Score:   1
Docket Number:   ND-FL  5:19-cr-00077
Case Name:   USA v CRAWSON ET AL
  Press Releases:
PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA – A federal grand jury in Tallahassee has returned a far-reaching indictment

that unveils a criminal network of 29 people who actively worked to defraud the federal government

and taxpayers of hundreds of thousands of dollars. At the helm of the scheme, a County Executive

Director of the United States Department of Agriculture’s Farm Service Agency is charged with

orchestrating a broad-based conspiracy to steal government drought assistance funds and hide the

actions through identify theft, tax evasion, and other federal crimes with a criminal network of

more than two dozen other people.

The indictment, announced today by Lawrence Keefe, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of

Florida as part of a crackdown by his office’s enhanced Public Trust Unit, produced a sweeping

roundup of 29 current and former federal, state, and local officials and local business people all

connected in the scheme to defraud the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The indictment alleges that Farm Service Agency director Duane Edward Crawson, 43, Bonifay,

Florida, led the conspiracy that included a former Holmes County Clerk of Court and numerous other

individuals who had served in positions of public trust and others in a variety of occupations.

Charges include conspiracy to commit wire fraud, theft of government funds, aggravated identity

theft, income tax evasion, and obstruction of Internal Revenue laws.

“These individuals betrayed their duty as public servants and as citizens in a shallow but

breathtakingly bold effort to lie, cheat, and steal from their fellow citizens and our federal

government,” said Keefe. “This pattern of shameless criminality strikes at the very heart of our

system of self-government and undermines public trust in the integrity of our basic institutions.

The United States Attorney’s Office and all our law enforcement partners will be relentless in

pursuing and prosecuting all such violations of public trust.”

The indictment alleges that between May and December 2017, Crawson -- while employed as the County

Executive Director of the USDA’s Farm Service Agency for Bay, Holmes, and Washington counties in

Florida -- devised a kickback scheme in which he and his co-conspirators unlawfully obtained approximately $373,483 in taxpayer funds by submitting fraudulent drought assistance claims.

Crawson is alleged to have submitted fraudulent claims for livestock and farmland parcels that were

not actually owned or leased by the conspirators, resulting in drought assistance funds being

deposited into the conspirators’ bank accounts. The co-conspirators are alleged to have paid

Crawson a portion of the fraud proceeds in the form of cash kickbacks.

The defendants’ trial is scheduled for January 6, 2020, at 8:00 a.m. at the United States

Courthouse in Pensacola, Florida.

Each defendant faces the following potential penalties:

- Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud: a maximum of 20 years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine.

-     Theft of Government Funds: a maximum of 10 years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine.

Besides Crawson, the defendants are:

•    Jeremiah Joe Rolling, 43, of Westville, Florida;

      Investigator – Office of the State Public Defender

•    Jordan Ryan Hicks, 36, of Ponce De Leon, Florida;

      Former Florida Department of Corrections Officer

•    Davey Eugene Mancill, 44, of Westville, Florida;

      Mancill Masonry, LLC

•    James Stacey Paul, 46, of Bonifay, Florida;

      Public Works - City of Bonifay, Florida

•    Kyle Martin Hudson, 39, of Westville, Florida;

      Former Holmes County Clerk of Court

•    Christopher Marion Ammons, 31, of Ponce De Leon, Florida;

      Heavy Equipment Operator

•    Danyel Michelle Witt, 44, of Bonifay, Florida;

      Clerk – United States Postal Service

•    Sheryl Day Gillman, 52, of Bonifay, Florida;

      Secretary - Florida Farm Bureau

•    Shyloe Rose Sachse, 40, of Bonifay, Florida;

      Former Corrections Officer

•    Tillman Douglas Mears, 30, of Bonifay, Florida;

      Public Works - City of Bonifay, Florida

•    Dawn Marie Crutchfield, 48, of Bonifay, Florida;

      Medical Assitant

•    Justin Mikel Chopelas, 21, of Fayetteville, North Carolina;

      Construction

•    Ronald Ryan Roof, 23, of Westville, Florida;

      Specialist – Army National Guard

•    Megan Leann Roof, 22, of Caryville, Florida;

      Hotel Clerk

•    Billy Coal Bradshaw, 35, of Bonifay, Florida;

      Auto Parts Employee

•    James Erwin Mancill, 48, of Bonifay, Florida;

      Auto Parts Employee

•    Joseph Matthew Crowder, 47, of Caryville, Florida;

      Brick Mason – Mancill Masonry, LLC

•    Audrey Lynn Smith, 32, of Caryville, Florida;

      Convenience Store Clerk

•    Brian Anthony Ammons, 44, of Ponce De Leon, Florida;

      Heavy Equipment Operator

•    Taylor Ward Stripling, 28, of Westville, Florida;

      Farm Laborer

•    Dawn Marie Roof, 44, of Chipley, Florida;

      Licensed Practical Nurse

•    Daniel Olajuwon Boston, 33, of Chipley, Florida;

      Brick Mason – Mancill Masonry, LLC

•    Chassity Lynn Lee, 31, of Bonifay, Florida;

      Auto Parts Employee

•    Jennifer Marie McCabe, 30, of Bonifay, Florida;

