Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:19-cr-20417
Case Name:   USA v. Spivey et al
  Press Releases:
After a lengthy investigation into the criminal conduct of various street gangs operating in and around Miami Gardens, Florida, a federal grand jury indicted 22 people in Miami on charges that include drug trafficking, armed drug trafficking, dealing in firearms, and firearm possession by convicted felons.  Some of the defendants are members and known associates of the Zone 3 gang, a Miami Gardens based gang.

Ariana Fajardo Orshan, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Ari C. Shapira, Special Agent in Charge of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), Miami Field Division, George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Miami Field Office, Delma Noel-Pratt, Chief of the City of Miami Gardens Police Department, and Gadyaces S. Serralta, U.S. Marshal for the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) Miami Field Office, made the announcement. 

Today’s operation involved approximately 200 federal and local law enforcement officers.  During the course of the operation, law enforcement officers arrested 17 of the 22 indicted defendants and seized over 40 firearms, approximately 220 rounds of assorted ammunition, cash, cocaine, crack, heroin, fentanyl, Alprazolam, marijuana, other drugs, and drug paraphernalia.

“As demonstrated by these charges and the arrests this morning, our commitment to combatting violent crime and drug trafficking in the City of Miami Gardens is unrelenting,” said U.S. Attorney Ariana Fajardo Orshan.  “Thanks to the collaboration of federal and local law enforcement, the armed sale of drugs and firearms by these Zone 3 gang members and associates in the City of Miami Gardens has come to an end.  We will continue to use all the tools at our disposal to combat violence, drug distribution, and the illegal sale and possession of firearms to ensure safety in our communities.”

“Today is truly a good day for our community, parts of which that have been terrorized by this group of violent individuals who have long-created chaos within the City of Miami Gardens.  I am proud of our partnerships to include the Miami Gardens Police Department.  This collaboration has led to the seizure of considerable evidence against this group to include more than 40 firearms,” said Special Agent in Charge Ari Shapira, ATF, Miami Field Division.  As we all know, even one firearm in the wrong hands can destroy countless lives.  This investigation proves that collaboration works, and demonstrates our commitment to combat gun violence and improve the communities of South Florida.  We all want our communities in South Florida to be filled with the sounds of happy children playing outside, not the noise of stray gunfire that strikes fear in the hearts of parents.  The people in Miami Gardens deserve no less.”

“Drug dealing and violent crime associated with gang activity have an insidious impact on our communities.  They take a toll on our citizens through street violence, increased law breaking, and addiction.  The vicious armed gangs pushing this poison into the streets tear apart the fabric of our communities,” said Scott A. Rottman, Assistant Special Agent in Charge, FBI Miami.  “It is a complex problem that requires effective partnerships between law enforcement agencies at the local, state and federal level.  Our combined efforts aim to disrupt and dismantle the criminal organizations involved in the illegal drug trade.  Removing drug traffickers and violent gang members from the streets means they can no longer threaten the health and safety of our communities.  We will continue to target these criminal organizations and their violent activities to ensure they are held responsible for the harm they cause.”

“I’m extremely proud of the hard work and dedication of my lead detectives, as well as other departmental personnel.  As a result of the strong partnerships that have been established with our federal, state and local partners, we are able to bring this case to a successful conclusion, said Miami Gardens Police Department Chief Delma Noel-Pratt.  “This case reaffirms the Miami Gardens Police Department’s commitment to building a safer community.” 

“Today, in Miami Gardens, the strong partnership between police officers and federal agents resulted in a successful operation that makes the City of Miami Gardens safer,” said Chief Deputy Darin D. Cooper for the U.S. Marshals Service.  “We remain committed to combatting violent crime.”

“Today is a win for residents of Miami Gardens, South Florida, as well as the many law enforcement agencies that worked together to say collectively, we will not tolerate crimes of any nature,” says Mayor Oliver Gilbert. “We are thankful to everyone involved in this operation and for the collaboration with agencies like the ATF, FBI and DOJ who provided access to expanded resources during the course of this investigation. Our combined efforts and activities have resulted in dangerous individuals, drugs, and illegal guns being taken off our streets.”

THE INDICTMENTS:

(1) United States of America v. Ernest Renard Smith, et al., Case No. 19-20415-CR-Gayles/Otazo-Reyes.

