Score:   1
Docket Number:   WD-WI  3:18-cr-00081
Case Name:   United States of America v. Steiskal Andrew
  Press Releases:
Madison, Wis. – Scott C. Blader, United States Attorney for the Western District of Wisconsin, announced that Andrew Steiskal, 23, New Lisbon, Wisconsin, was sentenced today by U.S. District Judge James Peterson to 15 years in federal prison for producing child pornography.  Steiskal pleaded guilty to this offense on December 7, 2018.

In January 2018, a minor in Dorchester, South Carolina went to the police and reported that she had been having contact with a Snapchat user who sent her a Dropbox link to sexually explicit pictures of an adult male and a young child.  Law enforcement officers ultimately were able to identify the sender, who had the user name “steisdaddy95,” as Andrew Steiskal.  

Law enforcement officers searched the minor’s phone and saw the images the minor described.  They also found numerous Snapchat messages from Steiskal identifying himself and the minor child as the people shown in the sexually explicit images. 

The mother of the child who appears in the sexually explicit images told the Court that there were not enough words to describe how horrible the experience has been for her and her child. 

In sentencing the defendant, Judge Peterson said that part of what made the crime so horrible is that the defendant exploited a child who was incapable of defending herself or calling for help.  Judge Peterson also pointed out that there were a number of victims here, and that the effects of the defendant’s actions would be felt long into the future.

The charges against Steiskal were the result of an investigation conducted by the Juneau County Sheriff’s Department, the Wisconsin Department of Justice Division of Criminal Investigation, and the Dorchester County (South Carolina) Sheriff’s Office.   The prosecution of the case has been handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Elizabeth Altman. 



MADISON, WIS. – -- A federal grand jury in the Western District of Wisconsin, sitting in Madison, returned the following indictments.  The indictments were returned today, with the exception of the indictment of Andrew Steiskal, which was returned by the grand jury yesterday.

You are advised that a charge is merely an accusation and that a defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.

The maximum statutory sentence is prescribed by Congress and is provided here for informational purposes.  If convicted, the sentencing of a defendant will be determined by the court based on the advisory Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors. 

Two Charged with Fraud Scheme

Shelly Scott, 43, and Jason Edge, 44, both from Missouri, are charged with a scheme to commit wire fraud which involved identity theft.   The defendants are charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, attempting to commit wire fraud, using the identification of another person to attempt to commit wire fraud, and possessing the means of identification of another person.  Scott is also charged with two counts of wire fraud. 

The indictment alleges that Scott and Edge obtained identification documents of actual people without their consent, and that they obtained personal checks for accounts belonging to other people without their consent and altered the checks to add the names of the persons who identities were stolen. 

The indictment alleges that Scott and Edge used the stolen identities and stolen or altered checks to purchase merchandise from Walmart stores, and then would return some of the merchandise in exchange for cash and gift cards.  The indictment alleges that when a Walmart employee attempted to obtain authorization from TeleCheck, a company used by Walmart for the verification of personal checks, the defendants would call a co-conspirator and falsely indicate that the person on the phone was a TeleCheck representative, who would tell the Walmart employee to override the declination and accept the check.  



            The indictment alleges that:

Between February 7 and February 13, 2018, Edge made over $17,000 in purchases at five Walmart stores in Illinois, using a stolen identity and altered personal checks;

On February 24, 2018, an unidentified co-conspirator made purchases totaling $6,633.58 at Walmart stores in Madison, Wisconsin, and Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin, using a stolen identity and stolen personal checks;

On February 25, 2018, Scott made a purchase totaling $4,945.10 at the Walmart in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, using a stolen identity and an altered personal check; and

On February 25, 2018, Scott and Edge attempted to make a purchase totaling $5,693.01 at the Walmart in Monona, Wisconsin, using a stolen identity and fraudulent personal check.           

Scott and Edge were arrested in Monona on February 25 by officers with the Monona Police Department. 

If convicted, Scott and Edge face a maximum penalty of 20 years in federal prison on each of the charges involving wire fraud, a maximum penalty of 15 years on the possession of another person’s identification, and a mandatory penalty of two years on the charge of using the identification of another person to attempt to commit wire fraud, also known as aggravated identity theft.  Federal law requires that any penalty imposed on the aggravated identity theft charge be served consecutive to any other sentence imposed.

The charges against Scott and Edge are the result of an investigation by the Monona and Sun Prairie Police Departments and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  The prosecution of this case is being handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Laura Przybylinski Finn. 

New Lisbon Man Charged with Producing, Distributing, and Possessing Child Pornography

Andrew Steiskal, 22, New Lisbon, Wisconsin, is charged with four counts of producing child pornography, one count of distributing child pornography, and one count of possessing child pornography.  The indictment alleges that on November 22, 2017, Steiskal used a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct and created four separate video files of such conduct.  The indictment also alleges that on January 9, 2018, he distributed visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct to another minor, and that on January 17, 2018, he possessed a cellular phone containing child pornography that included at least one depiction of a minor less than 12 years old. 

If convicted, Steiskal faces a mandatory minimum penalty of 15 years and a maximum of 30 years on each production count, a mandatory minimum penalty of five years and a maximum of 20 years on the distribution count, and a maximum of 20 years in federal prison on the possession count. 

The charges against Steiskal are the result of an investigation by the Juneau County Sheriff’s Department, Wisconsin Department of Justice Division of Criminal Investigation, and Dorchester County (South Carolina) Sheriff’s Office.  The prosecution of this case is being handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Elizabeth Altman.

Sun Prairie Man Charged with Gun Crime

Brendon Linus-Brown, 21, Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, is charged with being a felon in possession of firearms.  The indictment alleges that between April 30 and May 1, 2018, he possessed a .22 caliber pistol and a .40 caliber pistol. 

If convicted, Linus-Brown faces a maximum penalty of 10 years in federal prison.  The charge against him is the result of an investigation by the Sun Prairie Police Department and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.  The prosecution of this case is being handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Rita Rumbelow.

This indictment was brought as part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program that has been historically successful in bringing together all levels of law enforcement to reduce violent crime and make our neighborhoods safer for everyone.  Attorney General Jeff Sessions has made turning the tide of rising violent crime in America a top priority.  In October 2017, as part of a series of actions to address this crime trend, Attorney General Sessions announced the reinvigoration of PSN and directed all U.S. Attorney’s Offices to develop a district crime reduction strategy that incorporates the lessons learned since PSN launched in 2001.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/110eBcBpQHk9TOTvOo5N2NwiCTcBdiZWr8lHEzHg1eZQ
  Last Updated: 2024-03-25 22:27:13 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Date of Announcement: May 31, 2018
Arrest Start Date: May 01, 2018
Arrest End Date: May 2018
Photo: N
Arrested: 1
Rescued: 1
Country: US
State: WI
Arresting Agencies Involved: 3
Comments: CP production & related charges
Additional data courtesy @ArrestAnon 👼  
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E