Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-AL  2:19-cr-00021
Case Name:   USA v. Wester
  Press Releases:
United States Attorney Richard W. Moore of the Southern District of Alabama announces today that United States District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock sentenced defendant Bryan Heath Wester, 43, a resident of Springville, Alabama, to imprisonment for 12 months and one day for tampering with a consumer product. As part of the sentence, the judge ordered that Wester undergo three years of supervised release after finishing his term of imprisonment, pay a $100 mandatory special assessment, receive substance abuse and mental health treatment as directed by the U.S. Probation Office, and pay restitution totaling $511.48 to a patient-victim in the case.

On January 31, 2019, a federal grand jury for the Southern District of Alabama charged Wester with one count of tampering with consumer products in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1365(a). On April 26, 2019, Wester pleaded guilty to the charge. He faced up to ten years imprisonment. 

  

Wester admitted to the following facts at his plea hearing. He was previously a licensed nurse and a paramedic who worked for an air ambulance service in Demopolis, Alabama. On August 26, 2018, Wester, with reckless disregard for the risk that another person would be placed in danger of death and bodily injury, and under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to such risk, tampered with ketamine hydrochloride (ketamine), a consumer product that was manufactured outside of Alabama and affected interstate commerce. Wester accessed the controlled substances box inside a locked safe located on board an emergency helicopter, removed ketamine from two vials, and replaced the removed ketamine with saline, knowing that the ketamine was intended to be administered via injection to critically ill and injured patients being transported by helicopter for emergency treatment.

On August 27, 2018, a critically injured patient required air transport to Mobile, Alabama. The patient had been run over by a cow and suffered head trauma and loss of consciousness. The on-board nurse attempted to administer ketamine. The vial appeared to have a blue glue on the cap. When the needle was inserted, the vial did not appear to be vacuum sealed. The nurse administered the dose but it did not have the anticipated effect. The nurse then obtained a second vial of ketamine and found that the cap had been glued on.

On August 30, 2018, a special agent with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s Office of Criminal Investigations interviewed Wester, who admitted to removing ketamine from two vials on August 26. According to his statements, around midday on August 26 Wester asked another nurse on duty for the nurse’s set of keys to the locked narcotics on the helicopter, telling the other nurse that he would do the equipment check. The nurse gave Wester the keys. Wester opened the safe and did not lock one side back. The two-key lock system allowed Wester to return later with his own keys and access the safe. Later that evening, Wester went out to the helicopter, withdrew the ketamine from two vials, and replaced it with saline. Wester re-glued the tops of the vials with dermabond. There was a zip-tie securing the plastic narcotics box inside the safe; Wester cut the zip-tie off and replaced it with a new one. Wester also changed the number in the logbook to reflect the new number. The old number ended in a “2.” Wester changed it to a “1.”

At today’s sentencing, District Judge Beaverstock underscored that Wester had abused his position of trust treating vulnerable patients and that Wester was no longer working as a paramedic and flight nurse as a result of the offense conduct.

After sentencing, U.S. Attorney Moore stated, “Health care practitioners take an oath to treat the injured and vulnerable among us. This defendant brazenly violated that oath and has been held accountable for his criminal conduct. I commend the FDA for investigating this important case.”

“FDA is fully committed to the vigorous criminal prosecution of any individual who threatens the safety and security of the U.S. drug supply,” said Justin Fielder, Acting Special Agent in Charge, FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigations’ Miami Field Office. “The sentencing in this case should send a clear signal that this kind of illicit tampering activity will not be tolerated.”

FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigations investigated the case. Assistant United States Attorney Sinan Kalayoglu prosecuted the case.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zJ49P1juoIGN52KNDj5dgD91lvui9ud_Hi_P6XCowp0
  Last Updated: 2025-03-20 04:09:55 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E