Score:   1
Docket Number:   SD-FL  0:19-cr-60132
Case Name:   USA v. Greenberg
  Press Releases:
U.S. Attorney Ariana Fajardo Orshan for the Southern District of Florida, Special Agent in Charge George L. Piro of the FBI’s Miami Field Office and Sheriff Gregory Tony of the Broward County Sheriff’s Office (BSO) announced the Oct. 4, 2019 seizure of independentgirls.com, an Internet forum for escort services and prostitution.

The main purpose of independentgirls.com was to allow escort agencies and independent escorts to post advertisements for prostitution services and provide a forum in which potential customers of prostitution could review the prostitute and post it on the website for others to read.  Independentgirls.com allowed customers paying for sex to buy upgraded user accounts where they would be able to read customer reviews of advertising prostitutes, write reviews of prostitutes that were seen by other members, private message prostitutes, and view which prostitutes were currently available. Website members with upgraded user accounts were entitled to discounted hourly rates, invitations to parties hosted by independentgirls.com, as well as message forums discussing recent law enforcement action.  Some of the females advertised for escort services and prostitution were minor victims.

“Our goal, as a law enforcement community, is to ensure that websites that facilitate human trafficking and child exploitation cease to exist and that the traffickers are held accountable in a court of law for their criminal exploits,” stated U.S. Attorney Fajardo Orshan. “There is no lawful market for companies or individuals that profit off of illicit commercial sex and the victimization of others.”

“The FBI will not tolerate sex trafficking regardless if it is arranged in person or over the Internet,” said George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Miami’s Field Office. “The FBI and our law enforcement partners will continue to work tirelessly to combat those who engage in the sexual exploitation of others for profit.”

“At the center of this investigation was a website operated out of Broward County that catered to prostitution and served as a platform for human traffickers to advertise their victims for commercial sex acts,” said Sheriff Gregory Tony. “I commend BSO detectives and our federals partners who, through this significant arrest and seizure of this website, have made a large impact on the human trafficking activities in South Florida.”

In April of 2019, Neil Steven Greenberg, of Sunrise, Florida, the owner of the website independentgirls.com was arrested on a federal indictment charging him with two counts of production of child pornography, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2251(a) and (e) (Case No. 19cr60132).  During the execution of a search warrant at Greenberg’s residence, law enforcement is alleged to have discovered videos of Greenberg engaging in illicit sex acts with two minors.   The case is pending before U.S. District Court Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz II in Fort Lauderdale.

The charges and allegations contained in an indictment are merely accusations.  The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. 

The effort to seize independentgirls.com was led by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida.  The law enforcement agencies conducting the investigation and seizure include the FBI’s Miami Field Office, BSO, and the South Florida Internet Crimes Against Children/Human Trafficking Task Force.  The criminal case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jodi L. Anton.  Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard O. Brown is handling the asset forfeiture aspects of the case.

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or on http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

U.S. Attorney Ariana Fajardo Orshan for the Southern District of Florida, Special Agent in Charge George L. Piro of the FBI’s Miami Field Office and Sheriff Gregory Tony of the Broward County Sheriff’s Office (BSO) announced the Oct. 4, 2019 seizure of independentgirls.com, an Internet forum for escort services and prostitution.

The main purpose of independentgirls.com was to allow escort agencies and independent escorts to post advertisements for prostitution services and provide a forum in which potential customers of prostitution could review the prostitute and post it on the website for others to read.  Independentgirls.com allowed customers paying for sex to buy upgraded user accounts where they would be able to read customer reviews of advertising prostitutes, write reviews of prostitutes that were seen by other members, private message prostitutes, and view which prostitutes were currently available. Website members with upgraded user accounts were entitled to discounted hourly rates, invitations to parties hosted by independentgirls.com, as well as message forums discussing recent law enforcement action.  Some of the females advertised for escort services and prostitution were minor victims.

“Our goal, as a law enforcement community, is to ensure that websites that facilitate human trafficking and child exploitation cease to exist and that the traffickers are held accountable in a court of law for their criminal exploits,” stated U.S. Attorney Fajardo Orshan. “There is no lawful market for companies or individuals that profit off of illicit commercial sex and the victimization of others.”

“The FBI will not tolerate sex trafficking regardless if it is arranged in person or over the Internet,” said George L. Piro, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Miami’s Field Office. “The FBI and our law enforcement partners will continue to work tirelessly to combat those who engage in the sexual exploitation of others for profit.”

