-affiliated pharmacies in exchange for kickbacks. As a result of the fraudulent claims, the victim health care plans paid out nearly $175 million. Shut, who worked as a marketer for TYY, received approximately $6.8 million in kickbacks, some of which was, in turn, given to the charged podiatrists.
The charged podiatrists, Domenic Signorelli, 51, of Irvine, and Robert Joseph, 51, of Huntington Beach, along with several other unnamed co-conspirator doctors, allegedly received kickbacks for “writing” the prescriptions. Once the prescriptions were filled, members of the conspiracy submitted fraudulent claims to federal, state and private insurers for the compounded drugs.
The victims of the scheme include the Department of Defense’s TRICARE program – which provides civilian health benefits for U.S Armed Forces military personnel, military retirees, and their dependents – as well as federal and state workers’ compensation programs.
In addition to paying kickbacks to the charged podiatrists and other medical professionals, TYY induced other doctors to participate in the scheme by offering prostitutes, fancy meals, and expensive event tickets, according to the indictment.
This case is being investigated by the FBI and the United State Postal Service, Office of Inspector General (USPS-OIG).
USPS-OIG Special Agent in Charge Brian Washington stated, “Today’s indictments should send a clear message to all health care providers that health care fraud is a federal crime that carries serious consequences and will not be tolerated. The USPS-OIG, along with our law enforcement partners, will continue to aggressively investigate those who engage in fraudulent activities intended to defraud federal benefit programs and the Postal Service.”
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section.
Shut, Signorelli and Joseph will be directed to appear for arraignments next month in federal court in Los Angeles.
Distribution of prescription opioids
Angela Gillespie-Shelton, 48, of Houston, was arrested Wednesday in her hometown after being indicted last week in Los Angeles on federal drug trafficking and money laundering charges. The six-count indictment alleges that Gillespie-Shelton was one of the leaders of a narcotics trafficking ring based in Los Angeles that sold illegal prescriptions for cash and obtained opioids and other drugs that were shipped from Los Angeles to Texas for sale on the black market.
Gillespie-Shelton allegedly laundered over $1 million of the black market cash proceeds through numerous accounts both to conceal the proceeds and to further the narcotics trafficking conspiracy, including by paying rent for the clinic where the illegal prescriptions were written. The indictment further alleges that Gillespie-Shelton paid more than $200,000 to one of the doctors who wrote the illegal prescriptions.
The doctor, Madhu Garg and numerous other co-conspirators have already been convicted in this matter.
The case against Gillespie-Shelton is being investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration, IRS Criminal Investigation, the Los Angeles Police Department, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, the California Department of Justice, and the Texas Department of Public Safety.
The prosecution of Gillespie-Shelton is being handled by Assistant United States Attorney Michael G. Freedman of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force.
SoCal residents charged in compound drug scheme
A group of pharmacists, doctors and marketers worked together to defraud the TRICARE program by submitting more than $40 million in claims for medically unnecessary compounded medications prescriptions, according to an indictment unsealed Wednesday that also alleges AMPLAN, the Amtrak employee health benefit plan, was victimized.
Marketers that participated in the scheme solicited beneficiaries of the health plans through misleading cold calls that promised free compounded medications, as well as through “wellness” programs that included gym memberships, fitness tracking devices and supplements. The marketers used sensitive personal and insurance information gathered from the beneficiaries to generate fraudulent prescriptions for compounded medications.
The marketers paid doctors to authorize prescriptions by misleading the doctors into believing that the marketers operated legitimate telemedicine businesses or by paying the doctors to write the prescriptions.
The six defendants charged in this case are:
Thu Van Le, aka Tony Le, 40, of Yorba Linda, a licensed pharmacist and owner of TC Medical Pharmacy (TCMP) in Pomona and a silent owner of Mars Hill Pharmacy (MHP) in North Carolina;
Chau Nguyen, aka Cindy Le, 36, of Yorba Linda, a licensed pharmacist and co-operator of TCMP;
Truong Giang Le, 31, of Pomona, a co-operator of MHP;
Chan Van Le, aka Kevin Le, 39, of Chino, the manager of MHP;
Nha Le Tuan Truong, 36, of Fountain Valley, a pharmacist who laundered fraudulently obtained proceeds through a charity; and
Jeffery Lawrence, 55, of Los Angeles, the owner of Wellytics Inc., an entity through which he fraudulently solicited insurance information from beneficiaries of AMPLAN.
Through TCMP, the defendants submitted approximately $13 million in claims, and TRICARE paid reimbursements of more than $10 million, according to the indictment. Through MHP, the defendants submitted approximately $28 million in claims, and TRICARE paid more than $21 million. Nha Le Tuan Truong allegedly laundered more than $1 million in Tricare reimbursements through a charitable foundation.
Lawrence allegedly solicited Amtrak employees to participate in a wellness program that Lawrence claimed would be reimbursement by AMPLAN. Several employees gave Lawrence their AMPLAN beneficiary information, which he then used to procure compounded medications prescriptions submitted to TCMP in exchange for more than $600,000 in kickbacks.
“These cases reinforce our commitment and determination to pursue those who would defraud Amtrak’s health care programs and target such vulnerable populations,” said Amtrak Inspector General Tom Howard. “Our agents will continue to hold perpetrators accountable and to protect Amtrak, its employees and their dependents.”
This case is being investigated by the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the FBI, IRS Criminal Investigation, Amtrak’s Office of Inspector General, the Office of Personnel Management’s Office of Inspector General, the Department of Labor’s Office of Inspector General, and the California Department of Insurance.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Mark Aveis, Paul G. Stern and Cassie Palmer of the Major Frauds Section.
The six defendants charged in this case were arrested on Tuesday and each pleaded not guilty at their arraignments in United States District Court. A trial in this case was scheduled for August 21 in Santa Ana.
Medicare Fraud Strike Force Cases
Seven of the cases announced this week were filed by DOJ trial attorneys working in Los Angeles under the aegis of the Medicare Fraud Strike Force in conjunction with the United States Attorney’s Office. Strike Force operations are part of a joint initiative between the Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services to prevent and deter fraud and enforce current anti-fraud laws around the country.
“We will not tolerate criminals stealing precious dollars from our federal health care programs,” said Christian J. Schrank, Special Agent in Charge for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG). “Today’s announcement shows our commitment to working with our state and federal law enforcement partners to swiftly investigate these fraud schemes and bring criminals to justice.”
Strike Force prosecutors unsealed seven criminal cases this week.
Seven people were named in an indictment that alleges multiple health care fraud conspiracies in which the owner of two pharmacies submitted claims to Medicare and Medi-Cal for expensive, brand-name prescription drugs that were never dispensed to patients. Rather, the drugs were provided to co-conspirators to sell to third parties, thereby generating a profit from each prescription drug twice – first from the reimbursement from Medicare or Medi-Cal, and second from the sale of the prescription drugs diverted to the black market.
The defendants named in the indictment are:
Irina Sadovsky, 48, of Woodland Hills, the owner and pharmacist-in-charge of Five Star and Ultimate pharmacies;
Yigal Keren, 36, of Los Angeles, who owns and operates transitional housing centers;
Mikhail Khanukhov, 38, of Sherman Oaks, the manager at Five Star and Ultimate pharmacies;
Shahriar “Michael” Kalantari, 51, of Los Angeles, who was a marketer;
Andrei Sotnikov, 47, of Northridge, a marketer;
Nida Rosales, 62, of Bellflower, a marketer; and
Juan Carlos Enriquez, 31, of Van Nuys, a pharmacy technician and marketer
The indictment alleges that Sadovsky paid kickbacks to marketers in exchange for patient referrals from facilities that treated Medicare and/or Medi-Cal patients. Sadovsky also paid kickbacks directly to Medicare beneficiaries in exchange for filling their prescriptions at Five Star Pharmacy.
Five Star and Ultimate Pharmacies were collectively paid more than $54 million by Medicare and Medi-Cal between January 2014 and September 2017.
This matter is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG, and the case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Armen Pogossian, 69, of Pasadena, the owner of L.A. Nova Pharmacy, was indicted for his role in the submission of $2.9 million in claims to Medicare Part D sponsors for prescription drugs that were never dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries; indeed, they were never even ordered from a wholesaler. The five-count indictment alleges that Pogossian attempted to conceal the fraudulent claims from auditors through the use of fake invoices that purported to show the drugs had been obtained from wholesalers and thus were in the pharmacy’s inventory. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Tamar Tatarian, 37, of Pasadena, the owner of Akhtamar Pharmacy, was named in a three-count indictment that alleges she participated in a scheme that submitted $1.3 million in claims to Medicare Part D sponsors for prescription drugs that were never ordered from wholesalers, and thus never dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries, which Tatarian attempted to conceal from auditors through the use of fake invoices. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Ruben Filian, 33, of Glendale, a physician’s assistant, was indicted for allegedly participating in a $58 million scheme to certify patients to home health care in exchange for illegal kickbacks. Filian is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, four counts of health care fraud, one count of conspiracy to pay and receive kickbacks, five counts of paying and receiving kickbacks, and three counts of money laundering. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Emily Culbertson.
Dr. Stephen Levine, 74, of North Hollywood, a referring physician to home health agencies, was named in a criminal information for his role in the $58 million fraud scheme that also involved Filian. Levine allegedly certified numerous beneficiaries for home health services, without regard to whether the beneficiaries were homebound or whether the services were medically necessary. Levine was paid cash kickbacks for his referrals. Using Levine’s referrals as support, owners and operators at multiple home health agencies billed Medicare for home health services, and Medicare suffered losses of at least $6.5 million. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Emily Culbertson.
Sarkis Manukyan, 76, of Panorama City, and Eduard Terosipyan, 67, of Montebello, both of whom are managers of medical clinics in Los Angeles and Burbank, were indicted in a $1.9 million Medicare fraud involving kickbacks and outpatient physician services not rendered or not medically necessary. This matter is being investigated by the FBI, the California Department of Justice and the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department. This case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Niall O’Donnell.
Lucille Lam, 54, of Burbank, co-owner and managing employee of Bliss Hospice, was charged in a criminal information for allegedly participating in a scheme to pay kickbacks in exchange for Medicare beneficiaries referred to Bliss for hospice services. As part of the scheme, Lam and the co-owners of the hospice falsely categorized the illegal kickbacks as payroll expenses. Based on the referrals that Lam and her co-conspirators obtained through illegal kickbacks, Bliss submitted claims to Medicare and was paid approximately $2.4 million. This matter is being investigated by the FBI, HHS-OIG, and the California Department of Justice. This case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Claire Yan.
Indictments and criminal informations contain allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed to be innocent until and unless proven guilty in court.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
LOS ANGELES – In another massive law enforcement action targeting health care fraud, federal authorities here announced today criminal cases naming a total of 33 defendants – including doctors, pharmacists and an attorney – who have been charged in a wide-range of schemes that collectively attempted to bilk public and private insurance programs out of more than $660 million.
The defendants charged locally are among hundreds of people charged across the United States in cases that cumulatively allege approximately $2 billion in false billings. The nationwide sweep includes charges against 165 doctors, nurses and other licensed medical professionals who allegedly participated in health care fraud schemes
In the Central District of California, most of the defendants were charged for their roles in schemes to defraud health insurance programs such as Medicare. The cases allege health care fraud and kickback schemes involving surgeries, compounded drugs, home health services, Medicare Part D prescription drugs and hospice care.
“Health care fraud schemes cost Americans billions of dollars every year through higher premiums and tax money stolen from public programs, such as Medicare,” said First Assistant United States Attorney Tracy L. Wilkison. “There is an incredible array of scams, some of which involve services that are simply never provided, and some of which use complicated and sophisticated ruses to conceal illegal acts, such as bribes. Today’s announcement of the far-reaching law enforcement actions targeting a wide range of schemes and a large number of defendants demonstrates the excellent work by our law enforcement partners. Together, we will continue the hard work necessary to identify and hold accountable corrupt health care professionals and fraudsters seeking to line their pockets with your hard-earned money.”
"Health care fraud occurs quietly and behind the scenes on a regular basis in Southern California, which makes detecting it very challenging," said Paul Delacourt, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI's Los Angeles Field Office. "The charges we've brought in Los Angeles against physicians and pharmacists are particularly disturbing since these individuals are placed in a position of trust by victims simply trying to navigate a complicated insurance system. A great deal of investigative ability went into each one of these cases, and I'm proud that the work of our agents and law enforcement partners will ebb the flow of the destructive fraud that plagues Southern California.”
9 new defendants charged in Operation “Spinal Cap”
This week, prosecutors unsealed charges against nine new defendants being charged as part of Operation “Spinal Cap,” which targets a long-running health care fraud scheme that generated nearly $1 billion in fraudulent claims to federal government, California state, and private insurers. The scheme – which was spearheaded by Michael Drobot, the former owner of Pacific Hospital in LongBeach – involved more than $40 million in illegal kickbacks paid to doctors and other medical professionals in exchange for referring thousands of patients who received surgeries and other services at Pacific Hospital.
In the cases announced today in Operation Spinal Cap:
Daniel Capen, 68, of Manhattan Beach, an orthopedic surgeon, has agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy and illegal kickback charges. Capen accounted for approximately $142 million of Pacific Hospital’s claims to insurers, on which the hospital was paid approximately $56 million.
Timothy Hunt, 53, of Palos Verdes Estates, another orthopedic surgeon who referred spinal surgery patients to Capen and other doctors, has agreed to plead guilty to a conspiracy charge involving his receipt of illegal kickbacks stemming from various financial relationships with Pacific Hospital and related entities.
George William Hammer, 65, of Palm Desert, the former chief financial officer of the physician management arm of Pacific Hospital, has agreed to plead guilty to tax charges based on the fraudulent classification of illegal kickbacks in hospital-related corporate tax filings.
Lauren Papa, 52, of Tarzana, a chiropractor, has agreed to plead guilty to a conspiracy charge involving her receipt of illegal kickbacks to refer patients to a neurosurgeon with the understanding that the neurosurgeon would perform the surgeries at Pacific Hospital.
Tiffany Rogers, 53, of Palos Verdes Estates, an orthopedic surgeon, was named in an indictment unsealed Wednesday in connection with receiving illegal kickbacks to refer patients for spinal surgeries at Pacific Hospital.
Brian Carrico, 64, of Redondo Beach, a chiropractor – along with Performance Medical & Rehab Center, Inc., which was partially owned by Carrico; and One Accord Management, Inc., which Carrico wholly owned – were charged in connection with the receipt of illegal kickbacks to influence the referral of patients to Pacific Hospital. An indictment unsealed Wednesday alleges that these defendants and other co-conspirators were responsible for approximately $80 million in claims submitted to the federal workers’ compensation program and were paid approximately $56 million in connection with patients that Performance Medical referred to Pacific Hospital.
William Parker, 64, of Redondo Beach, was charged in a separate indictment unsealed on Wednesday in connection with the same kickback scheme involving Carrico and his companies.
With the new cases being filed in Operation Spinal Cap, the fraudulent claims related to this scheme now span a 15-year period and cumulatively total more than $950 million.
The investigation into the spinal surgery kickback scheme is being conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; IRS Criminal Investigation; the California Department of Insurance; and the United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General.
“Public health insurance programs – whether a workers’ compensation program or Medicare – are not a personal pocketbook for criminals seeking to exploit government programs designed to help those who need these plans the most,” stated R. Damon Rowe, Special Agent in Charge of IRS Criminal Investigation’s Los Angeles Field Office. “Taxpayers rightly expect individuals working in the healthcare industry that receive payments from taxpayer-funded programs to scrupulously follow the rules. IRS Criminal Investigation will continue to protect the integrity of public health insurance programs and ensure that doctors, pharmacists and medical service providers who profit from these illicit schemes are held accountable.”
The new cases were filed by Assistant United States Attorney Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section, and will be prosecuted by AUSA Janakiram and Assistant United States Attorneys Joseph T. McNally and Scott D. Tenley of the Santa Ana Branch Office.
The nine new defendants charged in this investigation will be summoned to appear for arraignments in United States District Court in Santa Ana next month.
Investigation into compound prescription kickback scheme at TYY Consulting
An indictment unsealed on Wednesday outlines a wide-ranging conspiracy that was responsible for more than $250 million in fraudulent claims for prescriptions that were filled by compounding pharmacies in Nevada and Southern California. The indictment charges Irena Shut, 41, an attorney who resides in Hidden Hills, with paying kickbacks to two podiatrists to authorize prescriptions written on pre-printed prescription pads designed to maximize insurance payments, regardless of the medical need for an expensive compounded formulary for each “patient.”
The scheme was operated through TYY Consulting, a Las Vegas, Nevada-based outfit that used a nationwide network of marketers to refer prescriptions to TYY-affiliated pharmacies in exchange for kickbacks. As a result of the fraudulent claims, the victim health care plans paid out nearly $175 million. Shut, who worked as a marketer for TYY, received approximately $6.8 million in kickbacks, some of which was, in turn, given to the charged podiatrists.
The charged podiatrists, Domenic Signorelli, 51, of Irvine, and Robert Joseph, 51, of Huntington Beach, along with several other unnamed co-conspirator doctors, allegedly received kickbacks for “writing” the prescriptions. Once the prescriptions were filled, members of the conspiracy submitted fraudulent claims to federal, state and private insurers for the compounded drugs.
The victims of the scheme include the Department of Defense’s TRICARE program – which provides civilian health benefits for U.S Armed Forces military personnel, military retirees, and their dependents – as well as federal and state workers’ compensation programs.
In addition to paying kickbacks to the charged podiatrists and other medical professionals, TYY induced other doctors to participate in the scheme by offering prostitutes, fancy meals, and expensive event tickets, according to the indictment.
This case is being investigated by the FBI and the United State Postal Service, Office of Inspector General (USPS-OIG).
USPS-OIG Special Agent in Charge Brian Washington stated, “Today’s indictments should send a clear message to all health care providers that health care fraud is a federal crime that carries serious consequences and will not be tolerated. The USPS-OIG, along with our law enforcement partners, will continue to aggressively investigate those who engage in fraudulent activities intended to defraud federal benefit programs and the Postal Service.”
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section.
Shut, Signorelli and Joseph will be directed to appear for arraignments next month in federal court in Los Angeles.
Distribution of prescription opioids
Angela Gillespie-Shelton, 48, of Houston, was arrested Wednesday in her hometown after being indicted last week in Los Angeles on federal drug trafficking and money laundering charges. The six-count indictment alleges that Gillespie-Shelton was one of the leaders of a narcotics trafficking ring based in Los Angeles that sold illegal prescriptions for cash and obtained opioids and other drugs that were shipped from Los Angeles to Texas for sale on the black market.
Gillespie-Shelton allegedly laundered over $1 million of the black market cash proceeds through numerous accounts both to conceal the proceeds and to further the narcotics trafficking conspiracy, including by paying rent for the clinic where the illegal prescriptions were written. The indictment further alleges that Gillespie-Shelton paid more than $200,000 to one of the doctors who wrote the illegal prescriptions.
The doctor, Madhu Garg and numerous other co-conspirators have already been convicted in this matter.
The case against Gillespie-Shelton is being investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration, IRS Criminal Investigation, the Los Angeles Police Department, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, the California Department of Justice, and the Texas Department of Public Safety.
The prosecution of Gillespie-Shelton is being handled by Assistant United States Attorney Michael G. Freedman of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force.
SoCal residents charged in compound drug scheme
A group of pharmacists, doctors and marketers worked together to defraud the TRICARE program by submitting more than $40 million in claims for medically unnecessary compounded medications prescriptions, according to an indictment unsealed Wednesday that also alleges AMPLAN, the Amtrak employee health benefit plan, was victimized.
Marketers that participated in the scheme solicited beneficiaries of the health plans through misleading cold calls that promised free compounded medications, as well as through “wellness” programs that included gym memberships, fitness tracking devices and supplements. The marketers used sensitive personal and insurance information gathered from the beneficiaries to generate fraudulent prescriptions for compounded medications.
The marketers paid doctors to authorize prescriptions by misleading the doctors into believing that the marketers operated legitimate telemedicine businesses or by paying the doctors to write the prescriptions.
The six defendants charged in this case are:
Thu Van Le, aka Tony Le, 40, of Yorba Linda, a licensed pharmacist and owner of TC Medical Pharmacy (TCMP) in Pomona and a silent owner of Mars Hill Pharmacy (MHP) in North Carolina;
Chau Nguyen, aka Cindy Le, 36, of Yorba Linda, a licensed pharmacist and co-operator of TCMP;
Truong Giang Le, 31, of Pomona, a co-operator of MHP;
Chan Van Le, aka Kevin Le, 39, of Chino, the manager of MHP;
Nha Le Tuan Truong, 36, of Fountain Valley, a pharmacist who laundered fraudulently obtained proceeds through a charity; and
Jeffery Lawrence, 55, of Los Angeles, the owner of Wellytics Inc., an entity through which he fraudulently solicited insurance information from beneficiaries of AMPLAN.
Through TCMP, the defendants submitted approximately $13 million in claims, and TRICARE paid reimbursements of more than $10 million, according to the indictment. Through MHP, the defendants submitted approximately $28 million in claims, and TRICARE paid more than $21 million. Nha Le Tuan Truong allegedly laundered more than $1 million in Tricare reimbursements through a charitable foundation.
Lawrence allegedly solicited Amtrak employees to participate in a wellness program that Lawrence claimed would be reimbursement by AMPLAN. Several employees gave Lawrence their AMPLAN beneficiary information, which he then used to procure compounded medications prescriptions submitted to TCMP in exchange for more than $600,000 in kickbacks.
“These cases reinforce our commitment and determination to pursue those who would defraud Amtrak’s health care programs and target such vulnerable populations,” said Amtrak Inspector General Tom Howard. “Our agents will continue to hold perpetrators accountable and to protect Amtrak, its employees and their dependents.”
This case is being investigated by the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the FBI, IRS Criminal Investigation, Amtrak’s Office of Inspector General, the Office of Personnel Management’s Office of Inspector General, the Department of Labor’s Office of Inspector General, and the California Department of Insurance.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Mark Aveis, Paul G. Stern and Cassie Palmer of the Major Frauds Section.
The six defendants charged in this case were arrested on Tuesday and each pleaded not guilty at their arraignments in United States District Court. A trial in this case was scheduled for August 21 in Santa Ana.
Medicare Fraud Strike Force Cases
Seven of the cases announced this week were filed by DOJ trial attorneys working in Los Angeles under the aegis of the Medicare Fraud Strike Force in conjunction with the United States Attorney’s Office. Strike Force operations are part of a joint initiative between the Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services to prevent and deter fraud and enforce current anti-fraud laws around the country.
“We will not tolerate criminals stealing precious dollars from our federal health care programs,” said Christian J. Schrank, Special Agent in Charge for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG). “Today’s announcement shows our commitment to working with our state and federal law enforcement partners to swiftly investigate these fraud schemes and bring criminals to justice.”
Strike Force prosecutors unsealed seven criminal cases this week.
Seven people were named in an indictment that alleges multiple health care fraud conspiracies in which the owner of two pharmacies submitted claims to Medicare and Medi-Cal for expensive, brand-name prescription drugs that were never dispensed to patients. Rather, the drugs were provided to co-conspirators to sell to third parties, thereby generating a profit from each prescription drug twice – first from the reimbursement from Medicare or Medi-Cal, and second from the sale of the prescription drugs diverted to the black market.
The defendants named in the indictment are:
Irina Sadovsky, 48, of Woodland Hills, the owner and pharmacist-in-charge of Five Star and Ultimate pharmacies;
Yigal Keren, 36, of Los Angeles, who owns and operates transitional housing centers;
Mikhail Khanukhov, 38, of Sherman Oaks, the manager at Five Star and Ultimate pharmacies;
Shahriar “Michael” Kalantari, 51, of Los Angeles, who was a marketer;
Andrei Sotnikov, 47, of Northridge, a marketer;
Nida Rosales, 62, of Bellflower, a marketer; and
Juan Carlos Enriquez, 31, of Van Nuys, a pharmacy technician and marketer
The indictment alleges that Sadovsky paid kickbacks to marketers in exchange for patient referrals from facilities that treated Medicare and/or Medi-Cal patients. Sadovsky also paid kickbacks directly to Medicare beneficiaries in exchange for filling their prescriptions at Five Star Pharmacy.
Five Star and Ultimate Pharmacies were collectively paid more than $54 million by Medicare and Medi-Cal between January 2014 and September 2017.
This matter is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG, and the case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Armen Pogossian, 69, of Pasadena, the owner of L.A. Nova Pharmacy, was indicted for his role in the submission of $2.9 million in claims to Medicare Part D sponsors for prescription drugs that were never dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries; indeed, they were never even ordered from a wholesaler. The five-count indictment alleges that Pogossian attempted to conceal the fraudulent claims from auditors through the use of fake invoices that purported to show the drugs had been obtained from wholesalers and thus were in the pharmacy’s inventory. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Tamar Tatarian, 37, of Pasadena, the owner of Akhtamar Pharmacy, was named in a three-count indictment that alleges she participated in a scheme that submitted $1.3 million in claims to Medicare Part D sponsors for prescription drugs that were never ordered from wholesalers, and thus never dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries, which Tatarian attempted to conceal from auditors through the use of fake invoices. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Ruben Filian, 33, of Glendale, a physician’s assistant, was indicted for allegedly participating in a $58 million scheme to certify patients to home health care in exchange for illegal kickbacks. Filian is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, four counts of health care fraud, one count of conspiracy to pay and receive kickbacks, five counts of paying and receiving kickbacks, and three counts of money laundering. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Emily Culbertson.
Dr. Stephen Levine, 74, of North Hollywood, a referring physician to home health agencies, was named in a criminal information for his role in the $58 million fraud scheme that also involved Filian. Levine allegedly certified numerous beneficiaries for home health services, without regard to whether the beneficiaries were homebound or whether the services were medically necessary. Levine was paid cash kickbacks for his referrals. Using Levine’s referrals as support, owners and operators at multiple home health agencies billed Medicare for home health services, and Medicare suffered losses of at least $6.5 million. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Emily Culbertson.
Sarkis Manukyan, 76, of Panorama City, and Eduard Terosipyan, 67, of Montebello, both of whom are managers of medical clinics in Los Angeles and Burbank, were indicted in a $1.9 million Medicare fraud involving kickbacks and outpatient physician services not rendered or not medically necessary. This matter is being investigated by the FBI, the California Department of Justice and the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department. This case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Niall O’Donnell.
Lucille Lam, 54, of Burbank, co-owner and managing employee of Bliss Hospice, was charged in a criminal information for allegedly participating in a scheme to pay kickbacks in exchange for Medicare beneficiaries referred to Bliss for hospice services. As part of the scheme, Lam and the co-owners of the hospice falsely categorized the illegal kickbacks as payroll expenses. Based on the referrals that Lam and her co-conspirators obtained through illegal kickbacks, Bliss submitted claims to Medicare and was paid approximately $2.4 million. This matter is being investigated by the FBI, HHS-OIG, and the California Department of Justice. This case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Claire Yan.
