Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-NY  1:18-cr-00217
Case Name:   USA v. Freedman et al
  Press Releases:
Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that JEFFREY GOLDSTEIN, a doctor who practiced in Manhattan, pled guilty today to conspiracy to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute, in connection with a scheme to prescribe Subsys, a potent fentanyl-based spray, in exchange for bribes and kickbacks from Subsys’s manufacturer, Insys Therapeutics.  GOLDSTEIN pled guilty before U.S. Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman.  The case is assigned to U.S. District Judge Kimba M. Wood.

U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said:  “As he admitted today, Jeffrey Goldstein, a Manhattan doctor who owned a private medical office on the Upper East Side, prescribed his patients Subsys, a powerful fentanyl drug, in exchange for nearly $200,000 in bribes and kickbacks from the drug’s manufacturer, Insys, as well as various other items of value, including all-expenses paid visits to a Manhattan strip club.  Goldstein is the fourth doctor to plead guilty in this case and his admission of guilt once again demonstrates that this Office will hold any physician accountable when that physician’s medical judgment is compromised by the corrupting influence of money.  That is particularly so when the drug that is being prescribed is a dangerous opioid like fentanyl.  This case should stand as a warning to the New York medical community that if you take bribes from pharmaceutical companies in exchange for prescribing – whether in the form of Speaker Program fees or otherwise – this Office will hold you to account for placing your own interests above those of your patients.”

According to the allegations contained in the Indictment against GOLDSTEIN and filings in related proceedings:

The Insys Speakers Bureau

Subsys, which is manufactured by Insys, is a powerful painkiller approximately 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine.  The FDA approved Subsys only for the management of breakthrough pain in cancer patients.  Prescriptions of Subsys typically cost thousands of dollars each month, and Medicare and Medicaid, as well as commercial insurers, reimbursed prescriptions written by GOLDSTEIN.

In or about August 2012, Insys launched a “Speakers Bureau,” a roster of doctors who would conduct programs (“Speaker Programs”) purportedly aimed at educating other practitioners about Subsys.  In reality, Insys used its Speakers Bureau to induce the doctors who served as speakers to prescribe large volumes of Subsys by paying them Speaker Program fees.  Speakers were supposed to conduct an educational slide presentation for other health care practitioners at each Speaker Program.  In reality, many of the Speaker Programs were predominantly social affairs where no educational presentation about Subsys occurred.  Attendance sign-in sheets for the Speaker Programs were frequently forged by adding the names and signatures of health care practitioners who had not actually been present.

GOLDSTEIN’s Participation in the Scheme

GOLDSTEIN was a doctor of osteopathic medicine who owned a private medical office on the Upper East Side.  GOLDSTEIN received approximately $196,000 in Speaker Program fees from Insys in exchange for prescribing large volumes of Subsys.  After GOLDSTEIN began prescribing a competitor painkiller, Insys pressured him to stop doing so and switch patients to Subsys, which GOLDSTEIN did. 

GOLDSTEIN also received other items of value from Insys in order to induce him to prescribe.  For example, Insys employees took GOLDSTEIN and Todd Schlifstein, who co-owned a private medical office with GOLDSTEIN, to a Manhattan strip club where Insys spent approximately $4,100 on a private room, alcoholic drinks, and “lap dances” for GOLDSTEIN and Schlifstein.  GOLDSTEIN also arranged for Insys to pay for the annual holiday party for his private medical office.

In 2014, GOLDSTEIN was approximately the fifth-highest-paid Insys Speaker nationally. He was the sixth-highest prescriber of Subsys in the last quarter of 2014, accounting for approximately $809,275 in overall net sales of Subsys in that quarter.

*          *          *

GOLDSTEIN, 49, of New Rochelle, New York, pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison.  The maximum potential sentence is prescribed by Congress and is provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the judge.  GOLDSTEIN is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Wood on January 22, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.

Mr. Berman praised the investigative work of the FBI, and thanked the Department of Health and Human Service’s Office of Inspector General for its participation in the investigation.

The case is being prosecuted by the Office’s Complex Frauds and Cybercrime Unit.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Noah Solowiejczyk and David Abramowicz are in charge of the prosecution.

Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that DIALECTI VOUDOURIS, a doctor who practiced in Manhattan, pled guilty today to conspiracy to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute, in connection with a scheme to prescribe Subsys, a potent fentanyl-based spray, in exchange for bribes and kickbacks from Subsys’s manufacturer, Insys Therapeutics.  VOUDOURIS pled guilty before U.S. Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang.  The case is assigned to U.S. District Judge Kimba M. Wood.

U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said:  “As she admitted today, Dialecti Voudouris, a prominent Manhattan oncologist, prescribed her patients Subsys, a powerful fentanyl drug, in exchange for over $100,000 in bribes and kickbacks from the drug’s manufacturer, Insys.  Today’s guilty plea – the third in this case – once again demonstrates that when a doctor’s best medical judgment is compromised by bribes, this Office will hold that physician to account, especially when a dangerous opioid like fentanyl is involved.”

According to the allegations contained in the Indictment against VOUDOURIS and filings in related proceedings:

The Insys Speakers Bureau

Subsys, which is manufactured by Insys, is a powerful painkiller approximately 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine.  The FDA approved Subsys only for the management of breakthrough pain in cancer patients.  Prescriptions of Subsys typically cost thousands of dollars each month, and Medicare and Medicaid, as well as commercial insurers, reimbursed prescriptions written by VOUDOURIS.

In or about August 2012, Insys launched a “Speakers Bureau,” a roster of doctors who would conduct programs (“Speaker Programs”) purportedly aimed at educating other practitioners about Subsys.  In reality, Insys used its Speakers Bureau to induce the doctors who served as speakers to prescribe large volumes of Subsys by paying them Speaker Program fees.  Speakers were supposed to conduct an educational slide presentation for other health care practitioners at each Speaker Program.  In reality, many of the Speaker Programs were predominantly social affairs where no educational presentation about Subsys occurred.  Attendance sign-in sheets for the Speaker Programs were frequently forged by adding the names and signatures of health care practitioners who had not actually been present.

VOUDOURIS’s Participation in the Scheme

VOUDOURIS, a doctor specializing in oncology and hematology who worked at a private medical office on the Upper East Side, received approximately $119,400 in Speaker Program fees from Insys in exchange for prescribing large volumes of Subsys.  During a September 2014 dinner with several Insys executives and managers, a senior Insys executive told VOUDOURIS, who had recently been nominated by Insys as a Speaker, that he wanted her to prescribe Subsys to one new patient every day, and that VOUDOURIS would be allocated Speaker Programs if she continued prescribing Subsys.  In a conversation with an Insys manager and sales representative soon thereafter, VOUDOURIS was once again informed that Insys expected her to write more Subsys prescriptions.  In the months that followed the dinner and this conversation, VOUDOURIS’s Subsys prescriptions rose significantly.  By the end of the first quarter of 2015, VOUDOURIS – who had prescribed very minimal quantities of Subsys prior to becoming a Speaker for Insys – was approximately the 10th-highest prescriber of Subsys nationally, accounting for total net sales of Subsys of approximately $581,500 in that quarter alone.

*          *          *

VOUDOURIS, 48, of Queens, New York, pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison.  The maximum potential sentence is prescribed by Congress and is provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the judge.  VOUDOURIS is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Wood on January 3, 2020.

Mr. Berman praised the investigative work of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and thanked the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General for its participation in the investigation.

The case is being prosecuted by the Office’s Complex Frauds and Cybercrime Unit.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Noah Solowiejczyk and David Abramowicz are in charge of the prosecution.

Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced today that TODD SCHLIFSTEIN, a doctor who practiced in Manhattan, pled guilty today to conspiracy to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute, in connection with a scheme to prescribe Subsys, a potent fentanyl-based spray, in exchange for bribes and kickbacks from Subsys’s manufacturer, Insys Therapeutics.  SCHLIFSTEIN pled guilty before U.S. Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn.  The case is assigned to U.S. District Judge Kimba M. Wood.

U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said:  “As he admitted today, Todd Schlifstein prescribed patients a powerful fentanyl drug in exchange for bribes and kickbacks from the drug’s manufacturer.  This case shows that doctors who let illegal payments corrupt their medical judgment will be held accountable.”

