Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:18-cr-20530
Case Name:   USA v. Estepa et al
  Press Releases:
Following a six-day trial before U.S. District Judge Ursula Ungaro, a Miami jury convicted Javier Estepa, 48, of Davie, and Diego Alejandro Estepa Vasquez, 37, of Boca Raton, of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, and false statements to a federal agency.  Estepa and Vasquez were the president and vice-president, respectively, of Aaron Construction Group, Inc. (“Aaron Construction”).

Ariana Fajardo Orshan, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and Rafiq Ahmad, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Inspector General (DOL-OIG), Nadine Gurley, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of the Inspector General (HUD-OIG), Mary T. Cagle, Inspector General, Miami-Dade County, Office of the Inspector General (OIG), made the announcement.

On May 24, 2019, Judge Ungaro sentenced Estepa to 51 months in prison to be followed by three years of supervised release; and sentenced Vasquez to 41 months in prison to be followed by three years of supervised release.

The evidence at trial established that, between June 2014 and December 2016, the defendants engaged in a scheme to unlawfully enrich themselves by securing Miami-Dade Public Housing and Community Development (PHCD) bid awards and causing payments on those contracts by making materially false and fraudulent representations, and by the concealment of material facts concerning, among other things, the utilization of subcontractors, the number of workers employed on the construction projects, the hours worked, and the status of those workers as employees of Aaron Construction.

Estepa and Vasquez submitted bids to PHCD, on behalf of Aaron Construction, for specific renovation and repair of low income housing in various locations throughout Miami-Dade County.  In the bids, Estepa and Vasquez falsely and fraudulently represented that (1) no subcontractors would be utilized in connection with the contract, (2) that each worker would be paid for each hour worked, including for overtime, according to the Davis Bacon prevailing wage rates, and (3) that Aaron Construction would obtain workers’ compensation insurance, in accordance with state laws.  However, immediately after being awarded the contracts, Aaron Construction entered into agreements with subcontractors which set a fixed payment at very low amounts for their work, regardless of the number of hours worked.  In addition, Aaron Construction required subcontractors to provide the information of two or three subcontractor employees so that they could be placed on Aaron Construction’s certified payroll to appear as if they were Aaron Construction employees.  The evidence at trial established that Aaron Construction failed to report accurately the hour employees worked on the job sites or the specific categories of work performed.

In order to obtain payment from PHCD, Estepa and Vasquez submitted Periodic or Final Estimate for Payment packets to PHCD containing false and fraudulent certified payroll records that listed fewer workers than were actually employed on the project and falsified the number of hours worked.  In addition, the evidence at trial established that the workers were not paid the appropriate wages under the Davis Bacon Act, nor were the workers paid overtime.  Estepa and Vasquez falsely and fraudulently stated that they had no subcontractors working on the project, falsely characterizing the workers as employees of Aaron Construction, when in fact they were subcontractors and subcontractor employees.  In addition, Estepa and Vasquez submitted with the Periodic or Final Estimate for Payment packets sworn statements of compliance that falsely and fraudulently certified that the information submitted was true and correct.  Due to these false and fraudulent submissions, PHCD transferred over $3.9 million dollars in funds to bank accounts controlled by Estepa and Vasquez.

U.S. Attorney Fajardo Orshan commended the investigative efforts of DOL-OIG, HUD-OIG, and Miami-Dade County, Office of the Inspector General.  The case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Joshua S. Rothstein and John Gonsoulin.

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or on http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov

Following a six-day jury trial, the president and vice president of a South Florida construction company were convicted of defrauding a low-income housing development program. 

Ariana Fajardo Orshan, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Rafiq Ahmad, Special Agent in Charge, United States Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General (DOL-OIG), Nadine Gurley, Special Agent in Charge, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Inspector General (HUD-OIG), and Mary T. Cagle, Inspector General, Miami Dade County Office of the Inspector General, made the announcement.

Javier Estepa, 48, of Davie, Florida and Diego Alejandro Estepa Vasquez, 37, of Boca Raton, Florida, were convicted yesterday of one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349, and three counts of Wire Fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343 (Case No. 18-CR-20530).   In addition, Javier Estepa was convicted of three counts of making a false statement to a federal agency and Diego Alejandro Estepa Vasquez was convicted of one count of making a false statement to a federal agency, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001.  The defendants face a statutory maximum penalty of 20 years in prison as to each count of wire fraud and a statutory maximum penalty of 5 years in prison for each count of making a false statement.   Sentencing is scheduled for May 10, 2019, at 2 p.m. before U.S. District Court Judge Ursula Ungaro.

The evidence at trial established that, between June 2014 and December 2016, Javier Estepa and Diego Alejandro Estepa Vasquez engaged in a scheme to unlawfully enrich themselves by securing Miami-Dade Public Housing and Community Development (PHCD) bid awards and causing payments on those contracts by making materially false and fraudulent representations, and by the concealment of material facts concerning, among other things, the utilization of subcontractors, the number of workers employed on the construction projects, the hours worked, and the status of those workers as employees of Aaron Construction Group, Inc.

