CAMDEN, N.J. – A Camden County, New Jersey, man and a Philadelphia man were each sentenced today to 30 months in prison for their respective roles in conspiring to distribute oxycodone, U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito announced.
Prussia Hing, 36, of Philadelphia, and Anthony Pepe, 42, of Cherry Hill, New Jersey, previously pleaded guilty before U.S. District Court Judge Jerome B. Simandle to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute oxycodone. U.S. District Judge Robert B. Kugler, who was assigned the case following the subsequent passing of Judge Simandle, imposed the sentence today in Camden federal court.
The defendants were charged in connection with one of the largest national healthcare fraud and opioid enforcement actions ever taken by the U.S. Department of Justice.
According to documents filed in this case and statements made in court:
From December 2017 through June 26, 2018, the defendants and others engaged in a conspiracy which resulted in the trafficking of 1,180 oxycodone pills – 680 of which were unadulterated oxycodone and 500 of which were pressed pills mixed with hydrocodone, codeine, and methylphenidate. Hing was a source of the supply. As part of the investigation, law enforcement observed eight controlled purchases, three of which were carried out by the defendants, including Pepe, dressed in his hospital scrubs in front of the major Philadelphia hospital where he was employed as the chief surgical technologist.
In addition to the prison term, Judge Kugler sentenced each defendant to three years of supervised release.
U.S. Attorney Carpenito credited special agents of the FBI’s Philadelphia Field Office, South Jersey Resident Agency, both under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Michael Harpster in Philadelphia; the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Scott J. Lampert, and the Camden County Police Department, under the direction of Chief Joseph D. Wysocki, with the investigation leading to today’s sentencings.
The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Christina O. Hud and Diana Vondra Carrig of the U.S. Attorney’s Office Criminal Division in Camden.
Defense counsel:
Pepe: Rocco Cipparone Esq., Haddon Heights, New Jersey
Hing: Gregory Pagano Esq., Philadelphia
CAMDEN, N.J. – A Camden County, New Jersey, man and a Philadelphia man today admitted their respective roles in conspiring to distribute oxycodone, U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito announced.
Daniel Watson, 40, of Bellmawr, New Jersey, and Prussia Hing, 36, of Philadelphia, pleaded guilty before U.S. District Court Judge Jerome B. Simandle in Camden federal court to separate informations charging them each with one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute oxycodone. Watson and Hing were previously charged in connection with one of the largest national healthcare fraud and opioid enforcement actions ever taken by the U.S. Department of Justice.
According to documents filed in this case and statements made in court:
From December 2017 through June 26, 2018, Watson and Hing conspired with each other and others to distribute unadulterated oxycodone and pressed pills containing oxycodone and hydrocodone, codeine, and methylphenidate. Hing was a source of supply; Watson made eight sales to an undercover officer and a confidential informant, totaling 1,080 oxycodone pills. The final three sales occurred in the vicinity of a Philadelphia hospital, where a conspirator worked as an anesthesiology technologist.
The drug trafficking conspiracy to which Watson and Hing pleaded guilty carries a maximum potential penalty of 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $1 million. Sentencing for both defendants is scheduled for July 17, 2019.
The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Diana Vondra Carrig and Christina O. Hud of the U.S. Attorney’s Office Criminal Division in Camden.
Defense counsel:
Watson: Christopher O’Malley Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Camden
Hing: Gregory Pagano Esq., Philadelphia
Defendants Include a New Jersey Doctor, an Anesthesiology Technologist for a Philadelphia Hospital, and the Owner of a Medical Billing Company
NEWARK, N.J. – The largest health care fraud and opioid enforcement action ever taken by the Justice Department resulted in three guilty pleas and five arrests in New Jersey involving a South Jersey-Philadelphia drug trafficking ring that sold over 1,100 oxycodone pills and multiple individuals who used phony claims to steal millions from state and private insurers, U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito announced today.
The national takedown targeted over 601 charged defendants across 58 federal districts, including more than 165 doctors, nurses and other licensed medical professionals, for their alleged participation in health care fraud schemes involving approximately $2 billion in false billings. Of those charged, over 162 defendants, including 76 doctors, were charged for their roles in prescribing and distributing opioids and other dangerous narcotics. Thirty state Medicaid Fraud Control Units also participated in today’s arrests. In addition, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced today that from July 2017 to the present, it has excluded 2,700 individuals from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and all other federal health care programs, which includes 587 providers excluded for conduct related to opioid diversion and abuse.
As part of the national takedown, the New Jersey U.S. Attorney’s Office filed five separate cases this week charging four defendants with conspiracy to commit health care fraud and three defendants with conspiracy to distribute oxycodone.
