Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that KEITH BORGE, the former controller of the College of New Rochelle (“CNR”), was sentenced to 36 months in prison for failing to pay more than $20 million in payroll taxes and for securities fraud. BORGE pled guilty to both charges in March 2019. U.S. District Judge Vincent L. Briccetti imposed today’s sentence.
Manhattan U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said: “Keith Borge failed to pay payroll taxes on behalf of CNR’s employees, and covered up CNR’s true financial condition. Borge thereby denied CNR’s leaders the opportunity to address the college’s financial problems, defrauded CNR’s bondholders, and left the college with a $20 million tax liability. He is now paying the price for those crimes.”
According to the allegations contained in the Information and other publicly filed documents:
From in or about 2011 to in or about August 2014, BORGE was the vice president for financial affairs at CNR, a private college with its main campus in New Rochelle, New York. From in or about August 2014 to in or about June 2016, BORGE was CNR’s controller. CNR had approximately 500 to 900 paid employees, depending on the time of year. The college withheld from its employees’ pay both federal income tax and its employees’ contributions to Social Security and Medicare. Federal law required that the college pay over those withheld taxes and contributions within one week of the day it paid its employees. During that one-week period, CNR held those withheld taxes and contributions in trust for the federal government.
As controller, BORGE managed CNR’s financial affairs and was responsible for paying over withheld payroll taxes and contributions. From the third quarter of 2014 through the second quarter of 2016, BORGE failed to do so. By the end of the second quarter of 2016, BORGE had failed to pay over more than $20 million in combined federal and state payroll taxes and contributions.
BORGE also made false entries into CNR’s books and records to conceal the college’s actual financial condition. As a result, CNR’s financial statements for its fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, reported the college had net assets of $25 million, which was an overstatement by at least $24 million. Among other things, BORGE caused the financial statements to understate CNR’s liability for federal and state payroll taxes by approximately $11 million; to overstate accounts receivable by approximately $9.2 million by recognizing pledged donations twice; to understate accounts payable by at least $1.5 million by failing to enter unpaid vendor invoices into CNR’s books and records; and to overstate investment assets by at least $2.2 million by recognizing assets that did not exist and by failing to enter his withdrawals from CNR’s investment accounts into the college’s books and records.
BORGE caused CNR’s inaccurate financial statements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, to be released to the public by, among other things, providing the financial statements to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board for publication on the Electronic Municipal Market Access web site, where they could be reviewed by the investing public. As a result, investors in bonds issued by the college through the City of New Rochelle Industrial Development Agency were defrauded by BORGE’s materially false and misleading statements in CNR’s financial statements.
* * *
In addition to the prison term, BORGE, 63, of Valley Cottage, New York, was sentenced to three years of supervised release and ordered to pay a fine of $25,000.
Mr. Berman praised the outstanding investigative work of the Postal Inspection Service and IRS-CI and also thanked the Securities and Exchange Commission, which has brought a civil proceeding against Borge.
This case is being handled by the Office’s White Plains Division. Assistant United States Attorneys James McMahon and Dan Loss are in charge of the prosecution.
Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Philip R. Bartlett, Inspector-in-Charge of the New York Field Division of the United States Postal Inspection Service (“USPIS”), and Jonathan D. Larsen, the Acting Special Agent in Charge of the New York Field Office of the Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (“IRS-CI”), announced that KEITH BORGE, the former controller of the College of New Rochelle (“CNR”), pled guilty today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy to one count of failing to pay over federal payroll taxes and one count of securities fraud in White Plains federal court. The case has been assigned to United States District Judge Vincent L. Briccetti.
Manhattan U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said: “By covering up CNR’s true financial condition, Keith Borge deprived CNR’s leaders of the opportunity to address the college’s financial problems for two years. Borge defrauded CNR’s bondholders and left CNR with a $20 million tax liability. He committed federal crimes for which he will now pay the price.”
USPIS Inspector-in-Charge Philip R. Bartlett said: “Investors rely on accurate financial reporting when deciding on where to invest their hard-earned money. When executives create and distribute inaccurate financial statements, investors are unknowingly steered into making poor investment choices. The United States Postal Inspection Service is committed to protecting American investors and bringing those who manipulate the financial system to justice.”