Indictments and criminal informations contain allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed to be innocent until and unless proven guilty in court.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
LOS ANGELES – In another massive law enforcement action targeting health care fraud, federal authorities here announced today criminal cases naming a total of 33 defendants – including doctors, pharmacists and an attorney – who have been charged in a wide-range of schemes that collectively attempted to bilk public and private insurance programs out of more than $660 million.
The defendants charged locally are among hundreds of people charged across the United States in cases that cumulatively allege approximately $2 billion in false billings. The nationwide sweep includes charges against 165 doctors, nurses and other licensed medical professionals who allegedly participated in health care fraud schemes
In the Central District of California, most of the defendants were charged for their roles in schemes to defraud health insurance programs such as Medicare. The cases allege health care fraud and kickback schemes involving surgeries, compounded drugs, home health services, Medicare Part D prescription drugs and hospice care.
“Health care fraud schemes cost Americans billions of dollars every year through higher premiums and tax money stolen from public programs, such as Medicare,” said First Assistant United States Attorney Tracy L. Wilkison. “There is an incredible array of scams, some of which involve services that are simply never provided, and some of which use complicated and sophisticated ruses to conceal illegal acts, such as bribes. Today’s announcement of the far-reaching law enforcement actions targeting a wide range of schemes and a large number of defendants demonstrates the excellent work by our law enforcement partners. Together, we will continue the hard work necessary to identify and hold accountable corrupt health care professionals and fraudsters seeking to line their pockets with your hard-earned money.”
"Health care fraud occurs quietly and behind the scenes on a regular basis in Southern California, which makes detecting it very challenging," said Paul Delacourt, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI's Los Angeles Field Office. "The charges we've brought in Los Angeles against physicians and pharmacists are particularly disturbing since these individuals are placed in a position of trust by victims simply trying to navigate a complicated insurance system. A great deal of investigative ability went into each one of these cases, and I'm proud that the work of our agents and law enforcement partners will ebb the flow of the destructive fraud that plagues Southern California.”
9 new defendants charged in Operation “Spinal Cap”
This week, prosecutors unsealed charges against nine new defendants being charged as part of Operation “Spinal Cap,” which targets a long-running health care fraud scheme that generated nearly $1 billion in fraudulent claims to federal government, California state, and private insurers. The scheme – which was spearheaded by Michael Drobot, the former owner of Pacific Hospital in LongBeach – involved more than $40 million in illegal kickbacks paid to doctors and other medical professionals in exchange for referring thousands of patients who received surgeries and other services at Pacific Hospital.
In the cases announced today in Operation Spinal Cap:
Daniel Capen, 68, of Manhattan Beach, an orthopedic surgeon, has agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy and illegal kickback charges. Capen accounted for approximately $142 million of Pacific Hospital’s claims to insurers, on which the hospital was paid approximately $56 million.
Timothy Hunt, 53, of Palos Verdes Estates, another orthopedic surgeon who referred spinal surgery patients to Capen and other doctors, has agreed to plead guilty to a conspiracy charge involving his receipt of illegal kickbacks stemming from various financial relationships with Pacific Hospital and related entities.
George William Hammer, 65, of Palm Desert, the former chief financial officer of the physician management arm of Pacific Hospital, has agreed to plead guilty to tax charges based on the fraudulent classification of illegal kickbacks in hospital-related corporate tax filings.
Lauren Papa, 52, of Tarzana, a chiropractor, has agreed to plead guilty to a conspiracy charge involving her receipt of illegal kickbacks to refer patients to a neurosurgeon with the understanding that the neurosurgeon would perform the surgeries at Pacific Hospital.
Tiffany Rogers, 53, of Palos Verdes Estates, an orthopedic surgeon, was named in an indictment unsealed Wednesday in connection with receiving illegal kickbacks to refer patients for spinal surgeries at Pacific Hospital.
Brian Carrico, 64, of Redondo Beach, a chiropractor – along with Performance Medical & Rehab Center, Inc., which was partially owned by Carrico; and One Accord Management, Inc., which Carrico wholly owned – were charged in connection with the receipt of illegal kickbacks to influence the referral of patients to Pacific Hospital. An indictment unsealed Wednesday alleges that these defendants and other co-conspirators were responsible for approximately $80 million in claims submitted to the federal workers’ compensation program and were paid approximately $56 million in connection with patients that Performance Medical referred to Pacific Hospital.
William Parker, 64, of Redondo Beach, was charged in a separate indictment unsealed on Wednesday in connection with the same kickback scheme involving Carrico and his companies.
With the new cases being filed in Operation Spinal Cap, the fraudulent claims related to this scheme now span a 15-year period and cumulatively total more than $950 million.
The investigation into the spinal surgery kickback scheme is being conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; IRS Criminal Investigation; the California Department of Insurance; and the United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General.
“Public health insurance programs – whether a workers’ compensation program or Medicare – are not a personal pocketbook for criminals seeking to exploit government programs designed to help those who need these plans the most,” stated R. Damon Rowe, Special Agent in Charge of IRS Criminal Investigation’s Los Angeles Field Office. “Taxpayers rightly expect individuals working in the healthcare industry that receive payments from taxpayer-funded programs to scrupulously follow the rules. IRS Criminal Investigation will continue to protect the integrity of public health insurance programs and ensure that doctors, pharmacists and medical service providers who profit from these illicit schemes are held accountable.”
The new cases were filed by Assistant United States Attorney Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section, and will be prosecuted by AUSA Janakiram and Assistant United States Attorneys Joseph T. McNally and Scott D. Tenley of the Santa Ana Branch Office.
The nine new defendants charged in this investigation will be summoned to appear for arraignments in United States District Court in Santa Ana next month.
Investigation into compound prescription kickback scheme at TYY Consulting
An indictment unsealed on Wednesday outlines a wide-ranging conspiracy that was responsible for more than $250 million in fraudulent claims for prescriptions that were filled by compounding pharmacies in Nevada and Southern California. The indictment charges Irena Shut, 41, an attorney who resides in Hidden Hills, with paying kickbacks to two podiatrists to authorize prescriptions written on pre-printed prescription pads designed to maximize insurance payments, regardless of the medical need for an expensive compounded formulary for each “patient.”
The scheme was operated through TYY Consulting, a Las Vegas, Nevada-based outfit that used a nationwide network of marketers to refer prescriptions to TYY-affiliated pharmacies in exchange for kickbacks. As a result of the fraudulent claims, the victim health care plans paid out nearly $175 million. Shut, who worked as a marketer for TYY, received approximately $6.8 million in kickbacks, some of which was, in turn, given to the charged podiatrists.
The charged podiatrists, Domenic Signorelli, 51, of Irvine, and Robert Joseph, 51, of Huntington Beach, along with several other unnamed co-conspirator doctors, allegedly received kickbacks for “writing” the prescriptions. Once the prescriptions were filled, members of the conspiracy submitted fraudulent claims to federal, state and private insurers for the compounded drugs.
The victims of the scheme include the Department of Defense’s TRICARE program – which provides civilian health benefits for U.S Armed Forces military personnel, military retirees, and their dependents – as well as federal and state workers’ compensation programs.
In addition to paying kickbacks to the charged podiatrists and other medical professionals, TYY induced other doctors to participate in the scheme by offering prostitutes, fancy meals, and expensive event tickets, according to the indictment.
This case is being investigated by the FBI and the United State Postal Service, Office of Inspector General (USPS-OIG).
USPS-OIG Special Agent in Charge Brian Washington stated, “Today’s indictments should send a clear message to all health care providers that health care fraud is a federal crime that carries serious consequences and will not be tolerated. The USPS-OIG, along with our law enforcement partners, will continue to aggressively investigate those who engage in fraudulent activities intended to defraud federal benefit programs and the Postal Service.”
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section.
Shut, Signorelli and Joseph will be directed to appear for arraignments next month in federal court in Los Angeles.
Distribution of prescription opioids
Angela Gillespie-Shelton, 48, of Houston, was arrested Wednesday in her hometown after being indicted last week in Los Angeles on federal drug trafficking and money laundering charges. The six-count indictment alleges that Gillespie-Shelton was one of the leaders of a narcotics trafficking ring based in Los Angeles that sold illegal prescriptions for cash and obtained opioids and other drugs that were shipped from Los Angeles to Texas for sale on the black market.
Gillespie-Shelton allegedly laundered over $1 million of the black market cash proceeds through numerous accounts both to conceal the proceeds and to further the narcotics trafficking conspiracy, including by paying rent for the clinic where the illegal prescriptions were written. The indictment further alleges that Gillespie-Shelton paid more than $200,000 to one of the doctors who wrote the illegal prescriptions.
The doctor, Madhu Garg and numerous other co-conspirators have already been convicted in this matter.
The case against Gillespie-Shelton is being investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration, IRS Criminal Investigation, the Los Angeles Police Department, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, the California Department of Justice, and the Texas Department of Public Safety.
The prosecution of Gillespie-Shelton is being handled by Assistant United States Attorney Michael G. Freedman of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force.
SoCal residents charged in compound drug scheme
A group of pharmacists, doctors and marketers worked together to defraud the TRICARE program by submitting more than $40 million in claims for medically unnecessary compounded medications prescriptions, according to an indictment unsealed Wednesday that also alleges AMPLAN, the Amtrak employee health benefit plan, was victimized.
Marketers that participated in the scheme solicited beneficiaries of the health plans through misleading cold calls that promised free compounded medications, as well as through “wellness” programs that included gym memberships, fitness tracking devices and supplements. The marketers used sensitive personal and insurance information gathered from the beneficiaries to generate fraudulent prescriptions for compounded medications.
The marketers paid doctors to authorize prescriptions by misleading the doctors into believing that the marketers operated legitimate telemedicine businesses or by paying the doctors to write the prescriptions.
The six defendants charged in this case are:
Thu Van Le, aka Tony Le, 40, of Yorba Linda, a licensed pharmacist and owner of TC Medical Pharmacy (TCMP) in Pomona and a silent owner of Mars Hill Pharmacy (MHP) in North Carolina;
Chau Nguyen, aka Cindy Le, 36, of Yorba Linda, a licensed pharmacist and co-operator of TCMP;
Truong Giang Le, 31, of Pomona, a co-operator of MHP;
Chan Van Le, aka Kevin Le, 39, of Chino, the manager of MHP;
Nha Le Tuan Truong, 36, of Fountain Valley, a pharmacist who laundered fraudulently obtained proceeds through a charity; and
Jeffery Lawrence, 55, of Los Angeles, the owner of Wellytics Inc., an entity through which he fraudulently solicited insurance information from beneficiaries of AMPLAN.
Through TCMP, the defendants submitted approximately $13 million in claims, and TRICARE paid reimbursements of more than $10 million, according to the indictment. Through MHP, the defendants submitted approximately $28 million in claims, and TRICARE paid more than $21 million. Nha Le Tuan Truong allegedly laundered more than $1 million in Tricare reimbursements through a charitable foundation.
Lawrence allegedly solicited Amtrak employees to participate in a wellness program that Lawrence claimed would be reimbursement by AMPLAN. Several employees gave Lawrence their AMPLAN beneficiary information, which he then used to procure compounded medications prescriptions submitted to TCMP in exchange for more than $600,000 in kickbacks.
“These cases reinforce our commitment and determination to pursue those who would defraud Amtrak’s health care programs and target such vulnerable populations,” said Amtrak Inspector General Tom Howard. “Our agents will continue to hold perpetrators accountable and to protect Amtrak, its employees and their dependents.”
This case is being investigated by the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the FBI, IRS Criminal Investigation, Amtrak’s Office of Inspector General, the Office of Personnel Management’s Office of Inspector General, the Department of Labor’s Office of Inspector General, and the California Department of Insurance.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Mark Aveis, Paul G. Stern and Cassie Palmer of the Major Frauds Section.
The six defendants charged in this case were arrested on Tuesday and each pleaded not guilty at their arraignments in United States District Court. A trial in this case was scheduled for August 21 in Santa Ana.
Medicare Fraud Strike Force Cases
Seven of the cases announced this week were filed by DOJ trial attorneys working in Los Angeles under the aegis of the Medicare Fraud Strike Force in conjunction with the United States Attorney’s Office. Strike Force operations are part of a joint initiative between the Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services to prevent and deter fraud and enforce current anti-fraud laws around the country.
“We will not tolerate criminals stealing precious dollars from our federal health care programs,” said Christian J. Schrank, Special Agent in Charge for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG). “Today’s announcement shows our commitment to working with our state and federal law enforcement partners to swiftly investigate these fraud schemes and bring criminals to justice.”
Strike Force prosecutors unsealed seven criminal cases this week.
Seven people were named in an indictment that alleges multiple health care fraud conspiracies in which the owner of two pharmacies submitted claims to Medicare and Medi-Cal for expensive, brand-name prescription drugs that were never dispensed to patients. Rather, the drugs were provided to co-conspirators to sell to third parties, thereby generating a profit from each prescription drug twice – first from the reimbursement from Medicare or Medi-Cal, and second from the sale of the prescription drugs diverted to the black market.
The defendants named in the indictment are:
Irina Sadovsky, 48, of Woodland Hills, the owner and pharmacist-in-charge of Five Star and Ultimate pharmacies;
Yigal Keren, 36, of Los Angeles, who owns and operates transitional housing centers;
Mikhail Khanukhov, 38, of Sherman Oaks, the manager at Five Star and Ultimate pharmacies;
Shahriar “Michael” Kalantari, 51, of Los Angeles, who was a marketer;
Andrei Sotnikov, 47, of Northridge, a marketer;
Nida Rosales, 62, of Bellflower, a marketer; and
Juan Carlos Enriquez, 31, of Van Nuys, a pharmacy technician and marketer
The indictment alleges that Sadovsky paid kickbacks to marketers in exchange for patient referrals from facilities that treated Medicare and/or Medi-Cal patients. Sadovsky also paid kickbacks directly to Medicare beneficiaries in exchange for filling their prescriptions at Five Star Pharmacy.
Five Star and Ultimate Pharmacies were collectively paid more than $54 million by Medicare and Medi-Cal between January 2014 and September 2017.
This matter is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG, and the case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Armen Pogossian, 69, of Pasadena, the owner of L.A. Nova Pharmacy, was indicted for his role in the submission of $2.9 million in claims to Medicare Part D sponsors for prescription drugs that were never dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries; indeed, they were never even ordered from a wholesaler. The five-count indictment alleges that Pogossian attempted to conceal the fraudulent claims from auditors through the use of fake invoices that purported to show the drugs had been obtained from wholesalers and thus were in the pharmacy’s inventory. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Tamar Tatarian, 37, of Pasadena, the owner of Akhtamar Pharmacy, was named in a three-count indictment that alleges she participated in a scheme that submitted $1.3 million in claims to Medicare Part D sponsors for prescription drugs that were never ordered from wholesalers, and thus never dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries, which Tatarian attempted to conceal from auditors through the use of fake invoices. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Ruben Filian, 33, of Glendale, a physician’s assistant, was indicted for allegedly participating in a $58 million scheme to certify patients to home health care in exchange for illegal kickbacks. Filian is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, four counts of health care fraud, one count of conspiracy to pay and receive kickbacks, five counts of paying and receiving kickbacks, and three counts of money laundering. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Emily Culbertson.
Dr. Stephen Levine, 74, of North Hollywood, a referring physician to home health agencies, was named in a criminal information for his role in the $58 million fraud scheme that also involved Filian. Levine allegedly certified numerous beneficiaries for home health services, without regard to whether the beneficiaries were homebound or whether the services were medically necessary. Levine was paid cash kickbacks for his referrals. Using Levine’s referrals as support, owners and operators at multiple home health agencies billed Medicare for home health services, and Medicare suffered losses of at least $6.5 million. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Emily Culbertson.
Sarkis Manukyan, 76, of Panorama City, and Eduard Terosipyan, 67, of Montebello, both of whom are managers of medical clinics in Los Angeles and Burbank, were indicted in a $1.9 million Medicare fraud involving kickbacks and outpatient physician services not rendered or not medically necessary. This matter is being investigated by the FBI, the California Department of Justice and the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department. This case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Niall O’Donnell.
Lucille Lam, 54, of Burbank, co-owner and managing employee of Bliss Hospice, was charged in a criminal information for allegedly participating in a scheme to pay kickbacks in exchange for Medicare beneficiaries referred to Bliss for hospice services. As part of the scheme, Lam and the co-owners of the hospice falsely categorized the illegal kickbacks as payroll expenses. Based on the referrals that Lam and her co-conspirators obtained through illegal kickbacks, Bliss submitted claims to Medicare and was paid approximately $2.4 million. This matter is being investigated by the FBI, HHS-OIG, and the California Department of Justice. This case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Claire Yan.
Indictments and criminal informations contain allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed to be innocent until and unless proven guilty in court.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
LOS ANGELES – In another massive law enforcement action targeting health care fraud, federal authorities here announced today criminal cases naming a total of 33 defendants – including doctors, pharmacists and an attorney – who have been charged in a wide-range of schemes that collectively attempted to bilk public and private insurance programs out of more than $660 million.
The defendants charged locally are among hundreds of people charged across the United States in cases that cumulatively allege approximately $2 billion in false billings. The nationwide sweep includes charges against 165 doctors, nurses and other licensed medical professionals who allegedly participated in health care fraud schemes
In the Central District of California, most of the defendants were charged for their roles in schemes to defraud health insurance programs such as Medicare. The cases allege health care fraud and kickback schemes involving surgeries, compounded drugs, home health services, Medicare Part D prescription drugs and hospice care.
“Health care fraud schemes cost Americans billions of dollars every year through higher premiums and tax money stolen from public programs, such as Medicare,” said First Assistant United States Attorney Tracy L. Wilkison. “There is an incredible array of scams, some of which involve services that are simply never provided, and some of which use complicated and sophisticated ruses to conceal illegal acts, such as bribes. Today’s announcement of the far-reaching law enforcement actions targeting a wide range of schemes and a large number of defendants demonstrates the excellent work by our law enforcement partners. Together, we will continue the hard work necessary to identify and hold accountable corrupt health care professionals and fraudsters seeking to line their pockets with your hard-earned money.”
"Health care fraud occurs quietly and behind the scenes on a regular basis in Southern California, which makes detecting it very challenging," said Paul Delacourt, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI's Los Angeles Field Office. "The charges we've brought in Los Angeles against physicians and pharmacists are particularly disturbing since these individuals are placed in a position of trust by victims simply trying to navigate a complicated insurance system. A great deal of investigative ability went into each one of these cases, and I'm proud that the work of our agents and law enforcement partners will ebb the flow of the destructive fraud that plagues Southern California.”
9 new defendants charged in Operation “Spinal Cap”
This week, prosecutors unsealed charges against nine new defendants being charged as part of Operation “Spinal Cap,” which targets a long-running health care fraud scheme that generated nearly $1 billion in fraudulent claims to federal government, California state, and private insurers. The scheme – which was spearheaded by Michael Drobot, the former owner of Pacific Hospital in LongBeach – involved more than $40 million in illegal kickbacks paid to doctors and other medical professionals in exchange for referring thousands of patients who received surgeries and other services at Pacific Hospital.
In the cases announced today in Operation Spinal Cap:
Daniel Capen, 68, of Manhattan Beach, an orthopedic surgeon, has agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy and illegal kickback charges. Capen accounted for approximately $142 million of Pacific Hospital’s claims to insurers, on which the hospital was paid approximately $56 million.
Timothy Hunt, 53, of Palos Verdes Estates, another orthopedic surgeon who referred spinal surgery patients to Capen and other doctors, has agreed to plead guilty to a conspiracy charge involving his receipt of illegal kickbacks stemming from various financial relationships with Pacific Hospital and related entities.
George William Hammer, 65, of Palm Desert, the former chief financial officer of the physician management arm of Pacific Hospital, has agreed to plead guilty to tax charges based on the fraudulent classification of illegal kickbacks in hospital-related corporate tax filings.
Lauren Papa, 52, of Tarzana, a chiropractor, has agreed to plead guilty to a conspiracy charge involving her receipt of illegal kickbacks to refer patients to a neurosurgeon with the understanding that the neurosurgeon would perform the surgeries at Pacific Hospital.
Tiffany Rogers, 53, of Palos Verdes Estates, an orthopedic surgeon, was named in an indictment unsealed Wednesday in connection with receiving illegal kickbacks to refer patients for spinal surgeries at Pacific Hospital.
Brian Carrico, 64, of Redondo Beach, a chiropractor – along with Performance Medical & Rehab Center, Inc., which was partially owned by Carrico; and One Accord Management, Inc., which Carrico wholly owned – were charged in connection with the receipt of illegal kickbacks to influence the referral of patients to Pacific Hospital. An indictment unsealed Wednesday alleges that these defendants and other co-conspirators were responsible for approximately $80 million in claims submitted to the federal workers’ compensation program and were paid approximately $56 million in connection with patients that Performance Medical referred to Pacific Hospital.
William Parker, 64, of Redondo Beach, was charged in a separate indictment unsealed on Wednesday in connection with the same kickback scheme involving Carrico and his companies.
With the new cases being filed in Operation Spinal Cap, the fraudulent claims related to this scheme now span a 15-year period and cumulatively total more than $950 million.
The investigation into the spinal surgery kickback scheme is being conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; IRS Criminal Investigation; the California Department of Insurance; and the United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General.
“Public health insurance programs – whether a workers’ compensation program or Medicare – are not a personal pocketbook for criminals seeking to exploit government programs designed to help those who need these plans the most,” stated R. Damon Rowe, Special Agent in Charge of IRS Criminal Investigation’s Los Angeles Field Office. “Taxpayers rightly expect individuals working in the healthcare industry that receive payments from taxpayer-funded programs to scrupulously follow the rules. IRS Criminal Investigation will continue to protect the integrity of public health insurance programs and ensure that doctors, pharmacists and medical service providers who profit from these illicit schemes are held accountable.”
The new cases were filed by Assistant United States Attorney Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section, and will be prosecuted by AUSA Janakiram and Assistant United States Attorneys Joseph T. McNally and Scott D. Tenley of the Santa Ana Branch Office.
The nine new defendants charged in this investigation will be summoned to appear for arraignments in United States District Court in Santa Ana next month.
Investigation into compound prescription kickback scheme at TYY Consulting
An indictment unsealed on Wednesday outlines a wide-ranging conspiracy that was responsible for more than $250 million in fraudulent claims for prescriptions that were filled by compounding pharmacies in Nevada and Southern California. The indictment charges Irena Shut, 41, an attorney who resides in Hidden Hills, with paying kickbacks to two podiatrists to authorize prescriptions written on pre-printed prescription pads designed to maximize insurance payments, regardless of the medical need for an expensive compounded formulary for each “patient.”
The scheme was operated through TYY Consulting, a Las Vegas, Nevada-based outfit that used a nationwide network of marketers to refer prescriptions to TYY-affiliated pharmacies in exchange for kickbacks. As a result of the fraudulent claims, the victim health care plans paid out nearly $175 million. Shut, who worked as a marketer for TYY, received approximately $6.8 million in kickbacks, some of which was, in turn, given to the charged podiatrists.
The charged podiatrists, Domenic Signorelli, 51, of Irvine, and Robert Joseph, 51, of Huntington Beach, along with several other unnamed co-conspirator doctors, allegedly received kickbacks for “writing” the prescriptions. Once the prescriptions were filled, members of the conspiracy submitted fraudulent claims to federal, state and private insurers for the compounded drugs.
The victims of the scheme include the Department of Defense’s TRICARE program – which provides civilian health benefits for U.S Armed Forces military personnel, military retirees, and their dependents – as well as federal and state workers’ compensation programs.
In addition to paying kickbacks to the charged podiatrists and other medical professionals, TYY induced other doctors to participate in the scheme by offering prostitutes, fancy meals, and expensive event tickets, according to the indictment.
This case is being investigated by the FBI and the United State Postal Service, Office of Inspector General (USPS-OIG).
USPS-OIG Special Agent in Charge Brian Washington stated, “Today’s indictments should send a clear message to all health care providers that health care fraud is a federal crime that carries serious consequences and will not be tolerated. The USPS-OIG, along with our law enforcement partners, will continue to aggressively investigate those who engage in fraudulent activities intended to defraud federal benefit programs and the Postal Service.”
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section.
Shut, Signorelli and Joseph will be directed to appear for arraignments next month in federal court in Los Angeles.
Distribution of prescription opioids
Angela Gillespie-Shelton, 48, of Houston, was arrested Wednesday in her hometown after being indicted last week in Los Angeles on federal drug trafficking and money laundering charges. The six-count indictment alleges that Gillespie-Shelton was one of the leaders of a narcotics trafficking ring based in Los Angeles that sold illegal prescriptions for cash and obtained opioids and other drugs that were shipped from Los Angeles to Texas for sale on the black market.
Gillespie-Shelton allegedly laundered over $1 million of the black market cash proceeds through numerous accounts both to conceal the proceeds and to further the narcotics trafficking conspiracy, including by paying rent for the clinic where the illegal prescriptions were written. The indictment further alleges that Gillespie-Shelton paid more than $200,000 to one of the doctors who wrote the illegal prescriptions.
The doctor, Madhu Garg and numerous other co-conspirators have already been convicted in this matter.
The case against Gillespie-Shelton is being investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration, IRS Criminal Investigation, the Los Angeles Police Department, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, the California Department of Justice, and the Texas Department of Public Safety.
The prosecution of Gillespie-Shelton is being handled by Assistant United States Attorney Michael G. Freedman of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force.
SoCal residents charged in compound drug scheme
A group of pharmacists, doctors and marketers worked together to defraud the TRICARE program by submitting more than $40 million in claims for medically unnecessary compounded medications prescriptions, according to an indictment unsealed Wednesday that also alleges AMPLAN, the Amtrak employee health benefit plan, was victimized.
Marketers that participated in the scheme solicited beneficiaries of the health plans through misleading cold calls that promised free compounded medications, as well as through “wellness” programs that included gym memberships, fitness tracking devices and supplements. The marketers used sensitive personal and insurance information gathered from the beneficiaries to generate fraudulent prescriptions for compounded medications.
The marketers paid doctors to authorize prescriptions by misleading the doctors into believing that the marketers operated legitimate telemedicine businesses or by paying the doctors to write the prescriptions.
The six defendants charged in this case are:
Thu Van Le, aka Tony Le, 40, of Yorba Linda, a licensed pharmacist and owner of TC Medical Pharmacy (TCMP) in Pomona and a silent owner of Mars Hill Pharmacy (MHP) in North Carolina;
Chau Nguyen, aka Cindy Le, 36, of Yorba Linda, a licensed pharmacist and co-operator of TCMP;
Truong Giang Le, 31, of Pomona, a co-operator of MHP;
Chan Van Le, aka Kevin Le, 39, of Chino, the manager of MHP;
Nha Le Tuan Truong, 36, of Fountain Valley, a pharmacist who laundered fraudulently obtained proceeds through a charity; and
Jeffery Lawrence, 55, of Los Angeles, the owner of Wellytics Inc., an entity through which he fraudulently solicited insurance information from beneficiaries of AMPLAN.
