Score:   1
Docket Number:   WD-WI  3:17-cr-00112
Case Name:   United States of America v. Pethley Curtis
  Press Releases:


MADISON, WIS. -- A federal grand jury in the Western District of Wisconsin, sitting in Madison, returned the following indictments today.  You are advised that a charge is merely an accusation and that a defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.

 

The maximum statutory sentence is prescribed by Congress and is provided here for informational purposes.  If convicted, the sentencing of a defendant will be determined by the court based on the advisory Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors. 

 

Two Texas Men Charged with Fraud Conspiracy

 

Clement Onuama, 52, and Orefo Okeke, 41, both of Arlington, Texas, are charged in a 10-count indictment with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering.  According to the indictment, Onuama and Okeke operated businesses in Grand Prairie, Texas, known as Destiny Auto Repair and Sysco Serve.  The indictment alleges that from 2010 to 2016, the defendants conspired to commit the following fraud schemes:

 

Romance fraud schemes – the indictment alleges that Onuama and Okeke received proceeds from victims who believed they were in romantic relationships with persons they met online and were asked for financial assistance.  The indictment alleges that victims sent funds to bank accounts that were controlled by the defendants.

Business email compromise schemes involving identity theft – the indictment alleges that victims received “spoofed” email messages that appeared to be from a fellow employee or business associate instructing them to wire funds to various accounts controlled by Onuama and Okeke.

Account takeover schemes involving identity theft – the indictment alleges that the defendants received proceeds from schemes that involved several victims whose financial accounts were accessed by unauthorized individuals who wired funds or drew checks on the victims’ account which were deposited into accounts held by Onuama and Okeke. 

Credit card fraud schemes involving identity theft - the indictment alleges that Onuama received proceeds from several victims who had unauthorized credit cards openend in their names without their permission and were charged in fake transactions by Destiny Auto Repair with payments going to a bank account held by Onuama.



 The indictment alleges that when confronted by various banks regarding possible fraudulent deposits into their accounts, Onuama and Okeke falsely told the banks that the money came from clients who were engaged in automobile purchases and sales with the defendants.  The indictment also alleges that as a further part of the conspiracy, the defendants concealed the proceeds of the fraud schemes by moving them through various bank accounts, withdrew the proceeds in structured cash increments of $10,000 or less, and failed to report any of the fraud proceeds on their tax returns.   The indictment alleges that Onuama and Okeke caused an actual fraud loss amount in excess of $2.6 million, and an attempted fraud loss amount in excess of $3.2 million.  In addition to the conspiracy charge, Onuama and Okeke are each charged with six counts of wire fraud and three counts of identity theft.  The indictment seeks money judgments from the defendants in an amount totaling $2,802,075.54, which is allegedly the amount of the proceeds from the conspiracy and the wire fraud charges. A sealed federal complaint in this matter was filed on October 26, and arrest warrants for Onuama and Okeke were issued.  They were arrested in Texas on November 1.  They appeared in federal court in Fort Worth, Texas on November 2, and were detained in custody pending their appearance in U.S. District Court in Madison.  No date has been set for their initial appearance in Wisconsin. If convicted, Onuama and Okeke face a maximum penalty of five years in federal prison on the conspiracy charge, 20 years on each of the six wire fraud charges, and a mandatory two years on each of the three identity theft charges.  Federal law requires that any sentence imposed on the identity theft charges be served consecutive to any other penalty imposed.  The charges against the defendants are the result of an investigation by IRS Criminal Investigation.  The prosecution of this case is being handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Graber.

McFarland Man Charged with Distributing & Possessing Child Pornography

Curtis S. Pethley, 60, McFarland, Wis., is charged with distributing a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct.  The indictment alleges that he sent child pornography via Facebook messenger on December 21, 2016. Pethley is also charged with possessing child pornography.  The indictment alleges that on July 11, 2017, he possessed a hard drive containing visual depictions of minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct.  The indictment further alleges that at least one of the depictions involved a prepubescent minor or a minor who had not attained 12 years of age. If convicted, Pethley faces a mandatory minimum penalty of five years and a maximum penalty of 40 years in federal prison on the distribution charge, and a maximum penalty of 20 years in federal prison on the possession charge.  The charges against him are the result of an investigation by the FBI Child Exploitation Task Force and the McFarland Police Department.  The Task Force is comprised of the FBI; Milwaukee and West Allis Police Departments; Sheboygan, Waukesha, and Milwaukee County Sheriffs’ Offices; and Homeland Security Investigations.  The prosecution of this case is being handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Elizabeth Altman.   

Two Wausau Residents Charged with Drug & Money Laundering Crimes 

Xiong Lo, 52, and Ying Lo, 38, both of Wausau, Wis., are charged with conspiracy to possess 50 kilograms or more of marijuana with the intent to distribute.  The indictment alleges that the conspiracy operated from January 2015 to July 2015. The indictment also charges Xiong Lo and Ying Lo with possessing marijuana on July 2, 2015, with the intent to distribute, and with two counts of money laundering.  The indictment alleges that the defendants engaged in a monetary transaction of greater than $10,000, using the proceeds from their marijuana distribution scheme to purchase real property in California on January 8, 2015, and to purchase real property in Florida on June 5, 2015.   Xiong Lo and Ying Lo are husband and wife.   If convicted, the defendants face a maximum penalty of 20 years in federal prison on the conspiracy charge, five years on the possession with intent to distribute charge, and 10 years on each of the money laundering charges.  The charges against them are the result of an investigation by the Wisconsin Department of Justice Division of Criminal Investigation, IRS Criminal Investigation, Marathon County Sheriff’s Department, and Wausau Police Department.  The prosecution of this case is being handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney David Reinhard.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JFBa9_TypW_2Wrk26uOjRa9RTjANtneawnke-D8qT78
  Last Updated: 2024-03-25 22:26:13 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The number of days from the earlier of filing date or first appearance date to proceeding date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from proceeding date to disposition date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from disposition date to sentencing date
Format: N3

Description: The code of the district office where the case was terminated
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant at the time the case was closed
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense that carried the most severe disposition and penalty under which the defendant was disposed
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A code indicating whether the prison sentence associated with TTITLE1 was concurrent or consecutive in relation to the other counts in the indictment or information or multiple counts of the same charge
Format: A4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE1
Format: N8

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense under which the defendant was disposed that carried the second most severe disposition and penalty
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE2
Format: N4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE2
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE2
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE2
Format: N8

Description: The total prison time for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and prison time was imposed
Format: N4

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Date of Announcement: Nov 15, 2017
Arrest Start Date: Nov 15, 2017
Arrest End Date: November 15, 2017
Photo: N
Arrested: 1
Rescued: Unknown
Country: US
State: WI
Arresting Agencies Involved: 7
Comments: CP related charges
Additional data courtesy @ArrestAnon 👼  
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E