Score:   1
Docket Number:   WD-PA  2:17-cr-00328
Case Name:   USA v. MENDOZA et al
  Press Releases:
PITTSBURGH - A resident of Greensburg, Pennsylvania, pleaded guilty in federal court to a charge of violating federal narcotics laws, United States Attorney Scott W. Brady announced today.

Thomas Ohler, 38, pleaded guilty to one count before Chief United States District Judge Mark R. Hornak.

In connection with the guilty plea, the court was advised that during 2015 and 2016, Ohler obtained multi-ounce quantities of cocaine from Jamie Lightfoot, Jr., which was thereafter sold by Ohler to various customers.

Judge Hornak scheduled sentencing for January 10, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. The law provides for a total sentence of not less than 5 years to a maximum of 40 years in prison, a fine not to exceed $5,000,000, or both. Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the actual sentence imposed is based upon the seriousness of the offense and the prior criminal history, if any, of the defendant.

Assistant United States Attorneys Timothy M. Lanni and Shaun E. Sweeney are prosecuting this case on behalf of the government.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Pennsylvania State Police, with assistance from the South Strabane Police Department, the Elizabeth Borough Police Department, the Penn Hills Police Department and the Perryopolis Police Department conducted the investigation that led to the prosecution of Thomas Ohler.

The investigation was funded by the federal Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force Program (OCDETF). The OCDETF program supplies critical federal funding and coordination that allows federal and state agencies to work together to successfully identify, investigate, and prosecute major interstate and international drug trafficking organizations and other criminal enterprises.

PITTSBURGH – A leader of one of the largest Drug Trafficking Organizations to operate in the Pittsburgh area has pleaded guilty to federal narcotics and firearm charges, United States Attorney Scott W. Brady announced today.

Jamie Lightfoot, Jr., 27, formerly of Verona, PA (Penn Hills) pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute and distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine and one count of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime before Chief United States District Court Judge Mark R. Hornak. In all, Lightfoot, Jr. accepted responsibility for between 50 kilograms and 150 kilograms of cocaine. Judge Hornak scheduled sentencing for January 10, 2020 at 10:30 a.m.  Lightfoot, Jr. has been detained since his initial appearance and will remain detained pending sentencing.

According to information presented to the court, from January 2015 to November 5, 2017, Jamie Lightfoot, Jr. conspired with others to import large quantities of cocaine and marijuana into Western Pennsylvania. The drugs would be driven to his Harvest Drive home from out of state in a Mercedes Sprinter ‘Sno Cold’ Van and eventually a large RV. Once the drugs came into Western Pennsylvania, Lightfoot and his co-conspirators would use his residence and other locations to break down, repackage, and distribute the drugs to co-conspirators in almost every region of Western Pennsylvania.

On November 5, 2017, an FBI and Pennsylvania State Police Task Force executed a search warrant at Lightfoot’s residence after the RV arrived at the location. The search netted 52 kilograms of cocaine and heroin, 85 pounds of marijuana, illegal steroids, three firearms, and nearly a million dollars in cash. Lightfoot, Jr. pleaded guilty to possessing of one of the firearms, which was found in the house, in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. As part of his plea, Lightfoot, Jr. agreed to forfeit all of the US Currency seized at the house as well as any interest in his Harvest Drive residence.

The law provides for a combined maximum sentence of not less than 15 years in prison and up to a maximum of life and/or a fine of not more than $10,000,000. Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the actual sentence imposed would be based upon the seriousness of the offenses and the prior criminal history, if any, of the defendant.

Assistant United States Attorneys Timothy M. Lanni and Shaun Sweeney are prosecuting this case on behalf of the government.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Pennsylvania State Police, with assistance from the South Strabane Police Department, the Elizabeth Borough Police Department, the Penn Hills Police Department and the Perryopolis Police Department, conducted the investigation that led to the Indictment in this case.

The investigation was funded by the federal Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force Program (OCDETF). The OCDETF program supplies critical federal funding and coordination that allows federal and state agencies to work together to successfully identify, investigate, and prosecute major interstate and international drug trafficking organizations and other criminal enterprises.