Through TCMP, the defendants submitted approximately $13 million in claims, and TRICARE paid reimbursements of more than $10 million, according to the indictment. Through MHP, the defendants submitted approximately $28 million in claims, and TRICARE paid more than $21 million. Nha Le Tuan Truong allegedly laundered more than $1 million in Tricare reimbursements through a charitable foundation.
Lawrence allegedly solicited Amtrak employees to participate in a wellness program that Lawrence claimed would be reimbursement by AMPLAN. Several employees gave Lawrence their AMPLAN beneficiary information, which he then used to procure compounded medications prescriptions submitted to TCMP in exchange for more than $600,000 in kickbacks.
“These cases reinforce our commitment and determination to pursue those who would defraud Amtrak’s health care programs and target such vulnerable populations,” said Amtrak Inspector General Tom Howard. “Our agents will continue to hold perpetrators accountable and to protect Amtrak, its employees and their dependents.”
This case is being investigated by the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the FBI, IRS Criminal Investigation, Amtrak’s Office of Inspector General, the Office of Personnel Management’s Office of Inspector General, the Department of Labor’s Office of Inspector General, and the California Department of Insurance.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Mark Aveis, Paul G. Stern and Cassie Palmer of the Major Frauds Section.
The six defendants charged in this case were arrested on Tuesday and each pleaded not guilty at their arraignments in United States District Court. A trial in this case was scheduled for August 21 in Santa Ana.
Medicare Fraud Strike Force Cases
Seven of the cases announced this week were filed by DOJ trial attorneys working in Los Angeles under the aegis of the Medicare Fraud Strike Force in conjunction with the United States Attorney’s Office. Strike Force operations are part of a joint initiative between the Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services to prevent and deter fraud and enforce current anti-fraud laws around the country.
“We will not tolerate criminals stealing precious dollars from our federal health care programs,” said Christian J. Schrank, Special Agent in Charge for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG). “Today’s announcement shows our commitment to working with our state and federal law enforcement partners to swiftly investigate these fraud schemes and bring criminals to justice.”
Strike Force prosecutors unsealed seven criminal cases this week.
Seven people were named in an indictment that alleges multiple health care fraud conspiracies in which the owner of two pharmacies submitted claims to Medicare and Medi-Cal for expensive, brand-name prescription drugs that were never dispensed to patients. Rather, the drugs were provided to co-conspirators to sell to third parties, thereby generating a profit from each prescription drug twice – first from the reimbursement from Medicare or Medi-Cal, and second from the sale of the prescription drugs diverted to the black market.
The defendants named in the indictment are:
Irina Sadovsky, 48, of Woodland Hills, the owner and pharmacist-in-charge of Five Star and Ultimate pharmacies;
Yigal Keren, 36, of Los Angeles, who owns and operates transitional housing centers;
Mikhail Khanukhov, 38, of Sherman Oaks, the manager at Five Star and Ultimate pharmacies;
Shahriar “Michael” Kalantari, 51, of Los Angeles, who was a marketer;
Andrei Sotnikov, 47, of Northridge, a marketer;
Nida Rosales, 62, of Bellflower, a marketer; and
Juan Carlos Enriquez, 31, of Van Nuys, a pharmacy technician and marketer
The indictment alleges that Sadovsky paid kickbacks to marketers in exchange for patient referrals from facilities that treated Medicare and/or Medi-Cal patients. Sadovsky also paid kickbacks directly to Medicare beneficiaries in exchange for filling their prescriptions at Five Star Pharmacy.
Five Star and Ultimate Pharmacies were collectively paid more than $54 million by Medicare and Medi-Cal between January 2014 and September 2017.
This matter is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG, and the case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Armen Pogossian, 69, of Pasadena, the owner of L.A. Nova Pharmacy, was indicted for his role in the submission of $2.9 million in claims to Medicare Part D sponsors for prescription drugs that were never dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries; indeed, they were never even ordered from a wholesaler. The five-count indictment alleges that Pogossian attempted to conceal the fraudulent claims from auditors through the use of fake invoices that purported to show the drugs had been obtained from wholesalers and thus were in the pharmacy’s inventory. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Tamar Tatarian, 37, of Pasadena, the owner of Akhtamar Pharmacy, was named in a three-count indictment that alleges she participated in a scheme that submitted $1.3 million in claims to Medicare Part D sponsors for prescription drugs that were never ordered from wholesalers, and thus never dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries, which Tatarian attempted to conceal from auditors through the use of fake invoices. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Ruben Filian, 33, of Glendale, a physician’s assistant, was indicted for allegedly participating in a $58 million scheme to certify patients to home health care in exchange for illegal kickbacks. Filian is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, four counts of health care fraud, one count of conspiracy to pay and receive kickbacks, five counts of paying and receiving kickbacks, and three counts of money laundering. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Emily Culbertson.
Dr. Stephen Levine, 74, of North Hollywood, a referring physician to home health agencies, was named in a criminal information for his role in the $58 million fraud scheme that also involved Filian. Levine allegedly certified numerous beneficiaries for home health services, without regard to whether the beneficiaries were homebound or whether the services were medically necessary. Levine was paid cash kickbacks for his referrals. Using Levine’s referrals as support, owners and operators at multiple home health agencies billed Medicare for home health services, and Medicare suffered losses of at least $6.5 million. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Emily Culbertson.
Sarkis Manukyan, 76, of Panorama City, and Eduard Terosipyan, 67, of Montebello, both of whom are managers of medical clinics in Los Angeles and Burbank, were indicted in a $1.9 million Medicare fraud involving kickbacks and outpatient physician services not rendered or not medically necessary. This matter is being investigated by the FBI, the California Department of Justice and the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department. This case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Niall O’Donnell.
Lucille Lam, 54, of Burbank, co-owner and managing employee of Bliss Hospice, was charged in a criminal information for allegedly participating in a scheme to pay kickbacks in exchange for Medicare beneficiaries referred to Bliss for hospice services. As part of the scheme, Lam and the co-owners of the hospice falsely categorized the illegal kickbacks as payroll expenses. Based on the referrals that Lam and her co-conspirators obtained through illegal kickbacks, Bliss submitted claims to Medicare and was paid approximately $2.4 million. This matter is being investigated by the FBI, HHS-OIG, and the California Department of Justice. This case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Claire Yan.
Indictments and criminal informations contain allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed to be innocent until and unless proven guilty in court.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
LOS ANGELES – In another massive law enforcement action targeting health care fraud, federal authorities here announced today criminal cases naming a total of 33 defendants – including doctors, pharmacists and an attorney – who have been charged in a wide-range of schemes that collectively attempted to bilk public and private insurance programs out of more than $660 million.
The defendants charged locally are among hundreds of people charged across the United States in cases that cumulatively allege approximately $2 billion in false billings. The nationwide sweep includes charges against 165 doctors, nurses and other licensed medical professionals who allegedly participated in health care fraud schemes
In the Central District of California, most of the defendants were charged for their roles in schemes to defraud health insurance programs such as Medicare. The cases allege health care fraud and kickback schemes involving surgeries, compounded drugs, home health services, Medicare Part D prescription drugs and hospice care.
“Health care fraud schemes cost Americans billions of dollars every year through higher premiums and tax money stolen from public programs, such as Medicare,” said First Assistant United States Attorney Tracy L. Wilkison. “There is an incredible array of scams, some of which involve services that are simply never provided, and some of which use complicated and sophisticated ruses to conceal illegal acts, such as bribes. Today’s announcement of the far-reaching law enforcement actions targeting a wide range of schemes and a large number of defendants demonstrates the excellent work by our law enforcement partners. Together, we will continue the hard work necessary to identify and hold accountable corrupt health care professionals and fraudsters seeking to line their pockets with your hard-earned money.”
"Health care fraud occurs quietly and behind the scenes on a regular basis in Southern California, which makes detecting it very challenging," said Paul Delacourt, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI's Los Angeles Field Office. "The charges we've brought in Los Angeles against physicians and pharmacists are particularly disturbing since these individuals are placed in a position of trust by victims simply trying to navigate a complicated insurance system. A great deal of investigative ability went into each one of these cases, and I'm proud that the work of our agents and law enforcement partners will ebb the flow of the destructive fraud that plagues Southern California.”
9 new defendants charged in Operation “Spinal Cap”
This week, prosecutors unsealed charges against nine new defendants being charged as part of Operation “Spinal Cap,” which targets a long-running health care fraud scheme that generated nearly $1 billion in fraudulent claims to federal government, California state, and private insurers. The scheme – which was spearheaded by Michael Drobot, the former owner of Pacific Hospital in LongBeach – involved more than $40 million in illegal kickbacks paid to doctors and other medical professionals in exchange for referring thousands of patients who received surgeries and other services at Pacific Hospital.
In the cases announced today in Operation Spinal Cap:
Daniel Capen, 68, of Manhattan Beach, an orthopedic surgeon, has agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy and illegal kickback charges. Capen accounted for approximately $142 million of Pacific Hospital’s claims to insurers, on which the hospital was paid approximately $56 million.
Timothy Hunt, 53, of Palos Verdes Estates, another orthopedic surgeon who referred spinal surgery patients to Capen and other doctors, has agreed to plead guilty to a conspiracy charge involving his receipt of illegal kickbacks stemming from various financial relationships with Pacific Hospital and related entities.
George William Hammer, 65, of Palm Desert, the former chief financial officer of the physician management arm of Pacific Hospital, has agreed to plead guilty to tax charges based on the fraudulent classification of illegal kickbacks in hospital-related corporate tax filings.
Lauren Papa, 52, of Tarzana, a chiropractor, has agreed to plead guilty to a conspiracy charge involving her receipt of illegal kickbacks to refer patients to a neurosurgeon with the understanding that the neurosurgeon would perform the surgeries at Pacific Hospital.
Tiffany Rogers, 53, of Palos Verdes Estates, an orthopedic surgeon, was named in an indictment unsealed Wednesday in connection with receiving illegal kickbacks to refer patients for spinal surgeries at Pacific Hospital.
Brian Carrico, 64, of Redondo Beach, a chiropractor – along with Performance Medical & Rehab Center, Inc., which was partially owned by Carrico; and One Accord Management, Inc., which Carrico wholly owned – were charged in connection with the receipt of illegal kickbacks to influence the referral of patients to Pacific Hospital. An indictment unsealed Wednesday alleges that these defendants and other co-conspirators were responsible for approximately $80 million in claims submitted to the federal workers’ compensation program and were paid approximately $56 million in connection with patients that Performance Medical referred to Pacific Hospital.
William Parker, 64, of Redondo Beach, was charged in a separate indictment unsealed on Wednesday in connection with the same kickback scheme involving Carrico and his companies.
With the new cases being filed in Operation Spinal Cap, the fraudulent claims related to this scheme now span a 15-year period and cumulatively total more than $950 million.
The investigation into the spinal surgery kickback scheme is being conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; IRS Criminal Investigation; the California Department of Insurance; and the United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General.
“Public health insurance programs – whether a workers’ compensation program or Medicare – are not a personal pocketbook for criminals seeking to exploit government programs designed to help those who need these plans the most,” stated R. Damon Rowe, Special Agent in Charge of IRS Criminal Investigation’s Los Angeles Field Office. “Taxpayers rightly expect individuals working in the healthcare industry that receive payments from taxpayer-funded programs to scrupulously follow the rules. IRS Criminal Investigation will continue to protect the integrity of public health insurance programs and ensure that doctors, pharmacists and medical service providers who profit from these illicit schemes are held accountable.”
The new cases were filed by Assistant United States Attorney Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section, and will be prosecuted by AUSA Janakiram and Assistant United States Attorneys Joseph T. McNally and Scott D. Tenley of the Santa Ana Branch Office.
The nine new defendants charged in this investigation will be summoned to appear for arraignments in United States District Court in Santa Ana next month.
Investigation into compound prescription kickback scheme at TYY Consulting
An indictment unsealed on Wednesday outlines a wide-ranging conspiracy that was responsible for more than $250 million in fraudulent claims for prescriptions that were filled by compounding pharmacies in Nevada and Southern California. The indictment charges Irena Shut, 41, an attorney who resides in Hidden Hills, with paying kickbacks to two podiatrists to authorize prescriptions written on pre-printed prescription pads designed to maximize insurance payments, regardless of the medical need for an expensive compounded formulary for each “patient.”
The scheme was operated through TYY Consulting, a Las Vegas, Nevada-based outfit that used a nationwide network of marketers to refer prescriptions to TYY-affiliated pharmacies in exchange for kickbacks. As a result of the fraudulent claims, the victim health care plans paid out nearly $175 million. Shut, who worked as a marketer for TYY, received approximately $6.8 million in kickbacks, some of which was, in turn, given to the charged podiatrists.
The charged podiatrists, Domenic Signorelli, 51, of Irvine, and Robert Joseph, 51, of Huntington Beach, along with several other unnamed co-conspirator doctors, allegedly received kickbacks for “writing” the prescriptions. Once the prescriptions were filled, members of the conspiracy submitted fraudulent claims to federal, state and private insurers for the compounded drugs.
The victims of the scheme include the Department of Defense’s TRICARE program – which provides civilian health benefits for U.S Armed Forces military personnel, military retirees, and their dependents – as well as federal and state workers’ compensation programs.
In addition to paying kickbacks to the charged podiatrists and other medical professionals, TYY induced other doctors to participate in the scheme by offering prostitutes, fancy meals, and expensive event tickets, according to the indictment.
This case is being investigated by the FBI and the United State Postal Service, Office of Inspector General (USPS-OIG).
USPS-OIG Special Agent in Charge Brian Washington stated, “Today’s indictments should send a clear message to all health care providers that health care fraud is a federal crime that carries serious consequences and will not be tolerated. The USPS-OIG, along with our law enforcement partners, will continue to aggressively investigate those who engage in fraudulent activities intended to defraud federal benefit programs and the Postal Service.”
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section.
Shut, Signorelli and Joseph will be directed to appear for arraignments next month in federal court in Los Angeles.
Distribution of prescription opioids
Angela Gillespie-Shelton, 48, of Houston, was arrested Wednesday in her hometown after being indicted last week in Los Angeles on federal drug trafficking and money laundering charges. The six-count indictment alleges that Gillespie-Shelton was one of the leaders of a narcotics trafficking ring based in Los Angeles that sold illegal prescriptions for cash and obtained opioids and other drugs that were shipped from Los Angeles to Texas for sale on the black market.
Gillespie-Shelton allegedly laundered over $1 million of the black market cash proceeds through numerous accounts both to conceal the proceeds and to further the narcotics trafficking conspiracy, including by paying rent for the clinic where the illegal prescriptions were written. The indictment further alleges that Gillespie-Shelton paid more than $200,000 to one of the doctors who wrote the illegal prescriptions.
The doctor, Madhu Garg and numerous other co-conspirators have already been convicted in this matter.
The case against Gillespie-Shelton is being investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration, IRS Criminal Investigation, the Los Angeles Police Department, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, the California Department of Justice, and the Texas Department of Public Safety.
The prosecution of Gillespie-Shelton is being handled by Assistant United States Attorney Michael G. Freedman of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force.
SoCal residents charged in compound drug scheme
A group of pharmacists, doctors and marketers worked together to defraud the TRICARE program by submitting more than $40 million in claims for medically unnecessary compounded medications prescriptions, according to an indictment unsealed Wednesday that also alleges AMPLAN, the Amtrak employee health benefit plan, was victimized.
Marketers that participated in the scheme solicited beneficiaries of the health plans through misleading cold calls that promised free compounded medications, as well as through “wellness” programs that included gym memberships, fitness tracking devices and supplements. The marketers used sensitive personal and insurance information gathered from the beneficiaries to generate fraudulent prescriptions for compounded medications.
The marketers paid doctors to authorize prescriptions by misleading the doctors into believing that the marketers operated legitimate telemedicine businesses or by paying the doctors to write the prescriptions.
The six defendants charged in this case are:
Thu Van Le, aka Tony Le, 40, of Yorba Linda, a licensed pharmacist and owner of TC Medical Pharmacy (TCMP) in Pomona and a silent owner of Mars Hill Pharmacy (MHP) in North Carolina;
Chau Nguyen, aka Cindy Le, 36, of Yorba Linda, a licensed pharmacist and co-operator of TCMP;
Truong Giang Le, 31, of Pomona, a co-operator of MHP;
Chan Van Le, aka Kevin Le, 39, of Chino, the manager of MHP;
Nha Le Tuan Truong, 36, of Fountain Valley, a pharmacist who laundered fraudulently obtained proceeds through a charity; and
Jeffery Lawrence, 55, of Los Angeles, the owner of Wellytics Inc., an entity through which he fraudulently solicited insurance information from beneficiaries of AMPLAN.
Through TCMP, the defendants submitted approximately $13 million in claims, and TRICARE paid reimbursements of more than $10 million, according to the indictment. Through MHP, the defendants submitted approximately $28 million in claims, and TRICARE paid more than $21 million. Nha Le Tuan Truong allegedly laundered more than $1 million in Tricare reimbursements through a charitable foundation.
Lawrence allegedly solicited Amtrak employees to participate in a wellness program that Lawrence claimed would be reimbursement by AMPLAN. Several employees gave Lawrence their AMPLAN beneficiary information, which he then used to procure compounded medications prescriptions submitted to TCMP in exchange for more than $600,000 in kickbacks.
“These cases reinforce our commitment and determination to pursue those who would defraud Amtrak’s health care programs and target such vulnerable populations,” said Amtrak Inspector General Tom Howard. “Our agents will continue to hold perpetrators accountable and to protect Amtrak, its employees and their dependents.”
This case is being investigated by the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the FBI, IRS Criminal Investigation, Amtrak’s Office of Inspector General, the Office of Personnel Management’s Office of Inspector General, the Department of Labor’s Office of Inspector General, and the California Department of Insurance.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Mark Aveis, Paul G. Stern and Cassie Palmer of the Major Frauds Section.
The six defendants charged in this case were arrested on Tuesday and each pleaded not guilty at their arraignments in United States District Court. A trial in this case was scheduled for August 21 in Santa Ana.
Medicare Fraud Strike Force Cases
Seven of the cases announced this week were filed by DOJ trial attorneys working in Los Angeles under the aegis of the Medicare Fraud Strike Force in conjunction with the United States Attorney’s Office. Strike Force operations are part of a joint initiative between the Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services to prevent and deter fraud and enforce current anti-fraud laws around the country.
“We will not tolerate criminals stealing precious dollars from our federal health care programs,” said Christian J. Schrank, Special Agent in Charge for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG). “Today’s announcement shows our commitment to working with our state and federal law enforcement partners to swiftly investigate these fraud schemes and bring criminals to justice.”
Strike Force prosecutors unsealed seven criminal cases this week.
Seven people were named in an indictment that alleges multiple health care fraud conspiracies in which the owner of two pharmacies submitted claims to Medicare and Medi-Cal for expensive, brand-name prescription drugs that were never dispensed to patients. Rather, the drugs were provided to co-conspirators to sell to third parties, thereby generating a profit from each prescription drug twice – first from the reimbursement from Medicare or Medi-Cal, and second from the sale of the prescription drugs diverted to the black market.
The defendants named in the indictment are:
Irina Sadovsky, 48, of Woodland Hills, the owner and pharmacist-in-charge of Five Star and Ultimate pharmacies;
Yigal Keren, 36, of Los Angeles, who owns and operates transitional housing centers;
Mikhail Khanukhov, 38, of Sherman Oaks, the manager at Five Star and Ultimate pharmacies;
Shahriar “Michael” Kalantari, 51, of Los Angeles, who was a marketer;
Andrei Sotnikov, 47, of Northridge, a marketer;
Nida Rosales, 62, of Bellflower, a marketer; and
Juan Carlos Enriquez, 31, of Van Nuys, a pharmacy technician and marketer
The indictment alleges that Sadovsky paid kickbacks to marketers in exchange for patient referrals from facilities that treated Medicare and/or Medi-Cal patients. Sadovsky also paid kickbacks directly to Medicare beneficiaries in exchange for filling their prescriptions at Five Star Pharmacy.
Five Star and Ultimate Pharmacies were collectively paid more than $54 million by Medicare and Medi-Cal between January 2014 and September 2017.
This matter is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG, and the case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Armen Pogossian, 69, of Pasadena, the owner of L.A. Nova Pharmacy, was indicted for his role in the submission of $2.9 million in claims to Medicare Part D sponsors for prescription drugs that were never dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries; indeed, they were never even ordered from a wholesaler. The five-count indictment alleges that Pogossian attempted to conceal the fraudulent claims from auditors through the use of fake invoices that purported to show the drugs had been obtained from wholesalers and thus were in the pharmacy’s inventory. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Tamar Tatarian, 37, of Pasadena, the owner of Akhtamar Pharmacy, was named in a three-count indictment that alleges she participated in a scheme that submitted $1.3 million in claims to Medicare Part D sponsors for prescription drugs that were never ordered from wholesalers, and thus never dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries, which Tatarian attempted to conceal from auditors through the use of fake invoices. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Ruben Filian, 33, of Glendale, a physician’s assistant, was indicted for allegedly participating in a $58 million scheme to certify patients to home health care in exchange for illegal kickbacks. Filian is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, four counts of health care fraud, one count of conspiracy to pay and receive kickbacks, five counts of paying and receiving kickbacks, and three counts of money laundering. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Emily Culbertson.
Dr. Stephen Levine, 74, of North Hollywood, a referring physician to home health agencies, was named in a criminal information for his role in the $58 million fraud scheme that also involved Filian. Levine allegedly certified numerous beneficiaries for home health services, without regard to whether the beneficiaries were homebound or whether the services were medically necessary. Levine was paid cash kickbacks for his referrals. Using Levine’s referrals as support, owners and operators at multiple home health agencies billed Medicare for home health services, and Medicare suffered losses of at least $6.5 million. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Emily Culbertson.
Sarkis Manukyan, 76, of Panorama City, and Eduard Terosipyan, 67, of Montebello, both of whom are managers of medical clinics in Los Angeles and Burbank, were indicted in a $1.9 million Medicare fraud involving kickbacks and outpatient physician services not rendered or not medically necessary. This matter is being investigated by the FBI, the California Department of Justice and the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department. This case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Niall O’Donnell.
Lucille Lam, 54, of Burbank, co-owner and managing employee of Bliss Hospice, was charged in a criminal information for allegedly participating in a scheme to pay kickbacks in exchange for Medicare beneficiaries referred to Bliss for hospice services. As part of the scheme, Lam and the co-owners of the hospice falsely categorized the illegal kickbacks as payroll expenses. Based on the referrals that Lam and her co-conspirators obtained through illegal kickbacks, Bliss submitted claims to Medicare and was paid approximately $2.4 million. This matter is being investigated by the FBI, HHS-OIG, and the California Department of Justice. This case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Claire Yan.
Indictments and criminal informations contain allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed to be innocent until and unless proven guilty in court.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
LOS ANGELES – In another massive law enforcement action targeting health care fraud, federal authorities here announced today criminal cases naming a total of 33 defendants – including doctors, pharmacists and an attorney – who have been charged in a wide-range of schemes that collectively attempted to bilk public and private insurance programs out of more than $660 million.
The defendants charged locally are among hundreds of people charged across the United States in cases that cumulatively allege approximately $2 billion in false billings. The nationwide sweep includes charges against 165 doctors, nurses and other licensed medical professionals who allegedly participated in health care fraud schemes
In the Central District of California, most of the defendants were charged for their roles in schemes to defraud health insurance programs such as Medicare. The cases allege health care fraud and kickback schemes involving surgeries, compounded drugs, home health services, Medicare Part D prescription drugs and hospice care.
“Health care fraud schemes cost Americans billions of dollars every year through higher premiums and tax money stolen from public programs, such as Medicare,” said First Assistant United States Attorney Tracy L. Wilkison. “There is an incredible array of scams, some of which involve services that are simply never provided, and some of which use complicated and sophisticated ruses to conceal illegal acts, such as bribes. Today’s announcement of the far-reaching law enforcement actions targeting a wide range of schemes and a large number of defendants demonstrates the excellent work by our law enforcement partners. Together, we will continue the hard work necessary to identify and hold accountable corrupt health care professionals and fraudsters seeking to line their pockets with your hard-earned money.”
"Health care fraud occurs quietly and behind the scenes on a regular basis in Southern California, which makes detecting it very challenging," said Paul Delacourt, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI's Los Angeles Field Office. "The charges we've brought in Los Angeles against physicians and pharmacists are particularly disturbing since these individuals are placed in a position of trust by victims simply trying to navigate a complicated insurance system. A great deal of investigative ability went into each one of these cases, and I'm proud that the work of our agents and law enforcement partners will ebb the flow of the destructive fraud that plagues Southern California.”
9 new defendants charged in Operation “Spinal Cap”
This week, prosecutors unsealed charges against nine new defendants being charged as part of Operation “Spinal Cap,” which targets a long-running health care fraud scheme that generated nearly $1 billion in fraudulent claims to federal government, California state, and private insurers. The scheme – which was spearheaded by Michael Drobot, the former owner of Pacific Hospital in LongBeach – involved more than $40 million in illegal kickbacks paid to doctors and other medical professionals in exchange for referring thousands of patients who received surgeries and other services at Pacific Hospital.
In the cases announced today in Operation Spinal Cap:
Daniel Capen, 68, of Manhattan Beach, an orthopedic surgeon, has agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy and illegal kickback charges. Capen accounted for approximately $142 million of Pacific Hospital’s claims to insurers, on which the hospital was paid approximately $56 million.
Timothy Hunt, 53, of Palos Verdes Estates, another orthopedic surgeon who referred spinal surgery patients to Capen and other doctors, has agreed to plead guilty to a conspiracy charge involving his receipt of illegal kickbacks stemming from various financial relationships with Pacific Hospital and related entities.
George William Hammer, 65, of Palm Desert, the former chief financial officer of the physician management arm of Pacific Hospital, has agreed to plead guilty to tax charges based on the fraudulent classification of illegal kickbacks in hospital-related corporate tax filings.
Lauren Papa, 52, of Tarzana, a chiropractor, has agreed to plead guilty to a conspiracy charge involving her receipt of illegal kickbacks to refer patients to a neurosurgeon with the understanding that the neurosurgeon would perform the surgeries at Pacific Hospital.
Tiffany Rogers, 53, of Palos Verdes Estates, an orthopedic surgeon, was named in an indictment unsealed Wednesday in connection with receiving illegal kickbacks to refer patients for spinal surgeries at Pacific Hospital.
