Score:   1
Docket Number:   WD-OK  5:18-cr-00011
Case Name:   United States of America v. Foust
  Press Releases:
OKLAHOMA CITY – JUSTIN LANE FOUST, 43, of Sulphur, Oklahoma, has been sentenced to 121 months in prison for wire fraud, money laundering, and aggravated identity theft in connection with fraud against Chesapeake Energy, announced U.S. Attorney Timothy J. Downing.

According to an 11-count indictment filed on January 16, 2018, Foust was employed by Chesapeake Operating, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Chesapeake Energy Corporation, from April 2002 until September 2011.  In July 2011, Foust formed Platinum Express, LLC, which became an approved vendor for Chesapeake Operating in October of that year.  The indictment alleged that from October 2011 until July 2014, Chesapeake Operating contracted with Platinum Express primarily to transport waste water to disposal facilities in western Oklahoma.

On February 5, 2019, a jury convicted Foust on 8 out of 11 counts of defrauding Chesapeake Operating by causing Platinum Express to submit false invoices for services it did not perform.  In particular, Foust created fraudulent work tickets for steaming production equipment, dirt berm work, plating tanks, hauling rock, repairing cattle guards, blading lease roads, and other services.  He generated many fraudulent invoices for amounts just under $5,000, which he knew from his prior work with Chesapeake Operating required a lower level of approval for processing and payment.  The trial evidence established he forged the signature and employee identification number a Chesapeake Operating employee on each invoice to ensure Chesapeake Operating’s accounting department would process them.  This conduct qualifies as aggravated identity theft.  He further caused these work tickets and invoices to be submitted through interstate wire communications to Oildex, the Denver, Colorado, company that processed the claims on behalf of Chesapeake Operating.

Today U.S. District Judge Stephen P. Friot sentenced Foust to 121 months in prison, to be followed by three years of supervised release, during which he must perform 104 hours of community service.  This sentence includes a mandatory minimum two-year sentence for aggravated identity theft.  It also takes into account the court’s finding that Foust obstructed justice by using civil lawsuits as a diversionary tactic to inculpate others, destroyed evidence, staged a fake break-in of the Platinum Express office, and provided false information to law enforcement.

The court also ordered Foust to pay $2,646,207.22 in restitution and $4,345,619.00 in forfeiture, which represents the proceeds he received from the offense as noticed in the indictment.

This case is the result of an investigation by the Oklahoma Economic and Identity Crimes Task Force, which is composed of the United States Secret Service, the FBI, IRS–Criminal Investigations, Homeland Security Investigations, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, the Oklahoma Highway Patrol, the Oklahoma City Police Department, the Edmond Police Department, the Moore Police Department, and the Norman Police Department.  The case agents hail from FBI and IRS–Criminal Investigations.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jessica L. Perry, Amanda Green, and Tom Snyder prosecuted the case.

Reference is made to court filings for further information.

OKLAHOMA CITY – A jury has convicted JUSTIN LANE FOUST, 42, of Sulphur, Oklahoma, of wire fraud, money laundering, and aggravated identity theft in connection with fraud against Chesapeake Energy, announced Robert J. Troester of the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

According to an 11-count indictment filed on January 16, 2018, Foust was employed by Chesapeake Operating, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Chesapeake Energy Corporation, from April 2002 until September 2011.  In July 2011, Foust formed Platinum Express, LLC, which became an approved vendor for Chesapeake Operating in October of that year.  The indictment alleged that from October 2011 until July 2014, Chesapeake Operating contracted with Platinum Express primarily to transport waste water to disposal facilities in western Oklahoma.

Trial began on January 28, 2019.  Over the course of six trial days, the evidence showed Foust defrauded Chesapeake Operating by causing Platinum Express to submit false invoices for services it did not perform.  In particular, he created fraudulent work tickets for steam cleaning, dirt berm work, plating tanks, hauling rock, repairing fence, supplying sand separators, and other services.  He generated many fraudulent invoices for amounts just under $5,000, which he knew from his prior work with Chesapeake Operating required a lower level of approval for processing and payment.  The trial evidence established he forged the signature and employee identification number of certain Chesapeake Operating employees to ensure Chesapeake Operating’s accounting department would process the invoices.  He further caused these work tickets and invoices to be submitted through interstate wire communications to Oildex, the Denver, Colorado, company that processed the claims on behalf of Chesapeake Operating.

