Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-NY  1:19-cr-00328
Case Name:   USA v. Estrada Orellana et al
  Press Releases:
Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced today that MARIO AMILCAR ESTRADA ORELLANA (“ESTRADA”), was sentenced to 180 months in prison for participating in a conspiracy to import and distribute tons of cocaine to the United States.  ESTRADA previously pled guilty to participating in a cocaine importation conspiracy before United States District Judge Jed S. Rakoff, who also imposed today’s sentence.

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said:  “Mario Estrada conspired to solicit Sinaloa Cartel money to finance a corrupt scheme to get him elected president of Guatemala.  Estrada promised to assist the cartel to export tons of cocaine into the U.S., and he attempted to arrange the assassinations of political rivals.  Thanks to the DEA, rather than a shot at the presidency in Guatemala, Estrada is headed to prison in the United States.”

According to the allegations in the Indictment to which ESTRADA pled guilty, public court filings, and statements made in court:

While he was running for president of Guatemala in 2018 and 2019, ESTRADA attempted to solicit funding from international drug cartels to support ESTRADA’s presidential campaign (the “Estrada Campaign”).  During certain of these negotiations, members of the Estrada Conspiracy, including ESTRADA and his co-defendant, Juan Pablo Gonzalez Mayorga (“Gonzalez”), interacted with purported members and associates of the Sinaloa Cartel – a powerful international drug-trafficking organization based in Mexico – who were, in fact, confidential sources (the “CSes”) acting at the Drug Enforcement Administration’s (“DEA”) direction.  At times during the course of his negotiations with the CSes, ESTRADA was polling in the top five of candidates for the Guatemalan presidency.    

During the course of their meetings and other communications with the CSes, some of which were video and audio recorded, ESTRADA and Gonzalez requested millions of dollars in drug proceeds from the Sinaloa Cartel to support the Estrada Campaign.  In exchange for financial support from the Sinaloa Cartel, ESTRADA and Gonzalez promised that if ESTRADA was elected president of Guatemala, ESTRADA would provide Guatemalan state-sponsored support to the Sinaloa Cartel’s drug-trafficking activities.  Among other things, ESTRADA and Gonzalez agreed to provide the Sinaloa Cartel with unfettered access to Guatemalan airports and maritime shipping locations so that the cartel could transport ton quantities of cocaine through Guatemala and ultimately into the United States.  ESTRADA also offered to appoint members of the Sinaloa Cartel to high-ranking government positions in Guatemala so that the CSes would be positioned to advance the Sinaloa Cartel’s drug-trafficking activities.  ESTRADA also agreed that he would receive a portion of the profits made by the Sinaloa Cartel on the cocaine it transited through Guatemala under his protection.  Throughout, ESTRADA believed he was negotiating with representatives from the leadership of the Sinaloa Cartel. 

In addition, during the course of his meetings with the CSes, ESTRADA bragged of his other drug cartel connections.  More specifically, ESTRADA stated that the Jalisco Nuevo Generación cartel in Jalisco, Mexico, had offered him financial support in connection with his campaign, and also boasted that he was working with a drug trafficker in Guatemala who was supporting his bid for president.  Further, at various times during their negotiations with the CSes, ESTRADA and Gonzalez also directed the CSes to hire hitmen to assassinate political rivals and their associates to ensure that ESTRADA was elected president of Guatemala.  In particular, ESTRADA and Gonzalez identified specific targets by name and agreed to provide the hitmen with firearms, including AK-47s, to carry out the murders.

*                *                *

In addition to his prison term, ESTRADA, 59, of Guatemala City, Guatemala, was sentenced to four years of supervised release.

Mr. Berman praised the outstanding efforts of the DEA’s Miami Field Office and its Guatemala Country Office, as well as the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs.

This case is being handled by the Office’s Terrorism and International Narcotics Unit.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Mathew Laroche and Jason A. Richman are in charge of the prosecution.

Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Adolphus P. Wright, Special Agent in Charge of the Miami Division of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”), announced today that Guatemalan presidential candidate MARIO AMILCAR ESTRADA ORELLANA (“ESTRADA”) and JUAN PABLO GONZALEZ MAYORGA (“GONZALEZ”) have been charged in Manhattan federal court with conspiring to import cocaine into the United States and a related weapons offense of conspiring to use and possess machineguns.  ESTRADA and GONZALEZ were arrested earlier today in Miami, Florida, and will appear tomorrow before United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman in Miami federal court. 

