Score:   0.5
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1kZS9wci9waGlsYWRlbHBoaWEtbWFuLXdoby1zb2xkLWZlbnRhbnlsLWtpbGxlZC1uZXdhcmstbWFuLXNlbnRlbmNlZC10d2VudHkteWVhcnMtcHJpc29u
  Press Releases:
WILMINGTON, Del. – A Philadelphia man was sentenced yesterday to 20 years in prison for distributing fentanyl that caused the death of Joel Davis, a 29-year-old Newark man. 

According to court documents, Emanuel Jimenez, who is a citizen of the Dominican Republic but was living in the United States under the false identity of “Robin Cintron-Pratts,” was a large-scale heroin dealer.  For several months in 2016-2017, he delivered 13,000 baggies of heroin per week to James Briggs of Wilmington.  In February 2017, the defendant delivered fentanyl-laced heroin to Briggs, who sold some of those drugs to Abdoulaye Diallo, who then sold several baggies to one of Joel Davis’s friends.  The friend gave four of the baggies to Joel Davis, who used them and then died as a result of fentanyl intoxication.  Diallo and Briggs were separately charged.  Briggs was sentenced on September 9, 2019 to ten years incarceration; Diallo was convicted and is pending sentencing.

When the defendant heard that someone had overdosed from his drugs, he explained to a customer: “You know what happens?  People, they do it… they didn’t feel it like that quick, so they think the shit not good so they do it over and over.  And like 20 minutes later… oh shit” “This shit happened like a couple times with me.”

According to United States Attorney David C. Weiss, “Since the introduction of fentanyl, selling heroin is like playing Russian roulette with others’ lives.  As the defendant well knew, people are dying every day using the product he was selling.  Today’s sentence sends an important message to heroin dealers: making a quick profit is simply not worth the prospect of spending decades in prison.  This case was part of the impetus for the First State Overdose Task Force, and we will continue to aggressively investigate and prosecute people whose drugs are killing Delawareans.”

"Jimenez was a drug-trafficker who distributed thousands of bags of heroin and fentanyl weekly across Wilmington," said Jonathan A. Wilson, Special Agent in Charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) Philadelphia Field Division.   "He was also the source of fentanyl-laced heroin bags that resulted in a fatal overdose.  The DEA will continue to work with our law-enforcement partners to aggressively investigate significant drug-traffickers like Jimenez who pose a great threat to the health and safety of the citizens of Delaware."

The U.S. Attorney made the announcement after sentencing by Chief U.S. District Judge Leonard P. Stark.  Before imposing sentence, the Court said, “The defendant knew that people were overdosing. It’s not a stretch to say that he knew that overdosing could mean death.  And none of that stopped him, nor is there any indication that it bothered him.”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jennifer K. Welsh prosecuted the case, which was investigated by the Drug Enforcement Agency’s First State Overdose Task Force in partnership with, among others, the New Castle County Police Department.

A copy of this press release is located on the website of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Delaware. Related court documents and information is located on the website of the District Court for the District of Delaware or on PACER by searching for Case No. 1:17-cr-0022-1(LPS) and 1:17-cr-0023-1(LPS).

Score:   0.5
Docket Number:   D-DE  1:20-cr-00056
Case Name:   USA v. Wood
  Press Releases:
WILMINGTON, Del. – David C. Weiss, U.S. Attorney for the District of Delaware announced today that a criminal complaint was issued on Saturday, June 6, 2020, charging Adrian Wood, 21, of Washington State, with engaging in a civil disorder that obstructed, impeded, or interfered with a law enforcement officer’s lawful duties.  If convicted, Wood faces a statutory maximum punishment of up to five years in prison.

The criminal complaint alleges that, beginning in the afternoon of May 30, 2020, protesters gathered in downtown Wilmington in recognition of George Floyd’s death in Minneapolis, Minnesota.  Protest participants marched in and around Wilmington, including onto Interstate Highway I-95 where they blocked traffic moving in both directions.  Later in the evening, a number of persons damaged and looted commercial businesses on Market Street, including restaurants, bars, retail stores, and at least one sporting goods store.  Defendant Wood was observed throwing a brick through the back window of a Wilmington Police Department (WPD) marked police car that was being operated by a WPD officer at the time of the incident.  Woods ultimately surrendered to police.