Brian Carrico, 64, of Redondo Beach, a chiropractor – along with Performance Medical & Rehab Center, Inc., which was partially owned by Carrico; and One Accord Management, Inc., which Carrico wholly owned – were charged in connection with the receipt of illegal kickbacks to influence the referral of patients to Pacific Hospital. An indictment unsealed Wednesday alleges that these defendants and other co-conspirators were responsible for approximately $80 million in claims submitted to the federal workers’ compensation program and were paid approximately $56 million in connection with patients that Performance Medical referred to Pacific Hospital.
William Parker, 64, of Redondo Beach, was charged in a separate indictment unsealed on Wednesday in connection with the same kickback scheme involving Carrico and his companies.
With the new cases being filed in Operation Spinal Cap, the fraudulent claims related to this scheme now span a 15-year period and cumulatively total more than $950 million.
The investigation into the spinal surgery kickback scheme is being conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; IRS Criminal Investigation; the California Department of Insurance; and the United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General.
“Public health insurance programs – whether a workers’ compensation program or Medicare – are not a personal pocketbook for criminals seeking to exploit government programs designed to help those who need these plans the most,” stated R. Damon Rowe, Special Agent in Charge of IRS Criminal Investigation’s Los Angeles Field Office. “Taxpayers rightly expect individuals working in the healthcare industry that receive payments from taxpayer-funded programs to scrupulously follow the rules. IRS Criminal Investigation will continue to protect the integrity of public health insurance programs and ensure that doctors, pharmacists and medical service providers who profit from these illicit schemes are held accountable.”
The new cases were filed by Assistant United States Attorney Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section, and will be prosecuted by AUSA Janakiram and Assistant United States Attorneys Joseph T. McNally and Scott D. Tenley of the Santa Ana Branch Office.
The nine new defendants charged in this investigation will be summoned to appear for arraignments in United States District Court in Santa Ana next month.
Investigation into compound prescription kickback scheme at TYY Consulting
An indictment unsealed on Wednesday outlines a wide-ranging conspiracy that was responsible for more than $250 million in fraudulent claims for prescriptions that were filled by compounding pharmacies in Nevada and Southern California. The indictment charges Irena Shut, 41, an attorney who resides in Hidden Hills, with paying kickbacks to two podiatrists to authorize prescriptions written on pre-printed prescription pads designed to maximize insurance payments, regardless of the medical need for an expensive compounded formulary for each “patient.”
The scheme was operated through TYY Consulting, a Las Vegas, Nevada-based outfit that used a nationwide network of marketers to refer prescriptions to TYY-affiliated pharmacies in exchange for kickbacks. As a result of the fraudulent claims, the victim health care plans paid out nearly $175 million. Shut, who worked as a marketer for TYY, received approximately $6.8 million in kickbacks, some of which was, in turn, given to the charged podiatrists.
The charged podiatrists, Domenic Signorelli, 51, of Irvine, and Robert Joseph, 51, of Huntington Beach, along with several other unnamed co-conspirator doctors, allegedly received kickbacks for “writing” the prescriptions. Once the prescriptions were filled, members of the conspiracy submitted fraudulent claims to federal, state and private insurers for the compounded drugs.
The victims of the scheme include the Department of Defense’s TRICARE program – which provides civilian health benefits for U.S Armed Forces military personnel, military retirees, and their dependents – as well as federal and state workers’ compensation programs.
In addition to paying kickbacks to the charged podiatrists and other medical professionals, TYY induced other doctors to participate in the scheme by offering prostitutes, fancy meals, and expensive event tickets, according to the indictment.
This case is being investigated by the FBI and the United State Postal Service, Office of Inspector General (USPS-OIG).
USPS-OIG Special Agent in Charge Brian Washington stated, “Today’s indictments should send a clear message to all health care providers that health care fraud is a federal crime that carries serious consequences and will not be tolerated. The USPS-OIG, along with our law enforcement partners, will continue to aggressively investigate those who engage in fraudulent activities intended to defraud federal benefit programs and the Postal Service.”
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section.
Shut, Signorelli and Joseph will be directed to appear for arraignments next month in federal court in Los Angeles.
Distribution of prescription opioids
Angela Gillespie-Shelton, 48, of Houston, was arrested Wednesday in her hometown after being indicted last week in Los Angeles on federal drug trafficking and money laundering charges. The six-count indictment alleges that Gillespie-Shelton was one of the leaders of a narcotics trafficking ring based in Los Angeles that sold illegal prescriptions for cash and obtained opioids and other drugs that were shipped from Los Angeles to Texas for sale on the black market.
Gillespie-Shelton allegedly laundered over $1 million of the black market cash proceeds through numerous accounts both to conceal the proceeds and to further the narcotics trafficking conspiracy, including by paying rent for the clinic where the illegal prescriptions were written. The indictment further alleges that Gillespie-Shelton paid more than $200,000 to one of the doctors who wrote the illegal prescriptions.
The doctor, Madhu Garg and numerous other co-conspirators have already been convicted in this matter.
The case against Gillespie-Shelton is being investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration, IRS Criminal Investigation, the Los Angeles Police Department, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, the California Department of Justice, and the Texas Department of Public Safety.
The prosecution of Gillespie-Shelton is being handled by Assistant United States Attorney Michael G. Freedman of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force.
SoCal residents charged in compound drug scheme
A group of pharmacists, doctors and marketers worked together to defraud the TRICARE program by submitting more than $40 million in claims for medically unnecessary compounded medications prescriptions, according to an indictment unsealed Wednesday that also alleges AMPLAN, the Amtrak employee health benefit plan, was victimized.
Marketers that participated in the scheme solicited beneficiaries of the health plans through misleading cold calls that promised free compounded medications, as well as through “wellness” programs that included gym memberships, fitness tracking devices and supplements. The marketers used sensitive personal and insurance information gathered from the beneficiaries to generate fraudulent prescriptions for compounded medications.
The marketers paid doctors to authorize prescriptions by misleading the doctors into believing that the marketers operated legitimate telemedicine businesses or by paying the doctors to write the prescriptions.
The six defendants charged in this case are:
Thu Van Le, aka Tony Le, 40, of Yorba Linda, a licensed pharmacist and owner of TC Medical Pharmacy (TCMP) in Pomona and a silent owner of Mars Hill Pharmacy (MHP) in North Carolina;
Chau Nguyen, aka Cindy Le, 36, of Yorba Linda, a licensed pharmacist and co-operator of TCMP;
Truong Giang Le, 31, of Pomona, a co-operator of MHP;
Chan Van Le, aka Kevin Le, 39, of Chino, the manager of MHP;
Nha Le Tuan Truong, 36, of Fountain Valley, a pharmacist who laundered fraudulently obtained proceeds through a charity; and
Jeffery Lawrence, 55, of Los Angeles, the owner of Wellytics Inc., an entity through which he fraudulently solicited insurance information from beneficiaries of AMPLAN.
Through TCMP, the defendants submitted approximately $13 million in claims, and TRICARE paid reimbursements of more than $10 million, according to the indictment. Through MHP, the defendants submitted approximately $28 million in claims, and TRICARE paid more than $21 million. Nha Le Tuan Truong allegedly laundered more than $1 million in Tricare reimbursements through a charitable foundation.
Lawrence allegedly solicited Amtrak employees to participate in a wellness program that Lawrence claimed would be reimbursement by AMPLAN. Several employees gave Lawrence their AMPLAN beneficiary information, which he then used to procure compounded medications prescriptions submitted to TCMP in exchange for more than $600,000 in kickbacks.
“These cases reinforce our commitment and determination to pursue those who would defraud Amtrak’s health care programs and target such vulnerable populations,” said Amtrak Inspector General Tom Howard. “Our agents will continue to hold perpetrators accountable and to protect Amtrak, its employees and their dependents.”
This case is being investigated by the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the FBI, IRS Criminal Investigation, Amtrak’s Office of Inspector General, the Office of Personnel Management’s Office of Inspector General, the Department of Labor’s Office of Inspector General, and the California Department of Insurance.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Mark Aveis, Paul G. Stern and Cassie Palmer of the Major Frauds Section.
The six defendants charged in this case were arrested on Tuesday and each pleaded not guilty at their arraignments in United States District Court. A trial in this case was scheduled for August 21 in Santa Ana.
Medicare Fraud Strike Force Cases
Seven of the cases announced this week were filed by DOJ trial attorneys working in Los Angeles under the aegis of the Medicare Fraud Strike Force in conjunction with the United States Attorney’s Office. Strike Force operations are part of a joint initiative between the Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services to prevent and deter fraud and enforce current anti-fraud laws around the country.
“We will not tolerate criminals stealing precious dollars from our federal health care programs,” said Christian J. Schrank, Special Agent in Charge for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG). “Today’s announcement shows our commitment to working with our state and federal law enforcement partners to swiftly investigate these fraud schemes and bring criminals to justice.”
Strike Force prosecutors unsealed seven criminal cases this week.
Seven people were named in an indictment that alleges multiple health care fraud conspiracies in which the owner of two pharmacies submitted claims to Medicare and Medi-Cal for expensive, brand-name prescription drugs that were never dispensed to patients. Rather, the drugs were provided to co-conspirators to sell to third parties, thereby generating a profit from each prescription drug twice – first from the reimbursement from Medicare or Medi-Cal, and second from the sale of the prescription drugs diverted to the black market.
The defendants named in the indictment are:
Irina Sadovsky, 48, of Woodland Hills, the owner and pharmacist-in-charge of Five Star and Ultimate pharmacies;
Yigal Keren, 36, of Los Angeles, who owns and operates transitional housing centers;
Mikhail Khanukhov, 38, of Sherman Oaks, the manager at Five Star and Ultimate pharmacies;
Shahriar “Michael” Kalantari, 51, of Los Angeles, who was a marketer;
Andrei Sotnikov, 47, of Northridge, a marketer;
Nida Rosales, 62, of Bellflower, a marketer; and
Juan Carlos Enriquez, 31, of Van Nuys, a pharmacy technician and marketer
The indictment alleges that Sadovsky paid kickbacks to marketers in exchange for patient referrals from facilities that treated Medicare and/or Medi-Cal patients. Sadovsky also paid kickbacks directly to Medicare beneficiaries in exchange for filling their prescriptions at Five Star Pharmacy.
Five Star and Ultimate Pharmacies were collectively paid more than $54 million by Medicare and Medi-Cal between January 2014 and September 2017.
This matter is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG, and the case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Armen Pogossian, 69, of Pasadena, the owner of L.A. Nova Pharmacy, was indicted for his role in the submission of $2.9 million in claims to Medicare Part D sponsors for prescription drugs that were never dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries; indeed, they were never even ordered from a wholesaler. The five-count indictment alleges that Pogossian attempted to conceal the fraudulent claims from auditors through the use of fake invoices that purported to show the drugs had been obtained from wholesalers and thus were in the pharmacy’s inventory. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Tamar Tatarian, 37, of Pasadena, the owner of Akhtamar Pharmacy, was named in a three-count indictment that alleges she participated in a scheme that submitted $1.3 million in claims to Medicare Part D sponsors for prescription drugs that were never ordered from wholesalers, and thus never dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries, which Tatarian attempted to conceal from auditors through the use of fake invoices. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Alexis Gregorian.
Ruben Filian, 33, of Glendale, a physician’s assistant, was indicted for allegedly participating in a $58 million scheme to certify patients to home health care in exchange for illegal kickbacks. Filian is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, four counts of health care fraud, one count of conspiracy to pay and receive kickbacks, five counts of paying and receiving kickbacks, and three counts of money laundering. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Emily Culbertson.
Dr. Stephen Levine, 74, of North Hollywood, a referring physician to home health agencies, was named in a criminal information for his role in the $58 million fraud scheme that also involved Filian. Levine allegedly certified numerous beneficiaries for home health services, without regard to whether the beneficiaries were homebound or whether the services were medically necessary. Levine was paid cash kickbacks for his referrals. Using Levine’s referrals as support, owners and operators at multiple home health agencies billed Medicare for home health services, and Medicare suffered losses of at least $6.5 million. This case is being investigated by the FBI and HHS-OIG and is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Emily Culbertson.
Sarkis Manukyan, 76, of Panorama City, and Eduard Terosipyan, 67, of Montebello, both of whom are managers of medical clinics in Los Angeles and Burbank, were indicted in a $1.9 million Medicare fraud involving kickbacks and outpatient physician services not rendered or not medically necessary. This matter is being investigated by the FBI, the California Department of Justice and the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department. This case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Niall O’Donnell.
Lucille Lam, 54, of Burbank, co-owner and managing employee of Bliss Hospice, was charged in a criminal information for allegedly participating in a scheme to pay kickbacks in exchange for Medicare beneficiaries referred to Bliss for hospice services. As part of the scheme, Lam and the co-owners of the hospice falsely categorized the illegal kickbacks as payroll expenses. Based on the referrals that Lam and her co-conspirators obtained through illegal kickbacks, Bliss submitted claims to Medicare and was paid approximately $2.4 million. This matter is being investigated by the FBI, HHS-OIG, and the California Department of Justice. This case is being prosecuted by DOJ Trial Attorney Claire Yan.
Indictments and criminal informations contain allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed to be innocent until and unless proven guilty in court.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
LOS ANGELES – A LongBeach man was sentenced today to 80 months in federal prison for participating in the March 2022 daylight smash-and-grab robbery of a Beverly Hills jewelry store in which nearly $2.7 million worth of merchandise was stolen.Jimmy Lee Vernon III, 33, was sentenced by United States District Judge George H. Wu, who also ordered Vernon to pay $2,674,600 in restitution.Vernon pleaded guilty on August 1 to one count of interference with commerce by robbery (Hobbs Act). He has been in federal custody since September 2022.“This defendant took part in a blatant assault on a store operating in daylight hours, believing he could rob and intimidate others with impunity,” said United States Attorney Martin Estrada. “Now, he will serve a lengthy sentence in federal prison. Our office and our law enforcement partners will not tolerate these sorts of brazen attacks on our community.”On March 22, 2022, Vernon committed a robbery of the Luxury Jewels of Beverly Hills store. Vernon used heavy tools to smash the store’s display case while employees were present, causing fear of injury to people inside the store.Vernon then removed jewelry and other items from the store display cases valued at approximately $2,674,600. The merchandise consisted of approximately 19 bracelets, seven pairs of earrings, four necklaces, a pair of obelisks, eight rings, and 20 watches.After the robbery, Vernon and his accomplices ran out of the store, leaving behind their Kia vehicle – which had been reported stolen out of LongBeach four days before the robbery. During the robbery, Vernon’s cellphone fell out of his sweatpants pocket while he smashed the jewelry store’s window, was left behind and later recovered by law enforcement, according to an affidavit previously filed in this case.Two days after the robbery, one of Vernon’s accomplices posted on his Instagram account numerous photographs that included large stacks of money and a message praising his “robbery gang,” according to court documents.As for Vernon’s co-defendants, Deshon Bell, 22, of LongBeach, pleaded guilty in December 2023 to one count of Hobbs Act robbery and is serving a federal prison sentence of one year and one day. Ladell Tharpe, 39, of LongBeach, pleaded guilty on September 30 to one count of Hobbs Act robbery and awaits a January 6, 2025, sentencing hearing.The FBI and the Beverly Hills Police Department investigated this matter.Assistant United States Attorneys Kevin J. Butler of the Violent and Organized Crime Section and Kevin B. Reidy of the Major Frauds Section prosecuted this case.
LOS ANGELES – A Willowbrook man pleaded guilty today to federal criminal charges for robbing three banks during a six-day crime spree while he was on supervised release for bank robbery convictions over a decade ago.
Rickey Lewis, 53, pleaded guilty to three counts of bank robbery and one count of attempted bank robbery.
According to his plea agreement, from January 22 to January 28, 2019, Lewis stole a total of $4,035 in cash by robbing two JPMorgan Chase bank branches in Gardena and an International City Bank branch in LongBeach. Lewis also attempted to rob a Bank of America branch in Downey.
During the robberies, Lewis threatened to shoot bank tellers – though it was not apparent that he was carrying a firearm – and he had clear tape on his fingers. In fear for their lives, the bank tellers handed over the cash.
According to an affidavit filed with a criminal complaint in this case, law enforcement recovered a partial palm print recovered from the LongBeach bank robbery that matched Lewis’ palm print.
While he committed the January 2019 bank robbery spree, Lewis was on supervised release for bank robbery convictions he sustained after he pleaded guilty in February 2006 to a month-long spree in which he robbed six banks in South Los Angeles and Inglewood.
United States District Judge Christina A. Snyder scheduled a January 23, 2023 sentencing hearing, at which time he will face a statutory maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison for each count.
The FBI investigated this matter with the assistance of the LongBeach Police Department, the Downey Police Department, the Gardena Police Department, and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.
Assistant United States Attorneys Patrick Castañeda of the International Narcotics, Money Laundering, and Racketeering Section and Kevin J. Butler of the Violent and Organized Crime Section are prosecuting this case.
LOS ANGELES – A wholesale clothing importer located in the Fashion District of downtown Los Angeles and two of its executives have been found guilty by a jury of avoiding the payment of more than $8 million in customs duties on imported clothing, and of running a scheme in which the company laundered money and failed to report on tax returns more than $17 million derived from cash transactions, the Justice Department announced today. At the conclusion of a six-week trial, a federal jury on late Tuesday found the following defendants guilty of dozens of felonies:C’est Toi Jeans, Inc. (CTJ), which imported apparel from China and other nations and exported clothing to customers in Mexico, Central America, and South America;Si Oh Rhew, 70, of La Cañada Flintridge, CTJ’s president and a 75% owner of the company; andLance Rhew, 37, of downtown Los Angeles, Si Oh Rhew’s son, a CTJ corporate officer, and the owner of another Los Angeles-based company called GLLR Inc. that did business as CTJ.The jury found CTJ and Si Oh Rhew guilty of two conspiracies and multiple counts of failure to file report of currency transaction over $10,000 in a trade or business. The jury also found all three defendants guilty of three counts of entry of falsely classified goods, three counts of entry of goods by means of false statements, three counts of passing false and fraudulent papers through a customhouse, and two counts of international promotional money laundering.CTJ was found guilty of an additional two concealment money laundering counts involving drug proceeds. Si Oh Rhew was found guilty of an additional two counts of aiding, assisting, and procuring the filing of a false tax return. Lance Rhew was found guilty of one additional count of aiding, assisting, and procuring the filing of a false tax return. Lance Rhew was also found guilty of one conspiracy count.“Money laundering is the lifeblood of large-scale drug trafficking, and it is therefore essential that we go after businesses and individuals that feed criminal organizations the money they crave,” said United States Attorney Martin Estrada. “A jury found this corporation facilitated the laundering of drug proceeds and now they will appropriately be held accountable. Together with our law enforcement partners, my office will continue to bring to justice businesses that facilitate criminal activity.”“This verdict once again demonstrates that working with drug trafficking organizations is a bad business model,” said Homeland Security Investigations Los Angeles Special Agent in Charge Eddy Wang. “This verdict should send a strong message to those who utilize their businesses to aid the cartels, that the HSI Los Angeles-led El Camino Real Financial Crimes Task Force and partners at U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and the IRS Criminal Investigation, will work tirelessly to hold you accountable.”According to evidence presented at trial, CTJ was a business owned by Si Oh Rhew and his wife that the Rhews operated. CTJ received U.S. currency in bulk cash that was derived from drug trafficking as payment for customer invoices. Those funds were delivered to CTJ by money couriers unrelated to and unknown to CTJ or to the customers whose invoices were being paid.CTJ and Si Oh Rhew failed to file currency transaction reports, which are required for any transaction involving more than $10,000 in cash, and the defendants concealed the cash receipts from an accountant who prepared their taxes, which led to the fraudulent omission of more than $17 million in gross sales from tax returns filed with the IRS.The defendants also avoided customs duties and tariffs by purchasing garments from overseas manufacturers, including from China, but then submitting false information to United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that understated the true value of the items being imported into the United States.As a result, the import duties owed on the shipments were lowered. The indictment alleges that the defendants sent 515 individual wire transfers totaling $137,156,726 to pay overseas suppliers for undervalued garments. Overall, CTJ imported goods that were undervalued by more than $51million, causing approximately $8.4 million in unpaid tariffs and duties that should have been paid to CBP.The jury found the defendants not guilty of several additional criminal counts, including – for CTJ – two counts of concealment money laundering and – for Lance Rhew – several counts of failure to file a report of a currency transaction in a nonfinancial trade or business.United States District Judge Mark C. Scarsi scheduled a sentencing hearing for January 21, 2025, at which time the Rhews will each face a sentence of decades in federal prison and CTJ will face fines of as much as $100 million.This case was investigated by Homeland Security Investigations and IRS-Criminal Investigation. They were aided by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Monterey Park Police Department, the El Segundo Police Department, the LongBeach Police Department, the Los Angeles Police Department, the Gardena Police Department, and the West Covina Police Department.This case is part of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) investigation known as Operation Fashion Police. OCDETF identifies, disrupts, and dismantles the highest-level criminal organizations that threaten the United States using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach. Additional information about the OCDETF Program can be found at www.justice.gov/OCDETF.The investigation was conducted by the HSI-led El Camino Real Financial Crimes Task Force, a multi-agency task force that includes federal and state investigators who are focused on financial crimes in Southern California.Assistant United States Attorneys MiRi Song, Julie J. Shemitz, and Skyler F. Cho of the International Narcotics, Money Laundering, and Racketeering Section are prosecuting this case.
LOS ANGELES – Two Orange County, California men were sentenced yesterday in U.S. District Court in Santa Ana, California to serve 41 and 47 months in prison, respectively, for their roles in a multi-million dollar fraudulent mortgage modification scheme posing as a successful law firm, the Justice Department announced.
Ronald Rodis, 52, of LongBeach, California, and Charles Wayne Farris, 56, of Aliso Viejo, California, each previously pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud. In addition to the terms of prison imposed by U.S. District Judge David O. Carter, Judge Carter ordered Farris to pay $3,534,927.43 in restitution and ordered Rodis to pay $3,826,947.95 in restitution.
Both defendants previously admitted that, between October 2008 and June 2009, they participated in a scheme to induce homeowners to pay between $3,500 and $5,500 for the services of the Rodis Law Group. These defendants and their co-conspirators made numerous misrepresentations regarding RLG’s ability to negotiate loan modifications from the homeowners’ mortgage lenders. They hid the involvement of Bryan D’Antonio, the true owner of the scheme. D’Antonio was a convicted felon and subject to a permanent injunction prohibiting him from having any involvement with any business that engaged in telemarketing or misrepresented the services it would provide.
“These defendants played key roles in a scheme that victimized homeowners facing foreclosure during the mortgage crisis,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Chad A. Readler of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “The defendants promised homeowners assistance saving their homes and modifying their mortgages, yet took their money knowing the promised benefits would never be realized.”
“These two defendants used their legal knowledge and expertise to coerce and victimize vulnerable homeowners,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Sandra R. Brown of the Central District of California. “Rather than help these individuals as promised, their fraudulent scheme cost the victims millions of dollars.”
Rodis was a licensed California attorney who allowed his name to be used to lend legitimacy to the scheme. He recorded radio advertisements encouraging struggling homeowners to call RLG. In the ads, Rodis falsely claimed that RLG consisted of “a team of experienced attorneys” who were “highly skilled in negotiating lower interest rates and even lowering your principal balance.” In fact, RLG was a telemarketing operation that never had a team of experienced attorneys and rarely achieved any of the promised results for homeowners. During much of the scheme, Rodis was the only attorney at RLG. After his involvement with the RLG scheme, Rodis surrendered his law license.
Farris supervised a sales force of dozens of telemarketers who fielded calls from struggling homeowners. At Farris’s direction and using scripts that he helped create, the telemarketers made numerous misrepresentations regarding the companies’ ability to negotiate loan modifications from the homeowners’ mortgage lenders. For example, the telemarketers stated that RLG and America’s Law Group – a successor to RLG – had been in business for 11 years when in fact the company had only opened in October 2008. They falsely stated that RLG and ALG routinely obtained positive results for homeowners, including lower monthly payments, reductions in principal balance and lower interest rates. In fact, positive results were rarely achieved for any RLG or ALG clients. Telemarketers also falsely reiterated that homeowners would have a team of attorneys and real estate professionals assigned to their case.
On April 10, Bryan D’Antonio, the leader of the scheme, was sentenced to 97 months in prison followed by 12 months in a halfway house and was ordered to pay $3,826,977.95 in restitution.
This case was investigated by the FBI Los Angeles Field Office and prosecuted by Trial Attorney John W. Burke of the Civil Division’s Consumer Protection Branch and Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph T. McNally of the Central District of California.
SANTA ANA, California – A Los Angeles man who participated in a scheme that filed fraudulent tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service seeking more than $800,000 in refunds was found guilty today of federal charges.
Julien Jitt Noel, 36, who lived in Placentia while he participated in the scheme, was convicted this morning of one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States and five counts of aiding and assisting in the preparation of false and fraudulent tax returns. After a five-day trial, a jury in United States District Court deliberated for approximately one hour before finding Noel guilty.
The evidence presented at trial showed that, starting in late 2008 or early 2009, Noel and two co-conspirators prepared and filed fraudulent tax returns, most of which were filed in the names of individuals whose identities had been stolen.
The fraudulent tax returns indicated that the taxpayers were employed by a shell company called Picaso Fashions, a business that did not employ the taxpayers and never had any employees. The tax returns indicated that Picaso Fashions had excessively withheld income tax for each taxpayer, and each fraudulently filed tax return sought a tax refund the taxpayer was not entitled to receive.
Members of the conspiracy filed 69 false individual federal tax returns during 2009 that claimed tax refunds totaling $621,589.
Noel and one of his co-conspirators established other fake companies to serve as fraudulent employers. In relation to these other bogus companies, Noel filed 45 fraudulent tax returns in 2009 and 2010 that sought $195,344 in refunds.
In total, Noel conspired to file a total of 114 fraudulent returns between 2009 and 2010 seeking tax refunds totaling $816,933. The IRS paid full or partial tax refunds on 98 of these returns and suffered actual losses of $520,426.
Noel, who has been in federal custody since this case was indicted two years ago, is scheduled to be sentenced by United States District Judge Josephine L. Staton on June 14. As a result of today’s six guilty verdicts, Noel faces a statutory maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison.
Co-conspirator Antonio Jerome Cook, 38, of LongBeach, was sentenced in March 2016 to four years in federal in prison and was ordered to pay restitution of $537,309 for his role in the scheme.
The third conspirator – Rebecca Magruder, 38, of Dallas, Texas – was sentenced in January of 2016 to 18 months in prison and ordered to pay $119,671 in restitution.
The investigation into Noel, Cook and Magruder was conducted by IRS Criminal Investigation and prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Aron Ketchel and Jamie A. Lang.
LOS ANGELES – A Hawaiian Gardens man was found guilty by a jury today of selling purported black tar heroin that in fact was fentanyl to an 18-year-old victim who later ingested it and suffered a fatal overdose from the powerful synthetic opioid.
Gregory Hevener, 47, was found guilty of one count of distribution of fentanyl resulting in death and one count of possession with intent to distribute heroin.
