Score:   1
Docket Number:   D-MD  1:19-cr-00265
Case Name:   USA v. Smego
  Press Releases:
Baltimore, Maryland – U.S. District Judge Ellen L. Hollander today sentenced Todd Andrew Leasure, age 45, of Orange Beach, Alabama, to six months of home detention as part of five years’ probation, for the federal charge of making false statements in connection with the number of hours he worked on a contract at the National Security Agency (NSA).  Judge Hollander also ordered Leasure to pay restitution of $150,001.

The sentence was announced by United States Attorney for the District of Maryland Robert K. Hur; Robert P. Storch, Inspector General of the National Security Agency; and Special Agent in Charge Robert E. Craig, Jr. of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service - Mid-Atlantic Field Office.

The National Security Agency (NSA) is a component of the United States Department of Defense.  Beginning in 2008, the NSA contracted with an outside company (Contractor A) to supply information technology (IT) services to the NSA, including onsite database administrators employed by Contractor A. 

According to his plea agreement, from February 2014 through February 2017, Leasure was employed on a full-time basis by Contractor A to work as a database administrator pursuant to the contract between NSA and Contractor A.  Leasure’s duty station was at a NSA facility located in Linthicum Heights, Maryland, and Leasure regularly traveled from Florida to Maryland to perform his responsibilities under the contract. 

Contractor A required Leasure to submit timesheets in electronic format providing date- and task-specific entries stating the number of hours he had worked on the contract.  Based on those entries, Contractor A periodically invoiced the NSA for the hours that Leasure worked, and NSA paid Contractor A for Leasure’s claimed hours at a rate of $247 to $280 per hour.

Leasure admitted that between February 3, 2014 and February 17, 2017, he submitted, and caused to be submitted, false timesheets to Contractor A in which he claimed to have worked at least 607 hours more than he actually worked on the NSA contract.  As a result, NSA overpaid Contractor A by an amount exceeding $150,000.

In a separate case, on December 6, 2019, U.S. District Judge Richard D. Bennett sentenced Kyle Duran Smego, age 41, of Raleigh, North Carolina, to serve eight months of home detention as a special condition of three years’ probation, and ordered Smego to pay restitution of $252,527.15.  Smego, who was a subcontractor at two companies where he was assigned to work on contracts at the NSA, previously pleaded guilty to submitting false claims to the government, inflating the number of hours he claimed to have worked on the two contacts by at least 40%.

Anyone with information about fraud at NSA may contact the NSA Office of the Inspector General at https://www.nsa.gov/about/contact-us/OIG-Hotline/.

United States Attorney Robert K. Hur commended the NSA OIG for their work in both investigations and the DOD OIG for its work in the Leasure investigation.  Mr. Hur thanked Assistant U.S. Attorneys Peter J. Martinez and Jefferson M. Gray, who prosecuted the Leasure and Smego cases, respectively.

# # #

Baltimore, Maryland – Kyle Duran Smego, age 40, of Raleigh, North Carolina, pleaded guilty on July 2, 2019, to submitting false claims to the United States, specifically for inflating the number of hours he claimed to have worked on two government contracts. 

The guilty plea was announced by United States Attorney for the District of Maryland Robert K. Hur and Robert P. Storch, Inspector General of the National Security Agency.

The National Security Agency (NSA) is a component of the United States Department of Defense.  During the period from February 2016 to present, the NSA had two ongoing contracts with an outside company (Contractor A).  Each of these contracts required Contractor A to supply information technology (IT) services to the NSA.  Contractor A subcontracted with Subcontractors 1 and 2, respectively, to provide software engineers and developers needed to carry out its obligations under each contract.  

According to his plea agreement, from February 2016 through May 2018, Kyle Duran Smego was successively employed on a full-time basis by Subcontractors 1 and 2 to work as a software engineer/front end developer on the two separate contracts held by Contractor A.  Because the subject matter of these contracts involved classified information, all of the work had to be performed at secure, access-controlled locations.  Smego was therefore required to be physically present at his assigned duty locations to do his work. 

Between February 2016 and November 2017, Smego reported to Subcontractor 1 that he had worked 3,289 hours on their contract.  Between November 2017 and May 2018, Smego reported to Subcontractor 2 that he had worked 797.5 hours on their contract.  A subsequent review by the NSA of key card and timecard information demonstrated that Smego was not actually present at his assigned duty stations for at least 1,326 of the 3,289 hours he had reported to Subcontractor 1 (40.3%) and 375 of the 797.5 hours he had reported to Subcontractor 2 (47%).  In addition to overstating the number of hours he had worked, the timesheets that Smego submitted to Subcontractors 1 and 2 included entries for 119 separate days in which Smego represented that he had worked an average of 8 hours when, in fact, he had not worked at all on those days. 

All of the hours that were falsely reported by Smego were subsequently billed by the subcontractors to Contractor A, and were in turn billed by Contractor A to, and paid by, NSA.  Based upon the false billing records submitted by Smego, the NSA overpaid a total of $220,379.42 to Contractor A.  Contractor A, in turn, paid most of those funds over to Subcontractors 1 and 2, who ultimately paid Smego $115,110 for work he had not performed.

As part of his plea agreement, Smego will be required to pay restitution and to forfeit any assets derived from or traceable to the offense.

Smego faces a maximum sentence of five years in prison.  U.S. District Judge Richard D. Bennett has scheduled sentencing for October 3, 2019 at 3:00 p.m.

United States Attorney Robert K. Hur commended NSA Senior Investigator Lori Hazenstab and the NSA OIG for their work in the investigation.  Mr. Hur thanked Assistant U.S. Attorney Jefferson M. Gray, who is prosecuting the case.

# # #

Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E