Score:   1
Docket Number:   WD-KY  3:18-cr-00176
Case Name:   USA v. Betts
  Press Releases:
LOUISVILLE, Ky. – United States District Judge David J. Hale has sentenced Kenneth R. Betts to 16 years’ imprisonment, followed by 20 years of Supervised Release, after he pleaded guilty in December of 2018 to enticement, attempted enticement, possession of child pornography, transfer of obscene materials to a minor, and distribution of child pornography, announced United States Attorney Russell Coleman.  The Court ordered Betts to pay a $5,000.00 special assessment under the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015.  And, an Agreed Order of Restitution in the amount of $20,000.00 will be entered with regard to John Doe 1.

“We know all too well that LMPD officers place their lives at jeopardy daily to protect our kids,” stated U.S. Attorney Russell Coleman. “Mr. Betts’ foul conduct tarnished his badge and earned him over a decade and a half in federal prison with no parole.”

Kenneth R. Betts, 34, of Shelbyville, Kentucky, was charged in an Indictment returned by a federal Grand Jury on November 7, 2018, with one count of distribution of child pornography, one count of possession of child pornography, three counts of enticement of individuals under the age of 18 years to engage in sexual activity, one count of transfer of obscene materials to an individual under the age of 16, and one count of attempted enticement of an individual under the age of 18.  All of his criminal conduct occurred in Jefferson County, Kentucky.

According to the Plea Agreement, in or about and between February 2006 and February 2008, Betts communicated with an individual (John Doe 1), who had not attained the age of eighteen years.  Betts communicated with John Doe 1 via Facebook and other social media.  During those communications, Betts knowingly persuaded, induced, and enticed John Doe 1 to engage in sexual activity, including sharing sexually explicit images with Betts.  The resending of such images is sexual activity that constitutes a criminal offense. 

On or about May 14, 2014, Betts knowingly distributed child pornography.  He sent two of the images referenced above to John Doe 1.  Betts transmitted the images to John Doe 1 using Facebook. 

Law enforcement officials executed a state search warrant on Betts’ residence on October 13, 2016.  Among other things, they seized digital devices – including an external hard drive.  Forensic examination of the digital devices revealed Betts’ possession of child pornography.  Namely, he possessed the four images he originally requested and received from John Doe 1.

John Doe 2 (Counts 4 and 5). On or about and between May 2010 and May 2014, Betts communicated via the Internet with an individual (John Doe 2), who had not attained the age of eighteen years.  The two met and became acquainted through the LMPD Explorers Program.  Betts communicated with John Doe 2 via Facebook and other social media platforms.  During those communications, Betts knowingly persuaded, induced, and enticed John Doe 2 to engage in sexual activity.  The sexual activities included a one-time in-person sexual encounter involving oral sex between Betts and John Doe 2 and repeated requests for sexually explicit images to be shared with Betts.  The oral sex and requests for photos are activities for which a person may be prosecuted for a criminal offense. 

From May 2010 through May 2012, Betts used a facility and means of interstate commerce to send pictures of himself to John Doe 2.  During that time period, Betts knew John Doe 2 had not attained the age of 16 years.

Jane Doe 1 (Count 6) On or about and between June 2013 and July 2013, Betts used a facility and means of interstate commerce, that is, a cellular telephone and its text messaging feature, to communicate with Jane Doe 1.  At that point in time, Jane Doe 1 was 16.  The two met and became acquainted through the LMPD Explorers Program.  During the communications, Betts asked Jane Doe 1 to meet for sexual activity.  He also asked Jane Doe 1 for sexually explicit photos, which Jane Doe 1 provided to him.  The photos Jane Doe 1 provided constituted a violation of Kentucky law.  Law enforcement officials with LMPD observed the images as well as the receipt of those images by Betts.  However, the images were destroyed during the initial investigation.

John Doe 3 (Count 7) On or about and between September 2014 and November 2014, Betts used a facility and means of interstate commerce, that is, a cellular telephone, Facebook and SnapChat (a social media platform), to communicate with John Doe 3.  At that point in time, John Doe 3 was 17.  Betts and John Doe 3 had met and become acquainted through the LMPD Explorers Program.  During the communications, Betts asked John Doe 3 to meet for sexual activity.  He also asked John Doe 3 for sexually explicit photos.  He attempted to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce John Doe 3 to engage in unlawful sexual activity. Betts sent John Doe 3 a photograph of himself wearing an LMPD uniform and in the company of a young woman during some of the communications encouraging a three-way.  However, John Doe 3 refused to meet Betts for sexual activity or to send the requested sexually explicit images of himself. 

