Score:   1
Docket Number:   ED-PA  2:18-cr-00591
Case Name:   USA v. SOSS et al
  Press Releases:
PHILADELPHIA, PA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced two indictments charging 14 people with a multitude of crimes, including conspiracy to dispense and distribute controlled substances outside the course of professional practice and without a legitimate medical purpose; distribution of oxycodone; health care fraud; and maintaining a drug-involved premises.  These charges are the result of coordinated law enforcement effort across multiple federal, state, and local agencies.  U.S. Attorney McSwain announced these charges as part of a press conference held today to highlight the Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s recent efforts to combat the opioid crisis in the District.

Criminal Indictment No. 18-CR-101: Advanced Urgent Care (AUC).  This superseding indictment charges 13 defendants with crimes in connection with their employment at AUC, a medical business with office locations at 5058 City Avenue in Philadelphia, PA; 9432 East Roosevelt Boulevard in Philadelphia, PA; 721 Bethlehem Pike in Montgomeryville, PA; and 126 Easton Road in Willow Grove, PA.

The 13 defendants charged in this indictment are Dr. Mehdi Nikparvar-Fard, 49, of Penn Valley, PA; Dr. Vincent Thompson, 70, of Elkins Park, PA; Dr. Loretta Brown, 65, of Landsowne, PA; Dr. Avrom Brown, 70, of Elkins Park, PA; Dr. Frederick Reichle, 83, of Warrington, PA; Dr. Marcus Rey Williams, 70, of Coatesville, PA; Dr. William Demedio, 58, of Springfield, PA; Dr. Neil Cutler, 77, of Warminster, PA; Physician’s Assistant Mitchell White, 33, of Philadelphia, PA; Physician’s Assistant Jason Dillinger, 40, of West Chester, PA; Physician’s Assistant Debra Cortez, 56, of Bristol, PA; Physician’s Assistant Samantha Hollis, 42, of Wilmington, DE, and Office Manager Joanne Rivera, 35, of Pennsauken, NJ.  Each defendant is charged with maintaining a drug-involved premises, and five defendants (Nikparvar-Fard, Rivera, Dillinger, Thompson, and White) are charged with conspiring to unlawfully distribute controlled substances.

AUC was owned and operated by Dr. Mehdi Nikparvar-Fard.  The indictment alleges that, in exchange for an $80 to $140 office fee, members of the public were offered “pain management” by AUC doctors and physician’s assistants.  Pain management typically involved obtaining a prescription for opioid painkillers.  The superseding indictment further alleges that AUC medical providers unlawfully prescribed controlled substances, such as opioid painkillers, on a daily basis from January of 2014 through August of 2017 and routinely ignored warning signs that patients were abusing and/or selling their prescription painkillers.  The warning signs included urine drug screens that were positive for illicit drugs like heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine, urine drug screens that were positive for Suboxone (a drug used to treat opiate addiction), and urine drug screen that were negative for all drugs, suggesting the patients may have been selling their prescription pills.  In the face of these test results, AUC medical providers nonetheless prescribed enormous quantities of opioid painkillers.  According to the indictment, at least 3,678 illegal prescriptions were issued by AUC’s doctors and physician’s assistants.

Criminal Indictment No. 18-CR-591: Drs. Murray Soss and Frederick Reichle.  This indictment charges Dr. Murray Soss, 78, of Philadelphia, PA, and Dr. Frederick Reichle,[1] 83, of Warrington, PA, with conspiracy to distribute and dispense oxycodone, outside the usual course of practice and not for a legitimate medical purpose.  Dr. Soss is also charged with seven counts of distributing oxycodone and seven counts of health care fraud.

As alleged in the indictment, Soss hired Reichle to write oxycodone prescriptions for Soss’s pain management patients after Soss’s Pennsylvania medical license was suspended in April 2017.  Soss and Reichle charged the patients a fee to obtain oxycodone prescriptions, written by Reichle, that were not medically necessary.  At times, Soss allegedly collected $2,500 in exchange for accepting a new patient for the sole purpose of that patient obtaining Schedule II narcotics.  The indictment further states that Reichle provided oxycodone prescriptions to one of Soss’s patients without this patient being present, and claims Soss was engaged in a sexual relationship with this same patient.  It further states that Soss obtained oxycodone prescriptions in Soss’s name and then distributed the prescriptions to this patient in exchange for sexual favors.

If convicted, these 14 defendants face a range of penalties, including substantial prison time and fines, depending on each defendant’s degree of involvement in the alleged crimes.

“Our country is in the midst of a deadly drug epidemic, and our District is, in many ways, ground zero in combatting this crisis,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain.  “As alleged in these indictments, thousands of illegally prescribed pills flooded our streets because of the conduct of these defendants.  My Office will continue to do its part to enforce our nation’s drug laws and hold physicians, physician’s assistants, and their agents accountable.  As these indictments show, medical professionals who violate their oaths and exploit their patients’ addictions to make an easy buck will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”

“We're seeing it over and over again: medical professionals, deciding to cash in on our area’s opioid crisis,” said Michael T. Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Philadelphia Division. “It seems ‘first, do no harm’ is a principle fast forgotten when money starts changing hands.  These doctors are just doling out piles of pills to anyone willing to pay for them.  It’s despicable, it’s criminal, and the FBI and our law enforcement partners will never stop working to put pill mills, and the people who run them, out of business.”



“The defendants arrested in this case are accused of setting up and operating a scheme in which the defendants sold opioid prescriptions to individuals without any legitimate medical need or purpose in exchange for cash.  The defendants issued 3,678 prescriptions which amount to hundreds of thousands of pills being used by addicted individuals,” said Jonathan A. Wilson, Special Agent in Charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) Philadelphia Field Division.  “When the DEA determines that a doctor is prescribing controlled substance medications without a legitimate medical purpose, the DEA will refer the investigation to the US Attorney’s Office for prosecution to the fullest extent of the law.”

 “Healthcare providers who ignore their Hippocratic oaths and put illegal prescription drugs on our streets are nothing more than drug dealers in white lab coats,” said Maureen R. Dixon, Special Agent in Charge of the Philadelphia Regional Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS-OIG).  “Medical providers who disregard the law and put greed in front of helping patients can expect criminal repercussions.”

“An important mission of the Office of Inspector General is to investigate allegations of health care fraud related to the U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL) Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP).  We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners and OWCP to protect the integrity of DOL’s benefit programs,” stated Richard Deer, Special Agent in Charge, Philadelphia Region, U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General.

The AUC case was investigated by the following agencies: Drug Enforcement Administration; the Federal Bureau of Investigation; Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General; the Department of Labor, Office of the Inspector General; and the Office of Personnel Management.  These agencies were assisted in their investigation by the Pennsylvania Department of State; Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General; Abington Police Department; Easttown Township Police Department; and Philadelphia Police Department.  The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Jason P. Bologna and Seth Schlessinger.

The Soss/Reichle case was investigated by Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General and Federal Bureau of Investigation, with assistance from Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General and the Philadelphia Police Department.  The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Karen Marston.

 



[1] Dr. Reichle also is a named co-defendant in the AUC superseding indictment, though the charges alleged in the AUC case arise from conduct that is separate from that alleged in Soss/Reichle case.





Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xppqa31JR5N_FGV2pO2ljQDorFjd_v-hrBma6y65NKE
  Last Updated: 2024-12-17 12:51:55 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E