Score:   1
Docket Number:   ED-TX  4:20-cr-00157
Case Name:   USA v. Mwanza
  Press Releases:
BEAUMONT, Texas – The Department of Justice Criminal Division announced today that it has charged more than 50 people who allegedly committed fraud to obtain funds from the Paycheck Protection Plan (PPP). 

          The PPP program is authorized by the CARES Act, which is a federal law enacted on March 29, 2020, designed to provide emergency financial assistance to the millions of Americans who are suffering the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.  The CARES Act initially authorized up to $349 billion in forgivable PPP loans to small businesses for job retention and certain other expenses, and in April 2020, Congress authorized over $300 billion in additional PPP funding,

          In partnership with the Criminal Division, the Eastern District of Texas has played a lead role in pursuing CARES Act fraud and has declared COVID-related fraud a top priority.

          “When thieves and fraudsters steal CARES Act funding, they steal from all of us – the corner store, the dry cleaner, and the local grocer.  These are not simple or easy cases to investigate and charge.  They involve piecing together often-complex financial, payroll, and tax records for individuals and companies.  This makes it all the more remarkable that the men and women of the Department of Justice have been able to bring so many cases so quickly — against over 50 defendants in a matter of months — and is a testament to the hard work and dedication of federal prosecutors and agents and our partners across the U.S. government.”

          The Eastern District of Texas has charged three individuals with violations related to the improper use of PPP funds.  In each case, the individuals fraudulently claimed their businesses had suffered catastrophic losses due to the COVID-19 pandemic and requested assistance in the form of forgivable small business loans through the PPP.  In May, Shashank Rai and Samuel Yates were each charged in separate cases with violations of wire fraud, mail fraud, and making false statements to a bank and to the SBA in order to unlawfully obtain millions of dollars in PPP loans.  In June, Fahad Shah was indicted and charged with three counts of wire fraud, one count of making a false statement to a bank, and four counts of money laundering.  It is alleged that Shah illegally obtained millions of dollars, which he used to purchase multiple Tesla automobiles, to play the stock market, and for personal expenses.  When conduct like the kind alleged in these cases occurs, it depletes the pool of available funds for businesses with legitimate needs, such as payroll for workers.  According to some reports, as many as 80 percent of loan applicants were turned away due to funds not being available.

          In addition to PPP cases, the Eastern District of Texas has also indicted James Mwanza, as well as Dalton Brewer and Emilee Fenton, for identity theft in connection with CARES Act Economic Impact Payments (EIPs).  These defendants allegedly used the names, birth dates, and Social Security Numbers of unknowing persons in order to illegally obtain EIP funds.  An estimated $300 billion of the CARES Act total was allocated for EIPs.  Under the CARES Act, qualifying individuals may receive up to $1,200 in EIPs per adult, up to $2,400 for married couples filing jointly, and $500 per child under 17 years old.  Individuals with income exceeding $99,000 or joint filers whose income exceeds $198,000 do not qualify for any payment.

          These cases are tremendously important for many reasons, and the speed with which these cases have been investigated and prosecuted is unparalleled.  The Department’s efforts began early in the implementation of the CARES Act, as prosecutors and agencies moved quickly to establish law enforcement partnerships, obtain critical data and evidence, and take concrete and affirmative steps to identify CARES Act fraud.  This cooperation, in turn, produced immediate results.  The Eastern District of Texas partnered with the Criminal Division to bring the very first PPP-related fraud cases within two months of the loan program’s launch

          Public awareness and cooperation amongst agencies is critical to fight against COVID-related fraud.  In July, U.S. Attorney Stephen J. Cox wrote an opinion editorial, which was published in the Texas Lawyer, pledging to remain vigilant in pursuing those individuals seeking to steal CARES Act assistance from those who truly need it and who it is intended to benefit.  As part of that pledge, in August, the Eastern District of Texas entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Office of the Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery (SIGPR) providing for the designation of Assistant U.S. Attorneys in the Eastern District of Texas to assist with SIGPR-related investigations and prosecutions.  EDTX plans to work with SIGPR, as well as DOJ’s Criminal Division and our other law enforcement partners to focus on coordinated criminal rings that have engaged in the systematic, organized looting of PPP funds.