Robert Agresti, 61, a doctor from Essex Fells, New Jersey, and Brian Catanzarite, 42, a former gym owner from Cedar Grove, New Jersey, pleaded guilty on June 26, 2018 to their roles in separate conspiracies to attain phony compounded medication prescriptions on behalf of companies that marketed those products. Enver Kalaba, 36, a Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) bus driver from Old Bridge, New Jersey, pleaded guilty June 27, 2018 to a similar scheme targeting his employer.
Tiffany Marsh, 40, a medical billing company owner from West Orange, New Jersey, and Keasam Johnson, 34, a telecommunications company employee from East Orange, New Jersey, were arrested on June 26, 2018 for their alleged roles in a conspiracy to collect insurance reimbursements for chiropractic services that were never rendered.
Anthony Pepe III, 40, of Cherry Hill, New Jersey, an anesthesiology technologist for a Philadelphia hospital, along with Daniel Watson, 39, of Bellmawr, New Jersey, and Prussia Hing, 35, of Philadelphia, were arrested on June 26, 2018 for their alleged roles in an oxycodone distribution ring.
“At a time when many Americans worry about securing health insurance for their families, we’ve seen far too many instances where public and private insurance providers are raided for millions in phony reimbursements for compounded medications or non-existent therapy services,” U.S. Attorney Carpenito said. “On top of that, we are in the midst of an opioid crisis perpetuated by both rogue health care professionals and street-level dealers seeking to profit from the addiction of others. This national takedown seeks to address both fronts, and thanks to the efforts of our federal and local law enforcement partners right here in the New Jersey area, eight individuals will now answer for these crimes in federal court.”
“Health care fraud is a betrayal of vulnerable patients, and often it is theft from the taxpayer,” said Attorney General Jeff Sessions. “In many cases, doctors, nurses, and pharmacists take advantage of people suffering from drug addiction in order to line their pockets. These are despicable crimes. That’s why this Department of Justice has taken historic new steps to go after fraudsters, including hiring more prosecutors and leveraging the power of data analytics. Today the Department of Justice is announcing the largest health care fraud enforcement action in American history. This is the most fraud, the most defendants, and the most doctors ever charged in a single operation – and we have evidence that our ongoing work has stopped or prevented billions of dollars’ worth of fraud. I want to thank our fabulous partners with the FBI, DEA, our Health Care Fraud task forces, HHS, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, IRS Criminal Investigation, Medicare, and especially the more than 1,000 federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement officers from across America who made this possible. By every measure we are more effective at finding and prosecuting medical fraud than ever.”
“Every dollar recovered in this year’s operation represents not just a taxpayer’s hard-earned money – it’s a dollar that can go toward providing healthcare for Americans in need,” said HHS Secretary Alex M. Azar III. “This year’s Takedown Day is a significant accomplishment for the American people, and every public servant involved should be proud of their work.”
Agresti
Agresti admitted that from November 2014 through September 2017, he participated in a scheme to defraud health insurance plans, including New Jersey state and local employee health benefit programs, by prescribing medically unnecessary compounded prescriptions on behalf of a company that marketed those products.
Agresti was paid $300 in cash for every prescription he authorized for compounded medication, regardless of medical necessity. Agresti signed the prescriptions brought to him by other conspirators without examining or speaking with the patients. Multiple health benefit programs paid more than $8.9 million as a result of Agresti’s phony prescriptions.
“Health care fraud adversely impacts our overburdened health care system, draining valuable funds away from those in need into the greedy coffers of the conspirators,” said Special Agent in Charge Gregory W. Ehrie of the Newark FBI Field Office. “The FBI will continue to vigorously investigate these so called 'victimless crimes,' which deplete our nation's resources."
Catanzarite
Catanzarite admitted that from March 2015 through January 2017, he conspired to defraud New Jersey state benefit programs. Catanzarite was recruited by one of his former gym members to become a sales representative of a company that marketed compounded medications. The marketing company received a percentage of every prescription that its sales representatives steered toward a particular compounding pharmacy.
To maximize his profit, Catanzarite convinced state beneficiaries to obtain compounded medications regardless of their medical necessity. On several occasions, Catanzarite even paid an advanced nurse practitioner, introduced to him by the marketing company, or used a telemedicine service that was paid for by the marketing company, to fraudulently obtain compounded medication prescriptions. Altogether, Catanzarite caused losses of at least $3.5 million and personally made over $1.1 million from the scheme.
