Score:   1
Docket Number:   CD-CA  2:18-cr-00771
Case Name:   USA v. Pure Assay Ingredients Inc. et al
  Press Releases:
          LOS ANGELES – Two Southern California residents were arrested Wednesday in connection with a long-running scheme to smuggle purported dietary supplement ingredients into the United States from China, the Department of Justice announced today.

          Lynn Chau, 43, of Rosemead, and Bao Luu, 42, of Mira Loma, were charged in a seven-count indictment that was returned by a Los Angeles federal grand jury on November 7, and unsealed today. The indictment also charged Pure Assay Ingredients Inc., Chau’s import company located in City of Industry, and two Chinese citizens, Alex Wang and Ivy He, who worked for Pure Assay in Chengdu, China.

          According to the indictment, the defendants conspired to deceive the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CPB) inspectors by mislabeling certain stimulants and other questionable ingredients as non-controversial substances to evade government scrutiny during import. The indictment alleges that the defendants sold the smuggled substances to dietary supplement manufacturers in the United States for use in consumer products. In one instance, the indictment contends that Chau and Luu assembled a false shipment to fool FDA into believing that Pure Assay destroyed substances the agency blocked from distribution. In reality, Pure Assay already had shipped out the real products and presented mislabeled substitutes for destruction.

          “The public deserves honesty and integrity from companies importing ingredients for the products people purchase and consume,” said Assistant Attorney General Jody Hunt for the Department of Justice’s Civil Division. “We will continue to pursue and prosecute those who import dangerous and illegal ingredients for fraudulent purposes.”

          “This case alleges a scheme designed to generate profits at the expense of the public’s health and safety,” said United States Attorney Nick Hanna. “Members of the conspiracy are charged with smuggling prohibited substances, such as steroid precursors, and attempting to prevent U.S. officials from learning the true nature of the shipments that made their way into so-called dietary supplements. We will continue to investigate and prosecute people involved in deceptive practices that endanger consumers.”

          According to the indictment, Pure Assay, Chau, Wang and He prepared fraudulent documents, including false certificates of analysis and false labels, and submitted them to FDA when they believed that an ingredient would be denied entry or invite inquiries from FDA and CPB. The false documents typically declared the substances to be sucralose, melatonin, or other legal ingredients. The indictment alleges that the defendants used this method to smuggle into the United States designer steroids and stimulants for use in dietary supplements while disregarding the risk that their operation posed to consumers.

          “American consumers are put at risk when the true nature of ingredients for dietary supplements is hidden from regulatory authorities,” said Charles L. Grinstead, Special Agent in Charge, FDA Office of Criminal Investigations’ Kansas City Field Office. “We will continue to pursue and bring to justice those who jeopardize the public health.” 

          The indictment against Pure Assay and its principals follows a separate, recent prosecution against several Chinese citizens charged with conspiring to mislabel synthetic dietary supplement ingredients or otherwise helping to hide the true nature of a purported new dietary supplement from American retailers. Three Chinese nationals arrested in Las Vegas last fall while attending a dietary supplement trade show later pleaded guilty in connection with that prosecution.

          The case was investigated by FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigations. The case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorneys Patrick Runkle, Raquel Toledo, and David Sullivan of the Department of Justice’s Consumer Protection Branch, and Erik Silber, Assistant United States Attorney for the Central District of California.

          An indictment merely alleges that crimes have been committed. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

          Additional information about the Consumer Protection Branch and its enforcement efforts may be found at www.justice.gov/civil/consumer-protection-branch.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GbeUCkgFTZ8GIUoEdI5v8gjJxLl_TMuMZbh0FC-SV3U
  Last Updated: 2026-07-08 11:03:52 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E