Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-IL  4:18-cr-40043
Case Name:   USA v. Johnson
  Press Releases:
The prison sentence for one inmate at the U.S. Penitentiary in Marion, Illinois, just got a lot 

longer. Kurt F. Johnson, 56, who was due to be released in 2028, was sentenced earlier today to 

serve an additional 216 months behind bars for filing fictitious, involuntary bankruptcy petitions 

against federal prison officials. Johnson was convicted of the charges after a three-day jury trial 

in Benton, Illinois, last year.

The evidence at trial established that, in January 2018, with the assistance of persons outside the 

prison, Johnson succeeded in filing false involuntary bankruptcy petitions against the prison 

warden and an officer at the prison. The bogus petitions alleged that each victim was indebted to 

Johnson in the amount of $20 billion, owing to a judgment Johnson claimed to have obtained from the 

International Court of Justice (also known as the World Court). As part of the scheme, Johnson 

purportedly canceled $1 billion of the supposed debt and then filed forms with the Internal Revenue 

Service showing the canceled debt as unreported income for his victims.

The mere filing of the fictitious claims resulted in both victims receiving solicitation letters 

from credit counseling services and loan companies based upon their supposed bankruptcy. Once the 

fraud was discovered, the United States quickly moved to seal the proceedings to prevent further 

damage to the victims’ reputations.

At trial, the United States presented evidence that Johnson has a history and pattern of harassing 

judges, court personnel, and Bureau of Prisons employees through the filing of fictitious claims. 

Johnson eschewed appointed counsel and represented himself at the trial, testifying in his own 

defense that he genuinely believed the World Court had awarded him a default judgment for

$20 billion on account of his placement in the prison’s Communications Management Unit. The jury 

deliberated for approximately 40 minutes before returning guilty verdicts on all four counts.

“Kurt Johnson broke the law trying to harm those who enforce it,” U.S. Attorney   Steven

D. Weinhoeft said. “His sentence sends an unmistakable message to all criminals who would lash out 

against the men and women who work within the justice system: you will be prosecuted to the fullest 

extent of the law.”

Johnson’s sentence also includes a three-year term of supervised release.

Johnson won’t begin serving his 18-year sentence until he finishes serving the last decade of a 

300-month sentence he previously received for an unrelated fraud conviction in the Northern 

District of California. His underlying crime involved a nationwide debt elimination scheme that 

raked in over $6 million.

“I am grateful to U.S. Attorney Weinhoeft and our law enforcement partners who serve on the 

Southern District of Illinois Bankruptcy Fraud Working Group for their strong commitment to 

combating fraud and abuse in bankruptcy cases, as evidenced by this prosecution,” stated Nancy J. 

Gargula, U.S. Trustee for Southern and Central Illinois and Indiana (Region 10). The U.S. Trustee 

Program is the component of the Justice Department that protects the integrity of the bankruptcy 

system by overseeing case administration and litigating to enforce the bankruptcy laws. Region 10 

is headquartered in Indianapolis, with additional offices in South Bend, Indiana, and Peoria, 

Illinois.

The case was investigated by the FBI, with substantial assistance from the Federal Bureau of 

Prisons. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Michael J. Quinley and William E. Coonan prosecuted the

case.

 

 

A federal inmate housed within the Communications Management Unit (CMU) at the U.S. Penitentiary in Marion, Illinois has been found guilty of filing fictitious involuntary bankruptcy petitions against federal prison officials. Kurt F. Johnson, 55, was convicted by a jury after a three-day trial in Benton, Illinois. The charges against Johnson were originally brought in a four-count federal indictment returned in July 2018.

The evidence at trial established that, on January 8, 2018, with the assistance of persons outside the prison, Johnson succeeded in filing false involuntary bankruptcy petitions against the prison warden and an officer at the prison. The bogus petitions alleged that each victim was indebted to Johnson in the amount of $20 billion, owing to a judgment Johnson claimed to have obtained from the International Court of Justice (also known as the World Court). As part of the scheme, Johnson purportedly canceled $1 billion of the supposed debt and then filed forms with the Internal Revenue Service showing the canceled debt as unreported income for his victims.

The mere filing of the fictitious claims resulted in both victims receiving solicitation letters from credit counseling services and loan companies based upon their supposed bankruptcy. Once the fraud was discovered, the United States quickly moved to seal the proceedings to prevent further damage to the victims’ reputations.

At trial, the United States presented evidence that Johnson has a history and pattern of harassing judges, court personnel, and Bureau of Prisons employees through the filing of fictitious claims. Johnson eschewed appointed counsel and represented himself at the trial, testifying in his own defense that he genuinely believed the World Court had awarded him a default judgment for $20 billion on account of his placement in the CMU. The jury deliberated for approximately 40 minutes before returning guilty verdicts on all four counts.

Johnson is currently serving out the last decade of a 300-month sentence for an unrelated fraud conviction in the Northern District of California. His underlying crime involved a nationwide debt elimination scheme that raked in over $6 million.

Sentencing is set for January 3, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. at the federal courthouse in Benton. By statute, Johnson could receive as much as 20 additional years in prison, which may be imposed to run consecutively to the time he is already serving.

"I am grateful to U.S. Attorney Weinhoeft and our law enforcement partners who serve on the Southern District of Illinois Bankruptcy Fraud Working Group for their strong commitment to combating fraud and abuse in bankruptcy cases, as evidenced by this prosecution," stated Nancy J. Gargula, U.S. Trustee for Southern and Central Illinois and Indiana (Region 10). The U.S. Trustee Program is the component of the Justice Department that protects the integrity of the bankruptcy system by overseeing case administration and litigating to enforce the bankruptcy laws. Region 10 is headquartered in Indianapolis, with additional offices in South Bend, Indiana, and Peoria, Illinois.

The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, with substantial assistance from the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Assistant United States Attorney Michael J. Quinley is prosecuting the case.

Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E