Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-NY  7:20-cr-00173
Case Name:   USA v. Nikc
  Press Releases:
Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Jonathan D. Larsen, the Special Agent in Charge of the New York Field Office of the Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation ("IRS-CI"), announced that ANTONIO NIKC, a Chappaqua businessman, pled guilty to tax evasion for the calendar years 2010 through 2014.  As part of his plea, NIKC agreed to pay $395,745 in restitution to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”).  NIKC pled guilty on March 3 before U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith. 

U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said:  “As he admitted, Antonio Nikc used family businesses to conceal his substantial income and prevent the IRS from calculating his tax due.  While using the business accounts to fund his extravagant lifestyle, Nikc failed to file any personal income tax returns.  Now Nikc awaits sentencing for his crime.”

IRS-CI Special Agent in Charge Jonathan D. Larsen said:  "Our tax system is based on voluntary compliance and we will hold those accountable who fail to report their income out of greed.  IRS-CI special agents will continue to pursue those who take advantage of our tax system."

According to the allegations contained in the Information to which NIKC pled guilty and statements made in court:

From 2010 to 2015, NIKC managed a number of family businesses that operate large rental buildings in New York and Connecticut.  NIKC ran these businesses and managed his personal finances in a manner designed to conceal his sources of income and prevent the IRS from calculating or assessing his tax due.  NIKC treated the business entities’ bank accounts as his own personal bank accounts, using them to pay for more than $1.5 million in personal expenses, including oceanside condominiums in Miami, marina fees for a boat docked in Miami, airline tickets, luxury car payments, college tuition and allowances for his children, and purchases at jewelry stores, clothing stores, and restaurants.

Despite earning and spending a substantial income, NIKC failed to file any personal federal income tax returns and failed to pay any taxes due and owing on the income he received.  NIKC took various affirmative steps to evade the assessment of taxes on that income, including paying for personal expenses out of the family business accounts and intentionally maintaining few assets in his own name.  Through this scheme, NIKC evaded $395,745 in federal income taxes.   

*                *                *

NIKC, 58, of Chappaqua, New York, pled guilty to one count of tax evasion, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison.  The maximum potential sentence in this case is prescribed by Congress and is provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the judge.  NIKC is scheduled to be sentenced by U.S. District Judge Nelson S. Román on June 5, 2020, at 11:00 a.m.

Mr. Berman praised the outstanding work of the Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation, in this case.

This case is being handled by the Office’s White Plains Division.  Assistant U.S. Attorney Jim Ligtenberg is in charge of the prosecution.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LNBWqPI2czFfniAJTxVsA9XlZM-zKkFK7pYiTVecvBo
  Last Updated: 2024-04-16 22:23:58 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E