CHICAGO — Six individuals are facing federal criminal charges as part of an investigation into heroin and crack cocaine sales in the Rockford area.
As part of the probe, law enforcement conducted numerous controlled purchases of narcotics and conducted extensive physical and video surveillance. Authorities earlier this month searched a residence in the 4400 block of Grinnell Drive in Rockford and discovered distribution quantities of heroin.
The investigation was conducted by the Rockford Area Violent Gang Task Force and the Winnebago County Sheriff’s Police. The Rockford Area Violent Gang Task Force is led by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and includes members of the FBI and the Rockford, Loves Park, and Freeport Police Departments.
A criminal complaint and affidavit filed in U.S. District Court in Rockford charges six defendants with conspiracy to distribute and possess heroin, cocaine, and crack cocaine, with intent to distribute. Several of the defendants were arrested Wednesday. Detention hearings will be held next week in U.S. District Court in Rockford.
The charges were announced by John R. Lausch, Jr., United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois; Jeffrey S. Sallet, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and Gary Caruana, Winnebago County Sheriff. The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives assisted in the investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorney Talia Bucci represents the government.
“The charges in this case send a clear message that the distribution of illegal drugs in Rockford will not be tolerated,” said U.S. Attorney Lausch. “I commend our federal and local law enforcement partners for working together to shut down a significant drug trafficking organization.”
“These arrests and seizures demonstrate our overall strategy and relentless determination to eradicate the drug-fueled gang violence plaguing our community,” said FBI Special Agent-in-Charge Sallett. “We are proud to work side by side with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the Rockford Area Violent Gang Task Force, and the Winnebago County Sheriff’s Office to bring these individuals to justice. Anyone who terrorizes our communities with their wanton drug dealing should know, we are coming for you.”
Winnebago County Sheriff Caruana thanked all law enforcement partners for their unselfish work to bring this case to a successful conclusion. “This operation makes the Winnebago County region a safer community and showcases Cooperative Law Enforcement,” Sheriff Caruana said.
According to the complaint, TYJUAN ANDERSON, 35, of Rockford, operated a drug-trafficking organization that distributed narcotics in the Rockford area. The complaint alleges that Anderson and other members of his crew, including CHRISTOPHER ARNOLD, 33, of Rockford, and LUMONT JOHNSON, 45, of Rockford, obtained narcotics from multiple suppliers and provided the drugs to other members of Anderson’s organization. The charges allege that CLEVELAND JOHNSON, 38, of Rockford, and DAVID APPLETON, 55, of Rockford, distributed the drugs to customers in the Rockford area.
According to the complaint, Anderson served as a mentor to JUSTIN HILL, 37, of Rockford, on how to operate a successful drug-trafficking business, manage money, and avoid police surveillance. At times when Anderson was low on narcotics, Hill would supply him with drugs to increase Anderson’s inventory, the complaint states.
The conspiracy charge carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison. If convicted, the Court must impose reasonable sentences under federal sentencing statutes and the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines. The public is reminded that a complaint contains only charges and is not evidence of guilt. The defendants are presumed innocent and are entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year