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said:  “As alleged, Estrada and Gonzalez conspired to solicit Sinaloa Cartel money to finance a corrupt scheme to elect Estrada president of Guatemala.  In return, the two allegedly promised to assist the cartel in using Guatemalan ports and airports to export tons of cocaine into the U.S.  As further alleged, Estrada and Gonzalez attempted to arrange the assassinations of political rivals.  Thanks to the DEA, Estrada stands no chance of election in Guatemala, but he and Gonzalez face justice in the United States.”

DEA Special Agent in Charge Adolphus P. Wright said:  “The DEA Miami Field Division is very happy with the arrests of Mario Estrada Orellana and Juan Gonzalez Mayorga.  Today’s action is the direct result of the strong partnership with our Guatemalan counterparts.  Together with our international law enforcement partners, we will continue our efforts to keep illegal drug trafficking from corrupting the just political systems of our Central and South American neighbors, as we also endeavor to prevent such activity from harming the United States.”

As alleged in the Complaint unsealed today in federal court:[1]

Since in or about December 2018, the DEA has been investigating several individuals (the “Estrada Conspiracy”) who attempted to solicit funding from international drug cartels to support ESTRADA’s presidential campaign (the “Estrada Campaign”).  During certain of these negotiations, members of the Estrada Conspiracy, including ESTRADA and GONZALEZ, interacted with purported members and associates of the Sinaloa Cartel – a powerful international drug-trafficking organization based in Mexico – who were, in fact, confidential sources (the “CSes”) acting at the DEA’s direction. 

During the course of these meetings and other communications, some of which were video and audio recorded, ESTRADA and GONZALEZ requested millions of dollars in drug proceeds from the Sinaloa Cartel to support the Estrada Campaign.  In exchange for financial support from the Sinaloa Cartel, ESTRADA and GONZALEZ agreed that if ESTRADA were elected president of Guatemala, ESTRADA would provide Guatemalan state-sponsored support to the Sinaloa Cartel’s drug trafficking activities.  Among other things, ESTRADA and GONZALEZ agreed to provide the Sinaloa Cartel with unfettered access to Guatemalan airports and maritime shipping locations so that the cartel could transport ton quantities of cocaine through Guatemala and ultimately into the United States.  ESTRADA also offered to appoint members of the Sinaloa Cartel to high-ranking government positions in Guatemala so that the CSes would be positioned to advance the Sinaloa Cartel’s drug trafficking activities. 

ESTRADA and GONZALEZ also directed the CSes to hire hitmen to assassinate political rivals to ensure that ESTRADA was elected president of Guatemala.  In particular, ESTRADA and GONZALEZ identified specific targets by name and agreed to provide the hitmen with firearms, including AK-47s, to carry out the murders.[2]

Origins of the Estrada Conspiracy

On or about January 6, 2019, one of the CSes (“CS-1”) met with GONZALEZ at his office in the vicinity of Guatemala City, Guatemala (the “January 6 Meeting”).  During the January 6 Meeting, GONZALEZ explained to CS-1, in substance and in part, that GONZALEZ was an active member of a political party in Guatemala (“Party-1”), and that Party-1’s presidential candidate was ESTRADA.  GONZALEZ told CS-1 that the Estrada Campaign needed drug cartel funding to compete in the upcoming presidential election, and he asked if CS-1 knew of any drug cartels that would be interested in providing such funding.  GONZALEZ also stated that ESTRADA, if elected president of Guatemala, would use various government agencies to support the cartel’s drug trafficking activities in Guatemala.  For example, GONZALEZ told CS-1 that, if a drug cartel provided funding to the Estrada Campaign and ESTRADA won, the Cartel would have direct influence on the appointed secretaries of the Interior, which oversees the police, and Defense, which oversees the military.         