IRS-CI Acting Special Agent in Charge Jonathan D. Larsen said: “As the tax filing deadline looms, it’s important for the American taxpayer to have confidence that when they are paying their taxes, their neighbor and co-workers are doing the same. And for those individuals who are considering evading their tax duty, they should consider the consequences which include potential imprisonment and civil penalties.”
According to the allegations contained in the Information and other publicly filed documents:
From in or about 2011 to in or about August 2014, BORGE was the Vice President for Financial Affairs at CNR, a private college with its main campus in New Rochelle, New York. From in or about August 2014 to in or about June 2016, BORGE was CNR’s controller. CNR had approximately 500 to 900 paid employees, depending on the time of year. CNR withheld both federal income tax and its employees’ contributions to Social Security and Medicare from its employees’ pay. Federal law required that the college pay over those withheld taxes and contributions within one week of the day it paid its employees. During that one-week period, CNR held those withheld taxes and contributions in trust for the federal government.
As controller, BORGE managed CNR’s financial affairs and was responsible for paying over withheld payroll taxes and contributions. From the third quarter of 2014 through the second quarter of 2016, BORGE failed to do so. By the end of the second quarter of 2016, BORGE had failed to pay over more than $20 million in combined federal and state payroll taxes and contributions.
BORGE also made false entries in CNR’s books and records to conceal the college’s actual financial condition. As a result, CNR’s financial statements for its fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, reported the college had net assets of $25 million, which was overstated by at least $24 million. Among other things, BORGE caused the financial statements to understate CNR’s liability for federal and state payroll taxes by approximately $11 million; to overstate accounts receivable by approximately $9.2 million by recognizing pledged donations twice; to understate accounts payable by at least $1.5 million by failing to enter unpaid vendor invoices into CNR’s books and records; and to overstate investment assets by at least $2.2 million by recognizing assets that did not exist and by failing to enter his withdrawals from CNR’s investment accounts into the college’s books and records.
BORGE caused CNR’s inaccurate financial statements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, to be released to the public by, among other things, providing the financial statements to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board for publication on the Electronic Municipal Market Access web site, where they could be reviewed by the investing public. As a result, investors in bonds issued by the college through the City of New Rochelle Industrial Development Agency were defrauded by BORGE’s materially false and misleading statements in CNR’s financial statements.
* * *
BORGE, 62, of Valley Cottage, New York, is charged with one count of failing to pay over payroll taxes, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, and one count of securities fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. The maximum potential sentences are prescribed by Congress and are provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentence will be determined by the court. BORGE is scheduled to be sentenced July 11, 2019, before Judge Briccetti.
In a related case, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission brought a civil action today against BORGE in U.S. District Court in White Plains."
Mr. Berman praised the outstanding investigative work of the Postal Inspection Service and IRS-CI. Mr. Berman also thanked the SEC for their investigative work.
This case is being handled by the Office’s White Plains Division. Assistant United States Attorneys James McMahon and Daniel Loss are in charge of the prosecution.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The number of days from the earlier of filing date or first appearance date to proceeding date
Format: N3
Description: The number of days from proceeding date to disposition date
Format: N3
Description: The number of days from disposition date to sentencing date
Format: N3
Description: The code of the district office where the case was terminated
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant at the time the case was closed
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense that carried the most severe disposition and penalty under which the defendant was disposed
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE1
Format: N4
Description: A code indicating whether the prison sentence associated with TTITLE1 was concurrent or consecutive in relation to the other counts in the indictment or information or multiple counts of the same charge
Format: A4
Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N4
Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N3
Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE1
Format: N8
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense under which the defendant was disposed that carried the second most severe disposition and penalty
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE2
Format: N4
Description: A code indicating whether the prison sentence associated with TTITLE2 was concurrent or consecutive in relation to the other counts in the indictment or information or multiple counts of the same charge
Format: A4
Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE2
Format: N4
Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE2
Format: N3
Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE2
Format: N8
Description: The total prison time for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and prison time was imposed
Format: N4
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year