Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-IN  1:18-cr-00395
Case Name:   USA v. EDWARDS et al
  Press Releases:
INDIANAPOLIS- On Wednesday, June 19, 2019 at 3:30 p.m. the SDIN and Federal law enforcement acknowledged the pursuit of excellence demonstrated by federal Special Agents, Task Force Officers, Analysts, and Victim/Witness Coordinators.  The ceremony and all day training was sponsored by United States Attorney Josh J. Minkler and held at the Indiana War Memorial.

The awards were broken down by three categories: Innovation, Perseverance, and Trailblazer.

The first group of individuals recognized for their perseverance are responsible for the indictment of 17 drug traffickers for drug distribution conspiracy, firearms violations, money laundering and murder for hire. The AUSA and Agent Award recipients are as follows:

AUSA Michelle Brady

John Grindean, DEA

Erik Collins, DEA

Derek Root, DEA

Barbara Johnson, DEA

Noel Kinney, DEA

Sam Chandler, DEA

Jeff Eig, DEA

James Howe, IRS

DeMarcus Calhoun, USPIS

Amy Ewing, ATF

While their perseverance is eminent, these individuals are not alone in their willingness to persevere. In the US v. Craig Nichols case, AUSA Tiffany Preston among three others were given an award for perseverance. Public corruption matters often require perseverance, patience and dogged determination. The agents nominated below demonstrated these and other remarkable qualities in the matter.

Glenn Carlson, FBI

Tim Kempf, FBI

Brian Monahan, FBI

Just as criminals are determined to commit crimes, the AUSAs and agents in the US v. Warren, ET AL., (“THE MOB”) were determined to reduce the number of pharmacy robberies in Indiana. In 2015, the State of Indiana led the nation in pharmacy robberies, and 10 individuals were driven to reducing that number by using a tremendous amount of resources and time:

AUSA Brad Blackington

AUSA Peter Blackett

Leonard Rothermich (FBI)

Steven Secor (FBI)

Cassandra Jones (ATF)

Brian Taylor (ATF)

Billy Lane (DEA)

Jeremy Ingram (IMPD)

Daniel Cherry (IMPD)

 

Perseverance and determination is not unheard of in the world of federal agents and AUSAs, but those who display it deserve to be recognized. In the US v. Goelz case, every lead was investigate by interviewing people in a respectful and strategic matter. Through such practice the criminal was found guilty and evidence was recovered which allowed the attorneys and agents on the case to charge Goelz with a federal offense of sexual exploitation of a minor. The AUSA and Agent Perseverance award recipients are as follows:

AUSA MaryAnn Mindrum

John Pirics, HIS

Michael Johnson, HIS

The last perseverance award is attributed to the AUSA and special agent on the US v. Williams case. Special Agent Launa Hunt, ATF took a case where all that was found was one bullet on the Defendant’s person and turned it into a prosecutable case. The AUSA who prosecuted the case is Abhishek Kambli.

Perseverance is significant, but it is not the only characteristic that is appreciated. AUSA Kristina Korobov and FAUSA Cynthia Ridgeway prosecuted the case US v. MAHMOUD, ET AL- Prosecuting ten white collar defendants engaged in a pattern of racketeering yielding the district’s first white collar RICO Conspiracy stemming from activity that spanned several years and three distinct but related fraud schemes as well as money laundering. Korobov and Ridgeway were given a reward for innovation, alongside the following people:

Doug Kasper, FBI

Charmaine Barfield, FBI

Chris Knight, FBI

Joseph J. De St. Jean, USPIS

Dan Taylor, USPIS

Marcy Ralston, US Social Security, OIG

Bryan Reed, IMPD

 

Stories about perseverance and innovation should continue to be told, but stories about those who go the extra mile should become more prominent than what they are currently. Many stories go untold about agents who go the extra mile to blaze trails, from which the light overshadows dark corners where criminals lie in wait. Special Agent Leonard Rothermich showed his willingness to be a trailblazer throughout the US v. Ingram case. Rothermich was able to gather nearly a dozen FBI agents to help him read and listen to any evidence that was uncovered. After reviewing the evidence in its entirety, there was enough to present in court and the witnesses were able to give a truthful and accurate testimony. The other individuals who worked alongside Rothermich was AUSA Nick Linder and AUSA Lawrence Hilton.  

These three are not the only trailblazers. The following individuals are a part of the project safe childhood team. These agents and attorneys work to investigate sex trafficking, victim support and have brought several criminals to just since 2015. They treat the victims and witnesses with the utmost respect and are able to connect with the victims who have otherwise been discarded from society. These individuals are as follows.

AUSA Kristina Korobov

Michelle Bartelson, FBI

Gabe Cuevas, FBI

Elizabeth Carlson, FBI

Sarah Abdullah, Victim Specialist

 The Evansville DEA Team, Doug Freyberger and Lauren Wheatley are being given an award for trailblazing characteristics. Freyberger has been leading the EV Branch of DEA for several years, quietly bringing some of the most consequential drug task force matters in the district. This small but mighty unit operates in harmony and their impact on the district is significant. 

 

All trailblazers are appreciated. Matt Holbrook (DEA), Eric Sills (IRS), and Kristen Schumacker (DEA). These three individuals equate an investigative team with an exceptional example of seamless prosecution who have brought several criminals to justice.

 

Perseverance, innovation and trailblazer are all awards that have different trait, but what they have in common is the need to be recognized and commended.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TjykQZSNGqc7EkTstYAU0ZuJ0ICncehWiWnd6SGvUzY
  Last Updated: 2024-04-09 12:47:33 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   SD-IN  1:18-mj-01178
Case Name:   USA v. EDWARDS et al
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1weMCqI_OVH9uTi_1JEqNQhVl4_8AtdcOEvKylBNB1y8
  Last Updated: 2024-04-09 12:46:16 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E