The first indictment, containing 21 counts, names: Ernest Renard Smith (“E. Smith”), 35; Ernest Smith, Jr. (“E. Smith Jr.”), 62; Thaddeus Auguast Smith, Jr. (“T. Smith”), 28; Denico Lynden Dudley McSweeney (“McSweeney”), 30; and Ivan Lewis Harris (“Harris”), 38, all of Miami Gardens.  According to the indictment, from at least as early as May 2018, and continuing through January 29, 2019, the defendants engaged in a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin, crack cocaine, marijuana, and ecstasy.  E. Smith, E. Smith Jr., T. Smith, and Harris each face up to 20 years in prison if convicted on the conspiracy count.  McSweeney faces up to 40 years in prison if convicted on the conspiracy count. 

The first indictment also charges E. Smith with seven counts of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, such as heroin, crack cocaine, and/or fentanyl, three counts of dealing in firearms and ammunition, one count of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, and three counts of being a felon in possession.  If convicted on all counts, E. Smith faces up to 20 years in prison on each count of possession with intent to distribute charge, five years in prison on each count of the dealing in firearms and ammunition charge, life imprisonment on the possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking charge with a five year mandatory minimum term in prison on this charge, and 10 years in prison on each felon in possession charge. 

The first indictment also charges T. Smith with possession with intent to distribute a heroin.  If convicted on this count, T. Smith faces up to 10 years in prison. 

The first indictment also charges McSweeney with three counts of dealing in firearms and ammunition and four counts of possession with intent to distribute heroin.  If convicted on all counts, McSweeney faces up to five years in prison on each dealing in firearms charge, and 20 years in prison on each possession with intent to distribute charge. 

(2) United States of America v. Sonya Anita Spivey, et al., Case No. 19-20417-Altonaga/Goodman.

The second indictment, containing 10 counts, names: Sonya Anita Spivey (“S. Spivey”), 49, of Miami Gardens; Jacqueline Renee Spivey (“J. Spivey”), 53, of Miami Gardens; Janie Spivey Bryant (“J. Bryant”), 68, of Miami Gardens; Charlie Billy Herman Taylor (“Taylor”), 25, of Miami Gardens; Keno Reuben Teveris Burton (“Burton”), 31, of Miami Gardens; Tekieya Nicole Aldridge (“Aldridge”), 41, of Opa Locka; and Alton Claude Hammonds (“Hammonds”), 38, of Miami.  According to the indictment, from at least as early as August 2018, and continuing through April 11, 2019, the defendants engaged in a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute N-Ethypentylone, Alprazolam, cocaine, crack cocaine, eutylone, and ecstasy.  The defendants face up to 20 years in prison if convicted on the conspiracy count. 

The second indictment also charges S. Spivey with seven counts of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, such as, N-Ethypentylone, cocaine, Alprazolam, eutylone, and marijuana. If convicted on all counts, S. Spivey faces up to 5 years in prison for the possession with intent to distribute Alprazolam count and 20 years on each remaining possession with intent to distribute charge.

The second indictment also charges J. Spivey with possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, such as fentanyl, eutylone, and marijuana.  If convicted on this count, J. Spivey faces up to 20 years in prison. 

The second indictment also charges J. Bryant with possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, such as fentanyl, eutylone, and marijuana.  If convicted on this count, J. Bryant faces up to 20 years in prison. 

The second indictment also charges Taylor with possession with intent to distribute Alprazolam and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime.  If convicted on both counts, Taylor faces up to five years in prison on the possession with intent to distribute count and life imprisonment on the possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking charge with a five year mandatory minimum term in prison on this charge. 

The second indictment also charges Burton with possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, such as cocaine, eutylone, Alprazolam, and marijuana, and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime.  If convicted on all counts, Burton faces up to 20 years in prison on the possession with intent to distribute count and life imprisonment on the possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking charge with a five-year mandatory minimum term in prison on this charge.

(3) United States of America v. Michael Anthony Hardaway, et al., Case No. 29-20416-CR-Williams/Torres.

The third indictment, containing eight counts, names: Michael Anthony Hardaway, Jr. (“Hardaway”), 42; Clementa Leaford Johnson, Jr. (“Johnson”), 42; Eric Ransom (“Ransom”), 49; Erin Meil Williams (“Williams”), 39; and James Earl Cammon (“Cammon”), 40, all of Miami Gardens.  According to the indictment, from at least as early as October 2018, and continuing through April 11, 2019, the defendants engaged in a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute eutylone, heroin, fentanyl, cocaine, crack cocaine, ecstasy, Percocet, and marijuana.  The defendants face up to 20 years in prison if convicted on the conspiracy count. 

The third indictment also charges Hardaway with four counts of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, such as heroin, fentanyl, and crack cocaine.  If convicted on all counts, Hardaway faces up to 20 years in prison on each count.

