Score:   1
Docket Number:   ND-IL  1:19-cr-00193
Case Name:   USA v. Keefe
  Press Releases:
CHICAGO — Federal authorities today announced criminal prosecutions against several Chicago-area defendants for a variety of alleged tax schemes.  With the arrival of Tax Day, the prosecutions serve as a reminder that individual taxpayers are responsible for the contents of their own return.

The recent prosecutions announced today include charges against a south suburban tax professional who allegedly filed a false personal income tax return, as well as a guilty plea by a west suburban general contractor who admitted willfully failing to file income tax returns for nearly a decade.

In addition to criminal penalties, including potential incarceration, tax evaders remain responsible for all taxes and interest due, as well as civil penalties. 

Today is the nation’s tax deadline.

“Preserving the integrity of the federal tax system is a significant priority in our office,” said John R. Lausch, Jr., United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois.  “Through vigorous criminal enforcement of the internal revenue laws, we will hold accountable those who attempt to cheat the system.”

“As the tax filing deadline quickly approaches, I urge all Chicago-area residents to fully comply with federal tax laws,” said Gabriel L. Grchan, Special Agent-in-Charge of the IRS Criminal Investigation Division in Chicago.  “If you choose to disobey these laws, please understand that you are not just hurting the government, you are hurting your neighbors and your community.  IRS special agents will continue to serve the American people by aggressively pursuing tax criminals year round.”

A federal jury last week convicted JERMAINE JACKSON, 48, of Chicago, of filing 13 fraudulent federal income tax returns in the names of various trusts he created.  Each of the returns sought a fraudulent tax refund based on fictitious income and withholding numbers.  The IRS identified the bogus nature of a dozen of the returns, but the agency paid a refund of $900,000 on one of them.  U.S. District Judge John Z. Lee set sentencing for July 10, 2019.  The government in Jackson’s case is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Stephen Heinze and Patrick King.

In a criminal information filed last month, the U.S. Attorney’s Office charged LISA LLOYD TAYLOR, 51, of Country Club Hills, with one count of willfully filing a false personal income tax return, and one count of stealing approximately $134,835 of Social Security funds.  According to the charges, Taylor, who owned Ebiz Accounting Services in Country Club Hills, filed a false personal income tax return for calendar year 2012 that falsely listed gross receipts or sales from her business as $7,890, when Taylor knew that her gross receipts or sales substantially exceeded that amount.  Taylor has pleaded not guilty to the charges.  A status hearing is set for April 23, 2019, before U.S. District Judge Andrea R. Wood.  The government in Taylor’s case is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Nani Gilkerson.  The public is reminded that charges are not evidence of guilt.  Taylor is presumed innocent and entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The general contractor, STEPHEN KEEFE, 47, of Downers Grove, pleaded guilty last month to multiple counts of willfully failing to file personal income tax returns.  Keefe, who previously owned Downers Grove-based Stephen Keefe Construction and S. Keefe Construction, admitted in a plea agreement that he willfully failed to file income tax returns for the calendar years 2010 through 2017, despite receiving taxable income of at least $2.08 million in those years.  Keefe’s conduct caused a combined tax loss to the federal and state government of approximately $379,493.  U.S. Magistrate Judge Sunil R. Harjani set sentencing for June 28, 2019.  The government in Keefe’s case is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Patrick King.

Another recent tax prosecution resulted in a term of imprisonment for a northwest suburban business executive.  PETER KONOPKA, 72, of Marengo, was sentenced in December to six months in federal prison, and ordered to pay restitution of $189,837.  While President of Illinois-based Solarcrete Energy Efficient Building Systems, Konopka filed a bankruptcy petition on behalf of Solarcrete that contained false statements in order to conceal corporate assets from the bankruptcy trustee.  In addition, Konopka willfully failed to report personal income for the calendar year 2011 that included payments from business accounts that were used to pay off personal loans.  The government in Konopka’s case was represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney William Hogan.

For tips to assist taxpayers in choosing a reputable tax professional or preparing their own taxes, visit the official IRS website: https://www.irs.gov/help-resources.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12LOBhgKlemDYRa0AhxjrCfTcquUo0_wNFwAhIslu_iY
  Last Updated: 2025-03-19 17:48:19 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The number of days from the earlier of filing date or first appearance date to proceeding date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from proceeding date to disposition date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from disposition date to sentencing date
Format: N3

Description: The code of the district office where the case was terminated
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant at the time the case was closed
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense that carried the most severe disposition and penalty under which the defendant was disposed
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A code indicating whether the prison sentence associated with TTITLE1 was concurrent or consecutive in relation to the other counts in the indictment or information or multiple counts of the same charge
Format: A4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE1
Format: N8

Description: The total prison time for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and prison time was imposed
Format: N4

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E