According to the allegations contained in the Indictment against SCHLIFSTEIN and filings in related proceedings:

The Insys Speakers Bureau

Subsys, which is manufactured by Insys, is a powerful painkiller approximately 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine.  The FDA approved Subsys only for the management of breakthrough pain in cancer patients.  Prescriptions of Subsys typically cost thousands of dollars each month, and Medicare and Medicaid, as well as commercial insurers, reimbursed prescriptions written by SCHLIFSTEIN.

In or about August 2012, Insys launched a “Speakers Bureau,” a roster of doctors who would conduct programs (“Speaker Programs”) purportedly aimed at educating other practitioners about Subsys.  In reality, Insys used its Speakers Bureau to induce the doctors who served as speakers to prescribe large volumes of Subsys by paying them Speaker Program fees.  Speakers were supposed to conduct an educational slide presentation for other health care practitioners at each Speaker Program.  In reality, many of the Speaker Programs were predominantly social affairs where no educational presentation about Subsys occurred.  Attendance sign-in sheets for the Speaker Programs were frequently forged by adding the names and signatures of health care practitioners who had not actually been present.

SCHILFSTEIN’s Participation in the Scheme

SCHLIFSTEIN, a doctor certified in physical medicine and rehabilitation, worked at a medical office in Manhattan.  From in or about March 2014 until in or about September 2015, SCHLIFSTEIN received approximately $127,100 in Speaker Program fees from Insys in exchange for prescribing large volumes of Subsys.  SCHLIFSTEIN became approximately the 19th-highest prescriber of Subsys nationally in the second quarter of 2015, accounting for approximately $593,373 in total net sales of the drug during that quarter.

*                *                *

SCHILFSTEIN, 50, of New York, New York, pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison.  The maximum potential sentence is prescribed by Congress and is provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the judge.  SCHLIFSTEIN is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Wood on September 26, 2019.

Mr. Berman praised the investigative work of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and thanked the Department of Health and Human Service’s Office of Inspector General for its participation in the investigation.

The case is being prosecuted by the Office’s Complex Frauds and Cybercrime Unit.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Noah Solowiejczyk and David Abramowicz are in charge of the prosecution.

Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced today that ALEXANDRU BURDUCEA, a doctor who practiced in Manhattan, pled guilty today to conspiracy to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute in connection with a scheme to prescribe Subsys, a potent fentanyl-based spray, in exchange for bribes and kickbacks from Subsys’s manufacturer, Insys Therapeutics (“Insys”).  BURDUCEA pled guilty before U.S. Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox.  The case is assigned to U.S. District Judge Kimba M. Wood.

U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said:  “As he admitted today, Alexandru Burducea, a prominent Manhattan pain management doctor, accepted tens of thousands of dollars in speaker fees from Insys in exchange for prescribing large volumes of Insys’s powerful fentanyl-based spray, Subsys.  The corrupting influence of money has no place in medicine, especially when it comes to prescribing fentanyl and other dangerous opioids.  Like many other doctors around the country, Dr. Burducea is now being held to account for his participation in this corrupt kickback scheme.”           

According to the allegations contained in the Indictment against BURDUCEA and filings in related proceedings:

The Insys Speakers Bureau 

Subsys, which is manufactured by Insys, is a powerful painkiller approximately 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine.  The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) approved Subsys only for the management of breakthrough pain in cancer patients.  Prescriptions of Subsys typically cost thousands of dollars each month, and Medicare and Medicaid, as well as commercial insurers, reimbursed prescriptions written by BURDUCEA.

In or about August 2012, Insys launched a “Speakers Bureau,” a roster of doctors who would conduct programs (“Speaker Programs”) purportedly aimed at educating other medical practitioners about Subsys.  In reality, Insys used its Speakers Bureau to induce the doctors who served as speakers to prescribe large volumes of Subsys by paying them Speaker Program fees.  Speakers were supposed to conduct an educational slide presentation for other health care practitioners at each Speaker Program.  In reality, many of the Speaker Programs were predominantly social affairs where no educational presentation about Subsys occurred.  Attendance sign-in sheets for the Speaker Programs were frequently forged by adding the names and signatures of medical practitioners who were not present.

