Score:   1
Docket Number:   WD-WA  2:19-cr-00120
Case Name:   USA v. Hsieh et al
  Press Releases:
Seattle – Two Kent, Washington, dentists who avoided more than $460,000 in income taxes were sentenced today in U.S. District Court in Seattle to seven days in prison and 400 hours of community service for filing false tax returns, announced U.S. Attorney Brian T. Moran.  MIKE HSIEH, 48, of Kent, Washington, and CHRISTINE CHEN, 46, of Renton, Washington, own Comfort Family Dentistry, Inc.  Between 2007 and 2014, the two took steps to hide illegally their income from the IRS to reduce their tax obligation.  At the sentencing hearing, U.S. District Judge Richard A. Jones ordered each to pay a $5,000 fine and said, “It was pure greed… It wasn’t about need, it was about greed…. It wasn’t a simple mistake.  For eight years you had your accountant file false tax returns.  You had eight separate years to change your mind and not be involved in criminal activity.”

According to records filed in the case, HSIEH and CHEN maintained two sets of financial statements for the business—one showing the actual expenses and another showing inflated expenses.  The fraudulent expense statements were given to their accountant for tax preparation.  The pair also established a bank account that was not disclosed to the tax preparer.  Patient fees deposited into the account were not reported as income.  Finally, the pair took cash proceeds from the dental practice and never reported that income to the accountant or on their taxes.

For tax year 2013, HSIEH admits he reported a taxable income of $232,753 when it was really more than $100,000 higher.  HSIEH should have paid taxes on income of $348,663.  For tax year 2013, CHEN reported income of $319,131 when her true income was $425,679.  For all the tax years between 2007 and 2014 they each admit failing to pay about $231,000 in taxes that they should have paid.

Both dentists own multiple properties and dental practices.  CHEN lists assets exceeding $4 million, while HSIEH lists assets of more than $2 million.  In his sentencing memorandum, Assistant United States Attorney Brian Werner noted, “This was a deliberate, calculated scheme to cheat the government….  (These) Defendants (were) not in need of money....  There was no need to cheat the government – this offense was motivated purely by greed.” 

Both defendants will pay slightly more than $231,000 in restitution.  Their attorneys estimate they will also need to pay an additional $300,000 in interest and penalties to the IRS.  In arguing that HSEIH and CHEN should avoid prison time, their attorneys noted that they criminal conviction prompted one bank to end its relationship with them, and that the dental practice was dropped as a preferred provider by a large dental insurance plan.

“Dr. Hsieh and Dr. Chen, each filed false tax returns that underreported income and inflated expenses at their dental practice in order to avoid paying income taxes. Their criminal scheme lasted years and cheated the Treasury of hundreds of thousands of dollars,” said IRS-Criminal Investigation’s Special Agent in Charge Justin Campbell. “Taxpayers should have confidence that IRS-Criminal Investigation will aggressively pursue tax fraud and ensure that all business owners pay their fair share.”

The case was investigated by the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI).  The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Brian Werner.

          Two Kent, Washington dentists who conspired to avoid more than $460,000 in income taxes pleaded guilty today in U.S. District Court in Seattle to filing a false tax return, announced U.S. Attorney Brian T. Moran.  MIKE HSIEH, 48, of Bellevue, Washington, and CHRISTINE CHEN 45, of Renton, Washington, own Comfort Family Dentistry Inc.  Between 2007 and 2014, the two took steps to illegally hide their income from the IRS to reduce their tax obligation.  U.S. District Judge Richard A. Jones scheduled sentencing for November 22, 2019.

            According to records filed in the case, HSIEH and CHEN maintained two sets of financial statements for the business – one showing the actual expenses, and another showing inflated expenses.  The fraudulent expense statements were given to their accountant for tax preparation.  The pair also established a bank account that was not disclosed to the tax preparer.  Patient fees deposited into the account were not reported as income.  Finally, the pair took cash proceeds from the dental practice and never reported that income to the accountant or on their taxes.

            For tax year 2013, HSIEH admits he reported a taxable income of $232,753, when it was really more than $100,000 higher.  HSIEH should have paid taxes on income of $348,663.  For tax year 2013, CHEN reported income of $319,131 when her true income was $425,679.  For all the tax years between 2007 and 2014 they each admit failing to pay about $231,000 in taxes that they should have paid.

            HSIEH and CHEN have agreed to make restitution of slightly more than $231,000 each to the U.S. and pay any additional tax, penalties and interest.

            Filing a false tax return is punishable by up to three years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

            The case was investigated by the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI).  The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Diggs.

 

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eAO0gn_2y6cpLK0stSAnjC7S5JcSDJ6Y8-jRrSt3MwA
  Last Updated: 2024-04-15 01:37:32 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E