Score:   1
Docket Number:   WD-WA  3:18-cr-05500
Case Name:   USA vs Scott
  Press Releases:
              A Vancouver, Washington, business owner who stole from later clients to pay off earlier ones in the style of a Ponzi scheme was sentenced today in U.S. District Court in Tacoma to four years in prison, announced U.S. Attorney Brian T. Moran.  AARON MICHAEL SCOTT, 40, of Portland, Oregon, was indicted in October 2018 following state and federal investigations of his internet precious metals business, Blue Moon Coins.  SCOTT began defrauding silver and gold purchasers as early as October 2013 and continued until Blue Moon Coins was shuttered by the Washington State Department of Financial Services in April 2014.  At today’s sentencing hearing, U.S. District Judge Ronald B. Leighton said, “White collar crime is under-punished in the country.  Drug addiction and white collar crime are two sides of a press that will destroy the fabric of society.”

            According to records filed in the case, between October 2013 and April 2014, SCOTT repeatedly accepted customer money for the purchase of precious metals and coins and then used the money for his personal, company, and hobby expenses.  SCOTT represented to customers that the money would be used immediately to purchase the coins and metals, but, instead, it was used for expenses or to fulfill earlier customer orders in the form of a Ponzi scheme.  When customers complained about the delay in receiving their items, SCOTT used a plethora of excuses such as: weather delays; a supplier had gone bankrupt; a corporate buyout; ice and snow; delayed armored truck delivery; and a bad flu season.

            In 2015, SCOTT declared bankruptcy revealing that he had a web of businesses involved in activities, such as producing rap albums and custom jewelry, including gold teeth or “grills.” During the fraud scheme, SCOTT owned a Maserati and a Porsche but transferred ownership of the luxury cars before the bankruptcy filing.    

            In all more than 139 customers were defrauded of more than $1.4 million.  Losses to individual investors range from just over $2,000 to more than $154,000.   

            The case was investigated by the FBI, Vancouver Police Department and the U.S. Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).  The CFTC has filed a civil enforcement action against SCOTT and Blue Moon Coins seeking restitution for the victims and a permanent registration and trading ban.

            The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney David Reese Jennings.

            The owner of Blue Moon Coins in Vancouver, Washington was indicted by the grand jury on 11 counts of wire fraud and five counts of mail fraud for his scheme to defraud customers of more than $1.3 million, announced U.S. Attorney Annette L. Hayes.  AARON MICHAEL SCOTT, 40, a resident of Portland, Oregon, is scheduled to be arraigned on the indictment in U.S. District Court in Tacoma at 10:30 on Thursday October 4, 2018.

            According to the indictment, between October 2013 and April 2014, SCOTT repeatedly accepted customer money for the purchase of precious metals and coins, and then used the money for his personal and company expenses.  SCOTT represented to customers that the money would be used to immediately purchase the coins and metals but instead it was used for expenses or to fulfill earlier customer orders in the form of a Ponzi scheme. When customers complained about the delay in receiving their items, SCOTT used a plethora of excuses such as: weather delays; a supplier had gone bankrupt; a corporate buyout; ice and snow; delayed armored truck delivery; and a bad flu season.

            In all more than 139 customers were defrauded of more than $1.3 million.  Losses to individual investors range from just over $2,000 to more than $154,000.

            Wire fraud and mail fraud are punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

            The charges contained in the indictment are only allegations.  A person is presumed innocent unless and until he or she is proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

          The case is being investigated by the FBI, Vancouver Police Department and the U.S. Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).   The CFTC has filed a civil enforcement action against SCOTT and Blue Moon Coins seeking restitution for the victims and a permanent registration and trading ban.

          The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney David Reese Jennings.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1y-P485JVr-qa3aPS5gy47atapXO4yAWnL9f7UWsVrK8
  Last Updated: 2024-04-10 21:33:16 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E