          Another key component of the Department’s ability to bring these cases so quickly has been the use of public-private partnerships to maximize its awareness and visibility of suspicious conduct and the collection of critical evidence.  Many financial institutions have been strong partners in assisting the Department in detecting and investigating potentially fraudulent activity and safeguarding taxpayer dollars by freezing funds and accounts.  In the coming weeks, EDTX plans to build partnerships with Texas banks to further our ability to uncover and combat suspected fraud.

          Anyone with information about allegations of attempted fraud involving COVID-19, can report it by calling the Department of Justice’s National Center for Disaster Fraud Hotline at 866-720-5721 or via the NCDF Web Complaint Form at https://www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud/ncdf-disaster-complaint-form.   

            SHERMAN, Texas – A 50-year-old Plano, Texas man has been indicted and charged with federal violations in the Eastern District of Texas, announced U.S. Attorney Stephen J. Cox today.

            James Mwanza was indicted by a federal grand jury on June 18, 2020 and charged with wire fraud, theft of government money, and aggravated identity theft.  Mwanza went before U.S. Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak today for an initial appearance.

            According to information presented in court, from at least January 2020 through April 2020, Mwanza, claiming to be a tax preparer, allegedly prepared and filed fraudulent income tax returns with the IRS.  To do so, he unlawfully obtained the personal identification information of other individuals, including names, birth dates, and Social Security numbers.  Mwanza used Electronic Filing Numbers assigned to other tax preparation firms who were not affiliated with him, to file the returns and claim false tax refunds.  The filing of the false returns also triggered payment of Economic Impact Payments (EIPs) provided for under the CARES Act.

            The CARES Act is a federal law enacted on March 29, 2020, designed to provide emergency financial assistance to the millions of Americans who are suffering the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.  The CARES Act authorized over $2 trillion in relief programs, including approximately $560 billion for benefits to individuals.  An estimated $300 billion of that total was allocated for Economic Impact Payments (EIPs).

            Under the CARES Act, qualifying individuals may receive up to $1,200 in EIPs per adult, up to $2,400 for married couples filing jointly, and $500 per child under 17 years old.  Individuals with income exceeding $99,000 or joint filers whose income exceeds $198,000 do not qualify for any payment. 

            “Fraudsters engaged in identity theft to steal taxpayer refunds have now turned their attention to stealing Economic Impact Payments,” said U.S. Attorney Stephen J. Cox. “The Eastern District of Texas is working with our law enforcement partners to utilize all available tools to ensure that government payments get to the taxpayers who need this economic relief.”

            “The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration remains committed to investigating and pursuing attempts to corruptly interfere with Federal tax administration, including tax preparer misconduct involving the theft of tax refunds and Economic Impact Payments,” said J. Russell George, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.  “We appreciate the hard work of our law enforcement partners in this investigation.”

            “IRS Criminal Investigation has seen a variety of Economic Impact Payment scams and other financial schemes looking to take advantage of unsuspecting taxpayers,” said IRS Criminal Investigation Special Agent in Charge Tamera Cantu of the Dallas Field Office.  “IRS Criminal Investigation is dedicated to working with our law enforcement partners and the U.S. Attorney’s Office to combat fraud schemes that harm innocent taxpayers.”   

            If convicted, Mwanza faces up to 20 years in federal prison.  A grand jury indictment is not evidence of guilt.

            This case is being investigated by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) and the Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigations and prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Frank Coan.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F9AdkWpwqfHYYH0fzfgIk5X0-gStvEMhoN4n3cMmOw8
  Last Updated: 2025-03-28 19:50:16 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E