A criminal complaint was unsealed yesterday in federal court in Central Islip charging Lawrence Ross with conspiring to distribute, and distributing, more than 10 kilograms of ecstasy and more than 45 grams of methamphetamine. The defendant’s initial appearance was yesterday afternoon before United States Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay, who ordered him detained.
Richard P. Donoghue, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Philip R. Bartlett, Inspector-in-Charge, United States Postal Inspection Service, New York Division (USPIS), and Angel M. Melendez, Special Agent-in-Charge, United States Department of Homeland Security, Homeland Security Investigations, New York Field Office (HSI) announced the charges.
“As alleged, Ross sold ecstasy and crystal methamphetamine via the dark web and Wickr in exchange for Bitcoin, and then shipped the drugs to his customers through the U.S. mail,” stated United States Attorney Donoghue. “Drug traffickers who believe they will escape detection by using the dark web, encrypted messaging applications and cryptocurrency should understand that they are not anonymous, their activities will be uncovered, and they will be prosecuted.” Mr. Donoghue expressed his grateful appreciation to the Suffolk County District Attorney's Office Heroin Task Force for their assistance in the investigation.
“This arrest highlights the benefits of cooperation and collaboration between law enforcement agencies. Through these partnerships, we are keeping our communities safe from the spread of illegal narcotics purchased through the dark web,” stated USPIS Inspector-in- Charge Bartlett.
“Ross allegedly imported and manufactured his own drugs and used the veil of the dark-net to distribute his illicit products,” said HSI Special Agent-in-Charge Melendez. “More and more criminals are seeking ways to use the dark web to further their illegal enterprise, but law enforcement continues to evolve in its investigations to locate these vendors and bring them out of the shadows to face justice.”
Between November 2018 and the present, Ross allegedly sold controlled substances on the dark web, communicated with customers using the Wickr encrypted messaging application, distributed the drugs through the U.S. mail, and accepted the Bitcoin cryptocurrency as payment. The investigation began when a parcel containing ecstasy was seized by the Postal Inspection Service and was traced to Ross. An undercover postal inspector began purchasing controlled substances from Ross at screenname “Gladyman” through various dark web marketplaces. Ross advertised on his “Gladyman” dark web profile that customers could contact him via the Wickr at screenname “Sweettooth80,” and the undercover postal inspector began communicating with Ross using Wickr.
On May 31, 2019, using Wickr, the postal inspector ordered 100 ecstasy pills from Ross at screenname “Sweettooth80” and transferred $1,000 worth of Bitcoin to Ross’s digital wallet. Several hours later, at the Islip Post Office, Ross mailed 33 packages, including one addressed to the postal inspector’s undercover name. That package was seized and contained 100 pills that tested positive for Ecstasy.
On June 5, 2019, again using Wickr, the postal inspector ordered five grams of crystal methamphetamine from Ross at screenname “Sweettooth80.” The postal inspector then transferred $228.17 worth of Bitcoin to Ross’s digital wallet. Ross mailed 61 packages at the Bay Shore Post Office, including a package addressed to the postal inspector’s undercover name. The package was seized by postal inspectors and contained approximately five grams of a substance that tested positive for crystal methamphetamine.
A search warrant was executed at Ross’s residence yesterday, and postal inspectors recovered over 10 kilograms of ecstasy with a street value of approximately $1.5 million, a pill press for the manufacturing of controlled substances, approximately $250,000 of Bitcoin cryptocurrency and approximately $50,000 of U.S. currency.
The charges in the complaint are allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
If convicted, the defendant faces a sentence of up to 20 years’ imprisonment.
The government’s case is being handled by the Office’s Long Island Criminal Division. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Lara Treinis Gatz and Artie McConnell are in charge of the prosecution.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
A criminal complaint was unsealed yesterday in federal court in Central Islip charging Lawrence Ross with conspiring to distribute, and distributing, more than 10 kilograms of ecstasy and more than 45 grams of methamphetamine. The defendant’s initial appearance was yesterday afternoon before United States Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay, who ordered him detained.
Richard P. Donoghue, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Philip R. Bartlett, Inspector-in-Charge, United States Postal Inspection Service, New York Division (USPIS), and Angel M. Melendez, Special Agent-in-Charge, United States Department of Homeland Security, Homeland Security Investigations, New York Field Office (HSI) announced the charges.
“As alleged, Ross sold ecstasy and crystal methamphetamine via the dark web and Wickr in exchange for Bitcoin, and then shipped the drugs to his customers through the U.S. mail,” stated United States Attorney Donoghue. “Drug traffickers who believe they will escape detection by using the dark web, encrypted messaging applications and cryptocurrency should understand that they are not anonymous, their activities will be uncovered, and they will be prosecuted.” Mr. Donoghue expressed his grateful appreciation to the Suffolk County District Attorney's Office Heroin Task Force for their assistance in the investigation.
“This arrest highlights the benefits of cooperation and collaboration between law enforcement agencies. Through these partnerships, we are keeping our communities safe from the spread of illegal narcotics purchased through the dark web,” stated USPIS Inspector-in- Charge Bartlett.
“Ross allegedly imported and manufactured his own drugs and used the veil of the dark-net to distribute his illicit products,” said HSI Special Agent-in-Charge Melendez. “More and more criminals are seeking ways to use the dark web to further their illegal enterprise, but law enforcement continues to evolve in its investigations to locate these vendors and bring them out of the shadows to face justice.”
Between November 2018 and the present, Ross allegedly sold controlled substances on the dark web, communicated with customers using the Wickr encrypted messaging application, distributed the drugs through the U.S. mail, and accepted the Bitcoin cryptocurrency as payment. The investigation began when a parcel containing ecstasy was seized by the Postal Inspection Service and was traced to Ross. An undercover postal inspector began purchasing controlled substances from Ross at screenname “Gladyman” through various dark web marketplaces. Ross advertised on his “Gladyman” dark web profile that customers could contact him via the Wickr at screenname “Sweettooth80,” and the undercover postal inspector began communicating with Ross using Wickr.
On May 31, 2019, using Wickr, the postal inspector ordered 100 ecstasy pills from Ross at screenname “Sweettooth80” and transferred $1,000 worth of Bitcoin to Ross’s digital wallet. Several hours later, at the Islip Post Office, Ross mailed 33 packages, including one addressed to the postal inspector’s undercover name. That package was seized and contained 100 pills that tested positive for Ecstasy.
On June 5, 2019, again using Wickr, the postal inspector ordered five grams of crystal methamphetamine from Ross at screenname “Sweettooth80.” The postal inspector then transferred $228.17 worth of Bitcoin to Ross’s digital wallet. Ross mailed 61 packages at the Bay Shore Post Office, including a package addressed to the postal inspector’s undercover name. The package was seized by postal inspectors and contained approximately five grams of a substance that tested positive for crystal methamphetamine.
A search warrant was executed at Ross’s residence yesterday, and postal inspectors recovered over 10 kilograms of ecstasy with a street value of approximately $1.5 million, a pill press for the manufacturing of controlled substances, approximately $250,000 of Bitcoin cryptocurrency and approximately $50,000 of U.S. currency.
The charges in the complaint are allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
If convicted, the defendant faces a sentence of up to 20 years’ imprisonment.
The government’s case is being handled by the Office’s Long Island Criminal Division. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Lara Treinis Gatz and Artie McConnell are in charge of the prosecution.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year