Score:   1
Docket Number:   WD-OK  5:19-cr-00174
Case Name:   United States of America v. Nammixay et al
  Press Releases:
OKLAHOMA CITY – Eight people have been charged in a conspiracy to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana by transporting it from Colorado Springs to Oklahoma, announced First Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert J. Troester.  TOMMY SAVANH NAMMIXAY, 40, CHRISTOPHER BLAND BYRNE, 40, ANDREW CORY EAVES, SR., 47, TERRY DON BROWNE, 34, LAWRENCE JOSEPH HARDEN, 33, RALPH ARTHUR GOLDEN, 59, Johnnie Wilmire Vinavong, 41, and ILIANA MACIAS, 29, are named in a criminal complaint filed on May 13, 2019.

According to an affidavit in support of the complaint, investigation began in September 2016, when the Norman Police Department conducted controlled purchases of marijuana and cocaine and discovered a potential distribution network linked to Nammixay.  The affidavit indicates that a long-term Drug Enforcement Administration investigation revealed Nammixay was the leader of a drug-trafficking organization that moved large amounts of high-grade marijuana from Colorado Springs to Oklahoma City, where it was re-distributed throughout Oklahoma.  In late 2017, using court-approved GPS location monitoring and physical surveillance, DEA investigators are alleged to have learned that Nammixay made numerous trips to and from Colorado Springs in which he drove a "lead" vehicle and a conspirator drove a "load" vehicle with large quantities of marijuana.  When Nammixay and his colleagues arrived in Oklahoma City, they allegedly stored the marijuana in various “stash houses” under Nammixay’s control.

According to the affidavit, the conspiracy included at least 49 trips to and from Colorado Springs.  It is alleged that law enforcement seized a total of 278.35 pounds of marijuana in the course of six traffic stops during the investigation.

Nammixay was arrested in the early morning hours of May 20, 2019.  Today, after an evidentiary hearing that showed the presence of more than 40 weapons, U.S. Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones determined that Nammixay is a risk of flight as well as a danger to community and ordered him detained pending further proceedings.

If found guilty of conspiring to possess 100 kilograms or more of marijuana, each defendant faces a maximum potential penalty of 40 years in prison and a fine of up to $5,000,000.  This crime carries a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in prison.  Each defendant would also be required to serve a term of supervised release of at least four years and up to life.

This case is a result of an investigation by the Drug Enforcement Administration, with assistance from the Norman Police Department, Homeland Security Investigations, Internal Revenue Service—Criminal Investigations, and the Oklahoma Highway Patrol.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Tom Snyder and David Petermann are prosecuting the case.

The public is reminded that this charge is merely an allegation and that each defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.  Reference is made to public filings for more information.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jDuCMc8uVPOqgaAPQKJngm-nvhtuR2DTosk8gpg4WOg
  Last Updated: 2024-04-14 07:57:10 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   WD-OK  5:19-mj-00240
Case Name:   USA v. Nammixay et al
  Press Releases:
OKLAHOMA CITY – Eight people have been charged in a conspiracy to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana by transporting it from Colorado Springs to Oklahoma, announced First Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert J. Troester.  TOMMY SAVANH NAMMIXAY, 40, CHRISTOPHER BLAND BYRNE, 40, ANDREW CORY EAVES, SR., 47, TERRY DON BROWNE, 34, LAWRENCE JOSEPH HARDEN, 33, RALPH ARTHUR GOLDEN, 59, Johnnie Wilmire Vinavong, 41, and ILIANA MACIAS, 29, are named in a criminal complaint filed on May 13, 2019.

According to an affidavit in support of the complaint, investigation began in September 2016, when the Norman Police Department conducted controlled purchases of marijuana and cocaine and discovered a potential distribution network linked to Nammixay.  The affidavit indicates that a long-term Drug Enforcement Administration investigation revealed Nammixay was the leader of a drug-trafficking organization that moved large amounts of high-grade marijuana from Colorado Springs to Oklahoma City, where it was re-distributed throughout Oklahoma.  In late 2017, using court-approved GPS location monitoring and physical surveillance, DEA investigators are alleged to have learned that Nammixay made numerous trips to and from Colorado Springs in which he drove a "lead" vehicle and a conspirator drove a "load" vehicle with large quantities of marijuana.  When Nammixay and his colleagues arrived in Oklahoma City, they allegedly stored the marijuana in various “stash houses” under Nammixay’s control.

According to the affidavit, the conspiracy included at least 49 trips to and from Colorado Springs.  It is alleged that law enforcement seized a total of 278.35 pounds of marijuana in the course of six traffic stops during the investigation.

Nammixay was arrested in the early morning hours of May 20, 2019.  Today, after an evidentiary hearing that showed the presence of more than 40 weapons, U.S. Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones determined that Nammixay is a risk of flight as well as a danger to community and ordered him detained pending further proceedings.

If found guilty of conspiring to possess 100 kilograms or more of marijuana, each defendant faces a maximum potential penalty of 40 years in prison and a fine of up to $5,000,000.  This crime carries a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in prison.  Each defendant would also be required to serve a term of supervised release of at least four years and up to life.

This case is a result of an investigation by the Drug Enforcement Administration, with assistance from the Norman Police Department, Homeland Security Investigations, Internal Revenue Service—Criminal Investigations, and the Oklahoma Highway Patrol.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Tom Snyder and David Petermann are prosecuting the case.

The public is reminded that this charge is merely an allegation and that each defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.  Reference is made to public filings for more information.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gcILYqwLdOE5Ff54RFYyRk68C1E1dpg6sFqYVG0cuNk
  Last Updated: 2024-04-14 07:54:47 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E