Score:   1
Docket Number:   WD-WA  2:19-cr-00246
Case Name:   USA v. Lauofo
  Press Releases:
Seattle –A 39-year-old Tacoma resident pleaded guilty today in U.S. District Court in Seattle to wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, and embezzlement of mail by a postal employee.  ILIGANOA THERESA LAUOFO illegally collected more than $267,000 over the course of a fraud scheme that began in 2011 and continued until 2018.  LAUOFO is scheduled to be sentenced by U.S. District Judge Richard A. Jones on April 17, 2020.

According to records in the case, LAUOFO lied about her household composition and income, used stolen identities to claim additional benefits and open bank and credit accounts, and stole checks from the mail during a period when she was employed by the U.S. Postal Service.  Between April 2011 and December 2018, LAUOFO applied for welfare benefits, including food, childcare, and income assistance, by claiming her husband did not live with the family, and submitted falsified documents to bolster that claim.  Had her husband’s income been counted, she would not have qualified for the assistance she received.  In addition to the benefits claimed in her own name, LAUOFO applied for and received additional benefits in stolen identities of friends and family members.  Across those various identities, LAUOFO also stole and misused the identity information of 13 minor children who lived in American Samoa, claiming they resided with her (or her alternate identities) when they did not.  By claiming these children, she received additional food and childcare benefits.  In all, LAUOFO fraudulently received $222,294 in benefits.  

LAUOFO falsely claimed the children on her tax filings, resulting in over $35,000 in tax credits and refunds that she did not deserve.

The fraud did not end with stolen benefits.  LAUOFO used some of the identities she stole to open bank and credit accounts.  She opened one of those accounts in the name of her ex-husband three years after he died, and deposited worthless checks in the bank account and quickly withdrew cash before the bank realized the fraud.  More than $10,000 in loss resulted from that conduct.

Finally, in March 2018, when LAUOFO was employed by the U.S. Postal Service as a letter carrier, she stole and deposited checks from the mail she was assigned to deliver.  She deposited the checks into an account in the name of one of the identities she had stolen in the benefits fraud scheme.  Later, in April 2018, LAUOFO discarded and destroyed more than 200 pieces of mail, later admitting she threw the mail in a dumpster so she could complete her route more quickly.

Wire fraud is punishable by up to 20 years in prison and embezzlement by a postal employee is punishable by up to five years in prison.  Aggravated identity theft is punishable by a mandatory consecutive two-year prison term to follow any punishment imposed on the other counts of conviction.  The ultimate sentence will be determined by the Court based on the advisory Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

The case is being investigated by the Social Security Administration Office of Inspector General (SSA-OIG), Washington State Department of Social and Health Services Office of Fraud and Accountability (DSHS/OFA), and the United States Postal Service Office of Inspector General (USPS-OIG).

The case is being prosecuted by Special Assistant United States Attorney Benjamin Diggs.  Mr. Diggs is an attorney with the Social Security Administration, specially designated to prosecute fraud cases in federal court.

Seattle – A 39-year-old Tacoma resident was charged today in an indictment alleging wire fraud, theft of public funds, Social Security number misuse, aggravated identity theft, and embezzlement of mail by a postal employee.  The indictment alleges ILIGANOA THERESA LAUOFO illegally collected more than $230,000 over the course of a fraud scheme that began in 2011 and continued until 2018.  LAUOFO will make her initial appearance on December 5, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Seattle.

According to the indictment, LAUOFO lied about her household composition and income, used stolen identities to claim additional benefits and open bank and credit accounts, and stole checks from the mail during a period when she was employed by the U.S. Postal Service.  Between April 2011 and December 2018, LAUOFO applied for welfare benefits, including food and income assistance, by claiming her husband did not live with the family.  LAUOFO submitted falsified documents to bolster the claim that her husband lived elsewhere.  Had her husband’s income been counted, she would not have qualified for the assistance she received.  LAUOFO also stole and misused the identity information of minor children who lived in American Samoa, claiming they resided with her when they did not.  By claiming these children, she received additional food and childcare benefits.  LAUOFO submitted forged letters from doctors and landlords to support her claim that the children resided with her.

Additionally, starting in 2015, LAUOFO used the identity information of two family members residing in California and an acquaintance in American Samoa to receive additional benefits including food assistance, cash assistance, and childcare funds.  She claimed still more children—again, actually living in American Samoa—were residing with her under these three false identities and created letters and documents to bolster those claims as well.  All told, LAUOFO received more than $220,000 from this scheme to which she was not entitled.

The alleged fraud did not end with stolen benefits.  LAUOFO used the identities she stole to open bank and credit accounts.  She opened one of those accounts in the name of her ex-husband three years after he died.  She deposited worthless checks in the bank account and quickly withdrew cash before the bank realized the fraud.  More than $10,000 in loss resulted from that conduct.

Finally, in March 2018, when LAUOFO was employed by the U.S. Postal Service as a letter carrier, she stole and deposited two checks from the mail she was assigned to deliver.  She deposited the checks into an account in the name of one of the identities she had stolen in the benefits fraud scheme.

LAUOFO is charged with six counts of wire fraud, four counts of theft of public funds, three counts of Social Security number misuse, three counts of aggravated identity theft and one count of embezzlement of mail by a postal employee.

Wire fraud is punishable by up to 20 years in prison.  Theft of public funds is punishable by up to ten years in prison.  Social Security number misuse and embezzlement by a postal employee are each punishable by up to five years in prison.  Aggravated identity theft is punishable by a mandatory consecutive two-year prison term to follow any punishment imposed on the other counts of conviction.

The charges contained in the indictment are only allegations.  A person is presumed innocent unless and until he or she is proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

The case is being investigated by the Social Security Administration Office of Inspector General (SSA-OIG), Washington State Department of Social and Health Services Office of Fraud and Accountability (DSHS/OFA), and the United States Postal Service Office of Inspector General (USPS-OIG).The case is being prosecuted by Special Assistant United States Attorney Benjamin Diggs.  Mr. Diggs is an attorney with the Social Security Administration, specially designated to prosecute fraud cases in federal court.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1o8PJxvkjVOknmdwqAmcU6yXt29b_KHUGg26_3ZLr1fc
  Last Updated: 2023-10-23 08:32:42 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E