Assistant U.S. Attorneys Daniel Silva and Colin McDonald (619) 546-9713
NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY – September 30, 2019
SAN DIEGO – Aidan Curry and Connor Brooke pleaded guilty in federal court today for conspiring to launder Dark Web proceeds through their unlicensed money transmitting business, which sold cryptocurrency to complete strangers in exchange for cash.
As part of their guilty pleas, the defendants agreed to forfeit tens of thousands of dollars’ worth of cash, cryptocurrency, and high-end, sophisticated hardware including computers, phones, hard drives and storage devices that were involved in the money laundering conspiracy.
Special Agents from Homeland Security Investigations identified Curry and Brooke as managers of a San Diego-based business advertising the ability and willingness to sell Bitcoin (a specific type of cryptocurrency) for a premium, and always in cash, to the public. Persons who purchase or sell contraband on online black markets (also known as the “Dark Web”) use cryptocurrency such as Bitcoin to conduct transactions. Cryptocurrency provides a vendor and customer with perceived anonymity. The Dark Web is a network of encrypted communication systems that can only be accessed using special software tools. Before someone can use cryptocurrency, they must first convert their “real,” fiat currency (such as United States Dollars) into the cryptocurrency. A common way to do so is through an unlicensed money transmitting business (an “MTB”) that exchanges cryptocurrency for cash.
As admitted in the plea agreements entered today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg, Curry and Brooke conducted, controlled, managed, supervised, directed and owned all or part of a cryptocurrency MTB called “BayCoins.” Curry described the unlicensed MTB to an acquaintance over text messages, stating: “I’m basically like a currency exchange place for Bitcoin”; and that he and Brooke advertised their MTB on a website that was equivalent to the “Craigslist of bitcoin”.
By August 2018, BayCoins had posted two separate online solicitations – one with Curry’s information and the other with Brooke’s. The advertisements promised “quick, easy, and hassle free” Bitcoin transactions, with a “non-negotiable” five percent transaction fee, and always for cash. By accepting cash in exchange for cryptocurrency, as opposed to other forms of payment such as electronic money transfers, checks, or cash deposits into a bank account, Curry and Brooke operated their MTB in relative anonymity and evaded the anti-money laundering scrutiny of other licensed and registered financial institutions. This anonymity extended to their customers as well.
BayCoins generated sufficient profits, alongside a growing inventory of cryptocurrency, to fund the defendants’ acquisition, sale, and distribution of marijuana on various Dark Web marketplaces. After receiving payment for the marijuana, Curry and Brooke then sold the cryptocurrency for additional profit through the BayCoins unlicensed MTB.
U.S. Attorney Robert Brewer said, “The United States will continue to pursue, uncover and dismantle money laundering and narcotics trafficking organizations seeking to operate behind multiple layers of anonymity – whether it’s the Dark Web, through unlicensed money transmitting businesses, or with sophisticated software. Compliance with the anti-money laundering laws of the United States is not an option. We treat knowing compliance failures for what they are: a crime. I applaud the excellent work of the federal agents and Assistant U.S. Attorneys who unraveled these complex crimes.”
“Homeland Security Investigations Special Agents worked diligently to uncover this Dark Web scheme led by Curry and Brooke that used cryptocurrency such as Bitcoin to conduct illegal transactions,” said Nick Annan, special agent in charge of HSI in San Diego. “The investigation resulting in today’s guilty plea is an excellent example of the commitment and partnership between HSI and prosecutors to seek out individuals and criminal networks who try to conceal their illicit activities under the cloak of the Dark Web.”
The investigation was led by Special Agents of Homeland Security Investigations. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Daniel Silva and Colin McDonald.
Sentencing is scheduled to occur on January 6, 2020. Curry and Brooke both face a maximum of 20 years in prison.
DEFENDANTS Case Number 19-CR-3839-GPC
Aidan Curry San Diego, CA Age: 23
Connor Brooke San Diego, CA Age: 25
SUMMARY OF CHARGES*
Money Laundering Conspiracy – Title 18, U.S.C., Section 1956(h)
Maximum penalty: Twenty years in prison and $500,000 fine
AGENCIES
Homeland Security Investigations
*The charges and allegations contained in an indictment or complaint are merely accusations, and the defendants are considered innocent unless and until proven guilty.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year