PITTSBURGH - A former resident of Clairton, PA, has pleaded guilty to a federal narcotics charge, United States Attorney Scott W. Brady announced today.

Kevin Ford, 33, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute and distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine in front of United States District Court Judge Mark R. Hornak. Ford has been detained since his initial arrest on April 25, 2018 and will remain detained pending sentencing.

According to information presented to the court, from April to December 2017, Ford was a member of the Lightfoot drug trafficking organization. As part of that conspiracy, Ford would acquire quantities of cocaine from Jamie Lightfoot, Jr. and would then resell that cocaine to other members of the conspiracy. Over the course of the conspiracy, Ford was responsible for between 500 grams and 2.5 kilograms of cocaine.

The law provides for a maximum sentence of not less than 10 years in prison, a fine of not more than $8,000,000. Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the actual sentence imposed would be based upon the seriousness of the offenses and the prior criminal history, if any, of the defendant. Due to a prior drug trafficking conviction, Ford is facing increased penalties.

Assistant United States Attorney Timothy M. Lanni is prosecuting this case on behalf of the government.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Pennsylvania State Police, with assistance from the South Strabane Police Department, the Elizabeth Borough Police Department, the Penn Hills Police Department and the Perryopolis Police Department, conducted the investigation that led to the Indictment in this case.

The investigation was funded by the federal Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force Program (OCDETF). The OCDETF program supplies critical federal funding and coordination that allows federal and state agencies to work together to successfully identify, investigate, and prosecute major interstate and international drug trafficking organizations and other criminal enterprises.

PITTSBURGH, PA - A federal grand jury in the Western District of Pennsylvania returned two separate, but related, superseding indictments charging 39 defendants with committing numerous drug trafficking, money laundering, financial structuring and firearms crimes, United States Attorney Scott W. Brady announced today.

"This cocaine organization is one of the largest in the history of Western Pennsylvania: it spread across the country, from Los Angeles to Pittsburgh, with sources to Mexican cartels, and brought hundreds of kilos of cocaine which were distributed through a network," stated U.S. Attorney Brady. "The goal of investigations by the U.S. Attorney’s Office is to prosecute and dismantle entire drug trafficking organizations as was done here. By taking down an entire multi-state organization at once, the impact on our region is felt immediately."

"Drugs tear at the inner fabric of our community," said FBI Special Agent in Charge Bob Johnson. "They bring violence to our streets. They waste young lives and wreak havoc on families. That's why the FBI is committed to preventing criminal enterprises from continuing to damage our community."

"The Pennsylvania State Police, along with our local and federal partners, are committed to dismantling large-scale drug trafficking organizations throughout the Commonwealth and the country, such as the Lightfoot Drug Trafficking Organization," said Sergeant Jeffrey P. Dombrosky, Western Section Supervisor of the PSP Bureau of Criminal Investigation, Drug Law Enforcement Division. "We are fully committed to an aggressive drug enforcement campaign against those that choose to traffic illegal drugs and poison our communities."

"I would like to thank Scott Brady, the U.S. Attorney, for his and his staff’s diligence and hard work in the prosecution of drug offenses in Fayette County," added Fayette County District Attorney Richard Bowers. "He has made a major impact in protecting the residents of Fayette County by the arrests of drug dealers today."

THE INDICTMENTS

The 13-count superseding indictment named the defendants as:

