SALT LAKE CITY – Three individuals are charged with travel within the United States with intent to deal firearms without a license in a complaint unsealed Thursday. The charges allege the defendants were involved in purchasing or attempting to purchase 27 firearms in Utah between Aug. 1, 2020, and Nov. 4, 2020.
Charged in the complaint are Erick Lopez, age 20, Christopher Lopez, 22, and Bryan Rodriguez, 21, all of California.
According to the complaint, an ATF special agent was contacted by a federal firearms licensee (FFL) regarding the suspicious attempted purchase of five pistols on Aug. 2, 2020, by a person referred to as Person A in the charging document. Person A was observed with two Hispanic males in a rental car with California plates. Ultimately, the FFL canceled the purchase and the sale was not completed.
Between Aug. 1 and Aug. 27, 2020, Person A made three separate purchases for a total of 12 pistols from three different FFLs. According to the complaint, the Person A paid cash for all of the purchases.
In late October, ATF learned that one of the firearms, a Glock pistol, had been recovered during a traffic stop in Arizona involving a convicted felon.
Investigators linked the rental car used during the attempted firearms purchase on Aug. 2, 2020, to an individual. Further investigation revealed Christopher and Erick Lopez were associated with the individual.
On Nov. 4, 2020, ATF agents learned Person A was attempting to purchase 10 Glock pistols from an FFL. The agent observed the individual fill out the paperwork to buy the weapons and provide cash for the firearms. However, the firearms were not transferred to Person A at that time, according to the complaint. Person A left the store and got into a car with a California license plate parked in a nearby alley. The vehicle left at that point.
Later that evening, the ATF investigator spoke with Person A. Person A admitted he/she had purchased or attempted to purchase 27 firearms in Utah since Aug. 1, 2020. The complaint alleges Person A indicated that all of the firearms were purchased for three males, who lived in California and were unable to legally purchase firearms in Utah. According to the complaint, prior to each transaction, the three males provided instructions to Person A as to the quantity and type of firearms to purchase and provided the individual with cash for each transaction.
Person A identified Erick and Christopher Lopez as two of the three males. Rodriquez was later identified by law enforcement officers. The three are believed to be related to each other.
Law enforcement officers located the three defendants. None of the defendants possessed a valid federal firearms license to deal, transport, or ship firearms. A federal arrest warrant was issued for their arrest.
Initial appearances for the three were held Thursday. Detention hearings were set for Dec. 4, 2020, for Bryan Rodriquez and Christopher Lopez. U.S. District Magistrate Judge Dustin Pead found Erick Lopez to be an unmanageable risk for non appearance and a risk of danger to the community. He will remain in the custody of the U.S. Marshals pending resolution of the case.
The potential maximum penalty for the charge in the complaint is 10 years, a fine of $250,000, and three years of supervised release following the completion of the sentence.
Complaints are not findings of guilt. Individuals charged in a complaint are presumed innocent unless or until proven guilty in court.
SALT LAKE CITY, Utah – Nelly Idowu, 39, of Provo, Utah, was sentenced today to six years’ imprisonment followed by three years’ supervised release, after a federal jury found her guilty of one count of money laundering conspiracy and two counts of money laundering in an online romance scam. Idowu is one of four defendants sentenced in a two-year scheme that cost victims over $6 million.
According to the evidence presented at trial, from 2017 to 2019 Idowu participated in an online romance scheme that involved creating fake online dating profiles to befriend and romance victims. Idowu, and her co-conspirators, led these victims to believe the fake persona they were engaging with had an urgent and financial need, none of which were legitimate. The victims targeted were mostly widowed and divorced women over 65-years-old. These significant life changes often occurred very late in life after many years of being accustomed to the company and support of a partner. Many victims suffered significant financial loss in the final years of life, with some losing their entire life savings.
Codefendants Emmanuel Osaigbovo Adesotu, Nnamdi Joel Chukwu, and Julius Omene Fredrick were each previously convicted by guilty plea to a money laundering conspiracy. Adesotu was sentenced to a term of 36 months’ imprisonment, Fredrick was sentenced to a term of 46 months’ imprisonment, and Chukwu was sentenced to a term of 12 months’ imprisonment. Each defendant was ordered by the court to pay $6,444,787.16 in restitution jointly for the victims.
“Idowu and her co-conspirators preyed on unsuspecting and vulnerable victims,” said U.S. Attorney Trina A. Higgins of the District of Utah. “The defendants gained their trust and convinced them to send large sums of money, leaving many of the victims in financial despair. My office, along with our law enforcement partners, will continue to prosecute these online scams, and seek justice for the victims.”
“Scammers like Idowu know exactly how to prey on their victims’ vulnerabilities, and sadly, the financial and emotional consequences can be absolutely devastating,” said Shohini Sinha, Special Agent in Charge of the Salt Lake City FBI. “The FBI is committed to investigating these perpetrators and continuously works to raise awareness about romance scams. Think twice before you share personal information online, be wary of online suitors who are quick to establish a relationship and gain your trust, and don’t send money to someone you’ve never met. If you think you’re a victim of a romance scam, file a complaint with the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center at ic3.gov.”
The investigation was conducted by the FBI Salt Lake City Field Office, Provo Resident Agency.
Assistant United States Attorneys Carl LeSueur and Mark Woolf of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Utah prosecuted the case.
The FBI encourages those engaged in online relationships to review and become familiar with information about romance scams on its website FBI.gov. Additionally, if you or someone you know has been a victim of elder fraud, help is available at the National Elder Fraud Hotline 833-FRAUD-11 or 833-372-8311 and online at the Office for Victims of Crime.
SALT LAKE CITY -- The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Salt Lake City filed a civil complaint in U.S. District Court afternoon morning against a doctor the complaint alleges is issuing prescriptions for controlled substances in violation of the Controlled Substance Act. To protect the public, the United States is also seeking a preliminary injunction to immediately stop the doctor from prescribing powerful controlled substances.
According to the complaint, Dr. Nicholas Carl Greenwood operates Greenwood Addiction Physicians in Murray. Greenwood Addiction Physicians claims on its website to be the premier outpatient program for the treatment of opioid dependence in the Western United States. In reality, the complaint alleges, Dr. Greenwood issues prescriptions for substances with no legitimate medical purpose and outside the usual course of professional practice.
Through his business, Dr. Greenwood claims to offer treatment options for opioid dependence, alcohol dependence, Benzodiazepine dependence, outpatient medical detox, and nicotine/tobacco dependence.
Dr. Greenwood has the authority to dispense and administer Schedule III drugs for maintenance or detoxification treatment. Currently, the only controlled substance approved for the treatment of narcotic addiction is Buprenorphine.
A Schedule III controlled substance, Buprenorphine and Buprenorphine combination products are manufactured by multiple companies, according to an affidavit filed in the case. The products are marketed under several trade names including Suboxone, Zubsolv, and Butrans. Suboxone is sold as a dissolvable film for the treatment of opioid dependence and should be used as part of a complete treatment plan including counseling and psychosocial support.
