Score:   1
Docket Number:   ED-NC  4:19-cr-00008
Case Name:   USA v. Hall
  Press Releases:
RALEIGH – Robert J. Higdon, Jr., United States Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina, announced that in federal court, United States Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. accepted a guilty plea in a health care fraud matter.

ANDREA BOATMAN HALL, now known as, ANDREA MONIQUE PURNELL, 32 years of age, from Sanford N.C., pled guilty to one count of Medicaid Provider Fraud.    

The investigation revealed that PURNELL was the owner, operator, manager and/or CEO of Extended Reach Day Treatment for Children and Adolescents (”Extended Reach”), a Medicaid provider of behavioral health services, including “day treatment” services. From on or about October 1, 2013, through October 26, 2016, PURNELL engaged in a scheme to defraud Medicaid by “adding” units of Day Treatment services not actually provided to Medicaid recipients in Extended Reach’s billed claim submissions.  These “added” units were added to those units of service that were actually provided to Medicaid recipients on a particular date of service.  For example, a particular beneficiary may have been at Extended Reach for four (4) hours on a particular day, but the Defendant billed the maximum six (6) hours for the individual on that day.  The defendant engaged in an extensive and systematic scheme to fraudulently bill “added” unit claims for “day treatment” services provided to Medicaid recipients.

Additionally, PURNELL engaged in a scheme to defraud Medicaid by billing for “day treatment” services allegedly provided to Medicaid recipients on dates of service when those recipients were absent, and where such services were not in fact provided.  As such, these false claims differ from “added” claims because no “day treatment” services at all were provided to the Medicaid recipients on the alleged dates of service.  These “absent” client billings include billings for clients who were simply absent on a particular billed day of the week (for example, if a client was only present on Monday, Wednesday and Friday of a week, the defendant would bill for services for every day of that week even when the client was absent); billing for clients who were physically present at and receiving services in some other facility that day (such as a psychiatric residential treatment facility), and; billing for services on days when the Extended Reach facility was actually closed – such as a snow day on February 17, 2015, and on Labor Day of 2014.

PURNELL also engaged in a scheme to bill for psychotherapy services as if they had been performed by a licensed medical doctor, when those services were not provided by the doctor for Extended Reach.  Investigators interviewed the doctor and he informed the investigators that he did not perform psychotherapy services for Extended Reach.

The total fraudulent billing for all schemes is $372,917.74.  The total loss amount due to Medicaid is $337,615.42.

United States Attorney Higdon commented: “Medicaid beneficiaries face complex and costly needs for care and rely on, and trust, their health care providers to provide quality care.  This defendant violated their trust by using their information to unlawfully line her pockets with money.  This should never happen.  The USAO-EDNC will continue to thoroughly investigate and prosecute to the fullest those who commit health care fraud to unlawfully obtain money to which they are not entitled.” 

The investigation of this case was conducted by the United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, and the North Carolina Attorney General’s Office Medicaid Investigations Division.  Special Assistant United State Attorney, Daniel Spillman, of the North Carolina Attorney General’s Office Medicaid Investigations Division, represented the United States.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18SYVfuCmWoNwbreO_QUtHVzVur9ifZTgtVDmwZoU5kc
  Last Updated: 2025-03-18 20:39:51 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E