Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:17-cr-20780
Case Name:   USA v. Suarez et al
  Press Releases:
Yesterday, following a four-week trial before U.S. District Court Judge Marcia G. Cooke, a federal jury convicted a former Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Safety Inspector Manuel R. Fernandez, 42, of Miami, of twenty-one criminal counts for his participation in a bribery and fraud scheme.

Ariana Fajardo Orshan, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Todd Damiani, Regional Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Inspector General (DOT-OIG), and George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Miami Field Office, made the announcement.

According to the evidence at trial, from 2010 through June 28, 2013, Fernandez served as a FAA Aviation Safety Inspector with the FAA South Florida Flight Standards District Office (“FSDO”). Patricia Suarez and Rolando Suarez were the co-owners, officers, and directors of AVCOM, a Miami aviation repair company, which was subject to the jurisdiction and official responsibility of the FAA South Florida FSDO.  The evidence showed that, at the same he was working for the FAA, Fernandez held various positions at AVCOM, including Vice President of Operations.

In exchange for Patricia Suarez and Rolando Suarez corruptly providing over $150,000 in cash, as well as jewelry, a cruise, clothing, and approximately $15,000 funneled to Fernandez’s mother, Fernandez violated his lawful and official duties as an FAA Aviation Safety Inspector.  Fernandez provided AVCOM with advanced notice and warnings as to pending FAA inspections of AVCOM, disclosed financial information about AVCOM’s competitors, and provided AVCOM with improperly obtained aviation repair manuals produced by original equipment manufacturers such as Honeywell and Delta, saving AVCOM from paying vast sums of money for this proprietary information.  The evidence further showed that Fernandez provided materially false statements to the FAA and DOT in order to hide his participation in these AVCOM-related activities. Additionally, Fernandez submitted a fraudulent sick leave request to the FAA, utilizing a forged doctor’s note.

Fernandez was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371 and 201(b)(1)(C) and (b)(2)(C); fifteen counts of bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 201(b)(2)(C); one count of providing false statements to a federal agency, in violation Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001(a)(2); two counts of wire fraud, in violation Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343; and two counts of aggravated identity theft, in violation Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028A.  Fernandez faces a maximum statutory sentence of 5 years in prison for the conspiracy count of conviction, 15 years in prison for each for the bribery counts, five years in prison for the false statement count, 20 years in prison for each wire fraud count, and a 2-year consecutive mandatory minimum sentence for the aggravated identity theft counts.  In addition, he faces a fine of up to $250,000 or triple the bribery proceeds. 

Rolando Suarez previously pled guilty and was sentenced to 24 months in prison.  Patricia Suarez previously pled guilty and was sentenced to 5 years’ probation with 240 days of electronic monitoring.  Rolando and Patricia Suarez were ordered to jointly pay $711,940.46 in restitution.

Fernandez is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Cooke on August 28, 2019, at 10:30 a.m. (Case No. 17-20780-Cr-Cooke).

U.S. Attorney Fajardo Orshan commended the investigative efforts of the DOT-OIG and FBI in this matter.  She also thanked the Hialeah Police Department, Miami Beach Police Department, and Miami-Dade Police Department for their assistance.  This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Michael Davis and Yeney Hernandez.

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or at http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

A former FAA Aviation Safety Inspector and the co-owner of a South Florida aviation repair company, AVCOM Avionics and Instruments Inc., were charged with various offenses in connection with bribery scheme during 2010-2013. To date, the other co-owner of AVCOM Avionics and Instruments Inc. has also been convicted and sentenced in connection with the ongoing investigation.

           

            Benjamin G. Greenberg, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Marlies T. Gonzalez, Regional Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Inspector General (DOT-OIG), and Robert F. Lasky, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Miami Field Office, made the announcement.

 

            Patricia Suarez, a/k/a “Patricia Bailly,” a/k/a “Patricia Del Castillo,” 49, of Coral Gables, was charged by indictment with one count of conspiracy to commit bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371 and 201(b)(1)(C) and (b)(2)(C), and fifteen counts of bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 201(b)(1)(C). If convicted, Patricia Suarez faces a maximum statutory sentence of five years’ imprisonment for the conspiracy count and fifteen years’ imprisonment each for the bribery counts, as well as a fine up to $250,000 or triple the bribery proceeds. 