According to the complaint, on April 4, 2018, the Tooele County Sheriff’s Office told the DEA’s Tactical Division Squad that an inmate was organizing and paying individuals to obtain controlled substances from Dr. Greenwood.
Following the tip from the Tooele County Jail inmate, three separate agents with the DEA Tactical Diversion Squad visited Dr. Greenwood 20 times in an undercover capacity, according to the complaint. The complaint alleges that over the course of almost eight months, Dr, Greenwood wrote the undercover agents 19 prescriptions for 889 pills without a legitimate medical purpose and outside the usual course of professional practice. All prescriptions were for Buprenorphine. The agents visited Dr. Greenwood from June 28, 2018, through February 21, 2019.
The complaint alleges all of the agents’ visits with Dr. Greenwood followed the same pattern: Dr. Greenwood never performed a medical examination, never asked questions about the agent’s health or symptoms, and never reviewed prior medical records. Instead, Dr. Greenwood issued prescriptions for Buprenorphine to the undercover agents without any evidence of medical need. Dr. Greenwood issued most of the prescriptions without actually meeting with the undercover agents, according to documents filed in court.
Dr. Greenwood knew, or should have known, that the prescriptions he issued, essentially on a cash-and-carry basis, were not medically necessary and were being sold or traded on the street, documents filed in court allege. Dr. Greenwood believed that 25 to 50 percent of the prescriptions he issued were sold or traded, documents filed with the court allege. None of Dr. Greenwood’s prescriptions issued to the undercover investigators had a legitimate medical purpose, according to a motion and memorandum in support of a preliminary injunction filed with the court.
The United States is seeking to stop Dr. Greenwood from prescribing controlled substances. Accordingly, the United States moved for a preliminary injunction at the same time it filed the complaint against Dr. Greenwood. Dr. Greenwood will have 60 days to respond to the complaint and 14 days to respond to the motion.
The claims made in the complaint and other court filings are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.
SALT LAKE CITY -- Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods partners have a message for those who “lie-and-try” in attempting to purchase a firearm from federal firearms licensees in Utah: If you lie on paperwork you are required to complete to purchase a firearm, you may end up facing a federal prison sentence.
Individuals restricted from possessing a firearm are not the only ones who could end up in federal court. Federal firearms licensees (FFLs), who sell or transfer a firearm to a prohibited person, allow a straw purchaser to buy a gun for someone else, or fail to keep proper records of who they sell firearms to, also face potential criminal prosecution as well.
"Our background check systems are only as good as the information they receive," U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said. "I have ordered our prosecutors to more aggressively charge those who lie to the background check system in order to try to get guns illegally. Under my tenure as Attorney General, we have already increased federal gun prosecutions to a 10-year high and violent crime prosecutions to a 25-year high. We are just getting started. We intend to break these records again, punish more criminals who try to cheat the system, and deter many more from lying to a background check in the first place."
“The Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods initiative fully supports the right of Utahns to own firearms and does not target legitimate firearms owners,” U.S. Attorney John W. Huber said today. “Our first priority is to stop crime before it is committed. Keeping firearms out of the hands of those with felony convictions or other prohibiting factors is a key part of our efforts to make Utah communities safer. A firearm in the hands of a gang member with a felony conviction or someone convicted of a domestic violence offense is a recipe for more violent crime. Those who attempt to circumvent the law by selling guns to prohibited individuals or those who lie to try to buy one are committing federal crimes.”
“ATF partners with the West Valley City and Unified Police departments, as well as federal firearm licensees, to combat lie-and-buy cases,” ATF Special Agent in Charge Debbie Livingston said today. “These partnerships are critical to our success.”
Two indictments returned by a federal grand jury last week targeted federal firearms licensees with violations of federal law related to the sale of firearms.
William Hammond, age 78, of North Salt Lake City, and Kristine Vanorman, age 57, of Woods Cross, Utah, are charged in an indictment with three counts of sale or transfer of a firearm to a prohibited person in relation to transactions occurring at their business. Hammond is charged in the first count of the indictment with selling a firearm to a person the indictment alleges he had reasonable cause to believe was prohibited from possessing a firearm. Vanorman is charged in the second count with selling a firearm to a person having reasonable cause to believe the person was prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. Both Hammond and Vanorman are charged in the third count with selling a firearm to a prohibited person. The sales involved straw purchases where an individual was allowed to purchase a firearm for an individual prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. Hammond and Vanorman are the responsible parties for the federal firearms license. The maximum potential penalty for each count in the indictment is 10 years in prison.
In a second indictment, Kenneth Gene Yama, age 68, of Moab, is charged with two counts of failure by a federal firearms licensed dealer to keep proper records. The indictment alleges Yama sold firearms at his business to individuals without noting the name, age, and place of residence of the firearms purchaser in records he is required to maintain under federal law. The maximum potential penalty for each count is five years in prison.
Six indictments recently returned by a federal grand jury target individuals with alleged “lie-and-try” efforts to get a firearm. In each case, the indictment alleges the individuals knowingly made a false statement intended to deceive as they were attempting to purchase a firearm from a licensed firearms dealer. Defendants in five of the cases answered no when asked if they were convicted felons. The sixth defendant falsely claimed that he had never been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence. The potential maximum penalty for making a false statement during the purchase of a firearm is 10 years in prison.
Defendants charged in the “lie-and-try” attempts are Tyrone Gary Taylor, age 43, of Elko, Nevada; Reginaldo Villicana, age 28, of Magna; Joshua Ian Newell, age 36, of Salt Lake City; Aaron James Stock, age 38, of Cottonwood Heights; Saul Perez, age 32, of Magna; and Michael Dean Brattin, age 27, of Tooele.
To aid federal firearms licensees in complying with federal law designed to keep our communities safe, PSN has produced a limited number of oversized clipboards. When buyers are filling out or signing background check paperwork, the clipboards carry the clear warning to would-be unlawful purchasers and their accomplices that serious penalties are in store for the violation of federal law.
PSN is a program designed to bring together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and make neighborhoods safer for everyone. U.S. Attorney General Sessions reinvigorated PSN in 2017 as part of the Department of Justice’s renewed focus on targeting violent criminals, directing all U.S. Attorney’s Offices to work in partnership with federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement and the local community to develop effective, local strategies to reduce violent crime. PSN is based on five key principles: leadership, partnership, targeted and prioritized enforcement, prevention of additional violence, and accountability.
“The heart of PSN is partnership. None of us can combat violent crime on our own. We all have a role to play—federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement; prosecutors; community members and organizations; victims’ advocates; social service providers; and many others. If we work together, we can have a meaningful impact on our communities,” Huber said today.
