HOUSTON ‐ A total of six Houston-area residents have been charged with varying offenses related to disaster assistance in their alleged efforts to defraud the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Small Business Administration (SBA).
U.S. Attorney Ryan K. Patrick made the announcement just after the Gulf Coast region marked the one-year anniversary of Hurricane Harvey, the costliest storm in United States history.
“These types of cases are no different than looting during and after a storm,” said Patrick. “Some people try to exploit natural disasters by taking things that aren’t theirs. It is white collar storm looting, and fewer people who actually need assistance get it.”
Five are charged in separate indictments linked to Hurricane Harvey with a sixth stemming from the Houston-area Memorial Day weekend flood in 2015.
The first indictment charges Clinton Booker, 51, of Houston, with engaging in a scheme to defraud the SBA when he applied for and received a disaster loan from the SBA. He allegedly claimed property damage from Hurricane Harvey in August 2017, but his residence had not sustained damage as claimed. According to the indictment, Booker submitted or caused others to submit falsified records to make the claim appear legitimate. Booker received $25,000 from the fraudulent SBA loan. He is charged with one count of fraud in connection with a major disaster and one count of wire fraud for which he faces up to 30 and 20 years in federal prison, respectively.
In a separate, but similar case, Randal Radack, 44, of Spring, allegedly engaged in a scheme to defraud the SBA and FEMA when he applied for and received disbursements, claiming property damage from Hurricane Harvey. However, he actually he did not reside at the property during Hurricane Harvey as claimed, according to the allegations. Radack allegedly received $115,100 from the fraudulent SBA loan and $16,541.38 in fraudulent disbursements from FEMA. Radack is charged with two counts of fraud in connection with a major disaster and five counts of wire fraud for which he faces up to 30 and 20 years in federal prison, on each count, respectively.
According to additional allegations, Humble resident Robert Kaitho, 55, also engaged in a scheme to defraud the SBA. He applied for and received a disaster loan from the SBA, claiming property damage from Hurricane Harvey when his residence had not sustained damage as claimed. According to the indictment, Kaitho used some of the proceeds from the fraudulent SBA loan to pay a credit card company. Kaitho received $53,000 from the fraudulent SBA loan, according to the charges. He is charged with one count of fraud in connection with a major disaster, two counts of wire fraud and two counts of money laundering. If convicted of the disaster fraud, he faces up to 30 years in prison, while wire fraud and money laundering carry a punishment of up to 20 and 10 years in federal prison, respectively.
Christopher Howard, 45, of Highlands Ranch, Colorado, did not even reside at his Crosby property at the time of Hurricane Harvey. Nevertheless, he allegedly applied for and received FEMA disbursements, claiming property damage. Howard received $30,586.45 in fraudulent disbursements from FEMA as a result of the claim, according to the allegations. He is charged with one count of fraud in connection with a major disaster and four counts of wire fraud for which he faces up to 30 and 20 years in federal prison, respectively.
Patricia Rodriguez, 38, of Houston, also allegedly engaged in a scheme to defraud when she applied for and received FEMA disbursements, claiming property damage from Hurricane Harvey. She was not even the owner of the property as claimed, according to the indictment. However, Rodriguez allegedly received $33,300 in fraudulent FEMA disbursements. She also faces a maximum of 30 and 20 years in federal prison, respectively, upon conviction of one count each of fraud in connection with a major disaster and wire fraud.
The final indictment alleges David Boniface claimed property damage from the Memorial Day flood in 2015, when his residence had not sustained damage as he had reported. Boniface, 60, of League City, applied for and received a disaster loan from the SBA totaling $64,200. He submitted or caused others to submit falsified records to make the claim appear legitimate. Boniface is charged with one count of fraud in connection with a major disaster and two counts of wire fraud which carry 30 and 20-years maximum federal prison terms, respectively.
“Fraud cases take time to investigate,” Patrick explained. “One year after the storm my office is actively engaged with DHS and other agencies in similar investigations. This is just the first of what will probably be many cases related to Hurricane Harvey.”
All six people charged today are expected to make their initial appearances before a U.S. magistrate judge in the near future.
The SBA-Office of Inspector General (OIG) and the Department of Homeland Security –OIG conducted the investigations. Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Day is prosecuting the cases.
Members of the public are reminded to apply a critical eye and do their due diligence before trusting anyone purporting to be working on behalf of disaster victims and before giving contributions to anyone soliciting donations on behalf of disaster victims as well as being extremely cautious before providing personal identifying or financial information to anyone, especially those who may contact you after a natural disaster. Solicitations can originate from e-mails, websites, door-to-door collections, mailings and telephone calls, and similar methods. Members of the public who suspect fraud, waste, abuse or allegations of mismanagement involving disaster relief operations, or believe they have been the victim of fraud from a person or organization soliciting relief funds on behalf of disaster victims, should contact the National Disaster Fraud Hotline toll free at (866) 720-5721. The telephone line is staffed by live operators 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You can also fax information to the Center at (225) 334-4707 or email it to disaster@leo.gov (link sends e-mail). Learn more about the NCDF at www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud and watch a public service announcement here. Tips for the public on how to avoid being victimized of fraud are at https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/tips-avoiding-fraudulent-charitable-contribution-schemes.
An indictment is a formal accusation of criminal conduct, not evidence.A defendant is presumed innocent unless convicted through due process of law.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year