Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-GA  4:18-cr-00243
Case Name:   USA v. Hudson
  Press Releases:
AUGUSTA, Ga: A Martinez man has been sentenced to federal prison and ordered to pay nearly $1.5 million in restitution for defrauding government healthcare and disability programs.

Jonathan Duane Austin, 32, of Martinez, Ga., was sentenced to 30 months in federal prison and ordered to pay $1,473,377.51 in restitution by U.S. District Court Chief Judge J. Randal Hall, said Bobby L. Christine, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Georgia.

At the completion of Austin’s sentence, he will be subject to an additional term of supervised release. There is no parole in the federal system.

According to court documents in the case, Austin admitted to defrauding Medicare and Tricare for nearly three years by submitting false claims for prescription reimbursements totaling $1,450,000, and to defrauding the Social Security Administration by providing forged documents to falsely claim disability status.

The Austin case represents one of the largest beneficiary-created fraud schemes ever prosecuted in the Southern District.

These Austin case was investigated by the Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Social Security Administration.

The Health Care Fraud Task Force aggressively prosecutes health care fraud and abuse. The Task Force’s effort is reflected in other recent plea agreements and sentences, including:

Maryanne Hudson, 49, of Millen, Ga., was sentenced to 13 months in federal prison by U.S. District Court R. Stan Baker for fraudulently billing Medicare for durable medical equipment that a physician had not actually ordered as reasonable and necessary; and,

Paula Padgett, 49, of Brunswick, Ga., was sentenced to probation for submitting false requests for compensation to the United States Department of Labor, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, by U.S. District Court Lisa Godbey Wood.

These cases were investigated by HHS, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Department of Labor (DOL), and the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

“These types of fraud erode faith in the health care system, and we will not tolerate it,” said Bobby L. Christine, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Georgia. “Individuals who engage in schemes to steal from taxpayers hurt those with real health problems and the systems in place to address those needs.”

“The Austin sentencing demonstrates the commitment of DCIS to protect the integrity of the DoD health care program (TRICARE) from fraud and abuse,” said Special Agent in Charge John F. Khin, DCIS Southeast Field Office.  “DCIS investigations ensure taxpayer money is properly used to support our warfighter, retirees and their family members.”

“The Social Security OIG will continue to maintain our strong partnerships with other federal, state, and local agencies as we combat fraud. Our responsibility in protecting taxpayers’ dollars doesn’t end with Social Security benefits only, “said Gail S. Ennis, Inspector General of the Social Security Administration. “We will continue to work closely with our law enforcement partners to detect and prevent benefit fraud across the country.”

“This sentencing reaffirms our commitment to protecting patients from the dangers of prescription drug fraud,” said Special Agent in Charge Derrick L. Jackson, of the HHS Office of Inspector General. "Our watchdog agency will continue to work closely with our law enforcement partners to root out waste, fraud and abuse."

“When Hudson fraudulently billed Medicare she not only cheated taxpayers, she also hurt those who rely on the government program for their healthcare needs,” said Chris Hacker, Special Agent in Charge of FBI Atlanta. “The FBI makes it a top priority to protect government programs like Medicare to ensure that only those who need assistance get it.”

“Paula Padgett engaged in a scheme to defraud the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Federal Employees’ Compensation Act program by submitting fraudulent claims to the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP) for the reimbursement of nonexistent travel expenses for medical treatment. We will continue to work with OWCP and our law enforcement partners to protect the integrity of DOL’s benefit programs,” said Rafiq Ahmad, Special Agent in Charge, Atlanta Region, U.S. Department of Labor Office of Inspector General.

Assistant United States Attorney J. Thomas Clarkson prosecuted these cases for the United States.

Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The number of days from the earlier of filing date or first appearance date to proceeding date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from proceeding date to disposition date
Format: N3

Description: The number of days from disposition date to sentencing date
Format: N3

Description: The code of the district office where the case was terminated
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant at the time the case was closed
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense that carried the most severe disposition and penalty under which the defendant was disposed
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with TTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with TTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The code indicating the nature or type of disposition associated with TTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The number of months a defendant was sentenced to prison under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A code indicating whether the prison sentence associated with TTITLE1 was concurrent or consecutive in relation to the other counts in the indictment or information or multiple counts of the same charge
Format: A4

Description: The number of months of probation imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N4

Description: A period of supervised release imposed upon a defendant under TTITLE1
Format: N3

Description: The fine imposed upon the defendant at sentencing under TTITLE1
Format: N8

Description: The total prison time for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and prison time was imposed
Format: N4

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E