So far, 97 PSN firearms cases have been indicted this year in Utah.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
SALT LAKE CITY -- Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods partners have a message for those who “lie-and-try” in attempting to purchase a firearm from federal firearms licensees in Utah: If you lie on paperwork you are required to complete to purchase a firearm, you may end up facing a federal prison sentence.
Individuals restricted from possessing a firearm are not the only ones who could end up in federal court. Federal firearms licensees (FFLs), who sell or transfer a firearm to a prohibited person, allow a straw purchaser to buy a gun for someone else, or fail to keep proper records of who they sell firearms to, also face potential criminal prosecution as well.
"Our background check systems are only as good as the information they receive," U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said. "I have ordered our prosecutors to more aggressively charge those who lie to the background check system in order to try to get guns illegally. Under my tenure as Attorney General, we have already increased federal gun prosecutions to a 10-year high and violent crime prosecutions to a 25-year high. We are just getting started. We intend to break these records again, punish more criminals who try to cheat the system, and deter many more from lying to a background check in the first place."
“The Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods initiative fully supports the right of Utahns to own firearms and does not target legitimate firearms owners,” U.S. Attorney John W. Huber said today. “Our first priority is to stop crime before it is committed. Keeping firearms out of the hands of those with felony convictions or other prohibiting factors is a key part of our efforts to make Utah communities safer. A firearm in the hands of a gang member with a felony conviction or someone convicted of a domestic violence offense is a recipe for more violent crime. Those who attempt to circumvent the law by selling guns to prohibited individuals or those who lie to try to buy one are committing federal crimes.”
“ATF partners with the West Valley City and Unified Police departments, as well as federal firearm licensees, to combat lie-and-buy cases,” ATF Special Agent in Charge Debbie Livingston said today. “These partnerships are critical to our success.”
Two indictments returned by a federal grand jury last week targeted federal firearms licensees with violations of federal law related to the sale of firearms.
William Hammond, age 78, of North Salt Lake City, and Kristine Vanorman, age 57, of Woods Cross, Utah, are charged in an indictment with three counts of sale or transfer of a firearm to a prohibited person in relation to transactions occurring at their business. Hammond is charged in the first count of the indictment with selling a firearm to a person the indictment alleges he had reasonable cause to believe was prohibited from possessing a firearm. Vanorman is charged in the second count with selling a firearm to a person having reasonable cause to believe the person was prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. Both Hammond and Vanorman are charged in the third count with selling a firearm to a prohibited person. The sales involved straw purchases where an individual was allowed to purchase a firearm for an individual prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. Hammond and Vanorman are the responsible parties for the federal firearms license. The maximum potential penalty for each count in the indictment is 10 years in prison.
In a second indictment, Kenneth Gene Yama, age 68, of Moab, is charged with two counts of failure by a federal firearms licensed dealer to keep proper records. The indictment alleges Yama sold firearms at his business to individuals without noting the name, age, and place of residence of the firearms purchaser in records he is required to maintain under federal law. The maximum potential penalty for each count is five years in prison.
Six indictments recently returned by a federal grand jury target individuals with alleged “lie-and-try” efforts to get a firearm. In each case, the indictment alleges the individuals knowingly made a false statement intended to deceive as they were attempting to purchase a firearm from a licensed firearms dealer. Defendants in five of the cases answered no when asked if they were convicted felons. The sixth defendant falsely claimed that he had never been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence. The potential maximum penalty for making a false statement during the purchase of a firearm is 10 years in prison.
Defendants charged in the “lie-and-try” attempts are Tyrone Gary Taylor, age 43, of Elko, Nevada; Reginaldo Villicana, age 28, of Magna; Joshua Ian Newell, age 36, of Salt Lake City; Aaron James Stock, age 38, of Cottonwood Heights; Saul Perez, age 32, of Magna; and Michael Dean Brattin, age 27, of Tooele.
To aid federal firearms licensees in complying with federal law designed to keep our communities safe, PSN has produced a limited number of oversized clipboards. When buyers are filling out or signing background check paperwork, the clipboards carry the clear warning to would-be unlawful purchasers and their accomplices that serious penalties are in store for the violation of federal law.
PSN is a program designed to bring together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and make neighborhoods safer for everyone. U.S. Attorney General Sessions reinvigorated PSN in 2017 as part of the Department of Justice’s renewed focus on targeting violent criminals, directing all U.S. Attorney’s Offices to work in partnership with federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement and the local community to develop effective, local strategies to reduce violent crime. PSN is based on five key principles: leadership, partnership, targeted and prioritized enforcement, prevention of additional violence, and accountability.
“The heart of PSN is partnership. None of us can combat violent crime on our own. We all have a role to play—federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement; prosecutors; community members and organizations; victims’ advocates; social service providers; and many others. If we work together, we can have a meaningful impact on our communities,” Huber said today.
So far, 97 PSN firearms cases have been indicted this year in Utah.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
SALT LAKE CITY -- Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods partners have a message for those who “lie-and-try” in attempting to purchase a firearm from federal firearms licensees in Utah: If you lie on paperwork you are required to complete to purchase a firearm, you may end up facing a federal prison sentence.
Individuals restricted from possessing a firearm are not the only ones who could end up in federal court. Federal firearms licensees (FFLs), who sell or transfer a firearm to a prohibited person, allow a straw purchaser to buy a gun for someone else, or fail to keep proper records of who they sell firearms to, also face potential criminal prosecution as well.
"Our background check systems are only as good as the information they receive," U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said. "I have ordered our prosecutors to more aggressively charge those who lie to the background check system in order to try to get guns illegally. Under my tenure as Attorney General, we have already increased federal gun prosecutions to a 10-year high and violent crime prosecutions to a 25-year high. We are just getting started. We intend to break these records again, punish more criminals who try to cheat the system, and deter many more from lying to a background check in the first place."
“The Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods initiative fully supports the right of Utahns to own firearms and does not target legitimate firearms owners,” U.S. Attorney John W. Huber said today. “Our first priority is to stop crime before it is committed. Keeping firearms out of the hands of those with felony convictions or other prohibiting factors is a key part of our efforts to make Utah communities safer. A firearm in the hands of a gang member with a felony conviction or someone convicted of a domestic violence offense is a recipe for more violent crime. Those who attempt to circumvent the law by selling guns to prohibited individuals or those who lie to try to buy one are committing federal crimes.”
“ATF partners with the West Valley City and Unified Police departments, as well as federal firearm licensees, to combat lie-and-buy cases,” ATF Special Agent in Charge Debbie Livingston said today. “These partnerships are critical to our success.”
Two indictments returned by a federal grand jury last week targeted federal firearms licensees with violations of federal law related to the sale of firearms.
