Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-FL  1:18-cr-20581
Case Name:   USA v. Dyer et al
  Press Releases:
Five residents of Miami were sentenced to federal prison for their participation in a tax fraud scheme.

Ariana Fajardo Orshan, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida and Michael J. De Palma, Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) made the announcement.

Jamal Dyer, 32, of Miami, was sentenced to 28 months in prison, to be followed by 3 years of supervised release.  Jorge Alfonso Osorio Rodriguez, 35, of Miami, was sentenced to 28 months in prison, to be followed by 3 years of supervised release.  Tramaine Das Sealy, 34, of Miami, was sentenced to 14 months in prison, to be followed by 3 years of supervised release.  Jonathan Charles Edwards, 33, of Miami, was sentenced to 12 months in prison, to be followed by 3 years of supervised release.  The final defendant, Daniel Alvaro Murias, 28, of Miami, was sentenced today to 14 months in prison, to be followed by one year of supervised release. Dyer, Osorio, Das Sealy, and Edwards previously pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to aid and assist the preparation of false tax returns, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371, and Murias previously pled guilty to one count of aiding and assisting the preparation of a false tax return, in violation of Title 26, United States Code, Section 7206(2) (Case No. 18-20581-CR-SCOLA).

According to the court docket, including the agreed upon factual proffer, from February of 2015 through May of 2017, the defendants operated a tax preparation business called “The Tax Firm Miami” in Miami, Florida.  While operating out of The Tax Firm Miami, all five defendants knowingly and willfully submitted thousands of false statements and claims on their clients’ tax returns, including false claims to the Education Credit, the American Opportunity Credit, and the Residential Energy Credit, resulting in a greater tax refund being paid from the IRS to their clients, or a lesser tax liability owed by their clients to the IRS.  Collectively, through the submission of tax returns claiming these false credits, the defendants stole more than $12 million on behalf of themselves and their clients.

U.S. Attorney Fajardo Orshan commended the investigative efforts of IRS-CI in this matter.   Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet prosecuted this case.

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or at http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Five Miami-Dade return preparers were charged with filing false tax returns with the IRS, in an indictment unsealed today.

Benjamin G. Greenberg, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and Michael J. De Palma, Acting Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), made the announcement. 

 Jamal Dyer, Jonathan Charles Edwards, Daniel Alvaro Murias, Jorge Alfonso Osorio Rodriguez, and Tramaine Das Sealy, were charged by indictment in the Southern District of Florida with one count of conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371, and five counts of preparing false tax returns, in violation of Title 26, United States Code, Section 7206(2).

According to publicly filed court documents, the defendants allegedly prepared tax returns at The Tax Firm Miami, a business with multiple addresses in Miami-Dade County. The defendants and their co-conspirators unlawfully enriched themselves by charging clients tax preparation fees to prepare materially false tax returns. The defendants knowingly submitted false statements and claims on their clients' tax returns, including false claims to the Education Credit, the American Opportunity Credit, the Residential Energy Credit, and false Schedules C, resulting in a greater tax refund being paid from the IRS to their clients or a lesser tax liability owed by their clients to the IRS. The defendants collected fees from clients for each tax return prepared and deposited the fees into individual bank accounts that they each controlled. According to allegations made in court, the defendants caused approximately $15 million in tax loss over the three charged years.

If convicted of the charged offenses, the defendants are facing up to 5 years in prison for the conspiracy and up to 3 years in prison for each count related to the filing false tax returns.

An indictment is merely an allegation and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

Mr. Greenberg commended the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel J. Marcet.

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WOvKciEjS6pyHc7EN4FiVeIPqrbaXegEksblucDdYKE
  Last Updated: 2024-04-09 10:59:23 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the second highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE2
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE2
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE2
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E