“One of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service’s (DCIS) top priorities is to protect the integrity of TRICARE, the DOD’s healthcare system for military members, retirees and their dependents,” stated Special Agent in Charge Leigh-Alistair Barzey of the DCIS Northeast Field Office. “This plea is the result of a joint effort and DCIS will continue to coordinate with the DOJ, FBI, HHS-OIG, MTA-OIG and other law enforcement partners to combat health care fraud.”
Kalaba
Kalaba admitted that from April 2016 through August 2017, he conspired to defraud the MTA’s health benefits plan using fraudulent claims for medically unnecessary compounded medications. Kalaba was recruited into the scheme by another former MTA bus driver, Christopher Frusci. Both Frusci and Kalaba acted as sales representatives of a company that marketed compounded medications.
Kalaba paid MTA beneficiaries monthly cash bribes, including $100 per phony prescription. To ensure physicians prescribed compounded medications regardless of medical necessity, Kalaba referred MTA beneficiaries to telemedicine physicians who were paid by the marketing company or its affiliates. Altogether, Kalaba caused losses of $2.9 million and made $138,629 from the scheme.
“Our investigation is ongoing to determine the extent to which additional MTA employees may have participated in this fraudulent scheme,” said Inspector General Barry Kluger of the MTA Office of the Inspector General. “I applaud and am pleased to support the efforts of the U.S. Attorney, along with the FBI and the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General, to combat this nationwide epidemic of health care fraud that unfortunately, and at great cost, has infected the MTA as well.”Marsh and Johnson
Marsh, the owner and operator of TJB Medical Billing Consultants LLC, provided medical billing to two New Jersey chiropractors. Johnson worked as a supervisor in the New Jersey office of a large telecommunications company.
Marsh used her access to the billing software at the chiropractor offices to generate false claims for out-of-network chiropractic services that were never performed. The claims were made pursuant to an agreement between Marsh and Johnson, who recruited other employees to allow false claims to be made in their names in exchange for a portion of the proceeds. From June 2016 through November 2017, Marsh submitted approximately 800 fraudulent claims seeking approximately $850,000 in reimbursements, which resulted in the payment of approximately $333,000 for chiropractic services that were never rendered.
Pepe, Watson, and Hing
Between January 2018 and May 2018, Pepe, Watson, and Hing engaged in a conspiracy which resulted in the trafficking of 1,180 oxycodone pills – 680 of which were unadulterated oxycodone and 500 of which were pressed pills mixed with hydrocodone, codeine, and methylphenidate. As part of the investigation, law enforcement observed eight controlled purchases, three of which were carried out by the defendants – including Pepe dressed in his work scrubs – in front of the Philadelphia hospital where Pepe was employed.
“Philadelphia and Camden are awash in opioids, with the human toll mounting steadily, day by day,” said Michael T. Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Philadelphia Division. “The idea of a medical professional taking a work break to push pills on the street, as alleged in the complaint, is at once disheartening and infuriating. The FBI will continue to doggedly investigate and bring to justice traffickers contributing to our area’s opioid crisis.”
“The individuals involved in these schemes are feeding this country’s opioid crisis,” said Scott J. Lampert, Special Agent in Charge for the Department of Health & Human Services Office of Inspector General. “This takedown sends a clear message that those suspected of engaging in health care fraud will be caught and face consequences for their actions.”
Agresti, Kalaba, Catanzarite, Marsh and Johnson each face a potential 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense. Sentencing for Agresti, Catanzarite, and Kalaba is scheduled for Oct. 30, 2018. Pepe, Watson, and Hing each face a potential 20 years in prison and a $1 million fine. The charges and allegations against Marsh, Johnson, Pepe, Watson, and Hing are merely accusations, and they are considered innocent unless and until proven guilty.
U.S. Attorney Carpenito credited special agents of the FBI Newark Field Office, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Ehrie; the FBI’s South Jersey Resident Agency, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Harpster in Philadelphia; the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Lampert; the U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Criminal Investigative Service, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Barzey; the MTA Office of the Inspector General, under the direction of Inspector General Kluger, and special agents of the U.S. Attorney’s Office with the investigations that yielded this week’s guilty pleas and arrests. He also thanked the Camden County Police Department, under the direction of Chief J. Scott Thomson, and the Cherry Hill Police Department, under the direction of William Monaghan, for their assistance.
The government is represented in these cases by Assistant U.S. Attorney Erica Liu, Chief of the U.S. Attorney's Office Opioid Abuse Prevention and Enforcement Unit in Newark, and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Lauren E. Repole, Christina O. Hud and Diana Carrig of the U.S. Attorney’s Office Criminal Division.
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY
Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2
Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3
Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5
Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2
Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18
Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15
Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7
Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3
Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1
Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2
Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2
Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2
Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20
Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2
Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4
Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3
Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5
Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8
Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1
Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1
Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10
Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2
Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD
Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year