BURDUCEA’s Participation in the Scheme

BURDUCEA, a doctor certified in pain management and anesthesiology, was an Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology at a large Manhattan hospital.  BURDUCEA also practiced at an anesthesiology and pain management office associated with the hospital.  From in or about September 2014 until in or about June 2015, BURDUCEA received approximately $68,400 in Speaker Program fees from Insys in exchange for prescribing large volumes of Subsys.  In addition, Insys hired BURDUCEA’s then-girlfriend, now wife, to work as BURDUCEA’s sales representative, and the company paid her large commissions based on the volume of Subsys prescribed by her assigned doctors, including BURDUCEA. 

BURDUCEA, who had never prescribed Subsys before in or about September 2014, became approximately the 14th-highest prescriber of Subsys nationally in the second quarter of 2015, accounting for total net sales of the drug of approximately $621,345 in that quarter.

*                *                *

BURDUCEA, 42, of Little Neck, New York, pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison.  The maximum potential sentence is prescribed by Congress and is provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the judge.  BURDUCEA is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Wood on May 22, 2019, at 11:00 a.m.

Mr. Berman praised the outstanding investigative work of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and thanked the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General for its assistance in the investigation.

The case is being prosecuted by the Office’s Complex Frauds and Cybercrime Unit.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Noah Solowiejczyk and David Abramowicz are in charge of the prosecution.

Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and William F. Sweeney Jr., the Assistant Director-in-Charge of the New York Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), announced the unsealing today of an Indictment in Manhattan federal court charging five Manhattan doctors, GORDON FREEDMAN, JEFFREY GOLDSTEIN, TODD SCHLIFSTEIN, DIALECTI VOUDOURIS, and ALEXANDRU BURDUCEA, with participating in a scheme to receive bribes and kickbacks in the form of fees for sham educational programs (“Speaker Programs”) from a pharmaceutical company (“Pharma Company-1”) in exchange for prescribing millions of dollars’ worth of a potent fentanyl-based spray manufactured by Pharma Company-1 (the “Fentanyl Spray”), among other offenses.  FREEDMAN, GOLDSTEIN, SCHLIFSTEIN, VOUDOURIS, and BURDUCEA were arrested this morning.  All are expected to be presented before U.S. Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn in Manhattan this afternoon.

Also unsealed today were the guilty pleas of two former Pharma Company-1 employees, Jonathan Roper and Fernando Serrano, in connection with their participation in the bribery and kickback scheme.  Both Roper and Serrano are cooperating with the Government. 

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said:  “These prominent doctors swore a solemn oath to place their patients’ care above all else.  Instead, they engaged in a malignant scheme to prescribe Fentanyl, a dangerous and potentially fatal narcotic 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine, in exchange for bribes in the form of speaker fees. Payments from pharmaceutical companies should not influence how doctors prescribe --- especially when a potent and dangerous drug like Fentanyl is involved.  This scheme to use their patients as an instrument for profit has resulted in the indictment of five physicians.”    

FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge William F. Sweeney Jr. said:  “A substance as powerful as Fentanyl should be prescribed based only on doctors’ own independent medical judgment. In this case, as alleged, a series of doctors were convinced to push aside their ethical obligations and prescribe a drug for profit to patients who turned to them for help. Doctors and medical professionals everywhere should be reminded of the faith and trust placed upon them, and that the health and safety of their patients is not for sale.”

As alleged in the Indictment[1] unsealed today in Manhattan federal court:

The Fentanyl Spray

The Fentanyl Spray, which is manufactured by Pharma Company-1, is a powerful painkiller that is approximately 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine.  The FDA approved the Fentanyl Spray only for the management of breakthrough pain in cancer patients.  Prescriptions of the Fentanyl Spray typically cost thousands of dollars each month, and Medicare and Medicaid, as well as commercial insurers, reimbursed prescriptions written by the defendants.

The Speaker Program Bribery and Kickback Scheme

Pharma Company-1 launched a “Speakers Bureau” in or about August 2012.  While the Speakers Bureau was purportedly aimed at educating other practitioners about the Fentanyl Spray, in reality Pharma Company-1 used its Speakers Bureau to induce the doctors to prescribe large volumes of the Fentanyl Spray by paying them Speaker Program fees. 

Speakers were supposed to conduct a slide presentation for other health care practitioners regarding the Fentanyl Spray at each Speaker Program.  In reality, many of the Speaker Programs led by the defendants were predominantly social affairs where no educational presentation about the Fentanyl Spray occurred.  Attendance sign-in sheets for the Speaker Programs were frequently forged by adding the names and signatures of health care practitioners who had not actually been present.

