Score:   1
Docket Number:   ED-PA  2:19-cr-00213
Case Name:   USA v. BONDS
  Press Releases:
PHILADELPHIA— First Assistant United States Attorney Jennifer Arbittier Williams announced this morning that former Universal Community Homes Chief Executive Officer and Board President Abdur Rahim Islam, 62, of Philadelphia, PA; former Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Universal’s Board Shahied Dawan, 68, of Philadelphia, PA; Philadelphia City Councilman Kenyatta Johnson, 46, and his spouse, political consultant Dawn Chavous, 40, both of Philadelphia, PA; were charged today in a twenty-two-count indictment alleging a wide-ranging racketeering conspiracy and related crimes including bribery, honest services fraud, multiple counts of wire fraud, and tax offenses.

The charges were announced at a press conference held by First Assistant U.S. Attorney Williams, FBI Assistant Special Agent-in-Charge Christian Zajac, and IRS Criminal Investigations Special Agent-in-Charge Guy Ficco.

According to the Indictment, the charges stem from criminal schemes orchestrated by Islam and Dawan through Universal Companies which included thousands of dollars in bribe payments to public officials and the misappropriation of hundreds of thousands of dollars from Universal. The Indictment, summarized briefly below, describes the various schemes.

“As alleged in the Indictment, Universal Companies, including its real estate and education arms, constituted a RICO enterprise, hijacked by the defendants Islam and Dawan to engage in a pattern of criminal activity that spanned two states and several years. In pursuing their criminal objectives, Islam and Dawan bribed public officials, including Johnson, with Universal’s funds, and hid those bribes as consulting fees paid through Chavous’ consulting firm,” said First Assistant U.S. Attorney Williams. “These charges are based on a pattern of activity which violates multiple federal and state laws including mail fraud, honest services mail fraud, honest services wire fraud, wire fraud, obstruction of justice, bribery, and use of an interstate facility in aid of racketeering.”

“What we have here is four people pretending their motives were purely civic-minded, when, in fact, they were unlawfully conspiring to enrich themselves,” said Christian D. Zajac, Assistant Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Philadelphia Division. “As alleged in the indictment, Abdur Rahim Islam and Shahied Dawan stole nearly half a million dollars from Universal — money for themselves, and to use as bribes to further their financial pursuits. Councilman Kenyatta Johnson accepted their payoffs and based his official actions on those bribes, with Dawn Chavous providing him cover. The FBI is committed to fighting public corruption at every level, and we would ask anyone with knowledge of wrongdoing by public officials to call the FBI, or share the information online at tips.fbi.gov.”

“IRS-Criminal Investigation is proud to have provided its financial expertise in this investigation,” said IRS Criminal Investigation Special Agent in Charge Guy Ficco. “We, along with our law enforcement partners and the Department of Justice, are committed to aggressively investigating individuals who engage in corruption, tax fraud, or other types of white-collar crimes.”

Bribery and Honest Services Fraud in Philadelphia

Islam and Dawan are charged with engaging in a corrupt scheme in which Philadelphia City Councilman Kenyatta Johnson and his spouse, Dawn Chavous, received payments in excess of $66,000 in exchange for Johnson using his public office to take official actions to benefit Islam, Dawan, and Universal, including but not limited to: introducing and voting upon spot zoning legislation related to the Royal Theater, a property formerly held by Universal, and blocking reversion to the City of Philadelphia of another property held by Universal after it failed to develop the property pursuant to its agreement with the City of Philadelphia;

Bribery and Honest Services Fraud in Milwaukee

Islam and Dawan are also charged with engaging in a corrupt scheme in which Michael Bonds, the former president of the Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS) Board of Directors, received approximately $18,000 in exchange for Bonds using his official position to take a series of official actions advantageous to Islam, Dawan, and Universal, including but not limited to: advocating for and voting in favor of Universal’s expansion of charter school operations in Milwaukee, motioning the MPS Board to lease MPS property to Islam, Dawan, and Universal, motioning the MPS Board to approve more favorable lease terms to the benefit of Islam, Dawan, and Universal, and voting in favor of the more favorable lease terms;

Theft and Embezzlement at Universal

Also according to the Indictment, between 2010 and 2016, Islam drew significant sums of money from Universal in the form of bonuses and travel or expense reimbursements, in addition to his annual salary. Although Universal’s Board of Directors was charged with reviewing and approving Universal’s financials and major initiatives on a quarterly or annual basis, defendants Islam and Dawan used their positions as CEO and CFO, respectively, to pay themselves bonuses without the approval or knowledge of the Board. Islam and Dawan paid themselves annual five-figure bonuses even while Universal was hemorrhaging money due to the failed charter school expansion in Milwaukee.

The Indictment also alleges that Islam and Dawan used Universal’s funds to pay Islam excessive, inflated, or outright fraudulent reimbursements for “travel” or other purported “business expenses.”  Islam would pad his “expenses” related to the operation of Universal, including its charter schools, with a variety of personal expenses that should not have been reimbursed. For example, Islam submitted his personal car insurance, political contributions, personal vacations, and gym memberships as “business expenses,” which were reimbursed by Universal and also not included as income on his IRS Forms 1040. Islam’s “reimbursements” were reviewed and approved by Dawan outside the standard procedures for Universal and without proper and detailed supporting documentation. Islam and Dawan also authorized Islam to receive large sums of “pocket money” or per diem from Universal. In total, Islam and Dawan stole approximately $463,000.