He has been in federal custody since February 2022.
According to evidence presented at a seven-day trial, in November 2020, the victim responded to an ad placed by Hevener on the website OfferUp, an online marketplace. The listing advertised the sale of “BLACK TAR ROOFING MATERIALS!!” – coded language for black tar heroin – in LongBeach. OfferUp records revealed Hevener operated or had access to several accounts on the platform, in which he advertised and distributed drugs, including heroin and fentanyl.
Hevener and the victim met in Hawaiian Gardens and the victim purchased what he believed to be heroin from Hevener. Instead, Hevener sold what was a black, tar-like substance containing fentanyl and tramadol, a pain-relief medication. The victim then drove home and took the drugs, suffering a fatal overdose.
In July and October 2021, law enforcement searched trash cans outside of Hevener’s residence in Hawaiian Gardens and seized discarded plastic bags and burnt pieces of tinfoil containing fentanyl and tramadol residue.
Another search in December 2021 resulted in the seizure of a plastic bag containing approximately 245 grams of black tar heroin, a digital scale, burnt tin foil, and a plastic bag containing approximately 1.2 grams of fentanyl.
United States District Judge Mark C. Scarsi scheduled a September 16 sentencing hearing, at which time Hevener will face a mandatory minimum sentence of 20 years in federal prison and a statutory maximum sentence of life in federal prison.
The Drug Enforcement Administration and the El Monte Police Department investigated this case.
Assistant United States Attorneys Kellye Ng and Maria Jhai of the Violent and Organized Crime Section and Kyle W. Kahan of the International Narcotics, Money Laundering, and Racketeering Section are prosecuting this case.
LOS ANGELES – A San Fernando Valley man who planned the bombing of a political rally in LongBeach in 2019 was sentenced today to 25 years in federal prison.
Mark Steven Domingo, 28, of Reseda, was sentenced by United States District Judge Stephen V. Wilson.
At the conclusion of a five-day trial, a federal jury on August 11 found Domingo guilty of one count of providing material support to terrorists and one count of attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction.
Judge Wilson sentenced Domingo to 15 years’ imprisonment on the providing material support count and 25 years in federal prison for attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction – both sentences to be served concurrently. The court also ordered Domingo to be placed on supervised release for a term of 20 years once Domingo completes his prison sentence.
Domingo has been in federal custody since his arrest in April 2019.
“This defendant planned a mass-casualty terrorist attack and repeatedly admitted at trial that he had a desire to kill as many people as possible,” said Acting United States Attorney Tracy L. Wilkison. “Had this bombing been successful, many innocent people would have been murdered, yet this defendant has shown no remorse for his conduct, nor has he renounced the extremist ideology that motivated his horrific plot.”
“Mr. Domingo represents the very real threat posed by homegrown violent extremists in the United States,” said Kristi K. Johnson, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office. “Domingo’s plans and a potentially catastrophic attack were thwarted when the Joint Terrorism Task Force learned of his intentions in advance and carried out this successful undercover operation with our partners. This case was the result of a collaborative effort with the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, the Los Angeles Police Department, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, and the LongBeach Police Department.”
The investigation into Domingo was prompted by his online posts and conversations in an online forum in which he expressed support for violence, specifically a desire to seek violent retribution for attacks against Muslims, as well as a willingness to become a martyr. After considering various attacks – including targeting Jewish people, churches, and police officers – Domingo decided to bomb a rally scheduled to take place in LongBeach in April 2019.
As part of the plot, Domingo asked a confederate – who actually was working with the FBI as part of the investigation – to invite a bomb-maker into the scheme. Domingo then purchased and provided to the confederate and the bomb-maker – who in fact was an undercover law enforcement officer – several hundred 3½-inch nails to be used as shrapnel for the bombs. Domingo specifically chose those nails because they were long enough to penetrate organs in the human body.
Leading up to the attack, Domingo called for an event similar to the October 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas. Following an attack on Muslims in New Zealand in March 2019, Domingo called for retribution in an online post.
Domingo selected the LongBeach rally as his target and, in April 2019, drove his confederate and the undercover officer to LongBeach to scout the location he planned to attack. While there, Domingo discussed finding the most crowded areas to place the bombs so he could kill the most people. On April 26, 2019, Domingo received what he thought were two live bombs, but actually were inert explosive devices delivered by an undercover law enforcement officer. He was arrested that same day with one of the bombs in his hands.
“At trial, [Domingo] testified and repeatedly affirmed that he intended to commit mass murder in March and April 2019,” prosecutors wrote in a sentencing memorandum that recommended a sentence of life in prison. “He admitted that the [confidential informant] stopped him from committing at least one murder in April 2019 by encouraging him to be patient. Finally, he admitted that he was excited when he learned that the [confidential informant] had access to an individual who could construct a bomb, and that he was the one who chose to attack the rally, chose to use the bombs, and chose to go through with the plot to commit mass murder, right up until the moment of his arrest.”
The FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) investigated this matter. JTTF members who participated in the investigation include the FBI, the Los Angeles Police Department, the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and the LongBeach Police Department.
Assistant United States Attorneys Reema M. El-Amamy and David T. Ryan of the Terrorism and Export Crimes Section, along with Trial Attorneys Lauren Goddard and Joshua Champagne of the National Security Section’s Counterterrorism Section at the Department of Justice, prosecuted this case.
LOS ANGELES – A federal grand jury today returned an eight-count superseding indictment that charges a Lynwood man with being the organizer and leader of a crew that committed at least 15 armed robberies of independent and “mom-and-pop” pharmacies across Southern California. The robbers allegedly stole a variety of prescription medications – in particular, oxycodone – with the intent of selling the stolen drugs on the black market.
The suspected organizer and leader, Tyrome Lewis, 24, a.k.a. “Boobie,” was charged with one count of conspiracy to interfere with commerce by robbery, one count of conspiracy to distribute oxycodone, two counts of interference with commerce by robbery, two counts of possession with intent to distribute oxycodone, and two counts of knowingly using and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence. Lewis, who was previously arrested and charged in a criminal complaint, is being held without bond. His arraignment is scheduled for August 22.
The superseding indictment filed today adds Lewis to a case in which another man – Darrell Mitchell, 29, of LongBeach – was previously charged. Darrell Mitchell, who is a fugitive, also faces conspiracy, narcotics and firearms offenses.
The initial indictment charged two additional co-conspirators, Terrell Mitchell, 31, (Darrell Mitchell’s brother) and Deandre Bonney, 29, both from Compton. Terrell Mitchell and Bonney have signed plea agreements in which they admitted their involvement in a December 2018 robbery of a Glendale pharmacy. Terrell Mitchel and Bonney are not named in the superseding indictment, and they are expected to enter guilty pleas in September.
Over an 18-month period that ended just a few weeks ago, Lewis allegedly led an armed crew that robbed pharmacies in Bellflower, Cerritos, South Los Angeles, Westminster, Pico Rivera, Fullerton, Hawthorne, Huntington Park, Anaheim, Glendale, Riverside, Paramount, and Claremont. Lewis allegedly picked out the robbery locations and provided details to the crew’s participants as to how the robberies should be conducted, including what medications to target. Lewis also traveled to the robbery locations in advance to scout the targeted stores and later oversaw the robberies as they were committed, the indictment alleges.
Each of the robberies shared a common modus operandi, including targeting smaller pharmacies, placing the stolen prescription drugs into the pharmacy’s trash bags or trash cans, using a black semi-automatic handgun to threaten and intimidate store employees, forcing employees to open the medication vault, and taking the store employees’ cell phones to prevent them from immediately calling police, according to court documents.
In addition to the Southern California robberies, the indictment alleges that Lewis was involved in a burglary of a Walgreens pharmacy in Anthony, Texas in January 2018.
If convicted of all charges, Lewis and Mitchell each would face a statutory maximum sentence of life in federal prison.
Three additional co-conspirators have been charged in a separate indictment. Aaron Ganner, 27, Karon Lofton, 28, and Devon Jackson, 30, all from Compton, were indicted for their role in a June 12 robbery of a pharmacy in Torrance. Ganner, Lofton and Jackson were arraigned Thursday in United States District Court, where they were ordered held without bond and a trial was scheduled for October 8.
An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
This matter was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, with assistance from the Torrance Police Department.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Jeffrey M. Chemerinsky and Joseph D. Axelrad of the Violent and Organized Crimes Section.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
LOS ANGELES – A federal grand jury today returned an eight-count superseding indictment that charges a Lynwood man with being the organizer and leader of a crew that committed at least 15 armed robberies of independent and “mom-and-pop” pharmacies across Southern California. The robbers allegedly stole a variety of prescription medications – in particular, oxycodone – with the intent of selling the stolen drugs on the black market.
The suspected organizer and leader, Tyrome Lewis, 24, a.k.a. “Boobie,” was charged with one count of conspiracy to interfere with commerce by robbery, one count of conspiracy to distribute oxycodone, two counts of interference with commerce by robbery, two counts of possession with intent to distribute oxycodone, and two counts of knowingly using and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence. Lewis, who was previously arrested and charged in a criminal complaint, is being held without bond. His arraignment is scheduled for August 22.
The superseding indictment filed today adds Lewis to a case in which another man – Darrell Mitchell, 29, of LongBeach – was previously charged. Darrell Mitchell, who is a fugitive, also faces conspiracy, narcotics and firearms offenses.
The initial indictment charged two additional co-conspirators, Terrell Mitchell, 31, (Darrell Mitchell’s brother) and Deandre Bonney, 29, both from Compton. Terrell Mitchell and Bonney have signed plea agreements in which they admitted their involvement in a December 2018 robbery of a Glendale pharmacy. Terrell Mitchel and Bonney are not named in the superseding indictment, and they are expected to enter guilty pleas in September.
Over an 18-month period that ended just a few weeks ago, Lewis allegedly led an armed crew that robbed pharmacies in Bellflower, Cerritos, South Los Angeles, Westminster, Pico Rivera, Fullerton, Hawthorne, Huntington Park, Anaheim, Glendale, Riverside, Paramount, and Claremont. Lewis allegedly picked out the robbery locations and provided details to the crew’s participants as to how the robberies should be conducted, including what medications to target. Lewis also traveled to the robbery locations in advance to scout the targeted stores and later oversaw the robberies as they were committed, the indictment alleges.
Each of the robberies shared a common modus operandi, including targeting smaller pharmacies, placing the stolen prescription drugs into the pharmacy’s trash bags or trash cans, using a black semi-automatic handgun to threaten and intimidate store employees, forcing employees to open the medication vault, and taking the store employees’ cell phones to prevent them from immediately calling police, according to court documents.
In addition to the Southern California robberies, the indictment alleges that Lewis was involved in a burglary of a Walgreens pharmacy in Anthony, Texas in January 2018.
If convicted of all charges, Lewis and Mitchell each would face a statutory maximum sentence of life in federal prison.
Three additional co-conspirators have been charged in a separate indictment. Aaron Ganner, 27, Karon Lofton, 28, and Devon Jackson, 30, all from Compton, were indicted for their role in a June 12 robbery of a pharmacy in Torrance. Ganner, Lofton and Jackson were arraigned Thursday in United States District Court, where they were ordered held without bond and a trial was scheduled for October 8.
An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
This matter was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, with assistance from the Torrance Police Department.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Jeffrey M. Chemerinsky and Joseph D. Axelrad of the Violent and Organized Crimes Section.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
SANTA ANA, California – A federal grand jury today issued a four-count indictment against a Long Beach man for his role in the May 15, 2018 bombing of the Magyar Kozmetica spa in Aliso Viejo that killed the man’s ex-girlfriend and seriously injured two other people.
Stephen William Beal, 59, who was arrested earlier this month pursuant to a criminal complaint, was charged with four felonies:
use of a weapon of mass destruction resulting in death,
malicious destruction of a building resulting in death,
use of a destructive device in relation to a crime of violence, and
possession of an unregistered destructive device.
Beal, who is currently being held without bond in federal custody, is scheduled to be arraigned on the indictment on March 25.
An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
The charges of use a weapon of mass destruction resulting in death and malicious destruction of a building resulting in death each carry a potential sentence of life without parole in federal prison. The charge of use of a destructive device in relation to a crime of violence carries an additional consecutive penalty of 30 years in federal prison. The charge of possession of an unregistered destructive device carries a statutory maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.
This matter is being investigated by the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force, which includes special agents with the FBI and deputies with the Orange County Sheriff’s Department. Task Force members who participated in the investigation included IRS Criminal Investigation; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations; the Los Angeles Police Department; the Long Beach Police Department; the Irvine Police Department; the Anaheim Police Department; and the Orange County Fire Authority.
The case against Beal is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Mark Takla and Annamartine Salick of the Terrorism and Export Crimes Section.
SANTA ANA, California – Law enforcement authorities associated with the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force on Sunday arrested a LongBeach man on federal charges stemming from an explosion last year that destroyed a day spa in Aliso Viejo, killed the man’s former girlfriend, and caused serious injuries to two spa clients.
Stephen William Beal, 59, was arrested pursuant to a federal criminal complaint filed on Friday that charges him with malicious destruction of a building resulting in the death of Ildiko Krajnyak.
“This was a horrific intentional attack that killed an innocent woman and severely injured two others who will live with the physical and emotional scars for the rest of their lives,” said United States Attorney Nick Hanna. “We will do everything we can to obtain justice for these victims and hold the perpetrator accountable.”
“The FBI and the Orange County Sheriff’s Department, with the assistance of many JTTF partners, brought full forensic resources to bear on the case in order to process an enormous amount of evidence recovered from the crime scene and related searches,” said Paul Delacourt, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office. “Though Mr. Beal has been charged, our work will continue to ensure justice is done in this case for the victims who continue to endure the loss and the pain of this horrific attack.”
“During this extensive investigation, we have worked seamlessly with our local and federal partners,” said Orange County Sheriff Don Barnes. “We are grateful for the many dedicated agencies who worked together to meticulously investigate and arrest the suspect. This will provide much-needed closure to our community.”
The charge against Beal relates to the May 15, 2018 explosion at the Magyar Kozmetica spa in Aliso Viejo. When first responders arrived on the scene, they discovered human remains outside of the building and noted major damage to building, according to the affidavit in support of the criminal complaint. A woman who survived the blast told investigators that the explosion was the result of the spa’s owner/operator, Ms. Krajnyak, opening a cardboard box.
Later that day, Beal contacted the Orange County Sheriff’s Department and identified himself as the co-owner of the spa that was operated by his “ex-wife.” Sheriff’s deputies and FBI personnel responded to Beal’s residence, where he consented to a search that led to the discovery of chemicals used to manufacture explosives, according to the affidavit. Pursuant to a search warrant obtained the day after the explosion, investigators recovered approximately 130 pounds of explosive precursors.
Further investigation at the scene of the bombing led to the recovery of a partially destroyed battery and bits of wire that the FBI laboratory determined were part of the explosive device, according to the affidavit. FBI laboratory personnel determined that there were “no meaningful differences” between the bits of wire recovered from the explosion site and wire removed from a homemade device found at Beal’s residence, according to the affidavit. Investigators determined that Beal purchased a battery consistent with the partially destroyed battery found at the blast scene at a store in LongBeach one week prior to the explosion. And, eight days before the explosion, Beal purchased three cardboard boxes very similar to the box the deceased victim was opening when the bomb detonated.
Furthermore, chemicals detected at the explosion scene were similar to those detected inside Beal’s car, which he purchased only three months before the incident and which he drove to Magyar Kozmetica spa four days before the blast, the affidavit states.
In addition to the forensic evidence, the affidavit outlines statements of three friends of Ms. Krajnyak. One of those witness told investigators that Ms. Krajnyak said “that her boyfriend was jealous, controlling, and possessive of her,” and “she was scared because he would threaten her.” While that witness did not know the name of the boyfriend, Ms. Krajnyak had sent her a photo of the boyfriend, which was identified as Beal.
Beal is expected to make his initial appearance in this case this afternoon in United States District Court in Santa Ana.
A criminal complaint contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
If he were to be convicted of the crime of malicious destruction of a building resulting in death, Beal would face a potential sentence of life without parole in federal prison.
This matter is being investigated by the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force, which includes special agents with the FBI and deputies with the Orange County Sheriff’s Department. Task Force members who participated in the investigation included IRS Criminal Investigation; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations; the Los Angeles Police Department; the LongBeach Police Department; the Irvine Police Department; the Anaheim Police Department; and the Orange County Fire Authority.
The case against Beal is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Mark Takla and Annamartine Salick of the Terrorism and Export Crimes Section.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
LOS ANGELES – Ten people were arrested in multiple cities over the past day in relation to two federal indictments charging members of an organized crime syndicate who allegedly conspired to traffic and import hundreds of kilograms of cocaine and other controlled substances from Mexico through Los Angeles for export to Canada or re-distribution throughout the United States.
Arrest and search warrants were executed this morning by a coalition of international law enforcement partners in various cities, including Los Angeles; Sacramento, California; Miami; Odessa, Texas; and the Canadian cities of Montreal, Toronto and Calgary.
In addition to those arrested, two defendants were already in state custody, and seven defendants are fugitives, including three Mexicans who allegedly supplied wholesale quantities of narcotics to the traffickers in the United States and Canada.
The investigation, known as “Operation Dead Hand,” resulted in two federal grand jury indictments returned under seal in Los Angeles earlier this month. The indictments, which were unsealed today, collectively charge 19 individuals for their alleged roles in the organized crime syndicate, including Mexico-based suppliers who brought large quantities of narcotics into the United States, United States distributors, a Canadian who led an exportation organization, Canadian-based semi-truck drivers who operate in the United States, and a large-scale Canadian trafficker and Italian organized crime figure, Robert Scoppa, whom investigators allege was purchasing massive quantities of drugs on a wholesale basis.
“Today’s charges and arrests across North America reflect the Justice Department’s close coordination with our Mexican and Canadian partners to disrupt international narcotics trafficking,” said Deputy Attorney General Lisa O. Monaco. “These cases provide yet another example of how our agents and prosecutors work side-by-side to uncover and dismantle organized criminal networks peddling and profiting from deadly drugs.”
“Drug trafficking is a global problem being driven by sophisticated, organized crime groups who put profits over people’s lives,” said United States Attorney Martin Estrada. “Motivated by greed, these criminals destroy lives, devastate families, and wreak havoc in our community. But this case shows that we will collaborate with our international partners to bring these criminal networks to justice. Those who traffic in highly addictive and dangerous drugs will be held accountable.”
“Until today, the organized members of this conspiracy operated with impunity throughout the many thousands of miles that comprise the North American continent, poisoning communities along the way,” said Donald Alway, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office. “The strength of this partnership cannot be overstated. The agents and detectives on this case did an outstanding job of pooling resources and worked seamlessly across borders toward a mutual goal of putting this massive drug pipeline out of business.”
Investigators developed information indicating the organized crime group used Canadian “handlers” and “dispatchers” who travelled from Canada to Los Angeles for short amounts of time. The handlers coordinated the pick-up and delivery of large shipments of cocaine and methamphetamine, which were loaded onto long-haul semi-trucks destined for Canada. Wholesale quantities of fentanyl were seized as a result of the investigation. The transportation was coordinated by a network of drivers working with dozens of trucking companies who made numerous border crossings from the United States to Canada via the Detroit Windsor Tunnel, the Buffalo Peace Bridge, and the Blue Water Bridge.
The indictments allege illicit drug trafficking activity cumulatively involving approximately 845 kilograms (1860 pounds) of methamphetamine, 951 kilograms (2,092 pounds) of cocaine, 20 kilograms (44 pounds) of fentanyl and 4 kilograms (nearly 9 pounds) of heroin. Over $900,000 in cash was seized during the investigation. The estimated wholesale value of the narcotics seized was between $16-28 million.
“Today, organized crime knows no boundaries,” said Michel Moore, the Chief of Police of the Los Angeles Police Department. “It is through the international cooperation between LAPD, the FBI, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and others that we were able to apprehend and charge multiple individuals who have imported significant amounts of drugs into this country. I am proud of our continued work with our federal and international partners to bring safety to our respective communities, and reduce the lives lost by these illicit drugs.”
“Organized crime groups continue to bring increasingly toxic drugs into our communities, a trend that has had a devastating impact on many Canadians, and most regrettably, our children and youth,” said Royal Canadian Mountain Police Chief Superintendent, Mathieu Bertrand. “As Canada's national police force, the RCMP is dedicated to disrupting the flow of illegal drugs into our country, looking beyond our borders to where these threats originate and stopping them at the source. Operation Dead Hand demonstrates the close work we do with our international partners to combat transnational organized crime, helping keep our communities safe on both sides of the border.”
“Customs and Border Protection’s partnerships with international, federal, state and local law enforcement agencies are a key component of our efforts to combat the transnational organized crime threat and prevent the movement of dangerous illicit drugs,” said Cheryl M. Davies, the Director of Field Operations for U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Los Angeles Field Office. “CBP will continue to invest in these partnerships as we work together to keep dangerous drugs out of our communities.”
“California is safer today thanks to this collaborative effort between our federal and local law enforcement partners,” said California Attorney General Rob Bonta. “Illicit drugs such as fentanyl can kill and have no place in our neighborhoods. I am proud of the task force officers working hard in our L.A IMPACT task force, and inspired by their commitment to ensuring the safety and well-being of all Californians.”
U.S. v. Sandoval:
An 18-count indictment returned on January 4 charges 10 defendants for their roles in an organization which allegedly began operating on an unknown date and continued to on or about March 2023. The charges in the indictment allege two drug trafficking conspiracies; conspiracy to import cocaine; drug exportation conspiracy; distribution/possession with intent to distribute controlled substances; possession of a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking and being a felon in possession of ammunition.
The defendants charged in this indictment are:
Jesus Ruiz Sandoval Jr., 45, of Guadalajara, Mexico;
John Joe Soto, 42, of Guadalajara, Mexico;
Eduardo Carvajal, 50, of Guadalajara, Mexico;
Roberto Scoppa, 55, of Montreal, Canada;
Ayush Sharma, 25, of Brampton, Canada;
Subham Kumar, 29, of Calgary, Canada;
Carlos Barragan, 51, of LongBeach, California;
Corell Carbajal Garcia, 38, of Hemet, California;
Humberto Luis Bermejo, 26, of Odessa, Texas; and
Esteban Sinhue Mercado, 24, of San Jacinto, California.
Sandoval Jr., who is currently a fugitive, is believed to be a large-scale drug trafficker involved in importing drugs from Mexico into the United States for distribution. John Joe Soto is believed to work under Sandoval. Eduardo Carvajal, also an alleged large-scale drug-trafficker, is believed to export drugs from the United States to Canada. Robert Scoppa is an alleged Canadian drug trafficker with close ties to an Italian organized crime family in Montreal. Barragan is an alleged drug trafficker who lives in the United States. Sharma and Kumar are semi-truck drivers involved in exporting drugs to Canada.
U.S. v. Sidhu:
A 23-count indictment returned on January 3 charges nine defendants for their roles in a related criminal enterprise which allegedly operated from at least September 2020 through February 2023. In addition to a drug trafficking conspiracy, the indictment alleges a drug exportation conspiracy and substantive counts of distribution/possession with intent to distribute controlled substances.
The defendants charged in this indictment are:
Guramrit Sidhu, 60, of Brampton, Canada;
Ivan Gravel Gonzalez, 32, a resident of both the Dominican Republic and Montreal, Canada;
Daniel Antonio Trejo Huerta, 43, of Riverside, California;
Ignacio Lopez, 53, a resident of Santa Ana, California;
Daniel Joseph Alan Herrera, 27, of Miami;
Orlando Velasco Jr., 29, of Stanton, California;
Angel Larry Sandoval, 32, of Bell Gardens, California;
Jorge Pina Nicols, 22, of LongBeach, California; and
Bryan Ureta Valenzuela, 24, of Ontario, California.
Sidhu is alleged to have orchestrated the trafficking and exportation of large-scale quantities of controlled substances to Canada working with several co-defendants described as suppliers. Ivan Gravel Gonzalez is alleged to be part of Sidhu’s exportation team based in the United States. Sidhu, also known as “King,” is charged with one count of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise. According to the indictment, Sidhu occupied a position of organizer, supervisor and manager, and in this role obtained substantial income and resources.
An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
If convicted, each defendant would face maximum penalties ranging from 40 years to life in federal prison. If convicted, Sidhu would face a mandatory minimum penalty of 20 years in prison. If convicted, Sandoval and Carvajal each would face a mandatory minimum penalty of 15 years in prison.
This case is part of an ongoing investigation by international law enforcement partners including the FBI, the Los Angeles Police Department and the Los Angeles Interagency Metropolitan Police Apprehension Crime Task Force (LA IMPACT), the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and law enforcement authorities in Mexico. Significant assistance was provided by Homeland Security Investigations and the Drug Enforcement Administration.
The Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs; the FBI’s Legal Attaché Offices in Mexico City, Ottawa and New Delhi; and the FBI Field Offices in Miami, El Paso and Buffalo provided substantial assistance and support.
Operation Dead Hand is part of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) investigation. OCDETF identifies, disrupts, and dismantles the highest-level drug traffickers, money launderers, gangs and transnational criminal organizations that threaten the United States by using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach that leverages the strengths of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies against criminal networks.
Assistant United States Attorney Brittney M. Harris of the International Narcotics, Money Laundering, and Racketeering Section is prosecuting this case.
LOS ANGELES – Law enforcement this morning arrested seven members and associates of Los Angeles Harbor area street gangs – including from the two largest gangs, Westside Wilmas and Eastside Wilmas – on federal charges alleging the trafficking of firearms and pound quantities of narcotics such as fentanyl.
Those arrested today are among 10 members and associates of street gangs who are named across three criminal complaints filed in federal court. One defendant is in state custody, and law enforcement continues to search for two defendants. Authorities arrested an additional four defendants on state charges.
In relation to the charges unsealed today, law enforcement seized approximately 23 firearms, 26.2 kilograms of methamphetamine, approximately 23,000 fentanyl pills, 2.4 kilograms of powdered fentanyl, and one kilogram of cocaine.
This morning’s arrests are the latest development in a violence reduction initiative started in late 2020 by a joint FBI and Los Angeles Police Department task force that targeted gang activity in the Harbor area. Prior to today’s arrests, 11 Harbor area gang members and associates were charged with federal drug, firearms and Hobbs Act robbery crimes. Three of those defendants already have been convicted and sentenced, receiving prison sentences of between 10 and 20 years.
The seven federal defendants arrested today are charged in complaints filed May 10 with various federal crimes, including distribution of controlled substances, possession with intent to distribute controlled substances, and being a felon in possession of a firearm.
According to an affidavit filed with one of the complaints, the task force has investigated influential members and associates of the Eastside Wilmas, Westside Wilmas and other Harbor area gangs who were suspected of being involved in a host of illegal activities. Both Eastside and Westside Wilmas are based in Wilmington, a Los Angeles neighborhood located near the twin ports of Los Angeles and LongBeach.