The third indictment also charges Williams with possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, such as marijuana, crack cocaine, cocaine, eutylone, and heroin, and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime.  If convicted on all counts, Williams faces up to 20 years in prison on each possession with intent to distribute charge and life imprisonment on the possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking charge with a five-year mandatory minimum term in prison on this charge.

The third indictment also charges Cammon with possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, such as marijuana, crack cocaine, cocaine, eutylone, and heroin, possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, and being a felon in possession of a firearm.  If convicted on all counts, Cammon faces up to 20 years in prison on each possession with intent to distribute charge, life imprisonment on the possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking charge with a five-year mandatory minimum term in prison on this charge, and 10 years in prison on the felon in possession charge. 

(4) United States of America v. Dana De Von Smith, Case No. 19-20420-CR-King/Becerra.

The fourth indictment charges Dana De Von Smith (“D. Smith”), 49, of Miami Gardens, with two counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine.  If convicted on both counts, D. Smith faces up to 20 years in prison on each count. 

(5) United States of America v. Theothis Rogers, Case No. 19-20419-CR-Gayles/Otazo-Reyes.

The fifth indictment charges Theothis Rogers (“Rogers”), 37, of Miami Gardens, with two counts of possession with intent to distribute N-Ethylpentylone.  If convicted on both counts, Rogers faces up to 20 years in prison on each count. 

(6) United States of America v. Jason Adam Dulman, Case No. 19-20422-CR-Bloom/Louis.

The sixth indictment charges Jason Adam Dulman (“Dulman”), 40, of Dania Beach, with possession with intent to distribute heroin and use of communications facility.  If convicted on both counts, Dulman faces up to 20 years in prison on the possession with intent to distribute charge and four years in prison on the use of communications charge. 

(7) United States of America v. Anthony Maurice Smith, Case No. 19-20418-CR-Ungaro/O’Sullivan.

The seventh indictment charges Anthony Maurice Smith (“A. Smith”), 29, of Miami Gardens, with possession with intent to distribute cocaine.  If convicted, A. Smith faces up to 20 years in prison. 

(8) United States of America v. Steven Alcime, Case No. 19-20421-CR-Scola/Torres

The eighth indictment charges Steven Alcime (“Alcime”), 30, of Miami, with dealing in firearms and being a felon in possession.  If convicted on both counts, Alcime faces up to five years in prison on the firearms charge and 10 years in prison on the felon in possession charge. 

Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the actual sentence imposed would be based upon the seriousness of the offense and the prior criminal history, if any, of the defendants. 

Through the collaborative Southern District of Florida’s Violence Reduction Partnership (“VRP”), the U.S. Attorney’s Office and its federal and local law enforcement allies have sought to dismantle the most violent criminal networks that plague communities throughout the Southern District of Florida. Through these Partnerships, the U.S. Attorney’s Office and its federal and local law enforcement allies have sought to dismantle the most violent criminal networks that plague communities in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties.  The VRP strives to combat violent crime, narcotics trafficking, gang activity and firearms offenses by prosecuting offenders and working with community leaders and non-profit entities to provide preventive services to the local populations.  The charges announced today are the result of the VRP’s law enforcement initiatives. Additional information regarding the VRP initiatives is available at usafls.vrp@usdoj.gov (link sends e-mail) or by calling (305) 961-9134.

The members of the VRP who participated or assisted in this investigation include the United States Attorney’s Office, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Miami Field Office,   Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Marshals Service Fugitive Task Force, Miami Gardens Police Department, Miami-Dade Police Department, Miami Field Office, Miami-Dade Police Department.

This investigation, Operation End Zone, is a result of the ongoing efforts by the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF), a partnership between federal, state and local law enforcement agencies.  The OCDETF mission is to identify, investigate, and prosecute high-level members of drug trafficking enterprises, bringing together the combined expertise and unique abilities of federal, state and local law enforcement.

U.S. Attorney Fajardo Orshan commended the FBI, ATF, City of Miami Gardens Police Department, and USMS for their dedicated efforts to combat violent crime and drug trafficking in South Florida.  She thanked the Miami-Dade Police Department for their assistance.  These cases are being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Rilwan Adeduntan and Stephanie Hauser.  Assistant U.S. Attorney William Zloch is handling the forfeiture aspects of this case.

An indictment is a charging instrument containing allegations. Every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or on http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NQKqsiSP0QXo2pjus0UZfJiro17xQpeKVC3FtdYf59U
  Last Updated: 2024-03-18 13:08:41 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the third highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE3
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE3
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE3
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the fourth highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE4
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE4
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE4
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E