 

            Manuel R. Fernandez, 40, of Miami, was charged by indictment with one count of conspiracy to commit bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371 and 201(b)(1)(C) and (b)(2)(C); fifteen counts of bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 201(b)(2)(C); one count of providing false statements to a federal agency, in violation Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001(a)(2); two counts of wire fraud, in violation Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343; and two counts of aggravated identity theft, in violation Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028A.  If convicted, Fernandez faces a maximum statutory sentence of five years’ imprisonment for the conspiracy count, fifteen years’ imprisonment each for the bribery counts, five years’ imprisonment for the false statements count, twenty years’ imprisonment for each wire fraud count, and a two-year consecutive mandatory minimum sentence for the aggravated identity theft counts, as well as a fine up to $250,000 or triple the bribery proceeds. 

 

            Rolando Suarez, 56, of Coral Gables, pled guilty to conspiracy to commit bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371 and 201(b)(1)(C). Rolando Suarez was sentenced to 24 months’ imprisonment and a $20,000 fine. Rolando Suarez also agreed to pay approximately $711,940 in joint and several restitution in relation to the bribery scheme.

 

Acting U.S. Attorney Benjamin G. Greenberg stated, “The Suarez’s, through their company, paid tens of thousands of dollars in bribes to Fernandez, an FAA Aviation Inspector, for the sake of minimizing the cost of doing business, gaining inside information on its competitors, and maximizing profits. This indictment represents our joint efforts to ensure that businesses compete on a level playing field, without improper outside influences or the payment or receipt of bribes.”

 

“This investigation of alleged bribery demonstrates that those entrusted with ensuring the safety our aviation system are held to the highest standards of integrity in the roles for which they are employed,” said Marlies T. Gonzalez, Regional Special Agent-In-Charge, U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General (DOT OIG). “The Department of Transportation has made safety and accountability a top priority. Working with our law enforcement and prosecutorial partners, we will continue our vigorous efforts to prevent, detect and prosecute fraud schemes that compromise the safety of the traveling public.”

 

“When those entrusted with aviation system safety put self-interest and personal enrichment ahead of their obligation, they breach the public's trust,” said Robert F. Lasky, Special Agent in Charge, FBI Miami.  “We encourage anyone who may have information about corruption to come forward and report it. This information is vital to our work. The South Florida community can be assured that public corruption will remain a top priority for the FBI.”

 

            According to the indictment, from 2010 through June 28, 2013, Fernandez served as a FAA Aviation Safety Inspector with the FAA South Florida Flight Standards District Office (“FSDO”).  Patricia Suarez and Rolando Suarez were the co-owners, officers, and directors of AVCOM, a Miami aviation repair company, which was subject to the jurisdiction and official responsibility of the FAA South FSDO.

 

            Patricia Suarez and Rolando Suarez corruptly provided thousands of dollars in cash, income, credit cards, vacation cruises, airline tickets, and other things of value to Fernandez, in exchange for Fernandez violating his lawful and official duties as an FAA Aviation Safety Inspector. In violation of his lawful and official duties, Fernandez provided AVCOM with improperly obtained aviation repair manuals, which saved AVCOM vast sums of money.  Fernandez assisted AVCOM in altering and erasing language, warnings, and advisories from the manuals that indicated confidential, proprietary, copyrighted, and trade secret material. Fernandez also provided AVCOM with notice and warnings as to FAA inspections and investigations regarding AVCOM and its competitors, disclosed to AVCOM sensitive and confidential information regarding AVCOM’s competitors, and concealed and failed to report AVCOM legal, regulatory, and policy violations to the FAA.

 

            In addition to cash payments, in order to funnel additional money to Fernandez, Patricia Suarez and Rolando Suarez submitted documents to AVCOM’s payroll provider establishing Fernandez’s relative as a no-show employee. In turn, Fernandez’s relative promptly provided these AVCOM funds directly to him. Patricia Suarez and Rolando Suarez also issued various company checks made out directly to Fernandez.

 

            According to the indictment, Fernandez also provided materially false statements to the FAA and DOT in order to hide his AVCOM activities. Additionally, Fernandez electronically submitted fraudulent sick leave requests to the FAA, including utilizing a forged and fictitious doctor’s note.

 

            Mr. Greenberg commended the investigative efforts of the DOT-OIG and the FBI Miami Area Corruption Task Force in this matter. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Sean T. McLaughlin.

 

An indictment merely contains allegations and a defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

 

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or on http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10vdxwJKVSolnSHn0KzDnbFmjZtoqm8YzdJrnO2taipA/edit#gid=0
  Last Updated: 2020-09-18 06:14:15 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E