Javier Estepa and Diego Alejandro Estepa Vasquez, the president and vice president, respectively, of Aaron Construction Group, submitted bids to PHCD, on behalf of Aaron Construction, for specific renovation and repair of low-income housing in various locations throughout Miami-Dade County.  In the bids, Javier Estepa and Diego Alejandro Estepa Vasquez falsely and fraudulently represented that no subcontractors would be utilized in connection with the contract, that each worker would be paid for each hour worked, including for overtime, according to the Davis Bacon prevailing wage rates, and that Aaron Construction would obtain workers’ compensation insurance, in accordance with state laws.  However, immediately after being awarded the contracts, Aaron Construction entered into agreements with subcontractors which set a fixed payment at very low amounts for their work, regardless of the number of hours worked.  In addition, Aaron Construction required subcontractors to provide the information of  two or three subcontractor employees so that they could be placed on Aaron Construction’s certified payroll to appear as if they were Aaron Construction employees.  The evidence at trial established that Aaron Construction failed to accurately report the hour employees worked on the job sites or the specific categories of work performed.

In order to obtain payment from PHCD, Javier Estepa and Diego Alejandro Estepa Vasquez submitted Periodic or Final Estimate for Payment packets to PHCD containing false and fraudulent certified payroll records that listed fewer workers than were actually employed on the project and falsified the number of hours worked.  In addition, the evidence at trial established that the workers were not paid the appropriate wages under the Davis Bacon Act, nor were the workers paid overtime.  Javier Estepa and Diego Alejandro Estepa Vasquez falsely and fraudulently stated that they had no subcontractors working on the project, falsely characterizing the workers as employees of Aaron Construction, when in fact they were subcontractors and subcontractor employees.  In addition, Javier Estepa and Diego Alejandro Estepa Vasquez submitted with the Periodic or Final Estimate for Payment packets sworn statements of compliance that falsely and fraudulently certified that the information submitted was true and correct.  As a result of these false and fraudulent submissions, PHCD transferred over $3.9 million dollars in funds to bank accounts controlled by Javier Estepa and Diego Alejandro Estepa Vasquez.

U.S. Attorney Fajardo Orshan commended the investigative efforts of the DOL-OIG, HUD-OIG and the Miami Dade County Office of the Inspector General.  She thanked the Miami-Dade Police Department for their assistance.  The case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Joshua S. Rothstein and John Gonsoulin.

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or at http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

President and vice president of South Florida construction company charged with defrauding low-income housing development program. 

Benjamin G. Greenberg, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Rafiq Ahmad, Special Agent in Charge, United States Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General (DOL-OIG), Nadine Gurley, Special Agent in Charge, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Inspector General (HUD-OIG), Juan J. Perez, Director, Miami-Dade Police Department (MDPD), and Mary T. Cagle, Inspector General, Miami Dade County Office of the Inspector General, made the announcement.

Javier Estepa, 47, of Davie, Florida and Diego Alejandro Estepa Vazquez, 36, of Boca Raton, Florida, were charged in a four-count indictment with conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349, and wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.  The defendants are scheduled to have their initial appearance on June 25, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.  before United States Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White.  If convicted, the defendants face up to twenty years in prison, three years of supervised release, a $250,000 fine, and restitution, as to each charged count. 

According to the indictment, between June 2014 and December 2016, Estepa and Estepa Vazquez engaged in a scheme to unlawfully enrich themselves by securing Miami-Dade Public Housing and Community Development (PHCD) bid awards and causing payments on those contracts by making materially false and fraudulent representations and by concealing material facts.

President Estepa and Vice President Estepa Vazquez of Aaron Construction Group submitted bids to PHCD for specific renovation and repair of low-income housing in various locations throughout Miami-Dade County.  It is alleged that, in their bids, Estepa and Estepa Vazquez falsely and fraudulently represented the number of workers to be employed on the projects, claimed subcontractors would not be utilized in connection with the contract, and asserted that Aaron Construction would obtain workers compensation insurance, in accordance with state laws.  By falsely and fraudulently under reporting the number of workers on the projects, Aaron Construction was able to submit lower bids for the PHCD repair work.   In order to obtain payment from PHCD, Estepa and Diego Estepa Vazquez submitted Periodic or Final Estimates for Payment and supporting documents that allegedly contained false and fraudulent payroll records, falsely characterized subcontractors and subcontractor employees as employees of Aaron Construction, and included sworn statements of compliance that falsely and fraudulently certified that the information submitted was true and correct.  As a result of these false and fraudulent submissions, PHCD transferred funds to bank accounts controlled by Estepa and Estepa Vazquez.

An indictment is a charging instrument containing accusations and the defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Mr. Greenberg commended the investigative efforts of the DOL-OIG, HUD-OIG, MDPD’s Public Corruption Unit and the Miami Dade County Office of the Inspector General in this matter.  This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Joshua S. Rothstein.

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or on http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1A77iqEYl7ggkqF_lfXvsf9tN0oFWCaCkrZ3Jx6KWmpc
  Last Updated: 2025-03-11 08:51:26 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E