William Hammond, age 78, of North Salt Lake City, and Kristine Vanorman, age 57, of Woods Cross, Utah, are charged in an indictment with three counts of sale or transfer of a firearm to a prohibited person in relation to transactions occurring at their business. Hammond is charged in the first count of the indictment with selling a firearm to a person the indictment alleges he had reasonable cause to believe was prohibited from possessing a firearm. Vanorman is charged in the second count with selling a firearm to a person having reasonable cause to believe the person was prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. Both Hammond and Vanorman are charged in the third count with selling a firearm to a prohibited person. The sales involved straw purchases where an individual was allowed to purchase a firearm for an individual prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. Hammond and Vanorman are the responsible parties for the federal firearms license. The maximum potential penalty for each count in the indictment is 10 years in prison.
In a second indictment, Kenneth Gene Yama, age 68, of Moab, is charged with two counts of failure by a federal firearms licensed dealer to keep proper records. The indictment alleges Yama sold firearms at his business to individuals without noting the name, age, and place of residence of the firearms purchaser in records he is required to maintain under federal law. The maximum potential penalty for each count is five years in prison.
Six indictments recently returned by a federal grand jury target individuals with alleged “lie-and-try” efforts to get a firearm. In each case, the indictment alleges the individuals knowingly made a false statement intended to deceive as they were attempting to purchase a firearm from a licensed firearms dealer. Defendants in five of the cases answered no when asked if they were convicted felons. The sixth defendant falsely claimed that he had never been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence. The potential maximum penalty for making a false statement during the purchase of a firearm is 10 years in prison.
Defendants charged in the “lie-and-try” attempts are Tyrone Gary Taylor, age 43, of Elko, Nevada; Reginaldo Villicana, age 28, of Magna; Joshua Ian Newell, age 36, of Salt Lake City; Aaron James Stock, age 38, of Cottonwood Heights; Saul Perez, age 32, of Magna; and Michael Dean Brattin, age 27, of Tooele.
To aid federal firearms licensees in complying with federal law designed to keep our communities safe, PSN has produced a limited number of oversized clipboards. When buyers are filling out or signing background check paperwork, the clipboards carry the clear warning to would-be unlawful purchasers and their accomplices that serious penalties are in store for the violation of federal law.
PSN is a program designed to bring together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and make neighborhoods safer for everyone. U.S. Attorney General Sessions reinvigorated PSN in 2017 as part of the Department of Justice’s renewed focus on targeting violent criminals, directing all U.S. Attorney’s Offices to work in partnership with federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement and the local community to develop effective, local strategies to reduce violent crime. PSN is based on five key principles: leadership, partnership, targeted and prioritized enforcement, prevention of additional violence, and accountability.
“The heart of PSN is partnership. None of us can combat violent crime on our own. We all have a role to play—federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement; prosecutors; community members and organizations; victims’ advocates; social service providers; and many others. If we work together, we can have a meaningful impact on our communities,” Huber said today.
So far, 97 PSN firearms cases have been indicted this year in Utah.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
SALT LAKE CITY -- Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods partners have a message for those who “lie-and-try” in attempting to purchase a firearm from federal firearms licensees in Utah: If you lie on paperwork you are required to complete to purchase a firearm, you may end up facing a federal prison sentence.
Individuals restricted from possessing a firearm are not the only ones who could end up in federal court. Federal firearms licensees (FFLs), who sell or transfer a firearm to a prohibited person, allow a straw purchaser to buy a gun for someone else, or fail to keep proper records of who they sell firearms to, also face potential criminal prosecution as well.
"Our background check systems are only as good as the information they receive," U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said. "I have ordered our prosecutors to more aggressively charge those who lie to the background check system in order to try to get guns illegally. Under my tenure as Attorney General, we have already increased federal gun prosecutions to a 10-year high and violent crime prosecutions to a 25-year high. We are just getting started. We intend to break these records again, punish more criminals who try to cheat the system, and deter many more from lying to a background check in the first place."
“The Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods initiative fully supports the right of Utahns to own firearms and does not target legitimate firearms owners,” U.S. Attorney John W. Huber said today. “Our first priority is to stop crime before it is committed. Keeping firearms out of the hands of those with felony convictions or other prohibiting factors is a key part of our efforts to make Utah communities safer. A firearm in the hands of a gang member with a felony conviction or someone convicted of a domestic violence offense is a recipe for more violent crime. Those who attempt to circumvent the law by selling guns to prohibited individuals or those who lie to try to buy one are committing federal crimes.”
“ATF partners with the West Valley City and Unified Police departments, as well as federal firearm licensees, to combat lie-and-buy cases,” ATF Special Agent in Charge Debbie Livingston said today. “These partnerships are critical to our success.”
Two indictments returned by a federal grand jury last week targeted federal firearms licensees with violations of federal law related to the sale of firearms.
William Hammond, age 78, of North Salt Lake City, and Kristine Vanorman, age 57, of Woods Cross, Utah, are charged in an indictment with three counts of sale or transfer of a firearm to a prohibited person in relation to transactions occurring at their business. Hammond is charged in the first count of the indictment with selling a firearm to a person the indictment alleges he had reasonable cause to believe was prohibited from possessing a firearm. Vanorman is charged in the second count with selling a firearm to a person having reasonable cause to believe the person was prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. Both Hammond and Vanorman are charged in the third count with selling a firearm to a prohibited person. The sales involved straw purchases where an individual was allowed to purchase a firearm for an individual prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. Hammond and Vanorman are the responsible parties for the federal firearms license. The maximum potential penalty for each count in the indictment is 10 years in prison.
In a second indictment, Kenneth Gene Yama, age 68, of Moab, is charged with two counts of failure by a federal firearms licensed dealer to keep proper records. The indictment alleges Yama sold firearms at his business to individuals without noting the name, age, and place of residence of the firearms purchaser in records he is required to maintain under federal law. The maximum potential penalty for each count is five years in prison.
Six indictments recently returned by a federal grand jury target individuals with alleged “lie-and-try” efforts to get a firearm. In each case, the indictment alleges the individuals knowingly made a false statement intended to deceive as they were attempting to purchase a firearm from a licensed firearms dealer. Defendants in five of the cases answered no when asked if they were convicted felons. The sixth defendant falsely claimed that he had never been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence. The potential maximum penalty for making a false statement during the purchase of a firearm is 10 years in prison.
Defendants charged in the “lie-and-try” attempts are Tyrone Gary Taylor, age 43, of Elko, Nevada; Reginaldo Villicana, age 28, of Magna; Joshua Ian Newell, age 36, of Salt Lake City; Aaron James Stock, age 38, of Cottonwood Heights; Saul Perez, age 32, of Magna; and Michael Dean Brattin, age 27, of Tooele.
To aid federal firearms licensees in complying with federal law designed to keep our communities safe, PSN has produced a limited number of oversized clipboards. When buyers are filling out or signing background check paperwork, the clipboards carry the clear warning to would-be unlawful purchasers and their accomplices that serious penalties are in store for the violation of federal law.