Assistant United States Attorney Jo E. Lawless prosecuted the case, and it was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Louisville Metro Police Department’s Public Integrity Unit.

 

***

This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse. Led by the United States Attorneys' Offices and the Criminal Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who sexually exploit children, and to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.usdoj.gov/psc  For more information about internet safety education, please visit www.usdoj.gov/psc and click on the tab "resources."

LOUISVILLE, Ky. – A former Louisville Metro Police Department officer has pleaded guilty before United States District Judge David J. Hale for enticement, attempted enticement, possession of child pornography, transfer of obscene materials to a minor and distribution of child pornography, announced United States Attorney Russell M. Coleman.

“This defendant dishonored the proud badge and uniform of Louisville’s Finest with his perversion and used it to prey on our young people,” stated U.S. Attorney Russell Coleman. “The Federal Bureau of Prisons awaits the outcome of his sentencing.”

Kenneth R. Betts, 34, of Shelbyville, Kentucky, was charged in an Indictment returned by a federal Grand Jury on November 7, 2018, with one count of distribution of child pornography, one count of possession of child pornography, three counts of enticement of individuals under the age of 18 years to engage in sexual activity, one count of transfer of obscene materials to an individual under the age of 16, and one count of attempted enticement of an individual under the age of 18.  All of his criminal conduct occurred in Jefferson County, Kentucky.

According to the Plea Agreement, in or about and between February 2006 and February 2008, Betts communicated with an individual (John Doe 1), who had not attained the age of eighteen years.  Betts communicated with John Doe 1 via Facebook and other social media.  During those communications, Betts knowingly persuaded, induced, and enticed John Doe 1 to engage in sexual activity, including sharing sexually explicit images with Betts.  The resending of such images is sexual activity that constitutes a criminal offense. 

On or about May 14, 2014, Betts knowingly distributed child pornography.  He sent two of the images referenced above to John Doe 1.  Betts transmitted the images to John Doe 1 using Facebook. 

Law enforcement officials executed a state search warrant on Betts’ residence on October 13, 2016.  Among other things, they seized digital devices – including an external hard drive.  Forensic examination of the digital devices revealed Betts’ possession of child pornography.  Namely, he possessed the four images he originally requested and received from John Doe 1.

John Doe 2 (Counts 4 and 5). In or about and between May 2010 and May 2014, Betts communicated via the Internet with an individual (John Doe 2), who had not attained the age of eighteen years.  The two met and became acquainted through the LMPD Explorers Program.  Betts communicated with John Doe 2 via Facebook and other social media platforms.  During those communications, Betts knowingly persuaded, induced, and enticed John Doe 2 to engage in sexual activity.  The sexual activities included a one-time in-person sexual encounter involving oral sex between Betts and John Doe 2 and repeated requests for sexually explicit images to be shared with Betts.  The oral sex and requests for photos are activities for which a person may be prosecuted for a criminal offense. 

From May 2010 through May 2012, Betts used a facility and means of interstate commerce to send pictures of himself to John Doe 2.  During that time period, Betts knew John Doe 2 had not attained the age of 16 years.

Jane Doe 1 (Count 6) In or about and between June 2013 and July 2013, Betts used a facility and means of interstate commerce, that is, a cellular telephone and its text messaging feature, to communicate with Jane Doe 1.  At that point in time, Jane Doe 1 was 16.  The two met and became acquainted through the LMPD Explorers Program.  During the communications, Betts asked Jane Doe 1 to meet for sexual activity.  He also asked Jane Doe 1 for sexually explicit photos, which Jane Doe 1 provided to him.  The photos Jane Doe 1 provided constituted a violation of Kentucky law.  Law enforcement officials with LMPD observed the images as well as the receipt of those images by Betts.  However, the images were destroyed during the initial investigation.

John Doe 3 (Count 7) In or about and between September 2014 and November 2014, Betts used a facility and means of interstate commerce, that is, a cellular telephone, Facebook and SnapChat (a social media platform), to communicate with John Doe 3.  At that point in time, John Doe 3 was 17.  Betts and John Doe 3 had met and become acquainted through the LMPD Explorers Program.  During the communications, Betts asked John Doe 3 to meet for sexual activity.  He also asked John Doe 3 for sexually explicit photos.  He attempted to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce John Doe 3 to engage in unlawful sexual activity. Betts sent John Doe 3 a photograph of himself wearing an LMPD uniform and in the company of a young woman during some of the communications encouraging a three-way.  However, John Doe 3 refused to meet Betts for sexual activity or to send the requested sexually explicit images of himself. 

