Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:18-cr-20361
Case Name:   USA v. Zubero et al
  Press Releases:
On August 23, 2019, Oyeyemi Olatunji Owagboriaye, 63, of Chicago, Illinois, was convicted of wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343 (Case No. 18cr20361).  A jury returned a guilty verdict following a five-day trial before United States District Judge Kathleen M. Williams, in Miami, Florida. 

Ariana Fajardo Orshan, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Miami Field Office, and the Florida Office of Financial Regulation (OFR), made the announcement.

The evidence presented at trial established that Owagboriaye participated in a $2 million dollar advance fee scheme targeting a Nigerian oil company called Zone 4.  In particular, Owagboriaye’s partner, Vincent Zubero, persuaded Zone 4 to hire him to raise a $45 million dollar loan to refinance an oil tank farm in Nigeria.  Zone 4 would provide a $2 million “equity contribution” toward the loan, which would be held in escrow until the first tranche of the loan was funded.  Instead, however, Zubero and the defendant split the proceeds of the $2 million equity contribution and never funded the loan.  Owagboriaye’s portion of the equity contribution was more than $835,000.  Owagboriaye and Zubero quickly covered their tracks by signing a bogus “memorandum of understanding” in which they purported to agree that the $835,000 being transferred to Owagboriaye was for the purpose of supporting a phony “trade platform” by which Owagboriaye would raise the financing for the oil tank farm project.  Then, Owagboriaye created a phony invoice for dump trucks to cover up the fact that Zubero was wiring him $835,000 of Zone 4’s  money.  Owagboriaye also created phony bank instruments purporting to establish his control over hundreds of millions of dollars to be used for Zone 4’s loan. In reality, Owagboriaye was spending Zone 4’s money, including a more than $300,000 transfer to himself in Nigeria, $190,000 in cash withdrawals, and thousands more on personal expenses.

Owagboriaye is scheduled for sentencing on October 31, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. and faces a maximum possible sentence of 20 years in prison.

Zubero previously pled guilty for his participation in the wire fraud scheme.  He is scheduled to be sentenced on September 12th, 2019 at 2 p.m.

U.S. Attorney Fajardo Orshan commended the investigative efforts of the FBI and OFR in this matter.  This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Amanda Perwin, Marty Elfenbein, and Roger Cruz. 

            Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Two individuals have been charged in connection with a scheme to defraud a Nigerian company of over $2 million.

Benjamin G. Greenberg, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Robert F. Lasky, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Miami Field Office, and Drew J. Breakspear, Commissioner, Florida Office of Financial Regulation (OFR), made the announcement. 

Vicente Jesus Zubero, 40, of Miami, Florida, and Oyeyemi Olatunji Owagboriaye, 62, of Skokie, Illinois, were charged by indictment with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and three counts of wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 1349.

As alleged in the unsealed indictment, Zubero, through his corporation, the Consortium for International Development (CID), purported to broker loans for clients.  In August 2014, Zubero and Owagboriaye induced a company headquartered in Nigeria to provide approximately $2.1 million upfront in order to obtain a loan from CID.  The $2.1 million was then used for Zubero and Owagboriaye’s personal use and benefit, in violation of the company’s agreement with CID.

The indictment further alleges that in order to facilitate the scheme, Zubero made it appear as if his girlfriend and others worked for CID as executives, when, in fact they did not.  Zubero also made materially false statements to the company, including that the money would be placed into a secure escrow account, and that the money would be used to generate the company’s loan.

Each count of conspiracy and wire fraud carries a maximum term of twenty years in prison.

An indictment is merely an accusation and a defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.

Mr. Greenberg commended the investigative efforts of the FBI and OFR.  This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Roger Cruz.

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or on http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1v_GVlOV4K36IRpcnjbrNDinqnhnJjEddKqtkkrmExpA
  Last Updated: 2024-04-09 10:36:56 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E