If convicted as charged, the defendant face the following statutory maximum sentences:

Islam: 303 years’ imprisonment; 3 years supervised release, a $4,350,000 fine, and a $2,100 special assessment;

Dawan: 285 years’ imprisonment; 3 years supervised release, a $3,750,000 fine, and a $1,500 special assessment;

Johnson: 40 years’ imprisonment; 3 years supervised release, a $500,000 fine, and a $200 special assessment;

Chavous: 40 years’ imprisonment; 3 years supervised release, a $500,000 fine, and a $200 special assessment.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation and Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigations Division conducted this investigation. The FBI and IRS received assistance from the Department of Education Office of Inspector General. Assistant United States Attorneys Eric L. Gibson and Mark B. Dubnoff are prosecuting the case. Trial Attorney Ivana Nizich of the Criminal Division’s Organized Crime and Gang Section in the Department of Justice provided assistance.                                                                     

An Indictment is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

PHILADELPHIA – First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jennifer Arbittier Williams announced that Michael Bonds, 60 of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, was charged today by Information with conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud and a violation of the Travel Act arising from his participation in a bribery scheme whereby Bonds, acting in his capacity as President of the Milwaukee Public School (“MPS”) Board, accepted payments and things of value in exchange for official acts taken to benefit a Philadelphia-based, privately-operated education and development company (“Company 1”) and its senior executives.

Company 1 was an umbrella organization for several business entities that perform services related to education management, charter school operations and neighborhood development.  Between 2012 and 2017, Company 1’s education component maintained management agreements with multiple schools operating in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and Milwaukee, Wisconsin to manage the schools’ leadership teams, create the schools’ budgets and administer their payroll processes, and ensure that their financial reporting complied with various government entities.  The main function of Company 1’s real estate development component was to redevelop residential properties into affordable housing in South Philadelphia neighborhoods. 

Executive 1 was a Philadelphia-based founding member of Company 1 who served as the President and Chief Executive Officer since the organization's inception.  Executive 2 was Company 1’s Philadelphia-based Chief Financial Officer.  In that capacity, Executive 2 was responsible for Company 1’s overall financial and contract management.

The Information charges that Bonds engaged in a bribery scheme in which he received a series of payments and things of value from Executive 1, Executive 2, and Company 1 in exchange for a series of official acts that Bonds took on behalf of Executive 1, Executive 2, and Company 1.

The Information further charges that the conspirators disguised the bribes as payments for book sales from a company created by Bonds called “African American Books and Gifts.”  According to the Information, the conspirators created fake documents disguising the bribery payments, including sham invoices and false entries in books, records, and tax returns.  According to the Information, the conspirators also used a private commercial interstate carrier to transport bribe payments in the form of checks disguised as payments to “African American Books and Gifts,” and concealed from the MPS Board the payments Bonds received from Executive 1, Executive 2, and Company 1.  

According to the Information, on December 9, 2014, Bonds appeared at a subcommittee meeting of the MPS Board and personally advocated in support of an expansion to include the opening of an additional campus by the charter school subsidiary of Company 1 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.  Bonds is then alleged to have brought a motion before an MPS Board subcommittee supporting a lease to house the additional campus, to have presided over the full MPS Board meeting at which the expansion was approved, and to have motioned the Board for approval of new lease terms favorable to Executive 1, Executive 2, and Company 1, which deferred lease payments of approximately $1,000,000 owed by the charter school subsidiary of Company 1.  

“Public officials, including those like Michael Bonds who were elected by voters to manage public schools, have a duty to provide honest services to their constituents,” said First Assistant U.S. Attorney Williams. “In this case, some of those constituents are school children who have no choice but to depend on adults to make decisions in their best interest, which makes Bonds’ alleged actions even more egregious. Public officials cannot be allowed to use their positions and influence to enrich themselves.”

“Today’s indictment alleges that Mr. Bonds abused his positions of trust for person gain. That is  unacceptable,” said Geoffrey Wood, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General’s Eastern Regional Office.  “OIG Special Agents will continue to investigate allegations of fraud and pursue those who seek to enrich themselves at the expense of our nation’s students. America’s students, their families, and taxpayers deserve nothing less.”

“Rooting out public corruption remains one of IRS Criminal Investigation's highest priorities,” said Guy Ficco, IRS-CI Special Agent in Charge. “We, along with our law enforcement partners, will continue to be relentless in our mission to enforce the law and ensure public trust.”

"When an individual elected to work on local schools' and students' behalf is more focused on their own enrichment, they've failed their constituents and community," said Michael T. Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Philadelphia Division. "The lesson here: the FBI will continue to investigate corruption wherever we find it and bring those responsible to justice."

If convicted, Bonds faces a maximum possible sentence of ten years’ imprisonment, a three year period of supervised release, and a $500,000 fine.  Forfeiture of $18,000 in bribery proceeds also may be ordered. 

The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigations, and the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Eric Gibson and Mark Dubnoff.

An Indictment, Information or Criminal Complaint is an accusation.  A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18c0A60yTw0UCy2Z-6QUG7Zpexlakz3EH_5K6nq8BrAI
  Last Updated: 2025-03-18 22:58:00 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E