PSN is a program designed to bring together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and make neighborhoods safer for everyone. U.S. Attorney General Sessions reinvigorated PSN in 2017 as part of the Department of Justice’s renewed focus on targeting violent criminals, directing all U.S. Attorney’s Offices to work in partnership with federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement and the local community to develop effective, local strategies to reduce violent crime. PSN is based on five key principles: leadership, partnership, targeted and prioritized enforcement, prevention of additional violence, and accountability.
“The heart of PSN is partnership. None of us can combat violent crime on our own. We all have a role to play—federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement; prosecutors; community members and organizations; victims’ advocates; social service providers; and many others. If we work together, we can have a meaningful impact on our communities,” Huber said today.
So far, 97 PSN firearms cases have been indicted this year in Utah.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
SALT LAKE CITY -- Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods partners have a message for those who “lie-and-try” in attempting to purchase a firearm from federal firearms licensees in Utah: If you lie on paperwork you are required to complete to purchase a firearm, you may end up facing a federal prison sentence.
Individuals restricted from possessing a firearm are not the only ones who could end up in federal court. Federal firearms licensees (FFLs), who sell or transfer a firearm to a prohibited person, allow a straw purchaser to buy a gun for someone else, or fail to keep proper records of who they sell firearms to, also face potential criminal prosecution as well.
"Our background check systems are only as good as the information they receive," U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said. "I have ordered our prosecutors to more aggressively charge those who lie to the background check system in order to try to get guns illegally. Under my tenure as Attorney General, we have already increased federal gun prosecutions to a 10-year high and violent crime prosecutions to a 25-year high. We are just getting started. We intend to break these records again, punish more criminals who try to cheat the system, and deter many more from lying to a background check in the first place."
“The Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods initiative fully supports the right of Utahns to own firearms and does not target legitimate firearms owners,” U.S. Attorney John W. Huber said today. “Our first priority is to stop crime before it is committed. Keeping firearms out of the hands of those with felony convictions or other prohibiting factors is a key part of our efforts to make Utah communities safer. A firearm in the hands of a gang member with a felony conviction or someone convicted of a domestic violence offense is a recipe for more violent crime. Those who attempt to circumvent the law by selling guns to prohibited individuals or those who lie to try to buy one are committing federal crimes.”
“ATF partners with the West Valley City and Unified Police departments, as well as federal firearm licensees, to combat lie-and-buy cases,” ATF Special Agent in Charge Debbie Livingston said today. “These partnerships are critical to our success.”
Two indictments returned by a federal grand jury last week targeted federal firearms licensees with violations of federal law related to the sale of firearms.
William Hammond, age 78, of North Salt Lake City, and Kristine Vanorman, age 57, of Woods Cross, Utah, are charged in an indictment with three counts of sale or transfer of a firearm to a prohibited person in relation to transactions occurring at their business. Hammond is charged in the first count of the indictment with selling a firearm to a person the indictment alleges he had reasonable cause to believe was prohibited from possessing a firearm. Vanorman is charged in the second count with selling a firearm to a person having reasonable cause to believe the person was prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. Both Hammond and Vanorman are charged in the third count with selling a firearm to a prohibited person. The sales involved straw purchases where an individual was allowed to purchase a firearm for an individual prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. Hammond and Vanorman are the responsible parties for the federal firearms license. The maximum potential penalty for each count in the indictment is 10 years in prison.
In a second indictment, Kenneth Gene Yama, age 68, of Moab, is charged with two counts of failure by a federal firearms licensed dealer to keep proper records. The indictment alleges Yama sold firearms at his business to individuals without noting the name, age, and place of residence of the firearms purchaser in records he is required to maintain under federal law. The maximum potential penalty for each count is five years in prison.
Six indictments recently returned by a federal grand jury target individuals with alleged “lie-and-try” efforts to get a firearm. In each case, the indictment alleges the individuals knowingly made a false statement intended to deceive as they were attempting to purchase a firearm from a licensed firearms dealer. Defendants in five of the cases answered no when asked if they were convicted felons. The sixth defendant falsely claimed that he had never been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence. The potential maximum penalty for making a false statement during the purchase of a firearm is 10 years in prison.
Defendants charged in the “lie-and-try” attempts are Tyrone Gary Taylor, age 43, of Elko, Nevada; Reginaldo Villicana, age 28, of Magna; Joshua Ian Newell, age 36, of Salt Lake City; Aaron James Stock, age 38, of Cottonwood Heights; Saul Perez, age 32, of Magna; and Michael Dean Brattin, age 27, of Tooele.
To aid federal firearms licensees in complying with federal law designed to keep our communities safe, PSN has produced a limited number of oversized clipboards. When buyers are filling out or signing background check paperwork, the clipboards carry the clear warning to would-be unlawful purchasers and their accomplices that serious penalties are in store for the violation of federal law.
PSN is a program designed to bring together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and make neighborhoods safer for everyone. U.S. Attorney General Sessions reinvigorated PSN in 2017 as part of the Department of Justice’s renewed focus on targeting violent criminals, directing all U.S. Attorney’s Offices to work in partnership with federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement and the local community to develop effective, local strategies to reduce violent crime. PSN is based on five key principles: leadership, partnership, targeted and prioritized enforcement, prevention of additional violence, and accountability.
“The heart of PSN is partnership. None of us can combat violent crime on our own. We all have a role to play—federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement; prosecutors; community members and organizations; victims’ advocates; social service providers; and many others. If we work together, we can have a meaningful impact on our communities,” Huber said today.
So far, 97 PSN firearms cases have been indicted this year in Utah.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
SALT LAKE CITY -- Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods partners have a message for those who “lie-and-try” in attempting to purchase a firearm from federal firearms licensees in Utah: If you lie on paperwork you are required to complete to purchase a firearm, you may end up facing a federal prison sentence.
Individuals restricted from possessing a firearm are not the only ones who could end up in federal court. Federal firearms licensees (FFLs), who sell or transfer a firearm to a prohibited person, allow a straw purchaser to buy a gun for someone else, or fail to keep proper records of who they sell firearms to, also face potential criminal prosecution as well.
"Our background check systems are only as good as the information they receive," U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said. "I have ordered our prosecutors to more aggressively charge those who lie to the background check system in order to try to get guns illegally. Under my tenure as Attorney General, we have already increased federal gun prosecutions to a 10-year high and violent crime prosecutions to a 25-year high. We are just getting started. We intend to break these records again, punish more criminals who try to cheat the system, and deter many more from lying to a background check in the first place."
“The Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods initiative fully supports the right of Utahns to own firearms and does not target legitimate firearms owners,” U.S. Attorney John W. Huber said today. “Our first priority is to stop crime before it is committed. Keeping firearms out of the hands of those with felony convictions or other prohibiting factors is a key part of our efforts to make Utah communities safer. A firearm in the hands of a gang member with a felony conviction or someone convicted of a domestic violence offense is a recipe for more violent crime. Those who attempt to circumvent the law by selling guns to prohibited individuals or those who lie to try to buy one are committing federal crimes.”