The next day, CS-1 met with GONZALEZ and ESTRADA in the vicinity of Guatemala City (the “January 10 Meeting”).   During the January 10 Meeting, CS-1 told ESTRADA that CS-1’s contacts in the Sinaloa Cartel could provide funding, but that the cartel had concerns about whether ESTRADA could provide the cartel with access to the Government of Guatemala.  ESTRADA responded that, if elected president, ESTRADA would appoint members of the Sinaloa Cartel to the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Defense, and to positions controlling Guatemala’s seaports and airports.  ESTRADA also asked that CS-1 provide the names of three potential candidates for each position so ESTRADA could choose between them. 

The Defendants Meet Purported Sinaloa Cartel Representative CS-2

On or about February 7, 2019, GONZALEZ met with CS-1 and a second confidential source involved in this investigation (“CS-2”) in the vicinity of Guatemala City (the “February 7 Meeting”).   The February 7 Meeting was audio and video recorded.  During the February 7 Meeting, GONZALEZ asked, in substance and in part, whether CS-1 and CS-2 could assassinate certain other political rivals who were threats to win the election.  GONZALEZ stated that it “wouldn’t be difficult” to kill a particular candidate because the candidate was “hated,” but cautioned that another candidate was “well protected.”  GONZALEZ also stated that the Estrada Campaign “would pay you to do it” if the CSes carried out the requested murders.

The following day, on or about February 8, 2019, ESTRADA and GONZALEZ met with CS-1 and CS-2 in the vicinity of Guatemala City (the “February 8 Meeting”).  This meeting was audio and video recorded.  During the February 8 Meeting, ESTRADA told CS-1 and CS-2 that he could win the election if the Sinaloa Cartel provided the Estrada Campaign with approximately 10 to 12 million U.S. dollars.  ESTRADA explained that he needed to deliver a sizeable amount of money to each of the 22 districts in Guatemala so that he could obtain the necessary votes in each district and that he was planning to hire an individual for approximately $2 million to help build the Estrada Campaign’s online presence.

CS-2 stated that, in exchange for the drug money, CS-2 wanted ESTRADA to help the Sinaloa Cartel transport cocaine through airports in Guatemala.  CS-2 estimated that the Sinaloa Cartel would send approximately six cocaine-laden airplanes per month through Guatemala, each of which would carry multiple tons of cocaine, and that CS-2 would pay ESTRADA 10 percent of the approximate value of cocaine on each plane.  ESTRADA agreed to assist the Sinaloa Cartel’s activities in exchange for campaign financing as proposed by CS-2.  GONZALEZ and ESTRADA also again discussed assassinating political rivals, and ESTRADA provided CS-2 with the names of two individuals who were potential targets.  ESTRADA also identified one individual to target first, and he noted that this assassination would be easy to complete because the target had many enemies in Guatemala.  

February 2019 Meetings in Florida and Guatemala

On or about February 14, 2019, GONZALEZ met with CS-2 and an undercover officer (“UC-1”) in an undercover DEA warehouse (the “Warehouse”) in Florida (the “February 14 Meeting”).  This meeting was audio and video recorded.  During the February 14 Meeting, CS-2 introduced UC-1 to GONZALEZ as a hitman who was available for hire to carry out the assassinations proposed by GONZALEZ and ESTRADA. 

GONZALEZ then discussed with CS-2 and UC-1, in substance and in part, the Estrada Campaign’s desire to assassinate certain political rivals.  GONZALEZ identified the person he thought was easiest “to take out,” and stated that he wanted it done “as fast as possible.”  GONZALEZ also promised to provide CS-2 and UC-1 with more information on their initial targets, and GONZALEZ told them that “we want to see the public reaction after the first two hits” before going forward with the others.  GONZALEZ also told them that he could provide “lots of AK-47s” to carry out the job, and when UC-1 specified that he needed “3 AK-47s and 2 pistols,” GONZALEZ replied that “Mario [ESTRADA] will have everything ready for you.” 

During the meeting, CS-2 and UC-1 also showed GONZALEZ approximately $5 million in supposed drug proceeds for the Estrada Campaign.  GONZALEZ then placed a video call to ESTRADA.  During that call, GONZALEZ handed the phone to CS-2, and CS-2 used GONZALEZ’s phone to show ESTRADA the Warehouse and purported bulk currency in various locations in the Warehouse.     