• Don Juan Mendoza, age 38, formerly of Lawrenceville, GA,

• Edward Alford II, age 30, of Donora, PA,

• Devon Bell, age 25, of Brownsville, PA,

• Pedro Blanco, age 40, formerly of Miami, FL,

• Douglas Cochran, age 39, of Washington, PA,

• Anthony Crews, age 44, of Monessen, PA,

• John Duchi, Jr., age 29, of Donora, PA,

• Sean Dungee II, age 32, of Donora, PA,

• Brett Fincik, age 43, formerly of Belle Vernon, PA,

• Kevin Ford, age 32, of Clairton, PA,

• Monty Grinage, age 39, formerly of Pittsburgh, PA,

• Kaylin Homa-Lightfoot, age 24, of Verona, PA,

• Chace Johnson, age 19, of California, PA,

• Malik Lawson, age 22, of Donora, PA,

• Deaubre Lightfoot, age 27, formerly of Monessen, PA,

• Jamie Lightfoot, Jr., age 25, formerly of Verona, PA,

• Todd Moses, age 33, of Decatur, Georgia, and originally from Donora, PA,

• Thomas Ohler, age 36, of Greensburg, PA,

• Eric Pinno, age 53, of Pittsburgh, PA,

• Brian Powell, age 39, formerly of Jacksonville, FL,

• Eugene Reddick, age 35, of Clairton, PA,

• Troy Rowe, age 28, formerly of Columbia, SC,

• Richard Russ, age 57, of Sarasota, FL,

• William Shaw, Jr., age 33, of Brownsville, PA,

• Herbert Sheppard, age 44, of Monessen, PA,

• Roddell Smalls, age 44, of Pittsburgh, PA,

• Quentin Vaden, age 35, of Washington, PA, and

• Jamie Lightfoot, Sr., age 46, currently incarcerated at FCI Loretto.

According to the superseding indictment, from January 2016 through December 2017, Mendoza, Alford, Bell, Blanco, Cochran, Crews, Duchi, Jr., Dungee, Fincik, Ford, Grinage, Deaubre Lightfoot, Lightfoot, Jr., Lightfoot, Sr., Moses, Ohler, Pinno, Powell, Reddick, Rowe, Shaw, Sheppard, Smalls, and Vaden conspired to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine.

On November 5, 2017, Mendoza, Blanco, Powell, and Rowe are charged with possession with intent to distribute 5 kilograms or more cocaine, and 50 kilograms or more of marijuana, as well as possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. Lightfoot, Jr. is also charged with possession of a firearm in furtherance of the drug trafficking crime on November 5, 2017. On that same date, Mendoza and Blanco, both convicted felons, are charged with being in possession of a firearm. Grinage, also a convicted felon, is charged with being in possession of a firearm on December 12, 2017. Federal law prohibits a convicted felon from possessing a firearm. From May 2017 through November 2017, Homa-Lightfoot and Johnson are charged with maintaining a drug involved premises.

The superseding indictment also charges five defendants with conspiring to commit money laundering. Lightfoot, Jr. and Moses are charged from January 2016 through November 2017; Lightfoot, Jr., Pinno and Russ from January 2017 through June 2017; and Lightfoot, Jr. and Lightfoot, Sr. from January 2017 through June 2017. Lightfoot, Jr. and Russ are also charged with conspiring to commit structuring from January 2017 through June 2017. Moses is charged with structuring from September 1, 2017 to September 5, 2017.

For the drug charges, the law provides for a total sentence of not less than 10 years and not more than life in prison, a fine of not more than $10,000,000 or both, at each count. For the firearms charges, the law provides for a combined maximum sentence of not less than 5 years in prison, and not more than life in prison, a fine of not more than $250,000, or both, at each count. For maintaining a drug premises, the law provides for a total maximum sentence of not more than 20 years in prison, a fine of not more than $500,000, or both. For the money laundering charges, the law provides to a maximum sentence of not more than 20 years in prison, a fine of not more than $500,000, or both, at each count. For the structuring charges, the law provides for a maximum sentence of not more than 5 years in prison, a fine of not more than $250,000, or both, at each count.

A separate, but related, one-count superseding indictment named the following defendants:

• Brandon Thomas, age 38, formerly of Donora, PA,

• Tyler Benefield, age 33, of Vanderbilt, PA,

• Regina Davis, age 48, of Donora, PA,

• Adam Farabaugh, age 28, of Canonsburg, PA,

• Josh Gillingham, age 35, of Fayette City, PA.

• Renee Kinder, age 45, of Donora, PA,

• Robert Margoni, age 28, of New Eagle, PA,

• Tyler Mucci, age 31, of Monongahela, PA,

• Jeff Newstrom, age 30, of Masontown, PA,

• Ricky Pietroboni, age 40, of Monongahela, PA, and

• Michael Tirpak, age 35, of Elizabeth, PA.

