Score:   1
Docket Number:   ED-AR  4:18-cr-00538
Case Name:   USA v. King et al
  Press Releases:
LITTLE ROCK— Twenty defendants from White County have been charged in a conspiracy to commit wire fraud by allegedly obtaining unemployment insurance benefits to which they were not entitled in Arkansas and 15 other states.

Cody Hiland, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas, and Steven Grell, Special Agent-in-Charge, Dallas Region, U.S. Department of Labor Office of Inspector General, announced today the unsealing of an indictment returned by a federal grand jury charging the 20 defendants, including Mark King, aka “Big Head,” the alleged ringleader of the conspiracy. On Wednesday, King, 53, of Judsonia, and two other defendants (Alan Gentry and Benjamin Bradley) were arrested. Also, Natalie Floyd was already in federal prison, and Mark Scheffler was in the Arkansas Department of Corrections, both on unrelated charges.

Those arrested today will be seen Thursday by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere for plea and arraignment. The remaining defendants will be served with a summons to appear in federal court at a later date.

“Our office is committed to protecting the integrity of important federal programs,” U.S. Attorney Hiland said. “We will continue to work with the Office of Inspector General to investigate and prosecute anyone attempting to take advantage of these programs, which ultimately hurts taxpayers and those who truly need assistance.”

The charge stems from an investigation by the United States Department of Labor, in collaboration with the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Arkansas, that began in the spring of 2016. Local law enforcement in the White County area also assisted in the effort.

The indictment alleges that the wire fraud conspiracy took place from June 2012 through August 2017. According to the indictment, King created employer business accounts in 16 states, including Arkansas, using fictitious business names. These fictitious businesses all had addresses in Arkansas. King then falsely reported to the various state unemployment agencies in these 16 states that the fictitious companies had paid wages to him and the other indicted and unindicted co-conspirators for work performed, when, in fact, that was not true. In turn, King and the other co-conspirators and unindicted co-conspirators then made claims for unemployment benefits and, because King did not contest the unemployment benefits on behalf of the fictitious businesses, these conspirators were paid by the Department of Labor.

“An important mission of the Office of Inspector General is to investigate allegations of fraud related to the U.S. Department of Labor’s Unemployment Insurance programs,” Special Agent-in-Charge Grell said. “We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to safeguard benefits intended for unemployed American workers,”

The indictment alleges that some of the co-conspirators claimed unemployment benefits while incarcerated, contrary to the eligibility requirement that a claimant must be available for work and actively seeking employment. The conspiracy resulted in a monetary loss exceeding $500,000.

The maximum statutory penalty for the charge is up to 20 years’ imprisonment, a fine of not more than $250,000, and supervised release of not more than three years.

The case is being investigated by the Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General, with assistance from the White County Sheriff’s Office, the Judsonia Police Department, the Searcy Police Department, and the Bald Knob Police Department. It is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Angela Jegley.

An indictment contains only allegations. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

# # #

This news release, as well as additional information about the office of the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas, is available on-line at

http://www.justice.gov/edar



Twitter:

@EDARNEWS

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18xXrmlBU8mzl-O-BQKXoQ6o-7pC_qHITUzAH-z5v4No
  Last Updated: 2025-03-08 13:26:45 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E