Alleging eight counts of wire fraud, the indictment stated Foust was responsible for over 1,100 fraudulent invoices, which generated over $4.3 million in Chesapeake Operating payments to which Platinum Express was not entitled.  Foust was also charged with two counts of aggravated identity theft based on his alleged use of the names and employee identification numbers of other people without their consent.  Finally, he was charged with one count of laundering money by transferring $43,857.09 to pay for Platinum Express payroll, after at least $10,000 of that transfer had been derived from wire fraud.

Today the jury returned guilty verdicts on six counts of wire fraud, one count of aggravated identity theft, and one count of money laundering.  It was unable to reach a unanimous verdict on the two remaining counts of wire fraud and the other count of aggravated identity theft.

Sentencing will take place in approximately ninety days.  Foust could be imprisoned for a maximum of twenty years on each of the wire-fraud convictions, to be followed by three years of supervised release.  Aggravated identity theft carries a mandatory minimum sentence of two years in prison, in addition to any other sentence of imprisonment.  The money-laundering conviction could result in a sentence of ten years in prison, followed by three years of supervised release.  Foust could also be fined up to $250,000 on each count and would be subject to mandatory restitution and to a forfeiture money judgment in the amount of the proceeds of the fraud, which the indictment alleges to be $4,345,619.00.

This case is the result of an investigation by the Oklahoma Economic and Identity Crimes Task Force, which is composed of the United States Secret Service, the FBI, IRS–Criminal Investigations, Homeland Security Investigations, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, the Oklahoma Highway Patrol, the Oklahoma City Police Department, the Edmond Police Department, the Moore Police Department, and the Norman Police Department.  The case agents hail from FBI and IRS–Criminal Investigations.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jessica L. Perry, Amanda Green, and Tom Snyder are prosecuting the case.

Reference is made to court filings for further information.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma – A federal grand jury has charged JUSTIN LANE FOUST, 41, of Sulphur, Oklahoma, with defrauding Chesapeake Energy of more than $4 million through fraudulent invoices, announced Mark A. Yancey, U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Oklahoma.

 

According to an 11-count indictment unsealed this afternoon, Foust was employed by Chesapeake Operating, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Chesapeake Energy Corporation, from April 2002 until September 2011.  In July 2011, Foust formed Platinum Express, LLC, which became an approved vendor for Chesapeake Operating in October of that year.  The indictment alleges that Chesapeake Operating contracted with Platinum Express primarily to transport waste water to disposal facilities in western Oklahoma.

 

Foust is charged with defrauding Chesapeake Operating by causing Platinum Express to submit false invoices for services it did not perform.  In particular, the indictment alleges he created fraudulent work tickets for steam cleaning, dirt berm work, plating trucks, hauling rock, repairing fence, supplying sand separators, and other services.  He allegedly generated many fraudulent invoices for amounts just under $5,000, which he knew from his prior work with Chesapeake Operating required a lower level of approval for processing and payment.  According to the indictment, he either forged or electronically copied and pasted the signature and employee identification number of certain Chesapeake Operating employees to ensure that Chesapeake Operating’s accounting department would process the invoices.  He further caused these work tickets and invoices to be submitted through interstate wire communications to Oildex, the Denver, Colorado, company that processed the claims on behalf of Chesapeake Operating.

 

The indictment alleges Foust submitted over 1,100 fraudulent invoices, which generated over $4.3 million in Chesapeake Operating payments to which Platinum Express was not entitled.

 

In addition to eight counts of wire fraud, Foust is charged with two counts of aggravated identity theft and one count of laundering money by transferring $43,857.09 to pay for Platinum Express payroll, after at least $10,000 of that transfer had been derived from fraud.

 

If convicted, Foust could be imprisoned for a maximum of twenty years on each of the eight wire-fraud counts, to be followed by three years of supervised release.  Each of the two counts of aggravated identity theft would carry a mandatory minimum sentence of two years in prison, followed by a year of supervised release.  The money-laundering count could lead to a sentence of ten years in prison, followed by three years of supervised release.  He could also be fined up to $250,000 on each count and would be subject to mandatory restitution.

  

The public is reminded these charges are merely accusations and that Foust is presumed innocent unless found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt by a unanimous jury.

 

This case is the result of an investigation by the Oklahoma City Economic and Identity Crimes Task Force, which is composed of the United State Secret Service, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, IRS–Criminal Investigations, Homeland Security Investigations, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, Oklahoma Highway Patrol, the Oklahoma City Police Department, the Edmond Police Department, the Moore Police Department, and the Norman Police Department.  Assistant U.S. Attorney Jessica L. Perry is prosecuting the case.

 

Reference is made to court filings for further information.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15hUAjUJqzNKZ96cRCkXi5Q_T3mKm0_8r10I9W8TQG1Q
  Last Updated: 2024-04-10 03:27:00 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E