Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-IN  1:19-cr-00394
Case Name:   USA v. APPLE
  Press Releases:
INDIANAPOLIS – United States Attorney Josh J. Minkler announced today that Walter Mays, 29, Lapre Apple, 22, Mickey Shipp, 35, David Bateman, 38,Christopher Allen, 27, Rodney Freeman, 36, all of Indianapolis, and Devonte Davis, 25, of Carlisle, Ind. were indicted by a grand jury on charges of illegal possession of firearms and/or drug-trafficking related charges.

“The U.S. Attorney’s Office will utilize all tools, available through the Project Guardian initiative, in its fight to reduce violent crime, and enforce federal gun laws,” said Minkler. “If you choose to illegally possess firearms to commit violent crimes, you will be prosecuted federally, and you will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.”

Walter Mays was indicted on charges of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, heroin, oxycodone, and marijuana. Mays was previously arrested by way of complaint following a November 25, 2019 traffic stop initiated for speeding. Upon approach of the vehicle, officers smelled marijuana emanating from the vehicle. Investigators asked Mays to step out of the vehicle and detained him. During a pat down of Mays, officers found narcotics and $3,058 on Mays’s person. Mays has previous felony convictions for resisting arrest, possession of a narcotic drug, dealing salvia, two for dealing marijuana, and three for dealing hash oil.  

Lapre Apple was indicted on charges of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, possession of a firearm within 1000 feet of a school zone, and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug-trafficking crime. Apple was previously arrested by way of complaint following a December 3, 2019 traffic stop initiated for changing lanes without using a turn signal and speeding in a school zone. Upon approach of the vehicle, officers smelled marijuana emanating from the car. A passenger and Apple were removed from the vehicle. Officers removed a firearm from Apple’s waistband. Officers recovered a small quantity of marijuana, cocaine and $6,955. Apple has a prior arrest for possession of 200-600 ecstasy pills and possession of a high capacity magazine and Category II weapons out of Illinois.     

According to Assistant United States Attorney Abhishek Kambli, who is prosecuting Mays and Apple for the government, defendants each face up to 20 years in prison, if convicted.

Mickey Shipp was indicted on two counts for unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Shipp was previously convicted in Marion County, Ind. for felony charges of theft.

Devonte Davis was indicted on charges of unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Davis was previously convicted in Marion County, Ind. for felony charges of criminal recklessness and resisting law enforcement, aggravated battery and battery resulting in serious bodily injury. Davis was also previously charged by way of complaint following an October 1, 2019 traffic stop. Federal agents traveling in the same area as Davis had witnessed suspicious activity and requested assistance from IMPD. The license plate number of the vehicle Davis was traveling in was provided to IMPD and it was determined that the registered owner of the vehicle did not have a valid driver’s license. The passengers were uncooperative with the officer during the traffic stop and provided false names. The officer asked the occupants to exit the vehicle. When Davis exited the vehicle, he pulled a handgun from his waistband and tossed it on the floorboard. Davis told officers that he knew he wasn’t supposed to possess firearms due to his previous felony conviction. Davis was previously convicted in Marion County, Ind. for criminal recklessness, resisting law enforcement, possession of cocaine, aggravated battery, and battery resulting in serious bodily injury.

According to Assistant United States Attorney Lawrence D. Hilton, who is prosecuting Shipp and Davis for the government, defendants each face up to 10 years in prison, if convicted.

David Bateman was indicted on charges of unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Bateman was previously convicted in Marion County, Ind. for felony charges of strangulation and battery with moderate bodily injury.

Christopher Allen was indicted on charges of unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Allen was previously convicted in Marion County, Ind. for felony charges of unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon and maintaining a common nuisance-controlled substances. 

According to Assistant United States Attorney Jeremy A. Morris, who is prosecuting Bateman and Allen, defendants each face up to 10 years in prison, if convicted.

Rodney Freeman was indicted on two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Freeman was previously convicted in Marion County, Ind. in three separate causes for felony charges of possession of a narcotic drug. Freeman also has three previous operating a vehicle while intoxicated felonies.  

According to Assistant United States Attorney William L. McCoskey, who is prosecuting Freeman for the government, defendant faces up to 10 years in prison, if convicted.

These cases are part of Project Guardian, the Department of Justice’s signature initiative to reduce gun violence and enforce federal firearms laws. Initiated by the Attorney General in the fall of 2019, Project Guardian draws upon the Department’s past successful programs to reduce gun violence; enhances coordination of federal, state, local, and tribal authorities in investigating and prosecuting gun crimes; improves information-sharing by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives when a prohibited individual attempts to purchase a firearm and is denied by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), to include taking appropriate actions when a prospective purchaser is denied by the NICS for mental health reasons; and ensures that federal resources are directed at the criminals posing the greatest threat to our communities. The United States Attorney’s Office has prosecuted these cases with support from the following Project Guardian partners: CGIC, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department.

For more information about Project Guardian, please see https://www.justice.gov/ag/project-guardian-memo-2019/download.

These arrests were made possible by the joint efforts of the Crime Gun Intelligence Center (CGIC), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), and the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department (IMPD).

“The Indianapolis Crime Gun Intelligence Center proves that by combining our resources and information we can make a greater impact in our community,” said Jonathan McPherson, Special Agent in Charge of ATF’s Columbus Field Division. “ATF will continue to work with IMPD to make Indianapolis safer for all of us.”

“The Indianapolis Crime Gun Intelligence Center was established to focus the efforts of partner law enforcement agencies on the small number of individuals perpetrating violence in our neighborhoods,” said IMPD Chief Bryan Roach. “Leveraging technology, we are better able to connect incidents of violence with perpetrators, the firearms they use, and the sources of their crime guns. And we will continue to focus on identifying these violent individuals, removing them from our community, and working with our federal law enforcement partners to hold them accountable.”

An indictment is only a charge and is not evidence of guilt. A defendant is presumed innocent and is entitled to a fair trial at which the government must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

In October 2017, United States Attorney Josh J. Minkler announced a Strategic Plan designed to shape and strengthen the District’s response to its most significant public safety challenges. This prosecution demonstrates the office’s firm commitment to targeting the District’s most violent geographic areas for the adoption of reactive federal drug and firearm prosecutions. This office will also continue to prosecute organizations and individuals distributing methamphetamine, cocaine, marijuana, and other controlled substances. See United States Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Indiana Strategic Plan Sections 2.2 and 3.3.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bOdVxTL89KYthamo3AobW4-DYUGJpt-ctkH8UGVb4vI
  Last Updated: 2024-04-13 09:41:44 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   SD-IN  1:19-mj-01104
Case Name:   USA v. APPLE
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_HbuSKZlX6aBLljJOM44DLSoX2CUXUZK2Pb_th9ummw
  Last Updated: 2024-04-13 09:41:52 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fifth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE5
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE5
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE5
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E