Score:   1
Docket Number:   WD-NC  3:18-cr-00096
Case Name:   USA v. Barron et al
  Press Releases:
CHARLOTTE, N.C. – Stanley Reginald Barron, 37, of Cornelius, N.C. and his co-conspirator, Kimberlie L. Flemings, 49, of Mt. Holly, N.C., were indicted on federal charges in connection with a $1 million bank loan scheme, announced R. Andrew Murray, U.S. Attorney for the Western District of North Carolina.  A third person, Brian Lyles, 46, formerly of Jersey City, New Jersey, was also charged separately for his role in the conspiracy. 

U.S. Attorney Murray is joined in making today’s announcement by David M. McGinnis, Inspector in Charge of the Charlotte Division of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS), and Steven Perez, Special Agent in Charge of the Northeast Region of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Office of Inspector General (FHFA-OIG).

According to the charging documents and court proceedings, from at least 2012 to 2015, Barron, Flemings, Lyles and others executed a fraudulent scheme to obtain automobile and personal loans from at least 19 financial institutions. The co-conspirators submitted dozens of fraudulent loan applications in their names, and the names of at least 30 other individuals, to at least 19 banks and credit unions.  As a result of the fraudulent scheme, the indictment alleges that the three defendants obtained more than $1 million in fraudulent loan proceeds.

According to allegations contained in the charging documents, Barron, Flemings and Lyles submitted the fraudulent loan applications for individuals they had recruited, falsely stating the loans would be used to purchase automobiles, among other things.  Many of the recruited loan applicants had negative information in their credit histories which made getting legitimate loans difficult. Because of this, Barron and others fraudulently “cleaned” or “repaired” the credit reports of certain loan applicants to improve the chances of obtaining a loan from the banks and credit unions. For example, the indictment alleges, Barron and Flemings filed police reports online in the names of certain loan applicants, falsely claiming that the loan applicants were victims of identity theft and that the negative items on their credit reports were due to the identity theft.  Barron, Flemings and others also submitted falsified supporting documents with the loan applications, including false employment and income information.

The indictment alleges that to further execute the scheme, Barron and his co-conspirators created fake automobile dealerships that purported to be the sellers of vehicles purchased with the fraudulent loans. They also set up bank accounts, websites, and addresses associated with these fake automobile dealerships and created fictitious purchase orders which were submitted to the financial institutions as part of the loan application. 

According to allegations contained in court documents, Barron, Flemings and Lyles deposited the fraudulently-obtained checks from the financial institutions into accounts Barron controlled. After keeping a portion of the fraudulent loan proceeds, Barron distributed the rest to his co-conspirators. In this manner, Barron and others obtained more than 25 checks, totaling more than $1 million, from at least 12 financial institutions.

Court documents allege that after Barron and others obtained the proceeds from the fraudulent loans, the majority of the loans defaulted, causing losses to the impacted financial institutions.  To cover up the fraud, Barron and others made false statements to the defrauded banks and credit unions that attempted to collect on the debts, including that borrowers had been the victims of identity theft and that they had not authorized the loans.

Baron, Flemings and Lyles are charged with one count of conspiracy to commit wire and bank fraud.  Barron and Flemings are also each charged with wire fraud affecting financial institutions and nine counts of financial institution fraud.  Barron also faces a money laundering conspiracy charge.

An indictment is merely an accusation, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.  The wire and bank fraud conspiracy charge carries a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and a $1,000,000 fine. The wire fraud affecting financial institutions charge carries a maximum prison term of 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.  Each of the nine financial institution fraud charges carry a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison and a $1,000,000 fine. The money laundering conspiracy charge carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 Fine.

USPIS and FHFA-OIG led the investigation.  Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Ryan of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Charlotte is in charge of the prosecution. 

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1msbnAB32NVILYq8LU3F8Aojqw6f_qzJA0YF6MEFNfvs
  Last Updated: 2024-04-10 03:04:46 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E