KANSAS CITY, Mo. – An Overland Park, Kansas, nurse pleaded guilty in federal court today to stealing fentanyl from a hospital pharmacy.
Julie Lynne Grant, 50, pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Brian C. Wimes to one count of obtaining a controlled substance by fraud.
Grant was a registered nurse who worked at the Hospital Corporation of America Midwest Research Medical Center in Kansas City, Missouri, at the time of the offense.
By pleading guilty today, Grant admitted that she ordered a compounded fentanyl intravenous (IV) bag from the HCA RMC pharmacy on April 4, 2019. Grant, using another name, falsely told the pharmacy that a patient’s fentanyl IV bag had run dry and another bag was needed. Grant picked up the IV bag shortly afterward, signing a false name on the pharmacy delivery signature receipt page to conceal her true identity. However, a pharmacist recognized the patient’s name because he had delivered a fentanyl IV bag for the patient an hour earlier. The pharmacist became suspicious and checked on the patient. He saw the fentanyl IV bag he had previously delivered was still at the patient’s bedside. He confronted Grant, who claimed it was a mistake, and they returned the fentanyl IV bag to the pharmacy.
According to today’s plea agreement, HCA RMC staff immediately started an internal investigation. The tamper seal over the IV port of the fentanyl bag was torn, and the patient sticker label on the IV bag was slightly wrinkled as if the bag had been squeezed. Grant refused to take a drug screening test and was sent home and subsequently terminated. The investigation revealed that Grant had tampered with the fentanyl IV bag when she extracted the controlled substance from the bag and later replaced an unknown liquid back into the IV bag in an effort to conceal her theft of fentanyl.
The investigation also revealed that Grant had received another fentanyl IV from the pharmacy for another patient at about 8 p.m. the night before, approximately an hour after her shift ended. This fentanyl IV bag was ultimately logged in and purportedly used on another patient by the ICU nursing staff. This patient was intubated and unable to communicate whether he/she received any relief from the fentanyl IV. The patient passed away on April 4, 2019.
Grant started working at Olathe Medical Center as a part-time RN on April 29, 2019. When Grant submitted her employment application, Grant omitted her prior employment at AdventHealth Shawnee Mission, St. Joseph Medical Center, and HCA Midwest Research Medical Center under the previous employment section. On May 20, 2019, through their normal reporting mechanisms, Olathe Medical Center identified possible suspicious activity regarding Grant’s dispensation of medication. Grant ultimately admitted to tampering with a fentanyl IV bag while working at HCA Midwest Health Research Medical Center. Grant was terminated on May 31, 2019, for failing to provide a complete list of previous employers on her employment application. Law enforcement obtained a hair sample from Grant, which tested positive for the presence of fentanyl and hydrocodone.
Today’s plea agreement also cites Grant’s suspicious behavior with controlled substances at other facilities where she had previously worked, including HCA Overland Park Regional Medical Center, AdventHealth Shawnee Mission, and St. Joseph Medical Center.
Under federal statutes, Grant is subject to a sentence of up to four years in federal prison without parole. The maximum statutory sentence is prescribed by Congress and is provided here for informational purposes, as the sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the court based on the advisory sentencing guidelines and other statutory factors. A sentencing hearing will be scheduled after the completion of a presentence investigation by the United States Probation Office.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Trey Alford. It was investigated by the Food and Drug Administration, Office of Criminal Investigations and the Johnson County, Kan., Sheriff’s Department.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year