Score:   1
Docket Number:   WD-MI  1:19-cr-00119
Case Name:   USA v. Boeve et al
  Press Releases:
Matthew Boeve Organized and Led a Methamphetamine Distribution Conspiracy In Holland and Threatened Cooperating Witnesses on Facebook

          GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN — U.S. Attorney Andrew Birge announced today that on January 24, 2020, Matthew James Boeve, 30, of Holland, Michigan, was sentenced to serve 235 months in the Federal Bureau of Prisons for conspiring to distribute methamphetamine, and 120 months for aiding and abetting obstruction of justice. He will serve the terms concurrently. U.S. District Judge Paul L. Maloney also imposed a 5-year period of supervised release. In sentencing Boeve, Judge Maloney noted the harm methamphetamine distribution causes to the community and families, and that Boeve’s obstructive conduct struck at the heart of the justice system.

          On September 3, 2019, Boeve pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine and endeavoring to influence, obstruct, or impede the due administration of justice by publicizing the names of witnesses in the underlying drug prosecution in an attempt to impede their testimony. Specifically, Boeve organized and led the conspiracy by selling methamphetamine, and by directing others to sell methamphetamine on his behalf. Additionally, while in custody awaiting trial on federal drug charges, Boeve directed others to publish and post to Facebook lists of witness names, and photographs of police reports with the names of witnesses underlined. The threatening posts caused at least one cooperating witness to contact law enforcement, fearing retaliation for his or her cooperation in the methamphetamine conspiracy prosecution.

          In announcing the sentence, U.S. Attorney Birge stated, “West Michigan has recently seen an increase in the distribution of methamphetamine, which is an extremely dangerous drug that destroys lives. Those who choose to sell methamphetamine are on notice that it will result in serious consequences.” Regarding Boeve’s sentence for obstruction of justice, U.S. Attorney Birge reiterated law enforcement’s commitment to protecting witnesses: “Witnesses who come forward to testify in criminal prosecutions play a vital role in our justice system. When we work with witnesses, we make their safety a priority. Any threats, harassment, or attempts to obstruct or prevent their testimony will be met with serious consequences, including years in federal prison.”

          “The West Michigan Enforcement Team (WEMET) is attacking the distribution of crystal methamphetamine head on,” stated D/F/Lt. Andy Fias, WEMET Section Commander. “In addition, we take the safety of all those who wish to cooperate very seriously, providing added protection when needed, and we seek prosecution of those individuals who threaten or cause them harm. The Boeve case is yet another great example of the cooperative efforts of law enforcement in West Michigan.”

          Boeve is the last defendant to be sentenced in this methamphetamine distribution conspiracy and obstruction of justice prosecution. The Court previously sentenced co-defendants Philip Noah Bell to 70 months in prison and Kayde Joseph Metzler to 37 months in prison for their roles in the drug conspiracy, and co-defendant Mark Adrian Baker to 63 months in prison for his role in the obstruction of justice offense.

          The Holland Police Department, the West Michigan Enforcement Team (WEMET) of the Michigan State Police, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) investigated the case. Assistant United States Attorney Daniel T. McGraw prosecuted the case.

###

Mark Baker Used Facebook to Publicize and Threaten Cooperating Witnesses in a Methamphetamine Trafficking Conspiracy Prosecution

          GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN — U.S. Attorney Andrew B. Birge announced today that on December 16, 2019, Mark Adrian Baker, 27, of Holland, Michigan, was sentenced to serve 63 months in the Federal Bureau of Prisons for aiding and abetting obstruction of justice. U.S. District Judge Paul L. Maloney also imposed a 3-year period of supervised release. In sentencing Baker, Judge Maloney made clear that this was a serious offense that threatened the very essence of the federal criminal justice system.

          On July 31, 2019, Baker pleaded guilty to endeavoring to influence, obstruct, or impede the due administration of justice by publicizing the names of witnesses in an underlying methamphetamine trafficking conspiracy prosecution in a corrupt effort to impede their testimony. Specifically, at the direction of the methamphetamine trafficking conspiracy’s leader, Matthew James Boeve, who was in custody at the Newaygo County Jail awaiting trial on federal drug charges, Baker posted to Facebook lists of witness names, and photographs of police reports with the names of witnesses underlined and with the following captions:

          "LETS PLAY A GAME… HOW MANY SNITCHES DOES IT TAKE TO CATCH Matt Boeve??? READ THE DAMN FACTS AND STOP BEING SOME DAMN TWACKS!!!! #freemattboeve #doingitright #snitchbitches"

          "Share and tag so my boy boeve ppls can all see this bullshit in the papers on his case… [wink emoji] [rat emoji] #freemattboeve … #breathlessly … #goviralwithit"

          The threatening posts caused at least one cooperating witness to contact law enforcement, fearing retaliation for his or her cooperation in the methamphetamine conspiracy prosecution. The posts are shown below, but with the government having subsequently obscured the witness names.

          In announcing the sentence, U.S. Attorney Birge stated, "Witnesses who come forward to testify in criminal prosecutions play a vital role in our justice system. When we work with witnesses, we make their safety a priority. Any threats, harassment, or attempts to obstruct or prevent their testimony will be met with serious consequences, including years in federal prison."

          "WEMET takes witness safety and protection very seriously," said D/F/Lt. Andy Fias, WEMET Section Commander. "We appreciate the swift action taken by the U.S. Attorney’s Office – Western District of Michigan in assisting us in this investigation. This case brought another organization to justice, responsible for trafficking large quantities of crystal methamphetamine into west Michigan. It is just another great example of the partnership we have with our federal partners in law enforcement."

          On September 3, 2019, Boeve pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine, and aiding and abetting obstruction of justice for his role in the threatening Facebook posts. Boeve is scheduled to be sentenced on January 6, 2020, and faces a mandatory minimum term of 10 years in prison and a maximum term of life in prison.

          The Holland Police Department, the West Michigan Enforcement Team (WEMET) of the Michigan State Police, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) investigated this case and the underlying methamphetamine trafficking conspiracy. Assistant United States Attorney Daniel T. McGraw prosecuted the case.

 





Facebook





 





Facebook





 

 

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QoUVpsOto0MvOb9m27S69JoRn18d1SAcbiSjZUg29F4
  Last Updated: 2024-04-14 04:15:47 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   WD-MI  1:19-mj-00102
Case Name:   USA v. Boeve
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19CHKFcEOFIYTG2lSHeZ8VFIaFtGRbBpwtfju_ayo4dU
  Last Updated: 2024-04-14 04:13:44 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E