“ATF partners with the West Valley City and Unified Police departments, as well as federal firearm licensees, to combat lie-and-buy cases,” ATF Special Agent in Charge Debbie Livingston said today. “These partnerships are critical to our success.”
Two indictments returned by a federal grand jury last week targeted federal firearms licensees with violations of federal law related to the sale of firearms.
William Hammond, age 78, of North Salt Lake City, and Kristine Vanorman, age 57, of Woods Cross, Utah, are charged in an indictment with three counts of sale or transfer of a firearm to a prohibited person in relation to transactions occurring at their business. Hammond is charged in the first count of the indictment with selling a firearm to a person the indictment alleges he had reasonable cause to believe was prohibited from possessing a firearm. Vanorman is charged in the second count with selling a firearm to a person having reasonable cause to believe the person was prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. Both Hammond and Vanorman are charged in the third count with selling a firearm to a prohibited person. The sales involved straw purchases where an individual was allowed to purchase a firearm for an individual prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. Hammond and Vanorman are the responsible parties for the federal firearms license. The maximum potential penalty for each count in the indictment is 10 years in prison.
In a second indictment, Kenneth Gene Yama, age 68, of Moab, is charged with two counts of failure by a federal firearms licensed dealer to keep proper records. The indictment alleges Yama sold firearms at his business to individuals without noting the name, age, and place of residence of the firearms purchaser in records he is required to maintain under federal law. The maximum potential penalty for each count is five years in prison.
Six indictments recently returned by a federal grand jury target individuals with alleged “lie-and-try” efforts to get a firearm. In each case, the indictment alleges the individuals knowingly made a false statement intended to deceive as they were attempting to purchase a firearm from a licensed firearms dealer. Defendants in five of the cases answered no when asked if they were convicted felons. The sixth defendant falsely claimed that he had never been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence. The potential maximum penalty for making a false statement during the purchase of a firearm is 10 years in prison.
Defendants charged in the “lie-and-try” attempts are Tyrone Gary Taylor, age 43, of Elko, Nevada; Reginaldo Villicana, age 28, of Magna; Joshua Ian Newell, age 36, of Salt Lake City; Aaron James Stock, age 38, of Cottonwood Heights; Saul Perez, age 32, of Magna; and Michael Dean Brattin, age 27, of Tooele.
To aid federal firearms licensees in complying with federal law designed to keep our communities safe, PSN has produced a limited number of oversized clipboards. When buyers are filling out or signing background check paperwork, the clipboards carry the clear warning to would-be unlawful purchasers and their accomplices that serious penalties are in store for the violation of federal law.
PSN is a program designed to bring together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and make neighborhoods safer for everyone. U.S. Attorney General Sessions reinvigorated PSN in 2017 as part of the Department of Justice’s renewed focus on targeting violent criminals, directing all U.S. Attorney’s Offices to work in partnership with federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement and the local community to develop effective, local strategies to reduce violent crime. PSN is based on five key principles: leadership, partnership, targeted and prioritized enforcement, prevention of additional violence, and accountability.
“The heart of PSN is partnership. None of us can combat violent crime on our own. We all have a role to play—federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement; prosecutors; community members and organizations; victims’ advocates; social service providers; and many others. If we work together, we can have a meaningful impact on our communities,” Huber said today.
So far, 97 PSN firearms cases have been indicted this year in Utah.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
SALT LAKE CITY -- Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods partners have a message for those who “lie-and-try” in attempting to purchase a firearm from federal firearms licensees in Utah: If you lie on paperwork you are required to complete to purchase a firearm, you may end up facing a federal prison sentence.
Individuals restricted from possessing a firearm are not the only ones who could end up in federal court. Federal firearms licensees (FFLs), who sell or transfer a firearm to a prohibited person, allow a straw purchaser to buy a gun for someone else, or fail to keep proper records of who they sell firearms to, also face potential criminal prosecution as well.
"Our background check systems are only as good as the information they receive," U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said. "I have ordered our prosecutors to more aggressively charge those who lie to the background check system in order to try to get guns illegally. Under my tenure as Attorney General, we have already increased federal gun prosecutions to a 10-year high and violent crime prosecutions to a 25-year high. We are just getting started. We intend to break these records again, punish more criminals who try to cheat the system, and deter many more from lying to a background check in the first place."
“The Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods initiative fully supports the right of Utahns to own firearms and does not target legitimate firearms owners,” U.S. Attorney John W. Huber said today. “Our first priority is to stop crime before it is committed. Keeping firearms out of the hands of those with felony convictions or other prohibiting factors is a key part of our efforts to make Utah communities safer. A firearm in the hands of a gang member with a felony conviction or someone convicted of a domestic violence offense is a recipe for more violent crime. Those who attempt to circumvent the law by selling guns to prohibited individuals or those who lie to try to buy one are committing federal crimes.”
“ATF partners with the West Valley City and Unified Police departments, as well as federal firearm licensees, to combat lie-and-buy cases,” ATF Special Agent in Charge Debbie Livingston said today. “These partnerships are critical to our success.”
Two indictments returned by a federal grand jury last week targeted federal firearms licensees with violations of federal law related to the sale of firearms.
William Hammond, age 78, of North Salt Lake City, and Kristine Vanorman, age 57, of Woods Cross, Utah, are charged in an indictment with three counts of sale or transfer of a firearm to a prohibited person in relation to transactions occurring at their business. Hammond is charged in the first count of the indictment with selling a firearm to a person the indictment alleges he had reasonable cause to believe was prohibited from possessing a firearm. Vanorman is charged in the second count with selling a firearm to a person having reasonable cause to believe the person was prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. Both Hammond and Vanorman are charged in the third count with selling a firearm to a prohibited person. The sales involved straw purchases where an individual was allowed to purchase a firearm for an individual prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. Hammond and Vanorman are the responsible parties for the federal firearms license. The maximum potential penalty for each count in the indictment is 10 years in prison.
In a second indictment, Kenneth Gene Yama, age 68, of Moab, is charged with two counts of failure by a federal firearms licensed dealer to keep proper records. The indictment alleges Yama sold firearms at his business to individuals without noting the name, age, and place of residence of the firearms purchaser in records he is required to maintain under federal law. The maximum potential penalty for each count is five years in prison.
Six indictments recently returned by a federal grand jury target individuals with alleged “lie-and-try” efforts to get a firearm. In each case, the indictment alleges the individuals knowingly made a false statement intended to deceive as they were attempting to purchase a firearm from a licensed firearms dealer. Defendants in five of the cases answered no when asked if they were convicted felons. The sixth defendant falsely claimed that he had never been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence. The potential maximum penalty for making a false statement during the purchase of a firearm is 10 years in prison.