      Holmes County Council on Aging

•    Justina Rae Williams, 30, of Caryville, Florida;

      Unemployed

•    Joseph Bailey Alexander, 22, of Chipley, Florida;

      Poker Dealer

•    Douglas Edward Mixon, 60, of Westville, Florida;

      Farmer

•    Dwayne Frazier White, 49, of Bonifay, Florida

      Former City of Bonifay Police Officer

Duane Crawson, Davey Mancill, James Paul, and Danyel Witt face an additional charge of aggravated

identity theft, which carries a penalty of a minimum 2 years imprisonment consecutive to any other

term of imprisonment and a $250,000 fine. In addition, Crawson also faces charges of income tax

evasion, carrying a maximum of 5 years imprisonment and a $100,000 fine; and obstruction of Internal Revenue laws, carrying a maximum of 3 years imprisonment and a $5,000 fine.

“The Livestock Forage Disaster Program (LFP) was created to help stabilize the U.S. livestock

industry and support producers whose grazing lands were significantly damaged by drought.

Those involved in fraud and abuse of USDA farm programs will be investigated by our office to the

fullest extent. This is particularly applicable for USDA employees who violate the trust vested in

them by American taxpayers,” said U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Inspector General

Special Agent-in-Charge Bethanne M. Dinkins. “In this joint investigation with the Internal Revenue

Service-Criminal Investigation, we worked together to identify those who sought to profit from the

LFP through illegal schemes. The USDA Office of Inspector General will continue to dedicate

investigative resources and work with our law enforcement partners to protect the integrity of

these programs and bring to justice those who commit fraud.”

The indictment culminates a 20-month investigation conducted by a partnership of law enforcement

agencies and prosecutors at all levels of government, including the United States Department of

Agriculture-Office of Inspector General and the Internal Revenue Service- Criminal Investigations.

Assistant United States Attorney Jason R. Coody is prosecuting the case.

“Those who violate their oaths and abuse positions of trust in our community do so out of greed.

IRS Special Agents are uniquely skilled to follow the money trail and bring to light financial

transactions conducted in such ways as to stay undetected,” stated Ron Loecker, Assistant Special

Agent in Charge for IRS Criminal Investigation’s Tampa Field Office. “IRS is a committed partner of

the U.S. Attorney’s Office Public Integrity Unit and we stand ready to ensure our public officials

work honestly in communities throughout northern Florida.”

An indictment is merely an allegation by a grand jury that a defendant has committed a violation of

federal criminal law and is not evidence of guilt. All defendants are presumed innocent and

entitled to a fair trial, during which it will be the government’s burden to prove guilt beyond a

reasonable doubt in a court of law.

The United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Florida is one of 94 offices that

serve as the nation’s principal litigators under the direction of the Attorney General. To access

public court documents online, please visit the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida website.  For more information about the United States Attorney's Office, Northern District of Florida, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/fln/index.html.

TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA – A federal grand jury in Tallahassee returned an indictment charging former

Holmes County, Florida, Clerk of Court, Kyle Martin Hudson, 39, of Westville, Florida, with wire

fraud. The indictment was announced by Lawrence Keefe, United States Attorney for the Northern

District of Florida.

“A public office at all levels of government is a sacred public trust and anyone who breaches or

betrays that trust will be held accountable,” said U.S. Attorney Keefe. “As the people expect and

deserve leaders who do their jobs with honesty and integrity, we will vigorously pursue and

prosecute those few who commit crimes and place their self-interest above the public interest.”

The indictment alleges that, between October 2017 and August 2018, Hudson, while employed as the

elected Clerk of Court for Holmes County, Florida, fraudulently obtained more than

$6,800 in taxpayer funds through the submission of fraudulent travel reimbursement claims.

Hudson will be arraigned in federal court on the charges on October 7, 2019, at 1:30 p.m. before

United States Magistrate Judge Michael Frank at the United States Courthouse in Pensacola, Florida.

Hudson faces the following potential penalty:

•    Wire Fraud: a maximum of 20 years’ imprisonment and a $250,000 fine

This case resulted from an investigation by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. Assistant

United States Attorney Jason R. Coody is prosecuting the case.

This case arose from an extensive investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Public Trust Unit, a

comprehensive anti-corruption initiative designed to target and hold accountable elected,

appointed, and employed public officials who abuse the sacred trust placed in them by citizens.

An indictment is merely an allegation by a grand jury that a defendant has committed a violation of

federal criminal law and is not evidence of guilt. All defendants are presumed innocent and entitled to a

fair trial, during which it will be the government's burden to prove guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

The United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Florida is one of 94 offices that

serve as the nation’s principal litigators under the direction of the Attorney General. To access

public court documents online, please visit the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of

Florida website. For more information about the United States Attorney’s Office, Northern

District of Florida, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/fln/index.html.

CourtListener:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16490123/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16484291/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16543158/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32494059/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32494179/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32494544/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32494778/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32495060/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32495230/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32495237/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32495560/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32495825/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32495827/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32495830/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32495954/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32496186/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32496465/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32496475/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32496571/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32496658/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32497166/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32494187/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32494430/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32494691/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32494885/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32495226/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32495440/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32495611/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32495681/united-states-v-crawson/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32502820/united-states-v-crawson/
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E