Freedman’s Participation in the Scheme

FREEDMAN was a doctor certified in pain management and anesthesiology who owned a private pain management office on Manhattan’s Upper East Side.  FREEDMAN, who was also an Associate Clinical Professor at a large hospital in Manhattan (“Hospital-1”), received approximately $308,600 in Speaker Program fees from Pharma Company-1 in exchange for prescribing large volumes of the Fentanyl Spray. 

In March 2013, a Regional Sales Manager for Pharma Company-1 sent an email to FREEDMAN informing him that he would receive more Speaker Programs in the coming months because Pharma Company-1 wanted prescriptions of the Fentanyl Spray to increase, and urging FREEDMAN to put more patients on the Fentanyl Spray.  FREEDMAN responded, in part, “Got it,” and significantly increased his Fentanyl Spray prescriptions in the following months, during which he received approximately $33,600 in Speaker Program fees. 

In 2014, FREEDMAN’s prescriptions of the Fentanyl Spray rose even further, and he was the fourth-highest prescriber of the Fentanyl Spray nationally in the final quarter of 2014, accounting for approximately $1,132,287 in overall net sales of the Fentanyl Spray in that quarter.  During 2014, FREEDMAN was the highest-paid Pharma Company-1 Speaker in the nation, receiving approximately $143,000. 

GOLDSTEIN’s Participation in the Scheme

GOLDSTEIN was a doctor of osteopathic medicine who owned a private medical office on the Upper East Side.  GOLDSTEIN received approximately $196,000 in Speaker Program fees from Pharma Company-1 in exchange for prescribing large volumes of the Fentanyl Spray.  After GOLDSTEIN began prescribing a competitor painkiller, Pharma Company-1 pressured him to stop doing so and switch patients to the Fentanyl Spray, which GOLDSTEIN did.

In 2014, GOLDSTEIN was approximately the fifth-highest-paid Pharma Company-1 Speaker nationally. He was the sixth-highest prescriber of the Fentanyl Spray in the last quarter of 2014, accounting for approximately $809,275 in overall net sales of the Fentanyl Spray in that quarter.

SCHLIFSTEIN’s Participation in the Scheme

SCHLIFSTEIN was a doctor certified in physical medicine and rehabilitation who co-owned with GOLDSTEIN a private medical office on the Upper East Side.  SCHLIFSTEIN, who also worked as an attending physiatrist and consulting physician at two other Manhattan hospitals, received approximately $127,100 in Speaker Program fees from Pharma Company-1 in exchange for prescribing large volumes of the Fentanyl Spray. 

In or about October 2013, SCHLIFSTEIN expressed an interest in becoming a Speaker for Pharma Company-1.  So a senior Pharma Company-1 executive traveled to New York, and took SCHLIFSTEIN, GOLDSTEIN, and others, to a Manhattan strip club where Pharma Company-1 spent approximately $4,100 on a private room, alcoholic drinks, and “lap dances” for SCHLIFSTEIN and GOLDSTEIN.  In the month following that outing and SCHLIFSTEIN’s nomination as a Speaker, SCHLIFSTEIN’s Fentanyl Spray prescriptions increased substantially.    

In late 2014, Pharma Company-1 significantly decreased SCHLIFSTEIN’s Speaker Programs in order to send a message to SCHLIFSTEIN that he would need to prescribe larger volumes of the Fentanyl Spray.  In response, SCHLIFSTEIN repeatedly requested more Speaker Programs.  Pharma Company-1 told SCHLIFSTEIN it would assign him more Speaker Programs only if he prescribed larger volumes of the Fentanyl Spray.  SCHLIFSTEIN’s Fentanyl Spray prescriptions then increased substantially, and Pharma Company-1 rewarded him with more Speaker Programs.

By the end of the second quarter of 2015, SCHLIFSTEIN was approximately the 19th-highest prescriber of the Fentanyl Spray nationally, accounting for approximately $593,373 in net sales in that quarter.

VOUDOURIS’s Participation in the Scheme

VOUDOURIS was a doctor specializing in oncology and hematology who worked at a private medical office on the Upper East Side, and was an Assistant Clinical Professor at Hospital-1.  VOUDOURIS received approximately $119,400 in Speaker Program fees from Pharma Company-1 in exchange for prescribing large volumes of the Fentanyl Spray. 