Defendants charged in the “lie-and-try” attempts are Tyrone Gary Taylor, age 43, of Elko, Nevada; Reginaldo Villicana, age 28, of Magna; Joshua Ian Newell, age 36, of Salt Lake City; Aaron James Stock, age 38, of Cottonwood Heights; Saul Perez, age 32, of Magna; and Michael Dean Brattin, age 27, of Tooele.
To aid federal firearms licensees in complying with federal law designed to keep our communities safe, PSN has produced a limited number of oversized clipboards. When buyers are filling out or signing background check paperwork, the clipboards carry the clear warning to would-be unlawful purchasers and their accomplices that serious penalties are in store for the violation of federal law.
PSN is a program designed to bring together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and make neighborhoods safer for everyone. U.S. Attorney General Sessions reinvigorated PSN in 2017 as part of the Department of Justice’s renewed focus on targeting violent criminals, directing all U.S. Attorney’s Offices to work in partnership with federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement and the local community to develop effective, local strategies to reduce violent crime. PSN is based on five key principles: leadership, partnership, targeted and prioritized enforcement, prevention of additional violence, and accountability.
“The heart of PSN is partnership. None of us can combat violent crime on our own. We all have a role to play—federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement; prosecutors; community members and organizations; victims’ advocates; social service providers; and many others. If we work together, we can have a meaningful impact on our communities,” Huber said today.
So far, 97 PSN firearms cases have been indicted this year in Utah.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
SALT LAKE CITY -- Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods partners have a message for those who “lie-and-try” in attempting to purchase a firearm from federal firearms licensees in Utah: If you lie on paperwork you are required to complete to purchase a firearm, you may end up facing a federal prison sentence.
Individuals restricted from possessing a firearm are not the only ones who could end up in federal court. Federal firearms licensees (FFLs), who sell or transfer a firearm to a prohibited person, allow a straw purchaser to buy a gun for someone else, or fail to keep proper records of who they sell firearms to, also face potential criminal prosecution as well.
"Our background check systems are only as good as the information they receive," U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said. "I have ordered our prosecutors to more aggressively charge those who lie to the background check system in order to try to get guns illegally. Under my tenure as Attorney General, we have already increased federal gun prosecutions to a 10-year high and violent crime prosecutions to a 25-year high. We are just getting started. We intend to break these records again, punish more criminals who try to cheat the system, and deter many more from lying to a background check in the first place."
“The Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods initiative fully supports the right of Utahns to own firearms and does not target legitimate firearms owners,” U.S. Attorney John W. Huber said today. “Our first priority is to stop crime before it is committed. Keeping firearms out of the hands of those with felony convictions or other prohibiting factors is a key part of our efforts to make Utah communities safer. A firearm in the hands of a gang member with a felony conviction or someone convicted of a domestic violence offense is a recipe for more violent crime. Those who attempt to circumvent the law by selling guns to prohibited individuals or those who lie to try to buy one are committing federal crimes.”
“ATF partners with the West Valley City and Unified Police departments, as well as federal firearm licensees, to combat lie-and-buy cases,” ATF Special Agent in Charge Debbie Livingston said today. “These partnerships are critical to our success.”
Two indictments returned by a federal grand jury last week targeted federal firearms licensees with violations of federal law related to the sale of firearms.
William Hammond, age 78, of North Salt Lake City, and Kristine Vanorman, age 57, of Woods Cross, Utah, are charged in an indictment with three counts of sale or transfer of a firearm to a prohibited person in relation to transactions occurring at their business. Hammond is charged in the first count of the indictment with selling a firearm to a person the indictment alleges he had reasonable cause to believe was prohibited from possessing a firearm. Vanorman is charged in the second count with selling a firearm to a person having reasonable cause to believe the person was prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. Both Hammond and Vanorman are charged in the third count with selling a firearm to a prohibited person. The sales involved straw purchases where an individual was allowed to purchase a firearm for an individual prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. Hammond and Vanorman are the responsible parties for the federal firearms license. The maximum potential penalty for each count in the indictment is 10 years in prison.
In a second indictment, Kenneth Gene Yama, age 68, of Moab, is charged with two counts of failure by a federal firearms licensed dealer to keep proper records. The indictment alleges Yama sold firearms at his business to individuals without noting the name, age, and place of residence of the firearms purchaser in records he is required to maintain under federal law. The maximum potential penalty for each count is five years in prison.
Six indictments recently returned by a federal grand jury target individuals with alleged “lie-and-try” efforts to get a firearm. In each case, the indictment alleges the individuals knowingly made a false statement intended to deceive as they were attempting to purchase a firearm from a licensed firearms dealer. Defendants in five of the cases answered no when asked if they were convicted felons. The sixth defendant falsely claimed that he had never been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence. The potential maximum penalty for making a false statement during the purchase of a firearm is 10 years in prison.
Defendants charged in the “lie-and-try” attempts are Tyrone Gary Taylor, age 43, of Elko, Nevada; Reginaldo Villicana, age 28, of Magna; Joshua Ian Newell, age 36, of Salt Lake City; Aaron James Stock, age 38, of Cottonwood Heights; Saul Perez, age 32, of Magna; and Michael Dean Brattin, age 27, of Tooele.
To aid federal firearms licensees in complying with federal law designed to keep our communities safe, PSN has produced a limited number of oversized clipboards. When buyers are filling out or signing background check paperwork, the clipboards carry the clear warning to would-be unlawful purchasers and their accomplices that serious penalties are in store for the violation of federal law.
PSN is a program designed to bring together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and make neighborhoods safer for everyone. U.S. Attorney General Sessions reinvigorated PSN in 2017 as part of the Department of Justice’s renewed focus on targeting violent criminals, directing all U.S. Attorney’s Offices to work in partnership with federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement and the local community to develop effective, local strategies to reduce violent crime. PSN is based on five key principles: leadership, partnership, targeted and prioritized enforcement, prevention of additional violence, and accountability.
“The heart of PSN is partnership. None of us can combat violent crime on our own. We all have a role to play—federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement; prosecutors; community members and organizations; victims’ advocates; social service providers; and many others. If we work together, we can have a meaningful impact on our communities,” Huber said today.
So far, 97 PSN firearms cases have been indicted this year in Utah.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
SALT LAKE CITY- On August 30, 2022, after a three-day trial, a federal jury in the District of Utah found Thomas Fairbanks, 69, of Logan, guilty of securities fraud as a result of his fraudulent activities as the CEO and founder of SupplyLine Partners, located in Logan.
At trial, federal prosecutors presented evidence that Fairbanks fraudulently represented to investors that Supplyline Partners’ purpose was to work as a cooperative in funding the financial needs of local businesses, and then leveraging those businesses’ assets to generate cash flow, which would benefit the local community. SupplyLine was not registered as a business with the State of Utah and neither SupplyLine nor Fairbanks were ever licensed to sell securities. In order to induce victims into investing in his scheme, Fairbanks promised investors that they would receive a six percent annual return on their investments; that investors would receive an accounting on their investments; that investors could liquidate their investment at any time; that invested funds would go towards funding SupplyLine’s lending capital; and that SupplyLine’s investments were collateralized by assets of other businesses. However, none of these representations were true.