Harbor area gangs, including the Wilmas, commit their crimes under the direction and authority of the Mexican Mafia, a California prison gang that controls many of the Latino street gangs in Southern California. Mexican Mafia leaders and associates direct the activities of the Wilmas gangs from within the California state prison system. Leaders have access to illicit cellular telephones and other digital devices that they use to communicate with gang members in the community.
Law enforcement believes the Wilmas gangs are controlled by separate Mexican Mafia members who are each serving a life sentence in a California state prison after being convicted of murder. One Mexican Mafia associate directs firearm and drug sales from prison despite being sentenced to death for murder.
The complaint affidavit alleges from October 2022 to February 2023, reputed Wilmas and Mexican Mafia associate Patricia Amelia Limon, 53, of Lomita, fulfilled seven drug and firearm deals under the direction of the Mexican Mafia associate on death row. Limon personally, and at least once through an intermediary, supplied methamphetamine, fentanyl, firearms and ammunition to a buyer and collected money on behalf of the Mexican Mafia member.
In one deal on November 2, 2022, Limon allegedly supplied 5,000 rainbow-colored fentanyl pills to a buyer for $5,300. Fifteen days later, Limon allegedly supplied 1.71 kilograms (3.8 pounds) of methamphetamine and 2,000 fentanyl pills to a buyer for $5,000. The affidavit further alleges Limon engaged in other illicit sales of fentanyl and firearms.
The affidavit further alleges that Jesus Chuy Delgado, 46, of San Pedro, who reputedly is a high-ranking Westside Wilmas member, engaged in a series of methamphetamine and firearms sales, including several in January and February 2023 that allegedly occurred across the street from a high school and a middle school in San Pedro. Delgado allegedly sold firearms – including semi-automatic weapons lacking a serial number, commonly known as “ghost guns” – and 883.9 grams (1.95 pounds) of methamphetamine while on parole.
A criminal complaint is merely an accusation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
If convicted, Limon and Delgado – who are charged with distribution of controlled substances – would face a statutory maximum sentence of life in federal prison.
The FBI and the LAPD are investigating this matter.
Assistant United States Attorneys Kevin B. Reidy of Major Frauds Section and Suria M. Bahadue of the Criminal Appeals Section are prosecuting this case.
LOS ANGELES – Federal authorities have arrested an Inglewood man on a federal narcotics trafficking charge following an investigation that determined he ordered bulk quantities of at least one chemical used to make PCP and a search that led to the discovery over 2 kilograms of the drug, the Justice Department announced today.
William Cless Hubbard Jr., 63, was arrested Thursday evening by special agents with the Drug Enforcement Administration. Federal prosecutors this morning filed a criminal complaint against Hubbard charging him with possession with intent to distribute phencyclidine (PCP).
At his first court appearance late this afternoon in United States District Court, Hubbard was ordered detained pending trial. An arraignment in this case was scheduled on February 18.
During a search at Hubbard’s residence on Thursday, authorities recovered a one-gallon jug containing amber liquid which tested presumptively positive for PCP, according to the affidavit in support of the complaint. During a related search at a business owned by Hubbard, law enforcement found 55-gallon drums containing precursor chemicals regulated under the Controlled Substances Act that can be used to manufacture PCP.
The investigation into Hubbard began in October 2019 when authorities learned of a shipment of four drums of bromobenzene from China to a beauty supply company that Hubbard owned, the affidavit states. Bromobenzene has a number of applications, including being used in the manufacturing of PCP.
After the bromobenzene was delivered to his business on West Manchester Boulevard in South Los Angeles in December 2019, Hubbard was under surveillance by law enforcement. On several occasions in 2020, authorities observed Hubbard distributing suspected chemicals to several locations, including a building in LongBeach where a clandestine PCP lab was discovered last May.
A criminal complaint contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
If convicted of the narcotics charge alleged in the complaint, Hubbard would face a statutory maximum sentence of life in federal prison.
This matter was investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and L.A. IMPACT (the Los Angeles Interagency Metropolitan Police Apprehension Crime Task Force).
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney JohnPaul LeCedre of the General Crimes Section.
LOS ANGELES – A federal grand jury today accused three companies with illegally discharging oil during a pipeline break in early October by acting negligently in at least six ways, including failing to properly respond to eight separate leak alarms over the span of more than 13 hours and improperly restarting the pipeline that had been shut down following the leak alarms.
An indictment filed this afternoon charges the companies that own and operate the 17-mile-long San Pedro Bay Pipeline with one misdemeanor count of negligent discharge of oil. The charged defendants are Amplify Energy Corp.; Beta Operating Co. LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of Amplify doing business as Beta Offshore); and San Pedro Bay Pipeline Co. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Amplify).
The pipeline, which was used to transfer crude oil from several offshore facilities to a processing plant in LongBeach, began leaking on the afternoon of October 1, but the defendants allegedly continued to operate the damaged pipeline, on and off, until the next morning. As a result of the allegedly negligent conduct, what is estimated to be about 25,000 gallons of crude oil were discharged from a point approximately 4.7 miles west of Huntington Beach from a crack in the 16-inch pipeline.
The indictment alleges that the defendants acted negligently by:
Failing to properly respond to eight alarms from an automated leak detection system that were activated between 4:10 p.m. on October 1 until the final alarm at 5:28 a.m. the following day;
Shutting down and then restarting the pipeline five times after the first five alarms were triggered on October 1, resulting in oil flowing through the damaged pipeline for a cumulative period of more than three hours;
Despite the sixth and seventh alarms, pumping oil for three additional hours late on October 1 into the early morning hours of October 2 while a manual leak test was performed;
Despite the eighth alarm, operating the pipeline for nearly one hour in the predawn hours of October 2 after a boat they contacted failed to see discharged oil in the middle of the night;
Operating the pipeline with crewmembers who had not been sufficiently trained on the automated leak detection system; and
Operating the pipeline with an understaffed and fatigued crew.
An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
For a corporate defendant, the charge of negligently discharging oil carries a statutory maximum penalty of five years of probation, as well as fines that potentially could total millions of dollars.
The Coast Guard Investigative Service; the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Inspector General; the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Criminal Investigation Division; and the FBI are investigating the oil leak.
Assistant United States Attorneys Matthew O’Brien and Brian Faerstein of the Environmental and Community Safety Crimes Section are prosecuting this case.
LOS ANGELES – Two Orange County men have been arrested on a three-count federal grand jury indictment alleging they ran a transnational drug trafficking organization that exported wholesale amounts of cocaine and methamphetamine – concealed within commercial products such as instant noodle packets, car parts, emergency kits, and subwoofers – to Australia, Papua New Guinea, and New Zealand, the Justice Department announced today.
Hoang Xuan Le, 42, a.k.a. “Big Bro,” “Blue,” and “Knockout,” of Tustin, and Tri Cao Buinguyen, 38, a.k.a. “Bro” and “Mango,” of Garden Grove, were arrested Thursday. They are scheduled for arraignment this afternoon at United States District Court in Los Angeles.
In total, four defendants – including Trung Buinguyen, 40, of Lakewood, and Narongsak Champy, 28, of LongBeach – have been charged with one count of conspiracy to export controlled substances and one count of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances. Le and Tri Buinguyen are charged with one additional count of distribution of methamphetamine.
Trung Buinguyen and Champy are being sought by law enforcement.
As part of this case, law enforcement seized a total of 755 kilograms (1,664 pounds) of methamphetamine and more than 100 kilograms of cocaine. Law enforcement estimates that the value of the drugs seized exceeds $65 million and ranges up to $160 million.
According to the indictment, from at least February 2017 to September 2022, Le and Tri Buinguyen communicated with members of the drug trafficking organization in Australia, New Zealand, and Papua New Guinea. They then arranged for the export of bulk quantities of drugs from the United States to these nations via air cargo, ocean freight, and the U.S. mail, concealing the drugs in a variety of commercial products and falsifying their true nature on the manifests and customs documents.
The defendants allegedly used phones equipped with military-grade encryption software and encrypted messaging applications, particularly “Signal,” to coordinate the export of drugs from the United States. They also allegedly used fictitious names, businesses, and email accounts to communicate with intermediaries, including vendors, freight forwarders, shipping companies, customs brokers, and customs officials in the United States and foreign countries, to fraudulently disguise the drugs as legitimate commercial products.
For example, Le and Tri Buinguyen allegedly directed the summer 2018 shipment to Australia of 390 kilograms (860 pounds) of methamphetamine concealed in packets of instant noodles and mushroom seasoning, as well as the September 2018 export of 113 kilograms (249 pounds) of methamphetamine and 100 kilograms (over 220 pounds) of cocaine disguised as garlic seasoning. Additional shipments of drugs in October 2018, November 2019, February 2020, and August 2020 were allegedly concealed in emergency kits, car parts, subwoofers, and customized metal boxes.
In June 2021, Le and Tri Buinguyen orchestrated a bulk shipment of 150 kilograms (over 330 pounds) of methamphetamine concealed in food storage buckets for export to Papua New Guinea, according to the indictment. Finally, in August and September of 2022, Tri Buinguyen allegedly arranged for the export to New Zealand of 32 kilograms (more than 70 pounds) of methamphetamine concealed in meals ready-to-eat packets.
An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
If convicted of all charges, each defendant would face a statutory maximum sentence of life in federal prison.
Homeland Security Investigations is investigating this matter. The following agencies have provided substantial assistance to this investigation: United States Postal Inspection Service, the Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Customs and Border Protection, the Australian Federal Police, the Australian Border Force, the Australian Department of Homeland Affairs – Intelligence Division, the Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary, the Papua New Guinea Customs Service, and the New Zealand Customs Service.
This case is the result of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) investigation led by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California and HSI. The principal mission of the OCDETF program is to identify, disrupt, and dismantle the most serious drug trafficking, weapons trafficking, and money laundering organizations, and those primarily responsible for the nation’s illegal drug supply. OCDETF uses a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach that leverages the strengths of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies against criminal networks.
Assistant United States Attorney Gregg E. Marmaro of the International Narcotics, Money Laundering, and Racketeering Section is prosecuting this case.
LOS ANGELES – A former tax and estate-planning lawyer who set up shell companies to evade the payment of more than $1.4 million he owed to the IRS was sentenced today to 60 months in federal prison.
James Roy McDaniel, 66, of LongBeach, was sentenced by United States District Judge S. James Otero, who also ordered McDaniel to pay $1.54 million in restitution.
In October 2019, McDaniel pleaded guilty to one count of tax evasion.
McDaniel was a licensed California lawyer from 1981 until he surrendered his law license in 2004, shortly before he pleaded guilty to one felony count of subscribing to a false income tax return. In 2005, McDaniel was sentenced to three years in federal prison for that crime. In that case, McDaniel’s failure to report income – $1.6 million embezzled from his law firm clients – resulted in a tax loss of $677,368 to the federal government. The IRS subsequently assessed McDaniel more than $1.4 million in taxes, interest and penalties for the tax years 1997 through 2001. The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office prosecuted McDaniel for grand theft in that matter and he was sentenced to two years in state prison.
Following his convictions in the previous cases, McDaniel willfully attempted to evade paying his debt to the IRS by creating two shell companies – Davis Bell Consulting LLC and James Roy Consulting LLC – where he directed payments for tax and estate planning consulting work he performed after he was released from prison. Between May 2008 and late 2018, McDaniel attempted to mislead federal tax authorities and conceal his income by directing other people to sign documents identifying themselves as the sole managing members of the shell companies. McDaniel directed them to open bank accounts where he deposited checks for his tax and estate planning work.
In his plea agreement, McDaniel admitted to owing a total of $1,584,126 in unpaid taxes for the years 2008 to 2017. He has been in federal custody since his arrest in December 2018.
“Despite his fortuitous second chance for a lucrative career, rather than properly report his income and pay taxes, defendant set up a complex web of limited liability corporations and straw bank accounts to conceal his connection to the tax consulting income,” prosecutors wrote in their sentencing memorandum. “As if defendant’s conduct was not bad enough, for years he used his unwitting girlfriend and young adult children as nominees.”
This case was investigated by IRS Criminal Investigation.
This matter was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Ruth C. Pinkel of the Public Corruption and Civil Rights Section.
LOS ANGELES – Operation Jungle Book, a law enforcement initiative led by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service that targeted wildlife smuggling, has resulted in federal criminal charges against 16 defendants who allegedly participated in the illegal importation and/or transportation of numerous animal species – including a tiger, monitor lizards, cobras, Asian “lucky” fish, turtles, exotic songbirds and several coral species.
“We are combatting an ever-growing black market for exotic animals. An insatiable desire to own examples – both living and dead – of these vulnerable creatures is fueling this black market,” said Acting United States Attorney Sandra R. Brown. “This is a truly international problem that threatens the survival of iconic species and vulnerable animal populations. The United States Attorney’s Office is prosecuting a wide array of cases that highlight the pervasive problem of wildlife trafficking and the associated issues of invasive species, disease transmission and the extinction of certain species.”
In conjunction with the announcement of the criminal cases filed by federal prosecutors based in Los Angeles, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is holding a media event today to showcase the broad range of species that are being smuggled into the United States and recognize its law enforcement and community partners who provide substantial assistance in the fight against wildlife trafficking.
“Wildlife trafficking does not stop at international borders, and it is our duty to protect imperiled species both at home and abroad,” said Ed Grace, USFWS Acting Chief of Law Enforcement. “I commend our special agents who worked collaboratively with our state and federal partners to investigate, arrest, and prosecute these criminals. I would also like to thank the zoos, sanctuaries, and educational centers that shelter, care for, and rehabilitate the live animals we seize. Together, we are saving imperiled animals while bringing to justice those who attempt to profit from the illegal wildlife trade.”
At today’s media event, USFWS officials will be joined by representatives of the United States Attorney’s Office, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW). Some of the animals that have been recovered are currently being cared for by the Los Angeles Zoo, the San Diego Zoo Global, the Turtle Conservancy, and the STAR Eco Station – organizations that will also be represented at today’s event.
Over the past several months, prosecutors from the Environmental and Community Safety Crimes Section of the United States Attorney’s Office have filed and litigated a series of cases that demonstrate the scope of the underground market for protected wildlife. The cases further illustrate the various means used by traffickers to avoid detection in the harvesting and illegal smuggling of various species.
The black market for protected wildlife increases the demand for wildlife and their parts, which threatens to decimate vulnerable species. The prosecution of these cases will educate the public about the laws protecting wildlife and deter future wildlife crimes.
Tiger
A Florida man was arrested yesterday afternoon on charges of being involved in the illegal sale and transportation of a Bengal tiger that was seized from a residence in Ventura County.
Nicholas Bishop, also known as “Nick the Wrangler,” 27 – who currently resides in Hollandale, Florida, but at the time of the offense lived in Henderson, Nevada – was named in a criminal complaint filed late last month that charges him with the federal felony offense of aiding and abetting the purchase of a prohibited wildlife species. The State of California also prohibits the possession of tigers and other large cats (certain licensed individuals and organizations have exceptions).
According to the affidavit in support of the complaint, Bishop falsified documents used to purchase the tiger in March 2014 from an Indiana organization called Wildlife In Need, Wildlife Indeed. In a statement he later gave to investigators, Bishop said that he had purchased the tiger for Michael Ray Stevenson, a rapper who uses the stage name Tyga.
The following month, the tiger was seen in a backyard in Ventura and reported to the DFW, which later located and seized the animal in Piru. The two individuals who possessed the tiger in Piru were convicted in state court. When it was recovered, the tiger weighed approximately 100 pounds; it now weighs well over 400 pounds.
Bishop allegedly falsified purchase records and caused the interstate transport of the tiger without the necessary documentation and permits required by the USFWS and the United State Department of Agriculture.
Bishop was taken into custody yesterday afternoon. He is expected to make his initial court appearance this afternoon in United States District Court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. If he were to be convicted of the criminal charge, Bishop would face a statutory maximum sentence of five years in federal prison.
King cobras
A Monterey Park man pleaded guilty last month to smuggling king cobras – reptiles that were illegally brought into the United States after being hidden in potato chip cans shipped from Hong Kong.
Rodrigo Franco, 34, was arrested in July and charged with smuggling the cobras that were intercepted by CBP in March, along with Chinese albino soft-shelled turtles. At the time the cobras were seized, Franco was already under investigation because of a prior shipment of three protected turtles – two big-headed turtles and a pig-nosed turtle (or “Fly River” turtle) – that USFWS had intercepted in January.
After the cobras were seized in March, USFWS agents searched Franco’s residence, where they found, in a child’s bedroom, a Morelet’s crocodile, five diamond back terrapins and various turtles – all of which are protected under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), a treaty among 183 nations that is designed to ensure that international trade in specimens of wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival.
When he pleaded guilty, Franco admitted smuggling a total of 23 cobras that had a black market value of approximately $46,000. The three cobras seized by CBP in March were sent to the San Diego Zoo, where one ultimately died.
Franco pleaded guilty on September 7 and is scheduled to be sentenced by United States District Judge George H. Wu on December 7, at which time he will face a statutory maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison.
Monitor lizards
An Inglewood man pleaded guilty last month to smuggling five monitor lizards into the United States – two of which died while they were being shipped.
Gayle Simpson, 33, pleaded guilty on September 27 to one count of smuggling monitor lizards that were shipped from the Philippines.
The case against Simpson stems from a package intercepted by CBP in April. The package, which was labeled as “speakers” and was addressed to Simpson’s son, contained five monitor lizards: three spiny-necked water monitor lizards, one Samar water monitor lizard, and one Palawan water monitor lizard. Two of the monitor lizards arrived dead, and a third had suffered a crushed foot. All five monitor lizards are protected under CITES. A subsequent search warrant executed by USFWS at Simpson’s residence resulted in the seizure of four yellow-headed water monitor lizards and two spiny-necked water monitor lizards.
Simpson is scheduled to be sentenced by United States District Judge Manuel L. Real on November 20, at which time he will face a statutory maximum penalty of 20 years in federal prison.
In another case involving monitor lizards, a LongBeach man is scheduled to be arraigned on November 7 after being charged earlier this month with smuggling two species that had been shipped from the Philippines.
Bryan Cho, 41, allegedly was set to receive five monitor lizards in a package that was intercepted by USFWS October 2016. After a shipping company delivered the package, USFWS agents went to Cho’s business, where agents saw the same species of lizards in the store.
In May, USFWS learned about another package from the Philippines that was sent to Cho’s business address in LongBeach. While the package was described as containing “Toy Cars,” Cho admitted to ordering two or three monitor lizards from the Philippines.
If he convicted of the smuggling offense, Cho would face a statutory maximum penalty of 20 years in federal prison.
Arowana fish (“lucky” fish)
A Westminster man who sold arowana fish – said to be the world’s most expensive aquarium fish – pleaded guilty yesterday to smuggling the protected fish thought to be symbols of luck and prosperity in parts of Asia, as well as various turtle species.
Kevin Duc Vu, 45, pleaded guilty to a felony charge that carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison.
In September 2016, CBP intercepted a package addressed to Vu’s wife that contained six arowanas and seven big-headed turtles. The intercepted package also contained seven four-eyed turtles, six Asian box turtles and one black-breasted turtle. Six of the turtles ultimately died as a result of the smuggling efforts.
On October 5, 2016, USFWS agents searched Vu’s residence and recovered two black-breasted turtles and four dead arowanas that were concealed in a freezer.
Evidence uncovered during the USFWS investigation revealed that Vu had previously ordered wildlife, including arowanas, from an overseas supplier. According to court documents, Vu sold arowanas for $1,900, big-headed turtles for $850, and a pair of black-breasted turtles for $2,000.
Vu is scheduled to be sentenced by United States District Judge Christina A. Snyder on February 5.
Arowanas are also at issue in a three-count indictment returned by a federal grand jury last month, which charges an Orange County man and a foreign national with conspiring to smuggle the protected fish into the United States.
The indictment charges Shawn Naolu Lee, 29, of Garden Grove, and Mickey Tanadi, 21, of Jakarta, Indonesia, with conspiracy, smuggling protected fish into the United States and submitting a false record for wildlife intended for importation.
According to court documents, Lee ordered eight arowanas from Tanadi, agreeing in January to pay $2,000 for the fish plus shipping costs. Tanadi put the fish into bags of water that were concealed in porcelain pots to evade detection, which he then allegedly shipped in February.
A CBP officer noticed that a package labeled as “Porcelain Herbal Pots” was leaking water, and CBP intercepted the shipment. Following a controlled delivery of the shipment to Lee’s residence, USFWS agents recovered the arowanas. However, all eight fish ultimately died as a result of the smuggling scheme.
Lee has pleaded not guilty to the charges in the indictment, and is scheduled to go on trial before United States District Judge Otis Wright II on November 14. Tanadi remains at large. If they are convicted of the three charges in the indictment, Lee and Tanadi would each face a statutory maximum penalty of 30 years in federal prison.
A Florida man was charged earlier this month with a misdemeanor offense of engaging in the unlawful trade of arowana fish. Cory Pham, 43, of Sunrise, Florida, was named in a criminal complaint that alleges he brought five arowanas on a flight from Vietnam to Los Angeles International Airport on October 5.
Pham allegedly concealed the fish in black bags that were hidden in a plastic container placed in his luggage. Pham did not declare the arowanas to customs officials, nor did he have any permits that would allow him to legally bring the fish into the United States.
Pham is scheduled to be arraigned in this case on November 14. If he was convicted, Pham would face a maximum sentence of one year in federal prison.
Asian songbirds
An Orange County man was ordered this week to serve one year in federal prison, and another six months in home detention, after pleading guilty to smuggling protected Asian songbirds into the United States.
Kurtis Law, 50, of Fountain Valley, was sentenced by United States District Judge Manuel L. Real after pleading guilty last summer to smuggling and attempted entry of goods by means of false statements.
Law was arrested in May after bringing 93 Asian songbirds, worth nearly $100,000, on a flight from Vietnam. All but eight of the birds died in transit or soon after arriving at Los Angeles International Airport.
Earlier this week, a Westminster man pleaded guilty to conspiring to smuggle Asian songbirds – specifically, Chinese Hwamei – into the United States.
Sonny Dong, 55, admitted hiring another man to illegally import the birds from Vietnam. The birds were smuggled by hiding them under clothes or in baggage on airline flights.
Dong pleaded guilty before United States District Judge S. James Otero, who scheduled a sentencing hearing for May 14, 2018. Dong faces a statutory maximum sentence of five years in federal prison.
Feathers from protected birds
A Santa Ana man is scheduled to go on trial December 12 on misdemeanor charges of illegally selling feathers on Facebook from protected migratory birds and bald eagles.
Tyler Rene Vela, 27, could be sentenced to up to one year in prison if he is convicted of selling feathers from a bald eagle and up to six months in prison if convicted of selling feathers from a red-tailed hawk and a turkey vulture.
Corals
Late last month, prosecutors obtained three indictments charging a total of three individuals and two companies with engaging in the unlawful trading of protected live corals. Arraignments for all of the defendants are scheduled for early November.
Indictments and criminal complaints contain allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty in court.
The cases brought as part of Operation Jungle Book are being handled by Assistant United States Attorneys Erik M. Silber, Amanda Bettinelli, Dennis Mitchell and Heather Gorman of the Environmental and Community Safety Crimes Section.
SANTA ANA, California – A LongBeach man was sentenced today to 272 months in federal prison for leading a crew that committed 13 robberies of Verizon stores across Southern California and Arizona, netting approximately $340,000 worth of smartphones and other merchandise.
Zachary David Wade, 42, was sentenced by United States District Judge David O. Carter, who ordered him to pay $360,236 in restitution. Wade pleaded guilty in March 2019 to conspiracy to interfering with commerce by robbery, attempted interference with commerce by robbery, and brandishing a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence.
Between July 2017 and February 2018, Wade planned, organized and supervised the armed robberies of Verizon stores in Tarzana, Torrance, Fullerton, LongBeach, Corona, San Pedro, Corona del Mar, and the Arizona cities of Tucson and Glendale.
Wade selected which Verizon stores would be robbed and instructed his co-conspirators on how the robberies should occur, including identifying entrance and exit routes. He also provided equipment such as duffle bags and loaded firearms, which his co-defendants used during the robberies.
Wade also exclusively determined how much each robbery participant would get paid. The typical robbery netted tens of thousands of dollars’ worth of smartphones and other merchandise, which Wade later sold to a buyer in Glendale, California.
On January 31, 2018, Wade planned and organized the robbery of a Verizon retailer in Tucson, Arizona. He was arrested the next day in Glendale, California while attempting to sell the stolen smartphones and other merchandise for cash.
Eight of Wade’s co-defendants have pleaded guilty to felony conspiracy, robbery, and firearms charges. They are: Daniel Joseph Smith, 31, of LongBeach; Sean Keith Rivers, Jr., 26, of LongBeach; Marques Alphonse Petty-Wright, 32, of LongBeach; Randall Lee Tate, Jr., 31, of LongBeach; Andre Dierre Stovall II, 25, of LongBeach; Drae Tamar Wright, 28, of LongBeach; Sylvester Edwards, Jr., 30, of Lancaster; and Jeffrey Kevin Duran, 51, of Bellflower.
Tate was sentenced in September 2018 to 51 months in federal prison. In September 2019, Petty-Wright was given a two-year federal prison sentence. The other defendants are expected to be sentenced in the coming weeks.
Francisco Javier Neri, 32, of Van Nuys, a former employee of an authorized Verizon retailer in Tarzana, pleaded guilty to a federal robbery charge in December 2019. Neri admitted in his plea agreement that he conspired with Wade to rob his former employer, Verizon Tarzana. Neri is scheduled to be sentenced on April 6.
This case was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.
This case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Scott D. Tenley and Daniel S. Lim of the Santa Ana Branch Office.
SANTA ANA, California – The ringleader of a crew that committed 10 armed robberies of Verizon stores across Southern California and Arizona, netting approximately $340,000 worth of stolen smartphones and other merchandise in the process, pleaded guilty on Friday to three federal felonies.
Zachary David Wade, 41, of LongBeach, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to interfering with commerce by robbery, attempted interference with commerce by robbery, and brandishing a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence. United States District Judge David O. Carter has scheduled a July 8 sentencing hearing, where Wade will face a statutory maximum sentence of life imprisonment.
According to his plea agreement, from July 2017 until February 2018, Wade planned, organized and supervised the armed robberies of Verizon stores in Tarzana, Torrance, Fullerton, LongBeach, Corona, San Pedro, Corona del Mar, as well as in Arizona.
Wade admitted to selecting which Verizon stores would be robbed and instructing his co-conspirators on how the robberies should occur, including identifying entrance and exit routes. He also admitted to providing equipment such as duffle bags and loaded firearms, which his co-defendants then used during the robberies. Wade also admitted to exclusively determining how much each robbery participant would get paid. The typical robbery netted tens of thousands of dollars’ worth of smartphones and other merchandise, which Wade later sold to a buyer in Glendale, California, the plea agreement states.
