Score:   1
Docket Number:   ED-NY  1:18-cr-00032
Case Name:   USA v. Crumble et al
  Press Releases:
Earlier today, in federal court in Brooklyn, an indictment was unsealed charging Michael Crumble and Ramell Markus with kidnapping, extortion and possessing and brandishing a firearm in relation to those crimes.  The defendants were arrested today and are scheduled to be arraigned this afternoon before United States Magistrate Judge James Orenstein.

Richard P. Donoghue, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, William F. Sweeney, Jr., Assistant Director-in-Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office (FBI), and James P. O’Neill, Commissioner, New York City Police Department (NYPD), announced the charges. 

“As alleged in the indictment, the defendants kidnapped and viciously assaulted an individual for eight hours, forcing him to turn over narcotics and cash,” stated United States Attorney Donoghue.  “This Office and our law enforcement partners, are committed to ridding our community of individuals, like these defendants, who are responsible for drug-related violence.”  Mr. Donoghue gave particular thanks to the New York Metropolitan Safe Streets Task Force, which is comprised of agents from the FBI and detectives from the NYPD.

“Not only did the subjects in this investigation allegedly rob their victim, but kidnapped and tortured him to extract information.  No human deserves to be beat, burned and pistol-whipped into submission,” stated FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge Sweeney. “The FBI Metro Safe Streets Task Force works each day with our law enforcement partners to uncover, and investigate cases to get these violent criminals off the streets and out of our communities.” 

As alleged in the indictment and detailed in court filings, the defendants Michael Crumble and Ramell Markus, along with a third co-conspirator (“CC-1”), abducted, assaulted, and extorted a victim (“John Doe”) in the early morning hours of December 18, 2017.  At that time, Doe left his home to meet Markus in Markus’s car.  As Doe got into the backseat, Crumble and CC-1 came out of the shadows and pushed Doe further into the car, where CC-1 pressed a gun against Doe’s head.  Markus, sitting in the front seat, told CC-1 to check Doe for any weapons and, if Doe had one, to shoot him in the face.  Markus then took the gun from CC-1 and pistol-whipped Doe across the head.  While in the vehicle, Markus demanded, in sum and substance, that Doe give Markus narcotics that the defendants believed Doe had at his home.

Subsequently, Markus, Crumble and CC-1 drove Doe to a residence in Brooklyn and forced him inside.  The defendants again demanded that Doe give them money and narcotics, and also disclose an address where the perpetrators believed additional narcotics and money were located.  To force Doe to comply, Markus broke a glass on Doe’s face, and CC-1 repeatedly burned both of Doe’s arms with a hot iron.  Doe eventually called his fiancée and told her to gather his cash and narcotics, which Markus and Crumble retrieved from outside Doe’s home and then brought back to the residence with Doe and CC-1.

Not satisfied with the drugs and cash, the defendants and CC-1 continued to keep Doe captive, and drove him to a hotel.  The perpetrators forced Doe to stay at the hotel while they waited for another individual to call Doe, who would supposedly provide the address that the defendants sought.  After waiting a number of hours, the defendants forced Doe back inside the car and took him back to his home.  Because Doe refused to provide the perpetrators with the address, they forced Doe to provide a pound of marijuana as collateral.  In total, the defendants kidnapped Doe for approximately eight hours.

The charges in the indictment are merely allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.  If convicted of all counts, the defendants face a mandatory minimum of seven years’ imprisonment and a maximum of life imprisonment.    

The government’s case is being handled by the Office’s Organized Crime and Gangs Section.  Assistant United States Attorneys Keith D. Edelman and Lindsay K. Gerdes are in charge of the prosecution.

The Defendants:

MICHAEL CRUMBLE

Age: 34 

Brooklyn, New York

RAMELL MARKUS (also known as “Rah,” “Dollah” and “Smooth”)

Age: 35 

Brooklyn, New York

E.D.N.Y. Docket No. 18-CR-32 (ARR)

Earlier today, in federal court in Brooklyn, Michael Crumble was sentenced by United States District Judge Allyne R. Ross to nine years’ imprisonment for kidnapping conspiracy, kidnapping and committing physical violence in furtherance of an extortion relating to the December 2017 abduction, assault and extortion of a victim.  On May 3, 2019, co-defendant Ramell Markus was sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment for his role in the same crimes.  The defendants were convicted by a federal jury in May 2018 following a one-week trial.

Richard P. Donoghue, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, William F. Sweeney, Jr., Assistant Director-in-Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office (FBI), and James P. O’Neill, Commissioner, New York City Police Department (NYPD), announced the sentences.

 “The defendants were seeking cash and drugs when they brutally assaulted the victim, but what they ultimately received as a result of their vicious conduct were lengthy prison sentences,” stated United States Attorney Donoghue.  “I commend our FBI and NYPD partners in the New York City Safe Streets Task Force for their outstanding investigative work in this case.”

“The primary mission of the NYPD and our law enforcement partners is to arrest, prosecute, and send away with a meaningful prison sentence anyone who commits violent crime, and instills fear in New Yorkers through their criminal actions,” stated NYPD Commissioner O’Neill.  “I want to thank the Eastern District and the investigators from the FBI and NYPD who worked on this case. Their hard work helps ensure that those who engage in serious crimes like kidnapping, extortion and assault will face justice.”

On December 17, 2017, Crumble, Markus, and a co-conspirator kidnapped the victim outside his residence in Queens and forced him into a vehicle.  Markus pistol-whipped the victim in a futile attempt to force him to give up narcotics believed to be in the victim’s home.  The defendants and their co-conspirator then drove the victim to another location in Brooklyn, and during the next several hours tortured him – smashing a glass into his face and burning his arms with a hot iron – until the drugs and cash were given to them. 

The government’s case is being handled by the Office’s Organized Crime and Gangs Section.  Assistant United States Attorneys Keith D. Edelman and Lindsay K. Gerdes are in charge of the prosecution. 

The Defendants:

MICHAEL CRUMBLE

Age:  35

Residence: Brooklyn, New York,

RAMELL MARKUS (also known as “Rah,” “Dollah” and “Smooth”)

Age:  36

Residence: Brooklyn, New York

E.D.N.Y. Docket No. 18-CR-32 (ARR)

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mFeUDBfY6iiGvg68ZzZkVbx37d16V018Vv9fXqLs_x0
  Last Updated: 2024-03-27 00:37:07 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E