Betts faces no less than 10 years in prison due to statutory mandatory minimum sentencing requirements.  The maximum potential sentence is life in prison.  The charges also carry a maximum potential fine of $1,750,000.00 and a term of Supervised Release of not less than five years and could be up to a term of life.  There is no parole in the federal criminal system. Sentencing has been scheduled for March 18, 2019.

Assistant United States Attorney Jo E. Lawless is prosecuting the case, and it is being investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Louisville Metro Police Department’s Public Integrity Unit.

LOUISVILLE, Ky. – A former Louisville Metro Police Department officer has been indicted by a federal grand jury for enticement, attempted enticement, possession of child pornography, transfer of obscene materials to a minor and distribution of child pornography.

“No person is above the law; especially one entrusted with the authority of a police officer, who then abuses that authority to prey on the vulnerable,” stated U.S. Attorney Russell M. Coleman. “Today’s multi-count indictment of Mr. Betts is a testament to that notion in the Western District of Kentucky”

“Today’s indictment is the first for Louisville’s Public Corruption Civil Rights Task Force, where we have combined local, state and federal resources to work together to investigate allegations of corruption or color of law violations,” said FBI SAC James Robert Brown Jr. “It is an example of the process working, and there will be others. The people of Louisville deserve to have confidence in their elected and law enforcement officials. This indictment serves as a reminder the Task Force will root out those who choose to violate this trust.”

The seven count Indictment charges Kenneth R. Betts, 34, of Shelbyville, Kentucky, with one count of distribution of child pornography, one count of possession of child pornography, three counts of enticement of an individual under the age of 18 years to engage in sexual activity, one count of transfer of obscene materials to an individual under the age of 16, and one count of attempted enticement of an individual under the age of 18.

According to the Indictment:  Betts enticed John Doe 1, an individual who was not yet 18 years old, between February 2006 and February 2008, to engage in sexual activity; Betts enticed John Doe 2, an individual who was not yet 18 years old, between May 2010 and May 2014, to engage in sexual activity; Betts enticed Jane Doe 1, an individual who was not yet 18 years old, between June 2013 and July 2013, to engage in sexual activity; and Betts attempted to entice John Doe 3, an individual who was not yet 18 years old, between September and November of 2014, to engage in sexual activity.   

If convicted Betts faces no less than five years and no more than 20 years in prison for distribution of child pornography, no more than 10 years for possession of child pornography, no less than 10 years for each count of enticement and attempted enticement, and no more than 10 years for transfer of obscene material to a minor.  The charges also carry a potential term of supervised release of no less than 5 years up to a term of life.

Assistant United States Attorney Jo E. Lawless is prosecuting the case, and it is being investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Louisville Metro Police Department Public Integrity Unit.

The indictment of a person by a Grand Jury is an accusationonly and that person is presumed innocent until and unlessproven guilty.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xBnQmtYkJM_cZ9C6odjD0EfgYbf9yZdAa7Yguvw9018
  Last Updated: 2024-03-25 21:41:09 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The number of days from the earlier of filing date or first appearance date to proceeding date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from proceeding date to disposition date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from disposition date to sentencing date
Format: N3

Description: The code of the district office where the case was terminated
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant at the time the case was closed
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense that carried the most severe disposition and penalty under which the defendant was disposed
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A code indicating whether the prison sentence associated with TTITLE1 was concurrent or consecutive in relation to the other counts in the indictment or information or multiple counts of the same charge
Format: A4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE1
Format: N8

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense under which the defendant was disposed that carried the second most severe disposition and penalty
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE2
Format: N4

Description: A code indicating whether the prison sentence associated with TTITLE2 was concurrent or consecutive in relation to the other counts in the indictment or information or multiple counts of the same charge
Format: A4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE2
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE2
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE2
Format: N8

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense under which the defendant was disposed that carried the third most severe disposition and penalty
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE3
Format: N4

Description: A code indicating whether the prison sentence associated with TTITLE3 was concurrent or consecutive in relation to the other counts in the indictment or information or multiple counts of the same charge
Format: A4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE3
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE3
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE3
Format: N8

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense under which the defendant was disposed that carried the fourth most severe disposition and Penalty
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE4
Format: N4

Description: A code indicating whether the prison sentence associated with TTITLE4 was concurrent or consecutive in relation to the other counts in the indictment or information or multiple counts of the same charge
Format: A4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE4
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE4
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE4
Format: N8

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense under which the defendant was disposed that carried the fifth most severe disposition and penalty
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE5
Format: N4

Description: A code indicating whether the prison sentence associated with TTITLE5 was concurrent or consecutive in relation to the other counts in the indictment or information or multiple counts of the same charge
Format: A4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE5
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE5
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE5
Format: N8

Description: The total prison time for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and prison time was imposed
Format: N4

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E