Score:   1
Docket Number:   ND-FL  4:19-cr-00077
Case Name:   USA v. FLEMING et al
  Press Releases:
 

TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA – Stephanie Lynn Fleming, 42, and Helen Elizabeth Storey, 37, both of Waldorf, Maryland (and formerly of Tallahassee, Florida), were arrested in Maryland after a federal grand jury in Tallahassee returned an indictment charging them with conspiracy to commit health care fraud, 75 counts of health care fraud, false statements in connection with a health care matter, and two counts of aggravated identity theft. The offenses are alleged to have been committed in the Northern District of Florida. The indictment was announced by Lawrence Keefe, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Florida.

The indictment alleges that Storey was the owner of North Florida Mental Health (NFMH), a Tallahassee-based counseling center that employed Fleming as one of its licensed mental health counselors. The indictment further alleges that beginning on or about April 15, 2016, Fleming and Storey submitted and caused to be submitted false and fictitious claims for payment and reimbursement to Florida Medicaid and its managed care organizations (MCOs) for psychotherapy, psychiatric diagnostic evaluations, and therapeutic behavioral services. In total, it is alleged that Fleming and Storey improperly obtained or attempted to obtain more than $250,000 from Florida Medicaid.

The indictment also alleges that in order for Fleming and NFMH to receive Florida Medicaid claim reimbursements:

• In or about February 2016, Storey made and submitted a materially false Florida Medicaid Provider Enrollment Application in which she falsely attested that Fleming (1) had not pled guilty or nolo contendere to a felony, (2) had no disciplinary action taken against any of her business or professional licenses held in Florida or any other state, and (3) had not surrendered a business or professional license in Florida or any other state.

• From about March 2016 to about March 2017, Fleming made and submitted a materially false Provider Agreement and a materially false Practitioner Network Application, in which she falsely attested that she had not pled guilty or nolo contendere to illegal conduct within the past ten years, and that she had not pled guilty or nolo contendere to a felony.

Fleming and Storey face the following potential penalties:

• Conspiracy to commit health care fraud: a maximum of 20 years prison;

• Health care fraud: a maximum of 10 years in prison per count;

• False statements in connection to health care matters: a maximum of 5 years in prison per count; and

• Aggravated identity theft: a 2-year mandatory minimum prison sentence per count, consecutive to any other sentence imposed.

This case resulted from an investigation by the Florida Attorney General’s Office – Medicaid Fraud Control Unit and the United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General. Assistant United States Attorney Justin M. Keen is prosecuting the case.

"Law enforcement works tirelessly to detect health care fraud, and we will continue to use every lawful tool at our disposal to prosecute those who defraud public programs of their limited funds," U.S. Attorney Keefe said. "This indictment is the next step in holding these two defendants accountable for their actions."

Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody said, "Providing health care services without a valid license is not just a safety concern, it is illegal. Our Medicaid Fraud Control Unit worked closely with federal officials on this case to stop health care fraud and protect patients. Fraud of any kind will not be tolerated in Florida, and we will continue to work with our federal partners to protect the integrity of the Medicaid program."

Special Agent in Charge Omar Perez Aybar of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General said "Medicaid recipients deserve to receive services from licensed health care professionals. Those who submit materially false information on Medicaid agreements and applications, and enrich themselves through the submission of false claims, will be investigated and held accountable by our state and federal law enforcement partners."

The arraignment of Fleming and Storey is scheduled for September 26, 2019, at 1:30 p.m. at the United States Courthouse in Tallahassee.

An indictment is merely an allegation by a grand jury that a defendant has committed a violation of federal criminal law and is not evidence of guilt. All defendants are presumed innocent and entitled to a fair trial, during which it will be the government’s burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at trial.

The United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Florida is one of 94 offices that serve as the nation’s principal litigators under the direction of the Attorney General. To access public court documents online, please visit the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida website. For more information about the United States Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Florida, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/fln/index.html

Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E