“At the center of this investigation was a website operated out of Broward County that catered to prostitution and served as a platform for human traffickers to advertise their victims for commercial sex acts,” said Sheriff Gregory Tony. “I commend BSO detectives and our federals partners who, through this significant arrest and seizure of this website, have made a large impact on the human trafficking activities in South Florida.”

In April of 2019, Neil Steven Greenberg, of Sunrise, Florida, the owner of the website independentgirls.com was arrested on a federal indictment charging him with two counts of production of child pornography, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2251(a) and (e) (Case No. 19cr60132).  During the execution of a search warrant at Greenberg’s residence, law enforcement is alleged to have discovered videos of Greenberg engaging in illicit sex acts with two minors.   The case is pending before U.S. District Court Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz II in Fort Lauderdale.

The charges and allegations contained in an indictment are merely accusations.  The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. 

The effort to seize independentgirls.com was led by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida.  The law enforcement agencies conducting the investigation and seizure include the FBI’s Miami Field Office, BSO, and the South Florida Internet Crimes Against Children/Human Trafficking Task Force.  The criminal case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jodi L. Anton.  Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard O. Brown is handling the asset forfeiture aspects of the case.

Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at www.flsd.uscourts.gov or on http://pacer.flsd.uscourts.gov.

Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qPzxwzU3xWzuTL14FlJdbXp3EUVZ9Dm7_WUdHPC5RUg
  Last Updated: 2024-03-26 01:20:05 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
Magistrate Docket Number:   SD-FL  0:19-mj-06235
Case Name:   USA v. Greenberg
Docket (0 Docs):   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1h20GZCfrukcSOU1UznzhqEObEdX7Uq7t6c6NaUJU2fU
  Last Updated: 2024-04-13 04:58:37 UTC
Description: The fiscal year of the data file obtained from the AOUSC
Format: YYYY

Description: The code of the federal judicial circuit where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the federal judicial district where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: The code of the district office where the case was located
Format: A2

Description: Docket number assigned by the district to the case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which cannot be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a case which can be modified by the court
Format: A3

Description: A sequential number indicating whether a case is an original proceeding or a reopen
Format: N5

Description: Case type associated with the current defendant record
Format: A2

Description: Case type associated with a magistrate case if the current case was merged from a magistrate case
Format: A2

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, defendant number, and reopen sequence number
Format: A18

Description: A concatenation of district, office, docket number, case type, and reopen sequence number
Format: A15

Description: The docket number originally given to a case assigned to a magistrate judge and subsequently merged into a criminal case
Format: A7

Description: A unique number assigned to each defendant in a magistrate case
Format: A3

Description: The status of the defendant as assigned by the AOUSC
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the fugitive status of a defendant
Format: A1

Description: The date upon which a defendant became a fugitive
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which a fugitive defendant was taken into custody
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date when a case was first docketed in the district court
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which proceedings in a case commenced on charges pending in the district court where the defendant appeared, or the date of the defendant’s felony-waiver of indictment
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code used to identify the nature of the proceeding
Format: N2

Description: The date when a defendant first appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: A code indicating the event by which a defendant appeared before a judicial officer in the district court where a charge was pending
Format: A2

Description: A code indicating the type of legal counsel assigned to a defendant
Format: N2

Description: The title and section of the U.S. Code applicable to the offense committed which carried the highest severity
Format: A20

Description: A code indicating the level of offense associated with FTITLE1
Format: N2

Description: The four digit AO offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: The four digit D2 offense code associated with FTITLE1
Format: A4

Description: A code indicating the severity associated with FTITLE1
Format: A3

Description: The FIPS code used to indicate the county or parish where an offense was committed
Format: A5

Description: The date of the last action taken on the record
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which judicial proceedings before the court concluded
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the final sentence is recorded on the docket
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The date upon which the case was closed
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: The total fine imposed at sentencing for all offenses of which the defendant was convicted and a fine was imposed
Format: N8

Description: A count of defendants filed including inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed excluding inter-district transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings commenced
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants filed whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated including interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated excluding interdistrict transfers
Format: N1

Description: A count of original proceedings terminated
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants terminated whose proceedings commenced by reopen, remand, appeal, or retrial
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period including long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: A count of defendants pending as of the last day of the period excluding long term fugitives
Format: N1

Description: The source from which the data were loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: A10

Description: A sequential number indicating the iteration of the defendant record
Format: N2

Description: The date the record was loaded into the AOUSC’s NewSTATS database
Format: YYYYMMDD

Description: Statistical year ID label on data file obtained from the AOUSC which represents termination year
Format: YYYY

Data imported from FJC Integrated Database
F U C K I N G P E D O S R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E