Fairbanks offered and sold investment opportunities in SupplyLine to at least two Utah residents and collected money from them, some of which he used to fund his own business enterprises and to make loans to a realty company where he worked as a real estate agent. In total, victims lost more than $600,000.
Assistant United States Attorneys Ruth Hackford-Peer and Kevin Sundwall tried the case against the defendant. Investigators from the Utah Division of Securities conducted the investigation with assistance from the FBI.
SALT LAKE CITY, Utah – An indictment was unsealed after a California man was arrested and is scheduled to appear in a Salt Lake City federal courthouse. The eight count indictment charges the defendant for unlawfully collecting unemployment insurance during COVID-19 from California while living and working in Utah. He also allegedly assisted others in committing the same acts for a cut of their unemployment insurance funds administered under the CARES Act.
According to court documents, Robert James Waff, 49, of Sacramento, CA, allegedly submitted an online application for unemployment insurance (UI) benefits on June 19, 2020, through the California Employment Development Department (EDD) website, while he was a resident of Clearfield, Utah. Waff listed his residence and mailing address as Fair Oaks, CA. Waff also claimed he had lost employment due to COVID-19 and that before losing employment his annual income was $44,000, and that he planned to return to work for his previous employer. Waff’s fraudulent California EDD application and continued renewal of his California EDD benefits resulted in Waff receiving over $36,000 in fraudulent payments.
Beginning in July 2020, Waff also allegedly helped three coconspirators apply for COVID-19 related California unemployment benefits through the California EDD website. None of the applicants lived or worked in the state of California. In return, Waff requested a cash payout from each applicant as compensation for assisting with the false application. As a result of the fraudulent filings, the actual loss resulting from fraudulent UI benefit claims exceeded $100,000.
Waff is charged with one count of wire fraud, three counts of wire fraud aiding and abetting, and four counts of mail fraud aiding and abetting. His initial court appearance on the indictment is scheduled for Jan. 5, 2024, at 1:00 p.m. in courtroom 8.4 before a U.S. Magistrate Judge at the Orrin G. Hatch United States District Courthouse in downtown Salt Lake City.
U.S. Attorney, Trina A. Higgins, of the District of Utah made the announcement.
The case is being investigated jointly by the FBI Salt Lake City Division and the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General (OIG).
Assistant United States Attorney Brian Williams of the District of Utah is prosecuting the case.
Anyone with information about allegations of attempted fraud involving COVID-19 can report it by calling the Department of Justice’s National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) Hotline at 866-720-5721 or via the NCDF Web Complaint Form at: https://www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud/ncdf-disaster-complaint-form.
An indictment is merely an allegation and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
SALT LAKE CITY – Roberto Miramontes Roman, 44, an armed drug dealer who boasted he would kill a law enforcement officer to stay out of jail, will serve life plus 80 years in federal prison for killing a deputy sheriff in Millard County during a traffic stop in 2010 . U.S. District Chief Judge David Nuffer imposed the sentence Thursday morning in Salt Lake City. Roman was in the country illegally. He reentered the country illegally after having been previously convicted of felony drug offenses and deported.
“Deputy Sheriff Fox sacrificed her life trying to keep our country safe, and we must never forget that. I am grateful to the investigators and prosecutors who brought her killer to justice no matter how long it took. This case also demonstrates that we must enforce the rule of law along our southwest border, and confront the scourge of drug trafficking,” said Attorney General Jeff Sessions. “During this National Police Week, and every day of the year, we must continue to stand behind our brave law enforcement officers, who do a dangerous job day in and day out.”
“An illegal-alien drug dealer, who killed a deputy sheriff to avoid prosecution for federal offenses, is a threat to our communities that cannot be overstated,” U.S. Attorney John W. Huber said. “The United States Attorney’s Office will use every resource at our disposal to protect and deliver justice for those who honorably serve as law enforcement officers in our state. These crimes clearly merit the lifetime of imprisonment imposed by Chief Judge Nuffer today, and will ensure this defendant will never again have the opportunity to victimize our communities. Deputy Josie Greathouse Fox faithfully and bravely performed her law enforcement duties. During this National Police Week and always, may we remember her and others like her who have offered the ultimate sacrifice on our behalf.”
“Several organizations worked tirelessly to achieve justice for Deputy Fox. It is immensely satisfying to know that ATF could help put her killer behind bars for the remainder of his life,” said ATF Special Agent in Charge Debora Livingston. “Although today’s sentence cannot possibly fill the hole left by Deputy Josie Fox’s senseless death, I sincerely wish her family, friends, and colleague can find peace and resolution going forward.”
“The sentencing today of Roberto Roman for the murder of Josie Greathouse Fox and related crimes comes at the end of a taxing seven-year journey. Throughout all of these years, our thoughts have never turned from her, her family, or her community. None of us will ever be completely the same,” Millard County Sheriff Robert Dekker said. “First and foremost, we recognize this justice as justice served for Josie. We are extremely grateful to the United States Attorney’s Office and the federal prosecution team that so diligently chose to task themselves with this labor of respect and professionalism. The long-sought closing of this chapter now provides for more peaceful recollections of our time together with Josie. She will never be forgotten.”
Millard County Deputy Sheriff Josie Greathouse Fox stopped Roman on a rural road in Millard County for suspicion of drug trafficking on Jan. 5, 2010. He had just sold methamphetamine and was armed with a handgun and a semi-automatic rifle. To avoid apprehension, Roman shot and killed Deputy Fox. She is the first female law enforcement officer in Utah to be killed in the line of duty.
A federal grand jury returned an 11-count indictment in September 2013 charging Roman with three drug trafficking crimes, intentionally killing a local law enforcement officer to avoid apprehension for a felony drug crime, one count of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking offense, two counts of carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense, and one count of use, carry and discharge of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence. Roman was also charged with possession of firearms by a restricted person, possession of firearms by a person unlawfully in the United States and illegally reentering the country after a previous deportation.
Prior to trial, Roman elected to plead guilty to possession of firearms by a restricted person, possession of firearms by a person unlawfully in the United States and illegally reentering the country after a previous deportation. A jury found him guilty of the remaining eight counts following a trial earlier this year.
Roman faced a guideline range of life imprisonment for intentionally killing a local law enforcement officer engaged in the performance of her official duties. He also faced consecutive mandatory minimum sentences totaling 80 years for the four charges involving possession of or carrying a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking offense and use, carry, and discharge of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence. Based on the aggravating circumstances of this case, federal prosecutors recommended Chief Judge Nuffer impose the maximum sentence authorized by law.
Federal prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Salt Lake City prosecuted the case. The case was investigated by the Utah County Sheriff’s Office and special agents of the ATF. The Millard County Sheriff’s Office also contributed to the investigation.