On January 31, 2018, Wade planned and organized the robbery of a Verizon retailer in Tucson, Arizona, but was arrested the next day in Glendale, California while attempting to sell the stolen smartphones and other merchandise for cash.
Eight of Wade’s co-defendants have pleaded guilty to felony conspiracy, robbery, and firearms charges. They are: Daniel Joseph Smith, 30, of LongBeach; Sean Keith Rivers, Jr., 25, of LongBeach; Marques Alphonse Petty-Wright, 31, of LongBeach; Randall Lee Tate, Jr., 30, of LongBeach; Andre Dierre Stovall II, 24, of LongBeach; Drae Tamar Wright, 27, of LongBeach; Sylvester Edwards, Jr., 29, of Lancaster; and Jeffrey Kevin Duran, 50, of Bellflower.
Tate was sentenced in September 2018 to 51 months in federal prison. The other co-defendants await sentencing.
This case was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Scott D. Tenley and Daniel S. Lim of the Santa Ana Branch Office.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
LOS ANGELES – A neurosurgeon pleaded guilty today to a federal criminal charge for accepting approximately $3.3 million in bribes for performing spinal surgeries at a now-defunct LongBeach hospital whose owner later was imprisoned for committing a massive workers’ compensation system scam.
Lokesh Tantuwaya, 55, of San Diego, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit honest services fraud and to violate the federal Anti-Kickback statute. He has been in federal custody since May 2021 after he was found to have violated the terms of his pretrial release.
According to his plea agreement and statements at today’s change-of-plea hearing, from 2010 to 2013, Tantuwaya accepted money from Michael Drobot, who owned Pacific Hospital in LongBeach, in exchange for Tantuwaya performing spinal surgeries at that hospital. The bribe amount varied depending on the type of spinal surgery.
Pacific Hospital specialized in surgeries, especially spinal and orthopedic procedures. Drobot conspired with doctors, chiropractors and marketers to pay kickbacks and bribes in return for the referral of thousands of patients to Pacific Hospital for spinal surgeries and other medical services paid for primarily through the California workers’ compensation system. During its final five years, the scheme resulted in the submission of more than $500 million in medical bills for spine surgeries involving kickbacks.
Tantuwaya entered into contracts with Drobot and Drobot-owned companies. Tantuwaya admitted in his plea agreement that he knew or deliberately was ignorant that the payments were being given to him in exchange for bringing his patient surgeries to Pacific Hospital.
In furtherance of the scheme, Tantuwaya met with Drobot and Drobot’s employees. Tantuwaya further admitted to depositing bribe checks into his bank accounts.
Tantuwaya admitted that he knew the receipt of money in exchange for the referral of medical service was illegal and that he owed a fiduciary duty to his patients to not accept money in exchange for taking their surgeries to Pacific Hospital.
In total, Tantuwaya received approximately $3.3 million in illegal payments.
In April 2013, law enforcement searched Pacific Hospital, which was sold later that year, bringing the kickback scheme to an end.
To date, 23 defendants have been convicted for participating in the kickback scheme.
United States District Judge Josephine L. Staton scheduled a December 9 sentencing hearing, at which time Tantuwaya will face a statutory maximum sentence of five years in federal prison.
The FBI, IRS Criminal Investigation, United States Postal Service Office of Inspector General, and the California Department of Insurance investigated this matter.
Assistant United States Attorneys Joseph T. McNally and Billy Joe McLain of the Violent and Organized Crime Section are prosecuting this case.
LOS ANGELES – A company that repaired railcars at a Terminal Island facility has pleaded guilty to a federal environmental offense of dumping parts into the ocean to conceal that it was performing unnecessary and improper repairs for several railcar operators.
United Industries LLC – a subsidiary of Progress Rail Services, Inc., which itself is a subsidiary of Caterpillar, Inc. – appeared yesterday afternoon in United States District Court and pleaded guilty to the federal water pollution charge.
Immediately after the guilty plea, United States District Judge Dolly M. Gee imposed a sentence that required United Industries to pay a $5 million criminal fine. Judge Gee also ordered United Industries to pay $20 million in restitution to three victim companies – TTX Company, Pacer International, and Greenbrier Company, all of whom owned and operated railcars that were improperly serviced and repaired.
United Industries admitted in a plea agreement filed in federal court that its employees “knowingly conducted inadequate inspections” on railcars the company serviced. United Industries employees improperly replaced functioning parts that did not need to be removed in a process known as making repairs to “green parts.” Employees also made random repairs on the railcars without conducting a proper inspection. The victim companies were then charged for the unnecessary and improper repairs.
“In order to conceal their unnecessary and improper repairs, United Industries’ employees, operating within the scope of their employment and motivated by an intent to benefit the company, concealed the replacement of ‘green’ railcar parts by throwing such parts into the Port of LongBeach (also known as LongBeach Harbor), a navigable water of the United States, from the shore alongside the Terminal Island repair facility,” according to the plea agreement.
After receiving a tip about the improper dumping, Port authorities conducted underwater dives that led to the discovery of a “large debris field” and the recovery of railcar parts that did not show any signs of mechanical wear that would have required replacement.
As a result of illegal conduct that spanned the years 2008 through 2014 – including the unnecessary and improper repairs on railcar adapters, brake beams, grating platforms, brake shoes, friction castings, hand brakes, roof liners and side bearings – United Industries earned at least $5 million.
After the investigation was initiated, United Industries exited the intermodal railcar repair business and no longer operates intermodal repair facilities on Terminal Island or elsewhere.
United Industries pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor offense of depositing refuse in navigable waters, specifically the Port of LongBeach.
The investigation into United Industries’ improper repairs did not uncover any rail accidents attributable to the company’s illegal activities.
The investigation into United Industries was conducted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Criminal Investigation Division; the Federal Bureau of Investigation; the Federal Rail Administration; and the Los Angeles Port Police, Hazardous Materials Investigations Unit.
This case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Mark A. Williams and Joseph O. Johns of the Environmental and Community Safety Crimes Section.
LOS ANGELES – A LongBeach resident who traveled to Mexico to engage in illicit sexual conduct with a minor – and also enticed his victim to produce child pornography – was sentenced today to 120 months in federal prison.
Jonathan Sandoval-Lepe, 32, was sentenced this morning by United States District Judge George H. Wu.
Sandoval-Lepe pleaded guilty in November 2018 to federal charges of engaging in illicit sexual conduct in a foreign place and receiving child pornography depicting other victims.
According to his plea agreement, over the course of about two years that began in the spring of 2015, Sandoval-Lepe traveled to Baja California to have sex with the victim, who was 13 when the illicit sexual conduct started.
Sandoval-Lepe also admitted that in September 2017 he enticed the victim, who was then 15, to produce child pornography while he was in the United States. The victim sent that child pornography to Sandoval-Lepe in California.
In August 2017, Sandoval-Lepe knowingly received child pornography that he downloaded onto his computer from a peer-to-peer network, the plea agreement states. The investigation found more than 600 images and videos of child pornography, some of which depicted children who were under 12 years of age, according to court documents.
In addition to the prison term, Judge Wu ordered Sandoval-Lepe to pay $15,000 in restitution to his victims, including $10,000 to the Mexican victim. Judge Wu also ordered him to pay a $10,000 special assessment paid to the Domestic Trafficking Victims’ Fund. Following his release from custody, Sandoval-Lepe will remain on federal supervised release for the remainder of his life.
This case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department. Mexican law enforcement officers in Baja California provided assistance in this investigation.
This case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Joshua O. Mausner and Lana Morton-Owens of the Violent and Organized Crime Section.
LOS ANGELES – United States Attorney Nick Hanna and FBI Assistant Director in Charge Paul D. Delacourt today announced a series of child exploitation cases involving the victimization of minors through crimes that include the production of child pornography.
FBI agents on Thursday arrested two defendants as part of a multi-agency sweep that led to eight defendants being taken into custody over the past 10 days. Several of the cases involved agents with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations (HSI). These cases are part of Project Safe Childhood, which is the Justice Department’s ongoing initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child exploitation crimes.
The internet has dramatically increased the availability of child pornography, and digital equipment has made it relatively easy to create, distribute and collect these disturbing images. But underlying each case in which an individual uses technology, there is a young victim who was abused, molested or coerced to engage in sexual activity to fulfill the deviant interests of a perpetrator. Every child exploitation prosecution is designed to end this horrific behavior, to stop the cycle of abuse, and to bring offenders to justice.
“These cases involve acts of depravity against vulnerable young people, many of whom will continue to be victimized as photos documenting their abuse spread across the internet,” said United States Attorney Nick Hanna. “These cases are a reminder that child predators cannot hide behind the perceived anonymity of the internet. Those who engage in the child pornography industry – whether they create new images or collect videos – can and will be caught as a result of the concerted efforts of local, state and federal law enforcement authorities. Our aggressive investigators and prosecutors will continue to diligently work to protect innocent children and to seek justice for those who are victimized.”
“The cases being announced today range from individuals who continuously feed the demand for child pornography by sharing it, to those who document the sexual abuse of children through images and video, and others who travel abroad for the purpose of molesting children. In each case, a voiceless child is victimized for life,” said Paul Delacourt, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office. “The FBI and our partners have a clear mission that includes rescuing these precious victims from this unspeakable abuse and delivering some justice by putting their abusers in prison.”
The two defendants arrested Thursday by the FBI are:
Nestor Ramirez, 36, of South Los Angeles, who is charged with production, distribution and possession of child pornography. The production charge relates to images that Ramirez allegedly created, and he allegedly distributed videos over a peer-to-peer network on at least two occasions. During his arraignment Thursday afternoon, Ramirez pleaded not guilty to the charges in a four-count indictment and was ordered to stand trial on November 27. Ramirez was detained – meaning held without bond – pending trial.
Victor Manuel Diaz Romo, 53, of Lawndale, who is named in an indictment alleging receipt of child pornography over a peer-to-peer network and five counts of possession of child pornography. During his arraignment on Thursday, Romo pleaded not guilty and was ordered to stand trial on November 27. Romo was ordered detained pending trial.
The FBI-led sweep resulted in the arrest of six other defendants last week. Each of those defendants has entered not guilty pleas and are facing trials later this year. Those arrested on September 26 and 27 pursuant to grand jury indictments are:
Christopher Norman Strinden, 57, of Long Beach, who is charged with three counts of possession of child pornography he obtained from a now-defunct website called Playpen, which was operating on the dark web. Many of the more than 17,000 images in this case allegedly involve minors under the age of 12, including toddlers.
Kenneth Rudy Smith, 31, of Lawndale, who is charged with one count of possession of child pornography involving victims under the age of 12 that was found during a search of his residence.
Justin Schobey, 19, of Canyon Country, who is charged with production, distribution and possession of child pornography. Schobey allegedly used text messages to coerce a boy in another state to produce child pornography.
Jorge De Los Santos, 31, of South Los Angeles, who is charged with two counts of receipt of child pornography and one count of possession. De Los Santos allegedly used an online peer-to-peer network to obtain sexually explicit videos depicting young males.
Fernando Vazquez Garcia, 30, of South Los Angeles, who is charged with receipt of child pornography, as well as possessing videos he allegedly obtained over a file-sharing network.
Nathan Pham, 27, of Long Beach, who is charged with both receipt and possession of child pornography obtained through a peer-to-peer network. The possession count alleges images involving minors under the age of 12.
“No crime impacts us as law enforcement agents and as parents more deeply as the abuse of an innocent child,” said Joseph Macias, Special Agent in Charge for Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Los Angeles. “As these cases vividly illustrate, the internet has left our children vulnerable to exploitation by sexual predators not just around the corner, but around the globe. The staggering number of arrests achieved through interagency cooperation is a testament to our combined passion to prevent future harm to innocent children."
In recent weeks, federal prosecutors have filed cases against additional defendants who allegedly committed child exploitation offenses. Those case include:
A former music teach from Ventura – John Zeretzke, 60– who is charged with production of child pornography, attempted enticement of a minor, and traveling to the Philippines with the intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct. This case is being investigated by the United States Postal Inspection Service.
Members of the Los Angeles Regional Human Trafficking Task Force arrested a Long Beach man on charges of coercing a minor to produce child pornography and travelling to Mexico to engage in illicit sexual conduct. Jonathan Sandoval-Lepe, 31, was taken into custody by deputies with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and FBI agents pursuant to a five-count indictment.
Israel Sanchez, 52, of Sylmar, who was arrested on August 30 pursuant to an indictment that charges him with 13 counts of production of child pornography and one count of possession. Sanchez was arrested after he was released from state custody on child molestation charges involving one of the very young victims in the child pornography case.
Alex Primitibo Campos, 25, of Palmdale, who was arrested on September 5 on charges of distributing child pornography and three counts of possession. The distribution charge relates to videos depicting children as young as approximately 7 that Campos allegedly made available to others via download from a peer-to-peer network.
Joseph Natale, 24, of Lancaster, who was indicted on September 18 on two counts of distributing child pornography and two counts of possession. This case stems from an undercover FBI investigation in which agents downloaded images that Natale allegedly made available via a peer-to-peer network.
There have been developments recently in other child exploitation cases being prosecuted by the United States Attorney’s Office. Those cases involve:
Michael Joseph Farber, 50, of West Los Angeles, who pleaded guilty on September 14 to one count of possession of child pornography. Farber specifically admitted that he possessed videos showing a child under the age of 12 engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Farber is scheduled to be sentenced on December 10.
Richard Celestino, 48, of Green Valley (on the eastern edge of the Antelope Valley), who pleaded guilty on July 30 to possession of child pornography, admitting that he used a peer-to-peer file-sharing network to distribute and possess child pornography, including images depicting children under the age of 2. Celestino’s sentencing hearing is now scheduled for November 19.
Edward Anthony Contes, 36, of San Pedro, is scheduled to be tried on January 29 on charges of traveling to Mexico for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct with minor boys, use of the internet in an attempt to entice a minor to engage in prostitution, and attempted sex trafficking of two boys in the Los Angeles area. Contes was arrested in June after allegedly traveling to Tijuana in May and making contact on the internet with a person he thought was a child sex trafficker, but who in fact was an undercover law enforcement agent. In addition to seeking a boy in Mexico, Contes allegedly made arrangements with the undercover agent to pay to have sex with a 7-year-old and a 9-year-old at a hotel in Long Beach. This investigation is being conducted by HSI’s Long Beach Child Exploitation Investigation Group and the FBI’s Long Beach Resident Agency.
An elementary school teacher from Burbank, Sean David Sigler, is scheduled to be tried on April 11, 2019, on charges related to the sexual exploitation of a 15-year-old student. Sigler has been in custody since his arrest in May.
Daniel Patrick Diaz, 34, of Wilmington, was arrested in July pursuant to a six-count indictment that alleges the production, distribution, receipt and possession of child pornography. Diaz is currently scheduled for trial on January 22.
Charles Patrick Miller, 49, of Lancaster, was sentenced on August 13 to nine years in federal prison for distributing child pornography on a peer-to-peer network. Miller admitted possessing tens of thousands of images and videos depicting child pornography, and his distribution of child pornography continued even after the FBI served a search warrant at his residence. Once he completes his prison sentence, Miller will be on supervised release for the rest of his life.
An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty in court.
The charge of producing child pornography carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years in federal prison and a statutory maximum penalty of 30 years in prison.
The charges of distributing and receiving child pornography carry a five-year mandatory minimum sentence and a statutory maximum penalty of 20 years in prison.
Possession of child pornography does not carry a mandatory minimum sentence, but a conviction on this charge can bring a sentence of up to 20 years in federal prison.
The recent arrests are the product of investigations by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, often working in conjunction with the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, as well as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations. The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department participated in several of the investigations.
Assistant United States Attorney Devon Myers of the Violent and Organized Crimes Section is the office’s Project Safe Childhood Coordinator. In addition to the cases she is prosecuting, some of the cases being announced today are being handled by Assistant United States Attorneys Jeffrey C. Chemerinsky, Shawn R. Andrews, Wilson Park, Lana Morton Owens, Joey L. Blanch, Damaris Diaz, Joanna M. Curtis, Joseph D. Axelrad, Bruce K. Riordan and Scott M. Lara of the Violent and Organized Crime Section. Assistant United States Attorney Robyn K. Bacon of the Cyber and Intellectual Property Crimes Section, Assistant United States Attorney Kathy Yu of the Organized Crime and Drug Enforcement Task Force Section, and Assistant United States Attorney MiRi Song of the General Crimes Section are also handling cases.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
LOS ANGELES – A San Fernando Valley man has been charged in a federal criminal complaint with the attempted armed robbery of a Downey business – an attack in which a store employee pulled out a firearm and opened fire – as part of a series of armed robberies of other businesses in Los Angeles and Orange counties during a two-week crime spree earlier this year, the Justice Department announced today.
Antonio Bland, 34, of North Hollywood, is charged in a criminal complaint with one count of attempted interference with commerce by robbery (Hobbs Act). Bland, who was in state custody until earlier this week, made his initial appearance on Wednesday in United States District Court in downtown Los Angeles and was ordered jailed without bond. His arraignment is scheduled for June 10.
Complaints have also been filed against two other suspected accomplices, who also face attempted Hobbs Act robbery charges:
Ronnie Tucker, 22, of LongBeach, who is expected to be transferred to federal custody in the coming weeks.
Abigail Luckey, 49, of North Hollywood, who was the alleged getaway driver in the February 14 robbery of the Downey donut shop. She was ordered released on bond in state court but has since failed to appear in court and is considered a fugitive.
According to an affidavit filed May 13 with the complaints, from January 29 to February 14, Bland and his accomplices are suspects in armed robberies of 11 other businesses: one smoke shop in Tustin, nine 7-Eleven stores in North Hollywood, Burbank, Torrance, Van Nuys, LongBeach, Glendale, Pasadena, and one donut shop in Los Angeles.
“We’ve seen too much violent gun crime in our community and it has to stop,” said United States Attorney Martin Estrada. “Our Operation Safe Cities initiative is intended to do just that. Violent criminals should take heed that federal and local partners are collaborating more than ever to ensure that there are consequences for those who engage in gun crime.”
“Mr. Bland and others went on a mission to violently rob employees of small businesses in and around Los Angeles,” said Krysti Hawkins, the Acting Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office. “The FBI is dedicated to working with our local partners to pursue the most violent criminals wreaking havoc on our communities. Anyone with information as to the whereabouts of fugitive Abigail Luckey is urged to contact the FBI.”
“We appreciate the ongoing partnership with the United States Attorney’s Office, which will go a long way in holding these individuals accountable for their alleged violent actions on our community,” said Burbank Police Chief Michael Albanese.
These commercial robberies typically occurred late at night and usually involved two men who entered each business wearing hooded sweatshirts and face masks. In several of the robberies, a getaway driver waited outside for the subjects to complete the robbery and fled the scene in a white four-door sedan when the subjects returned to the vehicle.
The spree ended after Bland, along with two other individuals, committed an attempted armed robbery of a donut shop in Downey during the early morning hours of February 14, the affidavit states.
Once the subjects entered the donut shop, one yelled, “Open the cash register!” The employee noticed that one of the subjects, believed to be Bland, had what appeared to be a handgun tucked into his front waistband with the handle visible. Fearing that the subjects were going to harm him, the employee ran toward the rear kitchen area from behind the main sales counter. The subjects jumped the counter in pursuit of him. The employee retrieved his own firearm to defend himself. To deter the suspects from attacking him, he fired at least one shot, hitting a wall of the building.
After the employee fired, the subjects ran out of the store.
Law enforcement witnessed the attempted robbery and, shortly afterward, pulled over a car containing Bland and two other individuals, and later retrieved a firearm from the vehicle.
A complaint is merely an allegation, and each defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
If convicted, Bland and the other defendants would face a statutory maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison.
Operation Safe Cities establishes strategic enforcement priorities with an emphasis on prosecuting the most significant drivers of violent crime. Across this region, the most damaging and horrific crimes are committed by a relatively small number of particularly violent individuals. This strategic enforcement approach is expected to increase the number of arrests, prosecutions and convictions of recidivists engaged in the most dangerous conduct. It is designed to improve public safety across the region by targeting crimes involving illicit guns, prohibited persons possessing firearms, or robbery crews that cause havoc and extensive losses to retail establishments.
The FBI and the Burbank Police Department are investigating with assistance from the Tustin, Torrance, LongBeach, Glendale, Pasadena, Los Angeles, and Downey police departments.
Assistant United States Attorneys J’me K. Forrest of the Violent and Organized Crime Section and Diane Roldán of the General Crimes Section are prosecuting this case.
LOS ANGELES – A North Carolina man who engaged in a series of cyber and swatting attacks, including sending bogus threats of shootings and bombings to schools in the United States and United Kingdom, was sentenced today to 95 months in federal prison.
Timothy Dalton Vaughn, 22, whose online aliases included “WantedbyFeds” and “Hacker_R_US,” of Winston-Salem, North Carolina, was sentenced by United States District Judge Otis D. Wright II.
Vaughn pleaded guilty in November 2019 to one count of conspiracy to convey threats to injure, convey false information concerning use of explosive device, and intentionally damage a computer; one count of computer hacking; and one count of possession of child pornography.
Judge Wright sentenced Vaughn to prison terms of 95 months for the child pornography possession charge and 60 months for each of the other charges. The terms are to be served concurrently.
Vaughn was a member of the “Apophis Squad,” a worldwide collective of computer hackers and swatters. The collective caused disruptions by making threatening phone calls, sending bogus reports of violent school attacks via email, and launching distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks on websites.
Vaughn and others sent emails to at least 86 school districts threatening armed students and explosives. The threatened attacks included the imminent detonation of a bomb made with ammonium nitrate and fuel oil, rocket-propelled grenade heads placed under school buses, and the placement of land mines on sports fields.
In another instance, Vaughn and others called in a false hijacking report related to a flight traveling from London to San Francisco, claiming that four men with weapons and explosives had hijacked the plane.
In early 2018, Vaughn demanded 1.5 bitcoin (then worth approximately $20,000) from a LongBeach company, to prevent denial-of-service attacks on its website. When the company refused to pay, he launched a DDoS attack that disabled the company’s website.
Vaughn also possessed nearly 200 sexually explicit images and videos depicting children, including at least one toddler.
This matter was investigated by the FBI with assistance provided by the United States Secret Service as part of the Electronic Crimes Task Force.
This case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Julia S. Choe of the Cyber and Intellectual Property Crimes Section.
LOS ANGELES – The former president and chief executive officer of a LongBeach substance abuse treatment provider was sentenced today to 84 months in federal prison for participating in a scheme in which more than $18.5 million in fraudulent claims were submitted to California’s Drug Medi-Cal program for alcohol and drug treatment services for high school and middle school students.
Richard Mark Ciampa, 67, of Commerce, was sentenced by United States District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, who also ordered him to pay $17,640,325 in restitution. Ciampa pleaded guilty on January 6 to one count of health care fraud.
Ciampa founded the non-profit Atlantic Recovery Services (ARS), later called Atlantic Health Services, in 1996 and served as its president and CEO until its closure in April 2013 following a suspension in payments. ARS provided substance use disorder treatment services to students at local high schools and middle schools through Medi-Cal and its Drug Medi-Cal program.
From March 2009 to April 2013, Ciampa participated in a scheme to defraud Medi-Cal in which ARS billed the Drug Medi-Cal program for services to students who did not medically need alcohol or drug treatment. ARS also billed Drug Medi-Cal for group and individual counseling sessions that were not provided or did not meet the requirements for reimbursement as to size, length or setting. ARS employees falsified documents to support the false claims.
In March 2009, Drug Medi-Cal ordered ARS to repay an overpayment assessed to the organization, which caused a significant amount of financial pressure on Ciampa. Ciampa, in turn, passed along this financial pressure to his employees and threatened the employees that they would lose their jobs with ARS or have their hours reduced to part-time if they did not generate significant billings.
Ciampa was aware or willfully blind to the fact that, in response to his threats, ARS employees were generating false and fraudulent claims for submission to Drug Medi-Cal. He also encouraged ARS employees to engage in fraud, telling them they should “find a way” to enroll more students in ARS’ program despite Drug Medi-Cal’s medical necessity requirement.
The scheme was executed in several ways, including ARS counselors and managers maintaining student caseloads by enrolling students in the ARS substance abuse counseling program even if they had used drugs or alcohol only occasionally or even just once.
For example, in December 2011, ARS fraudulently submitted a claim for Medi-Cal reimbursement for an individual counseling session for a student on November 23, 2011 – a school holiday and the day before Thanksgiving – when the student was absent and the counselor listed on the claim did not provide any counseling.
In total, $18,530,927 in fraudulent claims were submitted because of the scheme, resulting in an actual loss to Medi-Cal of $17,640,325.
Prosecutors have obtained a total of 19 guilty pleas in this case and related cases, including former ARS Program Manager Lori Renee Miller, 60, of Lakewood, multiple former ARS managers and counselors, and Dr. Leland Whitson, 81, of Redondo Beach, the former Medical/Clinical Director of ARS who previously pleaded guilty to making a false statement affecting a health care program.
Gregory Hearns, 65, of LongBeach, the billing supervisor for ARS who compiled the monthly billing and arranged for its submission to Medi-Cal, LaLonnie Egans, 63, of LongBeach, a former manager, and Tina Lynn St. Julian, 57, of Inglewood, a former counselor, are expected to go on trial on January 6. They are charged with multiple counts of health care fraud.
An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
The California Department of Justice, Division of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse; the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General; and IRS Criminal Investigation investigated this matter.
Assistant United States Attorneys Cathy J. Ostiller and Karen E. Escalante of the Major Frauds Section and Nisha Chandran of the General Crimes Section prosecuted this case.
LOS ANGELES – A federal jury today found a Montebello man guilty of distributing fentanyl to a buyer who then distributed it to a victim who the next day suffered a fatal overdose of the powerful synthetic opioid at a LongBeach drug treatment facility in late 2021.
Juan Carlos Gutierrez, 33, a.k.a. “Johnny G,” was found guilty of one count of distribution of fentanyl resulting in death and serious bodily injury, a felony offense that carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 20 years in federal prison and a statutory maximum sentence of life imprisonment.
According to evidence presented at an eight-day trial, Gutierrez on December 9, 2021, distributed fentanyl to co-defendant Jayleen Feusier, 36, of South Gate. Previously that night, Feusier agreed to get fentanyl for the victim, a 34-year-old man who was residing at a LongBeach drug treatment facility. In exchange for $60, Feusier agreed to get the fentanyl for the victim from Gutierrez.
Later that night, Feusier broke off approximately one gram of the fentanyl that Gutierrez provided to her, packaged it in a small plastic baggie, and placed the baggie, a lighter, and drug paraphernalia into a small box. She then placed the small box into a bag with a black t-shirt to mask the contents, ordered an Uber delivery service, and placed the item on the backseat of the vehicle to be delivered to the victim at the rehabilitation facility. Feusier then sent a link to the victim so he could track the Uber as it traveled to him.