U.S. Attorney Weiss commented on the issuance of the criminal complaint, “In recent days, protestors throughout Delaware have lawfully exercised their First Amendment rights in sympathy with those seeking criminal justice reform.  But peaceful protest does not extend to the lawless destruction of private or public property.  Thankfully, the defendant’s violent actions did not result in physical harm to the WPD officer driving the police car attacked by the defendant.  I commend WPD’s collaboration with the FBI and their efforts to quickly identify and bring the defendant to justice.

“We appreciate the continued partnership and support of the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation,” said Wilmington Police Chief Robert J. Tracy.  “I am glad that none of our officers were injured, and that our collaborative, investigative efforts have been successful in holding this individual responsible for his actions.”

“The cornerstone of America is built on the rights of its citizens to peacefully assemble and have their voices heard,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Jennifer Boone.  “But we cannot allow violence committed by those who try to take advantage of peaceful demonstrations to pursue their own agendas to stand.  Together with our partners, we will not let anyone use violence to silence a community and we encourage anyone with information or evidence of violence to submit a tip at fbi.gov/violence.”

A criminal complaint is merely an accusation.  The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. 

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17KG1n9yHd2y9SD7RXUuEzaWruasVSfYcavUUpluPI5E
  Last Updated: 2025-03-27 02:57:06 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   D-DE  1:20-mj-00116
Case Name:   USA v. Wood
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15D02sRN8-HpQ5_dCnrgjhU_JjfT0VUe3eye5Tcz3J-A
  Last Updated: 2025-03-27 02:54:43 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Score:   0.5
Docket Number:   aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanVzdGljZS5nb3YvdXNhby1kZS9wci9zdGF0ZW1lbnQtdXMtYXR0b3JuZXktZGF2aWQtYy13ZWlzcy11cy12LXdpbG1pbmd0b24tdHJ1c3QtY29ycG9yYXRpb24tZXQtYWwtc2VudGVuY2luZ3M
  Press Releases:
WILMINGTON, Del. – The downfall of Wilmington Trust is a tragedy.  It’s a tragedy to the over 700 employees who lost their jobs as a result of the Bank’s fire-sale acquisition by M&T.  It’s a tragedy to those former employees who built the Bank into something to be proud of over the last century.  It’s a tragedy to this Community, which lost what was thought to be a stable employer and a gold-standard financial institution.  And it didn’t have to be.

Banks are entrusted with a fiduciary responsibility to safeguard their depositors’ funds. That is one of the primary reasons they are required to regularly file financial disclosures with the regulators responsible for ensuring the safety and soundness of those banks.  Similarly, a publicly traded company is required to make certain disclosures to the investing public. Regulators and the public look to these filings to make informed decisions. In so doing, they have an absolute right to expect that the financial information disclosed is accurate. To function effectively, both our regulatory system and our free market system demand it.  And the law requires it.

WTC’s 2009 filings with the SEC and the Federal Reserve were false. The Bank’s certified submissions grossly understated the quantity of past due loans on WTC’s books, and thereby misled regulators and the public about the financial health of WTC’s portfolio.  In particular, the 2009 year-end filings failed to disclose that the Bank had waived 300M in loans more than 90 days past due, and had mass extended another 800M in commercial loans without the proper due diligence. At the same time, the Bank went to the market and asked investors for $287MM in additional capital.

Robert Harra, as WTC’s President and Chief Operations Officer, established an aggressive sales culture that ignored sound risk assessment in commercial real estate lending.  As the economy turned, these practices came home to roost.  But rather than acknowledge the inability of these borrowers to repay their loans, Harra embraced the waiver practice as a means of concealing the trouble faced by the Bank.

David Gibson, as the Bank’s Chief Financial Officer, was the ultimate decision maker on financial reporting. He knew about the true condition of the commercial loan portfolio--- the hundreds of millions of dollars in past due loans that were not included in the 2009 filings with the SEC and Federal Reserve.  Nonetheless he certified the Bank’s financials as accurate and overstated the health of the loan portfolio, while marketing the stock offering to the investing public. 

These actions do not define defendants’ lives. As you’ve heard, they were successful and productive both professionally and personally.  They are supported by their family, friends and members of our community whose lives they impacted in positive ways.  But, they did violate the law. They committed serious federal crimes and failed in their responsibilities to the Bank, its employees and shareholders. Justice demands accountability. 

Ultimately, this case, like many other prosecutions is about the human cost of defendants’ actions—the 700 WTC employees who lost their jobs, the shareholders who lost their investments, and in some instances their life savings, the defendants’ families, and a community that lost a bank that had been a proud and successful institution for decades. 

F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E