On or about February 27, 2019, ESTRADA met with CS-1 and CS-2 on an undercover DEA yacht (the “UC Yacht”) in the vicinity of Miami, Florida (the “February 27 Meeting”).  This meeting was audio and video recorded.  During the February 27 Meeting, CS-2 and ESTRADA discussed, among other things, their agreement concerning how ESTRADA would support the Sinaloa Cartel’s drug trafficking if ESTRADA were elected president.  ESTRADA stated, in substance and in part, that he was “convince[d] that I’m going to win [the election]” and that after he won, ESTRADA would support the cartel’s drug trafficking activities in Guatemala.  In particular, ESTRADA agreed to accept the Sinaloa Cartel’s cocaine-laden planes at airports and ports in Guatemala.  ESTRADA also agreed to appoint cartel members to key government positions.  ESTRADA also told CS-2 that he no longer wanted CS-2 and UC-1 to move forward with the proposed assassinations.  ESTRADA explained that someone else was going to assassinate one of the potential targets, and ESTRADA thought it would bring too many problems if they proceeded with the other assassinations. 

March 2019 Meetings in Florida and Guatemala

On or about March 4, 2019, ESTRADA met with another individual (“CC-1”) and CS-1 at ESTRADA’s office in the vicinity of Guatemala City (the “March 4 Meeting”).  This meeting was audio recorded.  During the March 4 Meeting, ESTRADA stated, in substance and in part, that the Estrada Campaign urgently needed funds from the Sinaloa Cartel to pay its expenses.  ESTRADA, CC-1, and CS-1 discussed how they could deliver the Cartel’s money to the Estrada Campaign in Guatemala.  ESTRADA suggested that they use the UC Yacht to transport ESTRADA’s money.  ESTRADA then took out a map, and demonstrated how the UC Yacht could travel from Miami, through Cuba, before arriving in Guatemala.  CC-1 questioned whether law enforcement would detect the UC Yacht, and ESTRADA responded that those risks were mitigated by the fact that the UC Yacht was a luxury yacht, flying the American flag, and sailed by American citizens.  ESTRADA further explained that it might be easier to buy a yacht than to pay the transportation fees they had been discussing. 

On or about March 5, 2019, ESTRADA met again with CC-1 and CS-1 at ESTRADA’s office (the “March 5 Meeting”).  This meeting was audio recorded.  During the March 5 Meeting, ESTRADA stated, in substance and in part, that he was arranging for another crew to get involved to bring the balance of the money from the Sinaloa Cartel to Guatemala because ESTRADA had run out of money himself and his campaign was stalling.  ESTRADA also stated that he was separately working with a drug trafficker based in Guatemala, who was also supporting ESTRADA’s bid for president.  ESTRADA also told CS-1 that he heard that people from another drug cartel wanted to provide ESTRADA with funding as well.

*                *                *

The Complaint charges ESTRADA, 58, and GONZALEZ, 50, in two counts:  (1) conspiring to import cocaine into the United States and (2) conspiring to use and carry machine guns and destructive devices during, and to possess machine guns and destructive devices in furtherance of, the cocaine-importation conspiracy.  If convicted, ESTRADA and GONZALEZ each face a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment and a maximum term of life imprisonment on Count One, and a maximum term of life imprisonment on Count Two.

The potential mandatory minimum and maximum sentences in this case are prescribed by Congress and provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendants will be determined by the judge.

Mr. Berman praised the outstanding efforts of the DEA’s Miami Field Office and its Guatemala Country Office, as well as the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs.

This case is being handled by the Office’s Terrorism and International Narcotics Unit.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Mathew Laroche and Jason A. Richman are in charge of the prosecution.

The charges contained in the Complaint are merely allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. 

 



[1] As the introductory phrase signifies, the entirety of the text of the Complaint and the description of the Complaint set forth herein, constitute only allegations, and every fact described should be treated as an allegation.





[2] The DEA promptly notified local authorities about these threats.





Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fPnaEw_EHR374ouLudRGXc7axCbE5-F1bOvQSiGUNDY
  Last Updated: 2024-04-13 10:42:43 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   SD-NY  1:19-mj-03705
Case Name:   USA v. Estrada Orellana et al
  Press Releases:
Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Adolphus P. Wright, Special Agent in Charge of the Miami Division of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”), announced today that Guatemalan presidential candidate MARIO AMILCAR ESTRADA ORELLANA (“ESTRADA”) and JUAN PABLO GONZALEZ MAYORGA (“GONZALEZ”) have been charged in Manhattan federal court with conspiring to import cocaine into the United States and a related weapons offense of conspiring to use and possess machineguns.  ESTRADA and GONZALEZ were arrested earlier today in Miami, Florida, and will appear tomorrow before United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman in Miami federal court. 

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said:  “As alleged, Estrada and Gonzalez conspired to solicit Sinaloa Cartel money to finance a corrupt scheme to elect Estrada president of Guatemala.  In return, the two allegedly promised to assist the cartel in using Guatemalan ports and airports to export tons of cocaine into the U.S.  As further alleged, Estrada and Gonzalez attempted to arrange the assassinations of political rivals.  Thanks to the DEA, Estrada stands no chance of election in Guatemala, but he and Gonzalez face justice in the United States.”

DEA Special Agent in Charge Adolphus P. Wright said:  “The DEA Miami Field Division is very happy with the arrests of Mario Estrada Orellana and Juan Gonzalez Mayorga.  Today’s action is the direct result of the strong partnership with our Guatemalan counterparts.  Together with our international law enforcement partners, we will continue our efforts to keep illegal drug trafficking from corrupting the just political systems of our Central and South American neighbors, as we also endeavor to prevent such activity from harming the United States.”

As alleged in the Complaint unsealed today in federal court:[1]

Since in or about December 2018, the DEA has been investigating several individuals (the “Estrada Conspiracy”) who attempted to solicit funding from international drug cartels to support ESTRADA’s presidential campaign (the “Estrada Campaign”).  During certain of these negotiations, members of the Estrada Conspiracy, including ESTRADA and GONZALEZ, interacted with purported members and associates of the Sinaloa Cartel – a powerful international drug-trafficking organization based in Mexico – who were, in fact, confidential sources (the “CSes”) acting at the DEA’s direction. 

During the course of these meetings and other communications, some of which were video and audio recorded, ESTRADA and GONZALEZ requested millions of dollars in drug proceeds from the Sinaloa Cartel to support the Estrada Campaign.  In exchange for financial support from the Sinaloa Cartel, ESTRADA and GONZALEZ agreed that if ESTRADA were elected president of Guatemala, ESTRADA would provide Guatemalan state-sponsored support to the Sinaloa Cartel’s drug trafficking activities.  Among other things, ESTRADA and GONZALEZ agreed to provide the Sinaloa Cartel with unfettered access to Guatemalan airports and maritime shipping locations so that the cartel could transport ton quantities of cocaine through Guatemala and ultimately into the United States.  ESTRADA also offered to appoint members of the Sinaloa Cartel to high-ranking government positions in Guatemala so that the CSes would be positioned to advance the Sinaloa Cartel’s drug trafficking activities. 

ESTRADA and GONZALEZ also directed the CSes to hire hitmen to assassinate political rivals to ensure that ESTRADA was elected president of Guatemala.  In particular, ESTRADA and GONZALEZ identified specific targets by name and agreed to provide the hitmen with firearms, including AK-47s, to carry out the murders.[2]

Origins of the Estrada Conspiracy

On or about January 6, 2019, one of the CSes (“CS-1”) met with GONZALEZ at his office in the vicinity of Guatemala City, Guatemala (the “January 6 Meeting”).  During the January 6 Meeting, GONZALEZ explained to CS-1, in substance and in part, that GONZALEZ was an active member of a political party in Guatemala (“Party-1”), and that Party-1’s presidential candidate was ESTRADA.  GONZALEZ told CS-1 that the Estrada Campaign needed drug cartel funding to compete in the upcoming presidential election, and he asked if CS-1 knew of any drug cartels that would be interested in providing such funding.  GONZALEZ also stated that ESTRADA, if elected president of Guatemala, would use various government agencies to support the cartel’s drug trafficking activities in Guatemala.  For example, GONZALEZ told CS-1 that, if a drug cartel provided funding to the Estrada Campaign and ESTRADA won, the Cartel would have direct influence on the appointed secretaries of the Interior, which oversees the police, and Defense, which oversees the military.         