At around 11 p.m. that night, the victim jumped a fence and retrieved the package from the Uber vehicle then went back inside the drug treatment facility. Approximately six hours later, the victim’s body was discovered inside the facility’s living room. Drug paraphernalia sent by Feusier was discovered nearby the victim.
The Los Angeles County Medical Examiner’s Office ruled that the victim’s death was caused by a fentanyl overdose.
United States District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. scheduled an October 15 sentencing hearing for Gutierrez, who has been in federal custody since May 2023.
Feusier, who has been in federal custody since February 6, pleaded guilty on March 5 to one count of distribution of fentanyl. She faces up to 20 years in federal prison at her sentencing hearing, which is expected to occur in the coming months.
The Drug Enforcement Administration and the LongBeach Police Department investigated this matter.
Assistant United States Attorneys Jeremy K. Beecher and Danbee C. Kim of the General Crimes Section are prosecuting this case.
SANTA ANA, California – An Internal Revenue Service official was arrested this morning for allegedly soliciting and accepting a $5,000 bribe to reduce the tax liability of a taxpayer who was under audit.
Felecia Edna Taylor, 50, a resident of the Florence neighborhood in South Los Angeles, was arrested at the IRS office in LongBeach after being named in a one-count criminal complaint that charges her with solicitation and receipt of a bribe by a public official.
Taylor is making her initial court appearance this afternoon in United States District Court in Santa Ana.
According to an affidavit in support of the criminal complaint, Taylor, who has been employed at the IRS since 1990, works as a tax compliance officer in LongBeach, where she plans and conducts examinations of individual and business taxpayers. On May 1, a taxpayer contacted law enforcement, and stated that, at a meeting two days earlier, Taylor was “inviting a bribe” in exchange for lowering the amount owed to the IRS to $10,000, according to court documents. The taxpayer was supposed to pay the bribe to Taylor on May 7 at her LongBeach office, court papers state.
The taxpayer met with law enforcement on Tuesday, was equipped with recording devices, and was given $5,000 in cash to give to Taylor, the affidavit states. According to a recording of that meeting, Taylor provided adjusted tax records to show a reduction of the taxpayer’s liability to $10,616 as agreed and, in response, the taxpayer handed Taylor an envelope containing $5,000 in cash. Taylor allegedly took the envelope in one hand, mouthed the word, “Five?” and placed five fingers in the air to non-verbally confirm the amount of cash the taxpayer had just given her. When the taxpayer replied, “Yes, what we agreed on, yep it’s all there,” Taylor placed the envelope on her desk and stated, “We are all done,” the affidavit states.
If convicted of the bribery charge, Taylor would face a statutory maximum penalty of 15 years in federal prison.
A complaint contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
This matter was investigated by the U.S. Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Jennifer Waier of the Santa Ana Branch Office.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
SANTA ANA, California – An Internal Revenue Service official was arrested this morning for allegedly soliciting and accepting a $5,000 bribe to reduce the tax liability of a taxpayer who was under audit.
Felecia Edna Taylor, 50, a resident of the Florence neighborhood in South Los Angeles, was arrested at the IRS office in LongBeach after being named in a one-count criminal complaint that charges her with solicitation and receipt of a bribe by a public official.
Taylor is making her initial court appearance this afternoon in United States District Court in Santa Ana.
According to an affidavit in support of the criminal complaint, Taylor, who has been employed at the IRS since 1990, works as a tax compliance officer in LongBeach, where she plans and conducts examinations of individual and business taxpayers. On May 1, a taxpayer contacted law enforcement, and stated that, at a meeting two days earlier, Taylor was “inviting a bribe” in exchange for lowering the amount owed to the IRS to $10,000, according to court documents. The taxpayer was supposed to pay the bribe to Taylor on May 7 at her LongBeach office, court papers state.
The taxpayer met with law enforcement on Tuesday, was equipped with recording devices, and was given $5,000 in cash to give to Taylor, the affidavit states. According to a recording of that meeting, Taylor provided adjusted tax records to show a reduction of the taxpayer’s liability to $10,616 as agreed and, in response, the taxpayer handed Taylor an envelope containing $5,000 in cash. Taylor allegedly took the envelope in one hand, mouthed the word, “Five?” and placed five fingers in the air to non-verbally confirm the amount of cash the taxpayer had just given her. When the taxpayer replied, “Yes, what we agreed on, yep it’s all there,” Taylor placed the envelope on her desk and stated, “We are all done,” the affidavit states.
If convicted of the bribery charge, Taylor would face a statutory maximum penalty of 15 years in federal prison.
A complaint contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
This matter was investigated by the U.S. Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Jennifer Waier of the Santa Ana Branch Office.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
SANTA ANA, California – A doctor and the former owner of a Long Beach hospital was sentenced this morning to 15 months in federal prison for taking part in a long-running health care fraud scheme where he authorized sham contracts that concealed over $30 million in illegal kickback payments to physicians who steered spinal surgeries to his hospital. The overall scheme resulted in more than $900 million in fraudulent bills being submitted, primarily to California’s worker compensation system.
Dr. Faustino Bernadett, 65, of Rolling Hills, was sentenced by United States District Judge Josephine L. Staton, who also ordered him to pay a $60,000 fine on top of $1 million he has already forfeited to the United States.
Bernadett, a board-certified anesthesiologist and pain management physician who retired his license last year, pleaded guilty in August to a one-count criminal information charging him with misprision of a felony.
The kickback scheme centered on Pacific Hospital in Long Beach, which specialized in surgeries, especially spinal and orthopedic procedures. Pacific Hospital’s owner, Michael D. Drobot, conspired with doctors, chiropractors and marketers to pay kickbacks in return for the referral of thousands of patients to Pacific Hospital for spinal surgeries and other medical services paid for primarily through the California workers’ compensation system.
In 2005, Bernadett purchased Pacific Hospital from Drobot. Under the terms of the sale, Drobot guaranteed to Bernadett that 75 spinal surgeries per month would be performed at Pacific Hospital or else Drobot’s payout would be reduced by $25,000 for each surgery below that requirement.
Bernadett, who became directly involved with the hospital’s day-to-day operations by late 2007, later learned that Drobot was making illegal kickback payments to physicians in order to cause those physicians to steer spinal surgeries to Pacific Hospital. By January 2008, Bernadett had learned that Drobot concealed the illegal kickback payments by entering into various types of sham contracts – such as management agreements, collection agreements and option agreements.
Instead of putting a halt to Drobot’s kickback scheme, Bernadett authorized the continued use of Drobot’s sham contracts to incentivize surgical referrals to his hospital. Between January 2008 and October 2010 (when Bernadett sold his interest in Pacific Hospital back to Drobot), Pacific Hospital and related entities made more than $30 million in illicit payments to kickback recipients and performed approximately 1,400 kickback-induced spinal fusion surgeries.
“Kickbacks corrupt the doctor-patient relationship and have a deleterious impact on the health care system because they incentivize doctors to put their financial interests before patients’ best interests,” prosecutors wrote in their sentencing memorandum. “More so than other Pacific Hospital executives, [Bernadett] understands the sacred nature of the doctor-patient relationship because he is a physician himself.”
Twenty-four defendants have been charged in connection with the scheme, and 15 of them have been convicted, including Drobot and his son.
Drobot is serving a five-year prison sentence for conspiracy and paying illegal kickbacks, and has admitted that he orchestrated a wide-ranging fraudulent kickback scheme where paid more than $50 million in bribes to doctors to steer hundreds of millions of dollars in spinal surgeries to his hospital. Drobot ultimately profited millions of dollars from the scheme. Drobot currently awaits sentencing after pleading guilty to breaking additional federal laws by violating a court forfeiture order by illegally selling his luxury cars.
The investigation into the spinal surgery kickback scheme was conducted by the FBI; IRS Criminal Investigation; the California Department of Insurance; and the United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General.
This case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Joseph T. McNally of the Violent and Organized Crime Section, Scott D. Tenley of the Santa Ana Branch Office, and Victor A. Rodgers of the Asset Forfeiture Section.
SANTA ANA, California – A spinal surgeon was sentenced today to 30 months in federal prison for participating in a long-running health care fraud scheme in which he received at least $5 million in kickbacks for performing hundreds of spinal surgeries. The overall scheme resulted in more than $580 million in fraudulent bills being submitted, mostly to California’s worker compensation system.
Dr. Daniel Capen, 70, of Manhattan Beach, was sentenced by United States District Judge Josephine L. Staton, who also ordered Capen to forfeit $5 million to the United States and pay a $500,000 fine.
Capen, an orthopedic surgeon specializing in spinal surgeries, pleaded guilty in August 2018 to conspiracy to commit honest services fraud, and soliciting and receiving kickbacks for health care referrals.
The kickback scheme centered on Pacific Hospital in Long Beach, which specialized in surgeries, especially spinal and orthopedic procedures. Pacific Hospital’s owner, Michael D. Drobot, conspired with doctors, chiropractors and marketers to pay kickbacks in return for the referral of thousands of patients to Pacific Hospital for spinal surgeries and other medical services paid for primarily through the California workers’ compensation system.
Capen received kickbacks for referring surgeries to Pacific Hospital and also for using medical hardware from a Pacific Hospital-affiliated entity during the spinal surgeries he performed. He also received kickbacks for referring medical services such as urine and drug testing to Pacific Hospital-affiliated entities.
In total, between 1998 and 2013, Capen accounted for approximately $142 million of Pacific Hospital’s claims to insurers, on which the hospital was paid approximately $56 million. Capen admitted to receiving at least $5 million in kickbacks during the course of his crimes.
Drobot is serving a five-year prison sentence for conspiracy and paying illegal kickbacks, and has admitted that he orchestrated a wide-ranging fraudulent kickback scheme where paid more than $50 million in bribes to doctors to steer hundreds of millions of dollars in spinal surgeries to his hospital. Drobot ultimately profited millions of dollars from the scheme. Drobot currently faces additional federal criminal charges for allegedly violating a court forfeiture order by illegally selling his luxury cars.
Seventeen defendants have been charged in connection with the scheme, and 10 of them have been convicted, including Drobot and his son. Another doctor – Timothy James Hunt, 55, of Palos Verdes Estates – was sentenced in late September to two years in federal prison after he admitted taking illegal kickbacks.
The investigation into the spinal surgery kickback scheme was conducted by the FBI; IRS Criminal Investigation; the California Department of Insurance; and the United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Joseph T. McNally of the Violent and Organized Crime Section, Scott D. Tenley of the Santa Ana Branch Office, Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section, and Victor A. Rodgers of the Asset Forfeiture Section.
SANTA ANA, California – The imprisoned former owner of Pacific Hospital in Long Beach has agreed to plead guilty to federal criminal charges for illegally selling his luxury cars and keeping the proceeds for himself, disobeying a court order that he forfeit the money because of a previous conviction for orchestrating a nearly $1 billion health care fraud scheme.
Michael D. Drobot, 74, formerly of Corona del Mar but who is now imprisoned at Taft Correctional Institution in Kern County, has been charged in a three-count criminal information with wire fraud, engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from unlawful activity, and criminal contempt of court.
Drobot is scheduled to be arraigned on the information in the coming weeks in United States District Court in Santa Ana. He faces a statutory maximum sentence of 50 years in federal prison.
Drobot pleaded guilty in 2014 to charges of conspiracy and paying illegal kickbacks, admitting that he orchestrated a wide-ranging fraudulent kickback scheme where paid more than $50 million in bribes to doctors to steer hundreds of millions of dollars in spinal surgeries to his hospital. Drobot ultimately profited millions of dollars from the scheme.
According to his plea agreement filed on Tuesday, in January 2018, Drobot was sentenced to five years in federal prison and was ordered by the court to forfeit $10 million to the United States government and to partially satisfy the forfeiture by selling his 1965 Aston Martin, 1958 Porsche, and 1971 Mercedes-Benz automobiles. Drobot was ordered to perform this obligation by July 5, 2018.
Instead, from June 22, 2018 until September 14, 2018, Drobot intentionally violated the court’s forfeiture order in an effort to keep his criminal proceeds, the plea agreement states.
For example, on June 22, 2018, Drobot conveyed an interest in the Aston Martin car to a classic car auction company in exchange for a $1 million advance on the proceeds of the car’s sale, according to the plea agreement. Drobot admitted that he caused the auction company to wire $1 million to Drobot’s bank account. Drobot also admitted he used that money for personal expenses and not to satisfy the court’s forfeiture order. Drobot further admitted to laundering the money via transfers to third parties.
After Drobot violated the court’s forfeiture order, the government moved successfully in February 2019 to satisfy the outstanding money judgment by forfeiting Drobot’s interest in his Newport Beach residence and Perris, California business property.
As part of the underlying health care fraud scheme for which he was imprisoned, Drobot paid bribes to California State Senator Ronald Calderon in exchange for Calderon performing official acts to keep the spinal pass-through law on the books. Calderon served a 3½-year sentence in federal prison after admitting that he took bribes from Drobot and undercover FBI agents.
Prosecutors have charged 17 individuals and obtained 10 convictions as part of Operation Spinal Cap, which targets a long-running health care fraud scheme that generated nearly $1 billion in fraudulent claims to federal government, California state, and private insurers. Drobot spearheaded the scheme.
This case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, IRS-Criminal Investigation, the California Department of Insurance, and the United States Postal Service, Office of the Inspector General.
This matter is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Joseph T. McNally of the Violent and Organized Crime Section, Scott D. Tenley of the Santa Ana Branch Office, Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section, and Jonathan S. Galatzan of the Asset Forfeiture Section.
SANTA ANA, California – Three additional doctors have been charged in three new cases for their roles in a 15-year-long health care fraud scheme that involved more than $40 million in illegal kickbacks paid to doctors and other medical professionals in exchange for referring thousands of patients who received spinal surgeries. As a result of the kickback scheme, more than $580 million in fraudulent bills were submitted, mostly to California’s worker compensation system.
David Hobart Payne, 60, an orthopedic surgeon who lives in Irvine, is scheduled to be arraigned later today in United States District Court on charges of conspiracy, honest services fraud, and using an interstate facility to aid in unlawful activity. A five-count superseding indictment returned by a federal grand jury on April 25 alleges that Payne was bribed approximately $450,000 to steer more than $10 million in kickback-tainted surgeries to Pacific Hospital of Long Beach.
Jeffrey David Gross, 52, an orthopedic surgeon who resides in Dana Point and Las Vegas, Nevada, appeared in federal court on Wednesday and pleaded not guilty to charges contained in a 14-count indictment returned earlier this year by a federal grand jury. Gross, who faces charges of conspiracy, honest services mail fraud and honest services wire fraud, was ordered to stand trial on August 7. The indictment alleges that Gross made at least $622,000 in exchange for performing and/or referring more than $19 million in kickback-tainted surgeries to Pacific Hospital.
In the third indictment being announced today, Lokesh Tantuwaya, 51, who maintains residences in Rancho Santa Fe and Rock Springs, Wyoming, was charged in February by a federal grand jury. The 13-count indictment charges Tantuwaya with conspiracy, honest services fraud, and using an interstate facility to aid in unlawful activity. Tantuwaya, who pleaded not guilty in April, has been ordered to stand trial on November 6. The indictment alleges that Tantuwaya received approximately $3.2 million in kickbacks for referring and/or performing $38 million in surgeries to Pacific Hospital.
The kickback scheme centered on Pacific Hospital of Long Beach, which specialized in surgeries, especially spinal and orthopedic procedures. The owner of Pacific Hospital, Michael D. Drobot, conspired with doctors, chiropractors and marketers to pay kickbacks in return for the referral of thousands of patients to Pacific Hospital for spinal surgeries and other medical services paid for primarily through the California workers’ compensation system. During its final five years, the scheme resulted in the submission of over $500 million in fraudulent medical bills. To date, nine defendants have been convicted for participating in the kickback scheme.
If they were to be convicted of the charges in the indictments announced today, Payne, Gross and Tantuwaya would face potential sentences of decades in federal prison.
An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed to be innocent until and unless proven guilty in court.
The investigation into the spinal surgery kickback scheme is being conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; IRS Criminal Investigation; the California Department of Insurance; and the United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Joseph T. McNally and Scott D. Tenley of the Santa Ana Branch Office, and Assistant United States Attorney Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section.
SANTA ANA, California – A federal judge today sentenced the former owner of Pacific Hospital in LongBeach to 63 months in prison for overseeing a 15-year-long health care fraud scheme that involved more than $40 million in illegal kickbacks paid to doctors and other medical professionals in exchange for referring thousands of patients who received spinal surgeries.
The scheme operated by Michael D. Drobot led to more than $500 million in fraudulent bills being submitted during last five years of the scheme – much of which was paid by the California worker’s compensation system.
Drobot, 73, of Corona Del Mar, was sentencing this morning by United States District Judge Josephine L. Staton, who noted that Drobot “introduced greed into the doctor-patient relationship.”
Drobot pleaded guilty in 2014 to charges of conspiracy and paying illegal kickbacks, admitting that he orchestrated a wide-ranging fraud scheme in which “[t]housands of patients received surgeries at Pacific Hospital not knowing that [Drobot] bribed their physician to perform their surgery at Pacific Hospital,” prosecutors wrote in a sentencing memorandum filed with the court. Drobot “was motivated by greed and ultimately profited millions of dollars through the scheme.”
From at least 1997 through 2013, Drobot, who owned and/or operated Pacific Hospital during this time, ran a scheme in which he billed workers’ compensation insurers hundreds of millions of dollars for spinal surgeries performed on patients who had been referred by dozens of doctors, chiropractors and others who were paid illegal kickbacks.
“The patients believed that they were receiving conflict-free medical advice when, in fact, [Drobot] illegally incentivized their physician to perform the surgery at Pacific Hospital,” prosecutors said in court documents.
The kickbacks were financed largely by money generated from Drobot’s sale of medical devices implanted into state workers’ comp patients during spinal surgeries. Drobot set up a scheme that exploited a now-repealed California law known as the spinal “pass-through” legislation, which permitted hospitals to pass on to workers’ comp insurers the full cost of medical devices implanted in spinal surgery patients.
Drobot generated the kickback money through his own medical hardware company – the Newport Beach-based International Implants (I2) – to sell hardware used in spinal surgeries performed at Pacific Hospital. I2 submitted bills to Drobot’s Hospital and tacked on an additional $250 per device knowing that the “pass-through” law required to state to pay the full amount of the invoices.
“Through the operation of I2, [Drobot] generated substantial profits that he used to pay at least $40 million dollars in kickbacks,” prosecutors wrote in court papers. “According to the former CFO of Pacific Hospital, his income, bonuses, and other compensation at the hospital was in excess of $20,000,000.”
As part of the health care fraud scheme, Drobot paid bribes to California State Senator Ronald Calderon in exchange for Calderon performing official acts to keep the spinal pass-through law on the books. Calderon is currently serving a 3½-year sentence in federal prison after admitting that he took bribes from Drobot and undercover FBI agents.
Drobot typically paid a kickback of $15,000 per lumbar fusion surgery and $10,000 per cervical fusion surgery. Some of the patients lived as much as hundreds of miles away from Pacific Hospital, and closer to other qualified medical facilities.
Drobot and his co-conspirators concealed the kickback payments by entering into bogus contracts with the doctors, chiropractors, and others who received kickbacks. In reality, the contracts merely provided a cover story for the kickback payments.
In addition to the prison term, which Drobot will begin serving on June 4, Judge Staton imposed a $500,000 criminal fine and issued an order directing Drobot to forfeit $10 million to the government. As part of the forfeiture judgment, which Judge Staton signed on Wednesday, Drobot was ordered to liquidate assets that include real estate and a 1965 Aston Martin, a 1958 Porsche, and a 1971 Mercedes Benz.
Judge Staton has scheduled a restitution hearing for May 11.
In addition to Drobot, prosecutors have charged seven other defendants in relation to the kickback scheme. The seven additional defendants – which include Drobot’s son, Michael R. Drobot – have pleaded guilty and are scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Staton over the next two months.
The ongoing investigation into the spinal surgery kickback scheme is being conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; IRS Criminal Investigation; the California Department of Insurance; and the United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General.
The case against Drobot was being handled by Assistant United States Attorneys Joseph T. McNally and Scott D. Tenley of the Santa Ana Branch Office, and Ashwin Janakiram of the Major Frauds Section.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
LOS ANGELES – A federal jury today convicted three defendants who participated in an $18.5 million scheme that submitted fraudulent claims to California’s Drug Medi-Cal program for alcohol and drug treatment services for high school and middle school students.
With today’s guilty verdicts, a total of 19 people have been convicted of federal criminal charges stemming from fraudulent bills submitted by a LongBeach company – the non-profit Atlantic Recovery Services (ARS), later called Atlantic Health Services – that provided substance use disorder treatment services to students at local high schools and middle schools through Medi-Cal and its Drug Medi-Cal program.
The three defendants convicted today of health care fraud charges are:
Gregory Hearns, 66, of Compton, the billing supervisor for ARS who compiled the monthly billing and arranged for its submission to Medi-Cal (guilty of one count and acquitted on 10 others);
LaLonnie Egans, 64, of Bellflower, a former manager at ARS (guilty of three counts);
Tina Lynn St. Julian, 58, of Inglewood, a former counselor at ARS (guilty of four counts).
United States District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez is scheduled to sentence all three defendants on July 15, at which time each will face up to 10 years in prison for each count of conviction.
According to court documents and the evidence presented at a 12-day trial, the participants in the ARS scheme defrauded the Drug Medi-Cal program by submitting bills for services to students who did not medically need alcohol or drug treatment. ARS also billed Drug Medi-Cal for group and individual counseling sessions that were not provided or did not meet the requirements for reimbursement as to size, length, or setting. To support the false billings, ARS employees falsified numerous documents.
The former president and chief executive officer of ARS – Richard Mark Ciampa, 68, of Commerce – pleaded guilty last year and was sentenced in September to seven years in federal prison.
In March 2009, Drug Medi-Cal ordered ARS to repay an overpayment, which caused a significant amount of financial pressure on Ciampa and ARS. Ciampa, in turn, passed along this financial pressure to his employees and threatened the employees that they would lose their jobs with ARS or have their hours reduced to part-time if they did not generate significant billings. In response to Ciampa’s threats, ARS employees generated false and fraudulent claims for submission to Drug Medi-Cal.
Hearns also pressured ARS employees to increase billings. The pressure from ARS management prompted Egans and St. Julian to commit specific actions, including enrolling students in ARS’s substance abuse treatment program even if the students had used drugs or alcohol only one time or just occasionally, exaggerating documentation to falsely show that enrolled students had a medically diagnosed substance use disorder, falsifying documents to make it look like group and individual counseling sessions had taken place, collecting student signatures on sign-in sheets for group counseling sessions that the students did not attend or that were not conducted, and forging signatures on sign-in sheets and other documents that were used to support claims for reimbursement.
During the four-year period that ended in March 2013, ARS submitted false and fraudulent claims of just over $18.5 million, and Drug Medi-Cal paid approximately $17,635,100 on those claims.
The California Department of Justice, Division of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse; the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General; and the Internal Revenue Service - Criminal Investigation investigated this matter.
Assistant United States Attorneys Cathy J. Ostiller and Karen E. Escalante of the Major Frauds Section, and Assistant United States Attorney Nisha Chandran of the General Crimes Section are prosecuting this case.
LOS ANGELES – A federal grand jury has returned a 35-count indictment alleging that a Fashion District outfit was at the center of two schemes, one that avoided the payment of more than $10 million in customs duties on imported clothing, and a second “Black Market Peso Exchange” scheme in which the company laundered narcotics proceeds and failed to report on tax returns over $17 million derived from cash transactions.
The schemes are outlined in a 49-page indictment, which was filed late Wednesday and is the latest case resulting from an operation in September 2014 when law enforcement authorities executed dozens of search warrants as part of an investigation into money laundering and other crimes at Fashion District businesses. During one of those searches at a downtown condominium linked to the defendants in this case, authorities seized more than $38.3 million in cash.
The defendants named in the indictment are:
C’est Toi Jeans, Inc. (CTJ), an importer of apparel from countries such as China, and exporter of clothing to customers in Mexico, Central America and South America;
Si Oh Rhew, 67, of La Cañada Flintridge, the president of CTJ and a 75 percent owner of the company; and
Lance Rhew, who is Si Oh Rhew’s son, 33, of downtown Los Angeles, a CTJ corporate officer and the owner of another company called GLLR, Inc. that did business as CTJ.
The indictment contains charges of conspiracy; entry of goods falsely classified; entry of goods by means of false statements; passing false and fraudulent papers through customhouse; international promotional money laundering; failure to file reports of $10,000 currency transactions; and aiding, assisting, and procuring the filing of a false tax return.
The first scheme outlined in the indictment allegedly involves the avoidance of customs duties and tariffs by purchasing garments from overseas manufacturers, including from China, but then submitting false information to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that understated the true value of the items being imported in the U.S. As a result, the import duties owed on the shipments were lowered. The indictment alleges that the defendants sent 515 individual wire transfers totaling $137,156,726 to pay overseas suppliers for undervalued garments. Overall, according to the indictment, CTJ imported goods that were undervalued by more than $62 million, causing approximately $10,269,068 in unpaid tariffs and duties that should have been paid to CBP. Some of this conduct occurred prior to authorities executing search warrants at CTJ and GLLR in 2014, but the indictment alleges that undervaluation resumed in 2018 and lasted until at least July 2020.
In the second scheme, the Rhews used CTJ “to receive large amounts of bulk United States currency, including from narcotics proceeds, as payment for outstanding merchandise orders from customers in Mexico and elsewhere,” according to the indictment. CTJ allegedly accepted large cash payments of up to $70,000 even after the law enforcement action targeted their businesses in 2014. The defendants failed to file currency transaction reports, which are required for any transaction involving more than $10,000 in cash, and they concealed the cash receipts from an accountant who prepared their taxes, which led the Rhews to fraudulently omit more than $17.6 million in gross sales from tax returns filed with the IRS, the indictment alleges.
An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
The court will issue summons directing the three defendants to appear for arraignments in United States District Court on February 4.
If convicted of the charges in the indictment, the Rhews would each face potential sentences of decades in federal prison, and CTJ could face fines of as much as $100 million.
This case is the product of an ongoing investigation by Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), IRS Criminal Investigation, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Monterey Park Police Department, the El Segundo Police Department, LA IMPACT, the LongBeach Police Department, the Los Angeles Police Department, the Gardena Police Department, and the West Covina Police Department. This investigation was conducted with the support of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force.
This case was investigated under the aegis of the HSI-led El Camino Real Financial Crimes Task Force, which includes representatives from the United States Attorney’s Office, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the FBI and IRS Criminal Investigation. The task force is working to protect legitimate businesses in the financial sector by targeting criminal activity and encouraging companies to comply with import/export regulations.
This matter is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Puneet V. Kakkar and Lucy B. Jennings of the International Narcotics, Money Laundering and Racketeering Section.