According to the superseding indictment, from March 2017 through December 2017, the defendants conspired to possess with intent to distribute a quantity of cocaine.

The law provides for a maximum total sentence of not more than 30 years in prison, a fine of not more than $2,000,000 or both.

Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the actual sentence imposed would be based upon the seriousness of the offense and the prior criminal history, if any, of the defendant.

Assistant United States Attorney Timothy M. Lanni is prosecuting this case on behalf of the government.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Pennsylvania State Police, with assistance from the South Strabane Police Department, the Elizabeth Borough Police Department, the Penn Hills Police Department and the Perryopolis Police Department, conducted the investigation that led to the indictment in these cases. The investigation was funded by the federal Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force Program (OCDETF). The OCDETF program supplies critical federal funding and coordination that allows federal and state agencies to work together to successfully identify, investigate, and prosecute major interstate and international drug trafficking organizations and other criminal enterprises.

A superseding indictment is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

CourtListener:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625402/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625387/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625407/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6613342/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625365/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625377/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625393/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625378/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625389/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625391/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6613337/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6472786/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6613333/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6518438/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625379/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625359/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625370/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625363/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6469164/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625367/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625385/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625394/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625380/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6491187/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625400/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/61044207/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6501413/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625395/united-states-v-mendoza/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6625398/united-states-v-mendoza/
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14eVWZyzLZh1urkni2hKVXCHaGyNB2S_75wkDBlU_oKM
  Last Updated: 2023-07-25 05:52:44 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   WD-PA  2:17-mj-01400
Case Name:   USA v. MENDOZA et al
  Press Releases:
PITTSBURGH – Five men have been arrested and charged in federal court with conspiracy to distribute cocaine, Acting United States Attorney Soo C. Song announced today.

The criminal complaint charges Don Juan Mendoza, age 38, of Lawrenceville, Georgia; Jamie Lightfoot, Jr., age 25, of, Verona, Pennsylvania; Pedro Alejandro Blanco, age 39, of Jacksonville, Florida; Brian Powell, age 39, of Jacksonville, Florida; and Troy Rowe, age 28, of Columbia, South Carolina, with conspiring to possess with intent to distribute and distribution of five kilograms or more of cocaine.

Acting U.S. Attorney Song said, “This seizure of 52 kilograms of cocaine is among the largest in Western Pennsylvania history and is a testament to proactive investigative work by federal, state and local partners. While fentanyl and heroin remain the most lethal threats, we are witnessing an alarming rebound in cocaine production and availability.”

According to the criminal complaint, the defendants were part of a large-scale drug trafficking scheme. Brian Powell, Troy Rowe and Pedro Blanco were involved in the transport of an RV, registered to Mendoza’s mother, containing drugs from the Los Angeles area to the Penn Hills residence of Jamie Lightfoot, Jr. Don Juan Mendoza also arrived at the Lightfoot residence about the same time as the RV containing the drugs.

According to the complaint, a search of the RV revealed approximately 52 kilograms of cocaine, approximately 85 pounds of marijuana, and two firearms. The cocaine and marijuana were secreted in a compartment underneath the bunk beds in the RV. The two firearms were found in the same compartment as some of the cocaine and marijuana. The complaint also alleges that hundreds of thousands of dollars were recovered during a search of Lightfoot, Jr.’s residence.

The defendants appeared today in federal court in Pittsburgh before U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan. The government is seeking detention of the defendants pending trial.

The law provides for a minimum sentence of 10 years in prison and up to life, a fine of $10 million, or both. Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the actual sentence imposed would be based upon the seriousness of the offense and the prior criminal history, if any, of the defendant.

Assistant United States Attorney Timothy M. Lanni is prosecuting this case. The Federal

Bureau of Investigation and the Pennsylvania State Police, with assistance from the South Strabane

Police Department, the Elizabeth Borough Police Department, the Penn Hills Police Department

and the Perryopolis Police Department, conducted the investigation that led to the complaint

against these individuals.

A criminal complaint is only a charge and is not evidence of guilt. A defendant may not be

prosecuted unless, within 30 days, a grand jury has found probable cause to believe that he is guilty

of an offense.

Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E