A Marquette, Michigan man pleaded guilty today to smuggling products into the United States using fraudulent shipping invoices, U.S. Attorney Matthew Schneider announced.
Schneider was joined in the announcement by Special Agent in Charge William P. Conway, of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Office of Criminal Investigations.
Pleading guilty was Curtis Wenzlaff, 55.
According to court records, Curtis Wenzlaff operated a domestic profit corporation, Sanno Industries, Inc., out of his residence previously located in Flushing, Michigan. Wenzlaff was acting as a drop shipper for companies outside the United States and was paid to assume the risk and consequences of the U.S. government identifying, seizing, and refusing entry of products illegally imported in to the United States.
Beginning in July 2014 and continuing until April 2016, Wenzlaff was involved with smuggling into the United States products commonly used to make drugs regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The products were falsely labeled, among other things, as blueberry extract and sunscreen lotion ingredients. Wenzlaff would accept delivery of the packages. Once a product was successfully delivered to Wenzlaff, other individuals would then provide him with instructions regarding relabeling, repackaging and shipping the product to the intended customer. Wenzlaff received in excess of $25,000 from shippers to receive and reship the packages. Defendant claims that a portion of the money received was reimbursement for shipping expenses associated with the imported product.
Wenzlaff knew that the merchandise imported into the United States was not intended for the uses he claimed on shipping documents. Even so, he knowingly received the product and then concealed it in order to facilitate the sale of the merchandise to a third party. The value of the merchandise/products illegally smuggled into the United States by Wenzlaff was in excess of $1,000,000.00.
“I commend the agents of the FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigations for their work on this case,” stated United States Attorney Schneider. “Our office is always working to protect Michigan consumers from harm, and that’s especially true in cases where people try to evade federal health and safety regulations in exchange for their own personal profits.”
“FDA regulations are in place to protect consumers and help ensure the drug products they receive are safe and effective,” said Special Agent in Charge William P. Conway, FDA Office of Criminal Investigations’ Chicago Field Office. “When unscrupulous importers attempt to evade FDA’s regulations, consumers in the U.S. are put at risk. The FDA will continue to pursue and bring to justice those who participate in fraudulent smuggling schemes to the detriment of public health.”
Wenzlaff’s plea agreement provides for an anticipated sentencing guideline range of 24-30 months’ imprisonment. Wenzlaff entered his guilty plea before U.S. District Judge Matthew Leitman in Flint, Michigan. Sentencing has been set for August 8, 2019 at 1:30 p.m..
The case was investigated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Office of Criminal Investigations and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Nancy Abraham.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year