Score:   1
Docket Number:   WD-WI  3:18-cr-00058
Case Name:   United States of America v. Draheim Roberta et al
  Press Releases:
MADISON, WIS. – Scott C. Blader, United States Attorney for the Western District of Wisconsin, announced that Tom Lewis, 29, De Soto, Wisconsin, was sentenced yesterday by U.S. District Judge William M. Conley to three years in federal prison for using a telephone to facilitate the of distribution of methamphetamine.  Lewis pleaded guilty to this charge on February 19, 2019.

Lewis agreed to join with Roberta Draheim, the leader of a methamphetamine distribution operation in La Crosse, to purchase two ounces of methamphetamine from her new source in California after her previous source disappeared.  While they waited for the package of methamphetamine to arrive in the mail, Lewis used a telephone to arrange to distribute methamphetamine to Draheim.

Lewis joined with Draheim only five days after getting released from state custody on a separate matter.  Judge Conley described Lewis as continuing to engage in the sale of multiple substances, including methamphetamine, while on state supervision.

Lewis and five other individuals were charged for their roles in Draheim’s methamphetamine distribution conspiracy.  All six individuals have pleaded guilty and Lewis was the last to be sentenced.

The charge against Lewis was the result of an investigation conducted by the Drug Enforcement Administration in Wisconsin and California; Wisconsin Department of Justice Division of Criminal Investigation; U.S. Postal Inspection Service; La Crosse Police Department; Prairie du Chien Police Department; and Dane County Sheriff’s Office. The prosecution of the case has been handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Diane Schlipper. 

MADISON, WIS. – Scott C. Blader, United States Attorney for the Western District of Wisconsin, announced that Ryan Koenig, 23, Onalaska, Wisconsin, was sentenced last week by U.S. District Judge William M. Conley to 72 months in federal prison for conspiring to distribute methamphetamine.  Koenig pleaded guilty to this charge on November 16, 2018 and was sentenced on February 8.

Koenig conspired with Roberta Draheim and others to distribute large quantities of methamphetamine to the La Crosse area.  Draheim’s trafficking operation was responsible for the shipment of over 35 packages of methamphetamine from California to the La Crosse area over a 15-month period.  Many of those packages consisted of multiple pounds of methamphetamine. 

During sentencing, Judge Conley stated that Koenig became aware that Draheim’s associates had access to cheap, high-quality methamphetamine from California and capitalized on this connection to order large quantities of methamphetamine for distribution in the La Crosse area.  This was Koenig’s first federal conviction, second drug distribution conviction, and fifth overall adult criminal conviction.

Koenig and five other individuals were charged for their roles in this methamphetamine distribution conspiracy.  Five of the six individuals charged in the indictment have pleaded guilty; Koenig is the third to be sentenced.

The charge against Koenig was the result of an investigation conducted by the Drug Enforcement Administration in Wisconsin and California; Wisconsin Department of Justice Division of Criminal Investigation; U.S. Postal Inspection Service; La Crosse Police Department; Prairie du Chien Police Department; and Dane County Sheriff’s Office. The prosecution of the case has been handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Diane Schlipper. 

MADISON, WIS. – Scott C. Blader, United States Attorney for the Western District of Wisconsin, announced that Roberta Draheim, 51, La Crosse, Wisconsin, was sentenced on Friday, February 1 by U.S. District Judge William M. Conley to 130 months in federal prison for conspiring to distribute methamphetamine.  Draheim pleaded guilty to this charge on October 23, 2018.

Draheim was responsible for the shipment of more than 35 packages of methamphetamine from California to the La Crosse area over a 15-month period.  Many of those packages consisted of multiple pound-level quantities of methamphetamine.  During sentencing, Judge Conley stated that Draheim used her friends in California to obtain high quality methamphetamine at a low cost so she could supply people in the La Crosse area; she was feeding addictions.  While this was Draheim’s first criminal conviction in over 20 years, the court found that she was an organizer of the conspiracy and sentenced her accordingly. 