In September 2014, VOUDOURIS, who had recently been nominated as a Speaker, had dinner with, among others, several Pharma Company-1 executives, as well as Roper and Serrano.  During the dinner, the Pharma Company-1 Vice-President of Sales told VOUDOURIS that he wanted her to prescribe the Fentanyl Spray to one new patient every day, and that VOUDOURIS would be allocated Speaker Programs if she continued prescribing the Fentanyl Spray.  

In the week that followed the dinner, VOUDOURIS did not prescribe what Pharma Company-1 viewed as an adequate quantity of the Fentanyl Spray.  Roper and Serrano met with VOUDOURIS and told her that Pharma Company-1 expected VOUDOURIS to write more Fentanyl Spray prescriptions.  In the months that followed the dinner and this conversation, VOUDOURIS’s Fentanyl Spray prescriptions rose significantly. 

By the end of the first quarter of 2015, VOUDOURIS was approximately the 10th-highest prescriber of the Fentanyl Spray nationally, accounting for total net sales of the Fentanyl Spray of approximately $581,500 in that quarter.

BURDUCEA’s Participation in the Scheme

BURDUCEA was a doctor certified in pain management and anesthesiology, was an Assistant Professor of anesthesiology at Hospital-1, and practiced at an anesthesiology and pain management office associated with Hospital-1.  BURDUCEA received approximately $68,400 in Speaker Program fees from Pharma Company-1 in exchange for prescribing large volumes of the Fentanyl Spray.  In addition, Pharma Company-1 hired BURDUCEA’s then-girlfriend, now wife (“CC-1”), to work as BURDUCEA’s sales representative and paid her in large part based on the volume of Fentanyl Spray prescribed by her assigned doctors, including BURDUCEA. 

By the end of the end of the second quarter of 2015, BURDUCEA was approximately the 14th-highest prescriber of the Fentanyl Spray nationally, accounting for total net sales of the Fentanyl Spray of approximately $621,345 in that quarter.

*          *          *

A chart containing the names, ages, residences, charges, and maximum penalties for the defendants is attached.  The maximum potential sentences in this case are prescribed by Congress and are provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendants will be determined by a judge.

Mr. Berman praised the investigative work of the FBI, and thanked HHS OIG and the New York City Police Department for their participation in the investigation.

The case is being prosecuted by the Office’s Complex Frauds and Cybercrime Unit.  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Noah Solowiejczyk and David Abramowicz are in charge of the prosecution; paralegal specialist Jake Sidransky provided additional support.

 



Defendant





Age





Hometown





Charges (Potential Maximum Term of Imprisonment)





GORDON FREEDMAN

 





57





Mount Kisco, NY





Anti-Kickback conspiracy (5 years), Violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute (5 years), and Honest services fraud conspiracy (20 years)

 





JEFFREY GOLDSTEIN

 





48





New Rochelle, NY





Anti-Kickback conspiracy (5 years), Violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute (5 years), Honest services fraud conspiracy (20 years), Aggravated identity theft (2 years mandatory), Wrongful disclosure of individually identifiable health information (1 year)

 





TODD SCHLIFSTEIN

 





49





New York, NY





Anti-Kickback conspiracy (5 years), Violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute (5 years), Honest services fraud conspiracy (20 years), Wrongful disclosure of individually identifiable health information (1 year)





DIALECTI VOUDOURIS





47





Long Island City, NY





Anti-Kickback conspiracy (5 years), Violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute (5 years), Honest services fraud conspiracy (20 years), Aggravated identity theft (2 years mandatory), Wrongful disclosure of individually identifiable health information (1 year)





ALEXANDRU BURDUCEA





41





Little Neck, NY





Anti-Kickback conspiracy (5 years), Violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute (5 years), Honest services fraud conspiracy (20 years), False statements to federal officers (5 years), Wrongful disclosure of individually identifiable health information (1 year)



 



[1] As the introductory phrase signifies, the entirety of the text of the Indictment and the description of the Indictment set forth herein constitute only allegations, and every fact described should be treated as an allegation.





Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15O06-qg0l36YuLpmnzS-EM4wiiOb_dNMvnhCZ_hGnc4
  Last Updated: 2024-04-09 13:49:41 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E