The next day, CS-1 met with GONZALEZ and ESTRADA in the vicinity of Guatemala City (the “January 10 Meeting”).   During the January 10 Meeting, CS-1 told ESTRADA that CS-1’s contacts in the Sinaloa Cartel could provide funding, but that the cartel had concerns about whether ESTRADA could provide the cartel with access to the Government of Guatemala.  ESTRADA responded that, if elected president, ESTRADA would appoint members of the Sinaloa Cartel to the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Defense, and to positions controlling Guatemala’s seaports and airports.  ESTRADA also asked that CS-1 provide the names of three potential candidates for each position so ESTRADA could choose between them. 

The Defendants Meet Purported Sinaloa Cartel Representative CS-2

On or about February 7, 2019, GONZALEZ met with CS-1 and a second confidential source involved in this investigation (“CS-2”) in the vicinity of Guatemala City (the “February 7 Meeting”).   The February 7 Meeting was audio and video recorded.  During the February 7 Meeting, GONZALEZ asked, in substance and in part, whether CS-1 and CS-2 could assassinate certain other political rivals who were threats to win the election.  GONZALEZ stated that it “wouldn’t be difficult” to kill a particular candidate because the candidate was “hated,” but cautioned that another candidate was “well protected.”  GONZALEZ also stated that the Estrada Campaign “would pay you to do it” if the CSes carried out the requested murders.

The following day, on or about February 8, 2019, ESTRADA and GONZALEZ met with CS-1 and CS-2 in the vicinity of Guatemala City (the “February 8 Meeting”).  This meeting was audio and video recorded.  During the February 8 Meeting, ESTRADA told CS-1 and CS-2 that he could win the election if the Sinaloa Cartel provided the Estrada Campaign with approximately 10 to 12 million U.S. dollars.  ESTRADA explained that he needed to deliver a sizeable amount of money to each of the 22 districts in Guatemala so that he could obtain the necessary votes in each district and that he was planning to hire an individual for approximately $2 million to help build the Estrada Campaign’s online presence.

CS-2 stated that, in exchange for the drug money, CS-2 wanted ESTRADA to help the Sinaloa Cartel transport cocaine through airports in Guatemala.  CS-2 estimated that the Sinaloa Cartel would send approximately six cocaine-laden airplanes per month through Guatemala, each of which would carry multiple tons of cocaine, and that CS-2 would pay ESTRADA 10 percent of the approximate value of cocaine on each plane.  ESTRADA agreed to assist the Sinaloa Cartel’s activities in exchange for campaign financing as proposed by CS-2.  GONZALEZ and ESTRADA also again discussed assassinating political rivals, and ESTRADA provided CS-2 with the names of two individuals who were potential targets.  ESTRADA also identified one individual to target first, and he noted that this assassination would be easy to complete because the target had many enemies in Guatemala.  

February 2019 Meetings in Florida and Guatemala

On or about February 14, 2019, GONZALEZ met with CS-2 and an undercover officer (“UC-1”) in an undercover DEA warehouse (the “Warehouse”) in Florida (the “February 14 Meeting”).  This meeting was audio and video recorded.  During the February 14 Meeting, CS-2 introduced UC-1 to GONZALEZ as a hitman who was available for hire to carry out the assassinations proposed by GONZALEZ and ESTRADA. 

GONZALEZ then discussed with CS-2 and UC-1, in substance and in part, the Estrada Campaign’s desire to assassinate certain political rivals.  GONZALEZ identified the person he thought was easiest “to take out,” and stated that he wanted it done “as fast as possible.”  GONZALEZ also promised to provide CS-2 and UC-1 with more information on their initial targets, and GONZALEZ told them that “we want to see the public reaction after the first two hits” before going forward with the others.  GONZALEZ also told them that he could provide “lots of AK-47s” to carry out the job, and when UC-1 specified that he needed “3 AK-47s and 2 pistols,” GONZALEZ replied that “Mario [ESTRADA] will have everything ready for you.” 

During the meeting, CS-2 and UC-1 also showed GONZALEZ approximately $5 million in supposed drug proceeds for the Estrada Campaign.  GONZALEZ then placed a video call to ESTRADA.  During that call, GONZALEZ handed the phone to CS-2, and CS-2 used GONZALEZ’s phone to show ESTRADA the Warehouse and purported bulk currency in various locations in the Warehouse.     