Draheim and five other individuals were charged for their roles in this methamphetamine distribution conspiracy.  Five of the six individuals charged in the indictment have pleaded guilty; Draheim is the second to be sentenced.

The charge against Draheim was the result of an investigation conducted by the Drug Enforcement Administration in Wisconsin and California; Wisconsin Department of Justice Division of Criminal Investigation; U.S. Postal Inspection Service; La Crosse Police Department; Prairie du Chien Police Department; and Dane County Sheriff’s Office. The prosecution of the case has been handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Diane Schlipper. 



MADISON, WIS. – Scott C. Blader, United States Attorney for the Western District of Wisconsin, and Wisconsin Attorney General Brad Schimel announced the unsealing of an indictment charging six people with crimes related to the distribution of methamphetamine.  The indictment was returned on April 19 by a federal grand jury sitting in Madison and was unsealed yesterday. 

The indictment charges Roberta Draheim, 51, La Crosse, Wisconsin; Ryan Koenig, 22, Onalaska, Wisconsin; Samuel Stanles, 26, La Crosse; and Eric Eckhoff, 24, La Crosse, with conspiring to distribute methamphetamine and to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute.  The indictment alleges that the conspiracy operated from October 2016 to February 2018, that the amount of methamphetamine attributable to Robert Draheim and Ryan Koenig was 500 grams or more, and that the amount of methamphetamine attributable to Samuel Stanles was 50 grams or more. 

Draheim is also charged with possessing methamphetamine on December 30, 2017, with intent to distribute, with attempting to possess 50 grams or more of methamphetamine with intent to distribute on January 8, 2018, and with attempting to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute on February 4, 2018. Draheim is also charged with possessing methamphetamine on December 30, 2017, with intent to distribute, with attempting to possess 50 grams or more of methamphetamine with intent to distribute on January 8, 2018, and with attempting to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute on February 4, 2018.  Koenig is also charged with attempting to possess 50 grams or more of methamphetamine with intent to distribute on October 16, 2017.  Stanles is also charged with possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute on December 23, 2017. 

The indictment also charges Mary Price, 51, North Hills, California, with attempting to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine on October 16, 2017, and with distributing methamphetamine on December 30, 2017.  Finally, the indictment charges Tom Lewis, 28, La Crosse, with attempting to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute on February 4, 2018. 

The charges in this case are the result of a joint investigation by the Drug Enforcement Administration, Wisconsin Department of Justice Division of Criminal Investigation, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, La Crosse Police Department, and Dane County Sheriff’s Office.  U.S. Attorney Blader said, “This indictment reflects the commitment of Wisconsin law enforcement – whether federal, state or local – to work together to combat methamphetamine in our communities.”



“Wisconsin law enforcement at all levels, local, state, and federal, share a common mission and are united in stopping dangerous drugs like methamphetamine from flowing into Wisconsin,” said Wisconsin Attorney General Brad Schimel.  “I’m proud of the Wisconsin Department of Justice agents who led a strong investigation that resulted in the indictments being announced today.” 

Draheim, Stanles, and Eckhoff were arrested yesterday.  They made an initial appearance in federal court in Madison yesterday afternoon.  Their next appearance dates have not been set.  Koenig and Lewis are in state custody; no date has been set for their initial appearance in federal court.  Price was arrested in California yesterday, and made an initial appearance in federal court in Los Angeles.  Her initial appearance in federal court in Wisconsin has not been set. 

The charge alleging 500 grams or more of methamphetamine has a mandatory minimum penalty of 10 years and a maximum of life in federal prison.  The charges alleges 50 grams or more of methamphetamine have a mandatory minimum penalty of five years and a maximum of 40 years.  All other charges in the indictment have a maximum penalty of 20 years in federal prison.

The prosecution of this case is being handled by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Diane Schlipper and Darren Halverson.

You are advised that a charge is merely an accusation and that a defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1teo-_-RypymZLOWKccwxc1CbBnJFEFIbcK96I56ARps
  Last Updated: 2026-08-19 19:04:17 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E