Score:   1
Docket Number:   MD-FL  2:20-cr-00078
Case Name:   USA v. Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute LLC
  Press Releases:
Fort Myers, FL – United States Attorney Maria Chapa Lopez announces that Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute, LLC (FCS), an oncology group headquartered in Fort Myers, Florida, has agreed to a civil settlement that will return $2,341,508.91 that was overpaid by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for certain claims relating to physician-administered drugs.

Although the majority of veterans enrolled in the VA healthcare system receive care in VA-operated medical facilities, the VA may also contract with non-VA facilities to provide services that are not readily available from a VA medical facility. The Code of Federal Regulations allows for VA reimbursement of non-VA care providers for certain physician-administered drugs in accordance with Medicare pricing schedules.

Marianne K. Parker, a Claims Resolution Specialist with FCS, filed a qui tam complaint in the Middle District of Florida after contacting the VA Office of Inspector General’s hotline concerning her discovery that FCS was being overpaid by the VA for physician-administered drugs. In response to the hotline complaint, the VA-OIG Office of Audits and Evaluation determined that a mistake in the Fee Basis Claims System had led the Florida Claims Processing Centers to pay the full amount billed by the provider rather than the appropriate Medicare rate. Subsequently, the VA fixed the issue. 

The United States worked cooperatively with FCS to identify the remaining amount of the overpayments made by the VA to FCS. The civil settlement will conclude the lawsuit filed by Ms. Parker and she will receive 20% of the recovery. 

“Money designated for the medical care of our veterans is a precious commodity,” said United States Attorney Chapa Lopez. “We are pleased that Florida Cancer Specialists cooperated with the investigation and will return the overpayment back to the VA. Any other providers who received such overpayments should follow suit.”

David Spilker, Special Agent in Charge, VA-Office of Inspector General, stated, “The VA’s Community Care program provides veterans with the ability to obtain critical healthcare services from providers in their community. This civil settlement reinforces the VA-OIG’s commitment to safeguarding the integrity of VA’s healthcare programs and preserving taxpayer funds for their intended purposes."

The investigation was handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Kyle S. Cohen, with assistance from the Department of Veterans Affairs – Office of Inspector General.

The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability. 

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SZ5XlYD5_hnS_75pOfVFznm1ED4DdpOJ7rwoPyifOp8
  Last Updated: 2025-03-29 00:36:12 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E