On or about February 27, 2019, ESTRADA met with CS-1 and CS-2 on an undercover DEA yacht (the “UC Yacht”) in the vicinity of Miami, Florida (the “February 27 Meeting”).  This meeting was audio and video recorded.  During the February 27 Meeting, CS-2 and ESTRADA discussed, among other things, their agreement concerning how ESTRADA would support the Sinaloa Cartel’s drug trafficking if ESTRADA were elected president.  ESTRADA stated, in substance and in part, that he was “convince[d] that I’m going to win [the election]” and that after he won, ESTRADA would support the cartel’s drug trafficking activities in Guatemala.  In particular, ESTRADA agreed to accept the Sinaloa Cartel’s cocaine-laden planes at airports and ports in Guatemala.  ESTRADA also agreed to appoint cartel members to key government positions.  ESTRADA also told CS-2 that he no longer wanted CS-2 and UC-1 to move forward with the proposed assassinations.  ESTRADA explained that someone else was going to assassinate one of the potential targets, and ESTRADA thought it would bring too many problems if they proceeded with the other assassinations. 

March 2019 Meetings in Florida and Guatemala

On or about March 4, 2019, ESTRADA met with another individual (“CC-1”) and CS-1 at ESTRADA’s office in the vicinity of Guatemala City (the “March 4 Meeting”).  This meeting was audio recorded.  During the March 4 Meeting, ESTRADA stated, in substance and in part, that the Estrada Campaign urgently needed funds from the Sinaloa Cartel to pay its expenses.  ESTRADA, CC-1, and CS-1 discussed how they could deliver the Cartel’s money to the Estrada Campaign in Guatemala.  ESTRADA suggested that they use the UC Yacht to transport ESTRADA’s money.  ESTRADA then took out a map, and demonstrated how the UC Yacht could travel from Miami, through Cuba, before arriving in Guatemala.  CC-1 questioned whether law enforcement would detect the UC Yacht, and ESTRADA responded that those risks were mitigated by the fact that the UC Yacht was a luxury yacht, flying the American flag, and sailed by American citizens.  ESTRADA further explained that it might be easier to buy a yacht than to pay the transportation fees they had been discussing. 

On or about March 5, 2019, ESTRADA met again with CC-1 and CS-1 at ESTRADA’s office (the “March 5 Meeting”).  This meeting was audio recorded.  During the March 5 Meeting, ESTRADA stated, in substance and in part, that he was arranging for another crew to get involved to bring the balance of the money from the Sinaloa Cartel to Guatemala because ESTRADA had run out of money himself and his campaign was stalling.  ESTRADA also stated that he was separately working with a drug trafficker based in Guatemala, who was also supporting ESTRADA’s bid for president.  ESTRADA also told CS-1 that he heard that people from another drug cartel wanted to provide ESTRADA with funding as well.

*                *                *

The Complaint charges ESTRADA, 58, and GONZALEZ, 50, in two counts:  (1) conspiring to import cocaine into the United States and (2) conspiring to use and carry machine guns and destructive devices during, and to possess machine guns and destructive devices in furtherance of, the cocaine-importation conspiracy.  If convicted, ESTRADA and GONZALEZ each face a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment and a maximum term of life imprisonment on Count One, and a maximum term of life imprisonment on Count Two.

The potential mandatory minimum and maximum sentences in this case are prescribed by Congress and provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendants will be determined by the judge.

Mr. Berman praised the outstanding efforts of the DEA’s Miami Field Office and its Guatemala Country Office, as well as the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs.

This case is being handled by the Office’s Terrorism and International Narcotics Unit.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Mathew Laroche and Jason A. Richman are in charge of the prosecution.

The charges contained in the Complaint are merely allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. 

 



[1] As the introductory phrase signifies, the entirety of the text of the Complaint and the description of the Complaint set forth herein, constitute only allegations, and every fact described should be treated as an allegation.





[2] The DEA promptly notified local authorities about these threats.





Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SM7oxoliFbNYJ5bdJiZAR6AhmUAT9MGlXxylvskdfXc
  Last Updated: 2024-03-28 02:31:47 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E